Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 13 views

    Jackson v. Angelone, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Donald L. Jackson, who sought relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 from his conviction. The Court of Appeals reviewed the district court record and found no reversible error in the district court's denial of relief and acceptance of the magistrate's recommendation. The appeals court therefore denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning of the district court's July 11, 2002 opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    Jackson v. Angelone, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    13 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Donald L. Jackson, who sought relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 from his conviction. The Court of Appeals reviewed the district court record and found no reversible error in the district court's denial of relief and acceptance of the magistrate's recommendation. The appeals court therefore denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning of the district court's July 11, 2002 opinion.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2002-09-09 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 02-7105

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Donald L. Jackson, who sought relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 from his conviction. The Court of Appeals reviewed the district court record and found no reversible error in the district court's denial of relief and acceptance of the magistrate's recommendation. The appeals court therefore denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning of the district court's July 11, 2002 opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    13 views2 pages

    Jackson v. Angelone, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Donald L. Jackson, who sought relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 from his conviction. The Court of Appeals reviewed the district court record and found no reversible error in the district court's denial of relief and acceptance of the magistrate's recommendation. The appeals court therefore denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning of the district court's July 11, 2002 opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    You are on page 1of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 02-7105

    DONALD L. JACKSON,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia
    Department of Corrections,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District
    Judge. (CA-02-161)

    Submitted:

    August 29, 2002

    Decided:

    September 9, 2002

    Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Donald L. Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Foster Barr, OFFICE OF
    THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Donald L. Jackson seeks to appeal the district courts order
    denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. 2254 (2000).
    We have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion
    accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no
    reversible

    error.

    Accordingly,

    we

    deny

    certificate

    of

    appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the


    district court.
    11, 2002).

    Jackson v. Angelone, No. CA-02-161 (E.D. Va. July

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

    legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before


    the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like