Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 8 views

    United States v. Courtney Gregory, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Courtney Floyd Gregory appealed the district court's denial of his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and agreed with the district court's reasons for denying Gregory's motion as stated in its February 10, 2012 opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    United States v. Courtney Gregory, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    Courtney Floyd Gregory appealed the district court's denial of his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and agreed with the district court's reasons for denying Gregory's motion as stated in its February 10, 2012 opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2012-06-19 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 12-6454

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Courtney Floyd Gregory appealed the district court's denial of his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and agreed with the district court's reasons for denying Gregory's motion as stated in its February 10, 2012 opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    8 views2 pages

    United States v. Courtney Gregory, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Courtney Floyd Gregory appealed the district court's denial of his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and agreed with the district court's reasons for denying Gregory's motion as stated in its February 10, 2012 opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 12-6454

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff Appellee,
    v.
    COURTNEY FLOYD GREGORY, a/k/a Bobby Lee Graves,
    Deangelo D. Marsh, a/k/a Marcello N. Williams,

    a/k/a

    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Newport News.
    Raymond A. Jackson,
    District Judge. (4:96-cr-00022-RAJ-I)

    Submitted:

    June 12, 2012

    Decided:

    June 19, 2012

    Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Courtney Floyd Gregory, Appellant Pro Se. Michael R. Smythers,


    Assistant
    United
    States
    Attorney,
    Norfolk,
    Virginia,
    for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Courtney
    order

    denying

    his

    Floyd
    18

    U.S.C.

    reduction of sentence.
    reversible error.
    by

    the

    district

    Gregory

    appeals

    the

    3582(c)(2)

    district

    (2006)

    courts

    motion

    for

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated


    court.

    United

    States

    v.

    Gregory,

    No.

    4:96-cr-00022-RAJ-I (E.D. Va. Feb. 10, 2012).

    We dispense with

    oral

    contentions

    argument

    adequately

    because

    presented

    in

    the
    the

    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    the

    court

    are
    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like