Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 9 views

    United States v. Steve Dias, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Steve Dias appealed the district court's denial of his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its October 11, 2012 opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    United States v. Steve Dias, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views2 pages
    1) Steve Dias appealed the district court's denial of his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its October 11, 2012 opinion.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2013-01-25 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 12-7863

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    1) Steve Dias appealed the district court's denial of his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its October 11, 2012 opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    9 views2 pages

    United States v. Steve Dias, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Steve Dias appealed the district court's denial of his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its October 11, 2012 opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 12-7863

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    STEVE DIAS, a/k/a Troy, a/k/a ONeil Guthrie,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.
    Henry E. Hudson, District
    Judge. (3:04-cr-00259-HEH-2)

    Submitted:

    January 17, 2013

    Decided:

    January 25, 2013

    Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Steve Dias, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen David Schiller, Roderick


    Charles Young, Assistant United States Attorneys, Olivia L.
    Norman, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond,
    Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Steve Dias appeals the district courts order denying
    his

    motion

    for

    reduction

    3582(c)(2) (2006).
    reversible error.

    of

    sentence

    pursuant

    to

    18

    U.S.C.

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

    by the district court.

    United States v. Dias, No. 3:04-cr-

    00259-HEH-2 (E.D. Va. Oct. 11, 2012).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before this court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like