Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 12 views

    Gilchrist v. Bakshi, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case in which Georgia L. Gilchrist appealed the district court's dismissal of her civil action against the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development and Raman Bakshi. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, denying Gilchrist's motion for appointment of counsel and affirming the district court's decision to dismiss the case for the reasons stated in its orders from December 2009.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    Gilchrist v. Bakshi, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    12 views3 pages
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case in which Georgia L. Gilchrist appealed the district court's dismissal of her civil action against the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development and Raman Bakshi. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, denying Gilchrist's motion for appointment of counsel and affirming the district court's decision to dismiss the case for the reasons stated in its orders from December 2009.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2010-07-29 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 10-1077

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case in which Georgia L. Gilchrist appealed the district court's dismissal of her civil action against the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development and Raman Bakshi. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, denying Gilchrist's motion for appointment of counsel and affirming the district court's decision to dismiss the case for the reasons stated in its orders from December 2009.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    12 views3 pages

    Gilchrist v. Bakshi, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case in which Georgia L. Gilchrist appealed the district court's dismissal of her civil action against the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development and Raman Bakshi. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, denying Gilchrist's motion for appointment of counsel and affirming the district court's decision to dismiss the case for the reasons stated in its orders from December 2009.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    You are on page 1of 3

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 10-1077

    GEORGIA L. GILCHRIST,
    Plaintiff Appellant,
    and
    MARIKA G. MATTHEWS,
    Plaintiff,
    v.
    RAMAN BAKSHI; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN
    DEVELOPMENT,
    Defendants Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:09cv-00415-RWT)

    Submitted:

    July 22, 2010

    Decided:

    July 29, 2010

    Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Georgia L. Gilchrist, Appellant Pro Se. Raman Bakshi, Appellee


    Pro Se.
    Larry David Adams, Assistant United States Attorney,
    Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Georgia

    L.

    Gilchrist

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    orders dismissing her civil action against the United States


    Department of Housing and Urban Development and Raman Bakshi.
    We

    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    error.

    Accordingly, we deny her motion for appointment of counsel and


    affirm

    for

    Gilchrist v.
    Dec. 10,

    the

    reasons

    Bakshi,

    2009

    &

    stated

    No.

    entered

    Dec.

    We

    facts

    contentions

    materials

    legal
    before

    the

    dispense

    court

    the

    8:09-cv-00415-RWT

    Dec. 14, 2009).


    and

    by

    11,

    with

    2009;

    oral

    district
    (D.

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    Md.

    filed

    argument

    &

    filed
    entered

    because

    presented

    would

    court.

    not

    the

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like