Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 45 views

    Stanley Corbett, Jr. v. Kenneth Lassiter, 4th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding plaintiff Stanley Earl Corbett Jr.'s appeal of the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its opinion. The Fourth Circuit found no reversible error in the district court's ruling and dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    Stanley Corbett, Jr. v. Kenneth Lassiter, 4th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    45 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding plaintiff Stanley Earl Corbett Jr.'s appeal of the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its opinion. The Fourth Circuit found no reversible error in the district court's ruling and dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2016-01-06 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 15-7089

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding plaintiff Stanley Earl Corbett Jr.'s appeal of the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its opinion. The Fourth Circuit found no reversible error in the district court's ruling and dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    45 views2 pages

    Stanley Corbett, Jr. v. Kenneth Lassiter, 4th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding plaintiff Stanley Earl Corbett Jr.'s appeal of the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its opinion. The Fourth Circuit found no reversible error in the district court's ruling and dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 15-7089

    STANLEY EARL CORBETT, JR.,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    KENNETH LASSITER; MR. WADDELL; MR. PULLEY; MICHAEL NORRIS;
    OFFICER BRANTLEY; OFFICER BIXLER; OFFICER JONES; JARED
    WELCH; ROBERT MOORE; SERGEANT HOLLEY; OFFICER ALEXANDER;
    TIMMIE HICKS,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    Terrence W. Boyle,
    District Judge. (5:14-ct-03264-BO)

    Submitted:

    December 21, 2015

    Decided:

    January 6, 2016

    Before NIEMEYER and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Stanley Earl Corbett, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Stanley

    Earl

    Corbett,

    Jr.,

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2012) complaint under


    28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012).
    and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed the record

    Accordingly, we affirm for the

    reasons stated by the district court.

    Corbett v. Lassiter, No.

    5:14-ct-03264-BO (E.D.N.C. June 25, 2015).


    oral

    argument

    adequately

    because

    presented

    in

    the
    the

    facts

    and

    materials

    We dispense with

    legal
    before

    contentions
    this

    court

    are
    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.


    AFFIRMED

    You might also like