Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 26 views

    United States v. Catherine Hubbard, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Catherine Hubbard appealed the denial of her motion to reduce her sentence. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's ruling denying the motion. The appellate court found no reversible errors in the district court's decision to deny Hubbard's request for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c). The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were clear based on the case materials. The court affirmed the district court's ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    United States v. Catherine Hubbard, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    26 views2 pages
    Catherine Hubbard appealed the denial of her motion to reduce her sentence. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's ruling denying the motion. The appellate court found no reversible errors in the district court's decision to deny Hubbard's request for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c). The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were clear based on the case materials. The court affirmed the district court's ruling.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2012-08-27 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 12-6769

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Catherine Hubbard appealed the denial of her motion to reduce her sentence. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's ruling denying the motion. The appellate court found no reversible errors in the district court's decision to deny Hubbard's request for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c). The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were clear based on the case materials. The court affirmed the district court's ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    26 views2 pages

    United States v. Catherine Hubbard, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Catherine Hubbard appealed the denial of her motion to reduce her sentence. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's ruling denying the motion. The appellate court found no reversible errors in the district court's decision to deny Hubbard's request for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c). The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were clear based on the case materials. The court affirmed the district court's ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 12-6769

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    CATHERINE DENISE HUBBARD,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.
    Henry E. Hudson, District
    Judge. (3:07-cr-00183-HEH-1)

    Submitted:

    August 22, 2012

    Decided: August 27, 2012

    Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Catherine Denise Hubbard, Appellant Pro Se.


    Olivia L. Norman,
    OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Catherine Denise Hubbard appeals the district courts
    order denying relief on her motion for reduction in sentence
    pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3582(c) (2006).
    record and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed the

    Accordingly, we affirm for

    the reasons stated by the district court.

    United States v.

    Hubbard, No. 3:07-cr-00183-HEH-1 (E.D. Va. Apr. 10, 2012).


    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    We

    legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like