Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 11 views

    Belk v. Dickerhoff, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a 3-page unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case between plaintiff Ronnie M. Belk and defendant Officer Dickerhoff. The district court had denied Belk's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision to deny relief for the reasons stated in its orders dated October 19, 2006 and August 14, 2007. The appellate court granted Belk's motion to proceed in forma pauperis and issued its opinion without oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    Belk v. Dickerhoff, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    11 views3 pages
    This document is a 3-page unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case between plaintiff Ronnie M. Belk and defendant Officer Dickerhoff. The district court had denied Belk's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision to deny relief for the reasons stated in its orders dated October 19, 2006 and August 14, 2007. The appellate court granted Belk's motion to proceed in forma pauperis and issued its opinion without oral argument.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2008-04-17 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 07-7363

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document is a 3-page unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case between plaintiff Ronnie M. Belk and defendant Officer Dickerhoff. The district court had denied Belk's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision to deny relief for the reasons stated in its orders dated October 19, 2006 and August 14, 2007. The appellate court granted Belk's motion to proceed in forma pauperis and issued its opinion without oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    11 views3 pages

    Belk v. Dickerhoff, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a 3-page unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case between plaintiff Ronnie M. Belk and defendant Officer Dickerhoff. The district court had denied Belk's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision to deny relief for the reasons stated in its orders dated October 19, 2006 and August 14, 2007. The appellate court granted Belk's motion to proceed in forma pauperis and issued its opinion without oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    You are on page 1of 3

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 07-7363

    RONNIE M. BELK,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    OFFICER DICKERHOFF,
    Defendant - Appellee,
    and
    SUPERINTENDENT SORRELL SAUNDERS; ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT RANDY
    TURNER; SERGEANT MCNEIL,
    Defendants.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior
    District Judge. (5:06-ct-03071-H)

    Submitted:

    March 20, 2008

    Decided:

    April 17, 2008

    Before GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Ronnie M. Belk, Appellant Pro Se.


    James Philip Allen, NORTH
    CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    - 2 -

    PER CURIAM:
    Ronnie

    M.

    Belk

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.


    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    orders
    We have

    Accordingly, we

    affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

    Belk v.

    Dickerhoff, No. 5:06-ct-03071-H (E.D.N.C. Oct. 19, 2006; Aug. 14,


    2007).

    We grant Belks motion to proceed in forma pauperis and

    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 3 -

    You might also like