Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 5 views

    Watkins v. Guilford County, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a 3-sentence unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Adrian Dominic Watkins under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the Guilford County Sheriff's Department and others. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Watkins, finding no reversible error after reviewing the record. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    Watkins v. Guilford County, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    This document is a 3-sentence unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Adrian Dominic Watkins under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the Guilford County Sheriff's Department and others. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Watkins, finding no reversible error after reviewing the record. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2007-10-17 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 07-7044

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document is a 3-sentence unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Adrian Dominic Watkins under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the Guilford County Sheriff's Department and others. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Watkins, finding no reversible error after reviewing the record. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    5 views2 pages

    Watkins v. Guilford County, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a 3-sentence unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Adrian Dominic Watkins under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the Guilford County Sheriff's Department and others. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Watkins, finding no reversible error after reviewing the record. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 07-7044

    ADRIAN DOMINIC WATKINS,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    GUILFORD COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT; CAPTAIN
    WILLIAMSON, Division Commander Guilford County
    Sheriff's Department; LIEUTENANT WATKINS,
    Administrative Shift; B. J. BARNES, Sheriff,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
    District of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr.,
    District Judge. (1:06-cv-00995-NCT)

    Submitted:

    October 11, 2007

    Decided:

    October 17, 2007

    Before MICHAEL and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Adrian Dominic Watkins, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew L. Mason, OFFICE


    OF GUILFORD COUNTY SHERIFF, Greensboro, North Carolina, for
    Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Adrian Dominic Watkins appeals the district courts order
    accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.
    the record and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed

    Accordingly, we affirm

    for the reasons stated by the district court.

    Watkins v. Guilford

    County Sheriffs Dept, No. 1:06-cv-00995-NCT (M.D.N.C. July 5,


    2007).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like