Marginal REVOLUTION: From The Comments
Marginal REVOLUTION: From The Comments
Marginal REVOLUTION: From The Comments
8/15/16, 6:31 PM
Marginal REVOLUTION
From the comments
by Tyler Cowen on August 15, 2016 at 2:50 pm
The authors of an article entitled Mysticism in Literature (by H.C. Gardiner and E.
Larkin) were surprisingly dismissive of Blake, an I-It enthusiast (like Wordsworth and
fantasy novel world-builders); apparently the real success in the Mysticism in
Literature world is in the I-Thou (Carmelite poets, very generous people, that sort of
thing) area. I have long thought that JM Keynes whose General Theory is in places
as well written as Finnegans Wake, as I once read somewhere on this blog was to his
brother Geoffrey (the Blake specialist) what the fictional Sherlock was to Mycroft; a very
bright sibling but clearly the exponentially less capable of the two. Economics, though,
is often just common sense reiterated and refined with the mistakes thrown out; it
seems almost comical to associate something that takes such a long time with young
students. I read my first economics book, with a banana-yellow cover, in high school
(bought at a Waldenbooks at a Bay Area shopping mall, long vanished; at the same
mall, I was in line behind a young woman, now in her 70s, who bought a cassette
recording of Rachmaninoffs 24 variations on a theme of some long-forgotten fiddler. I
still remember the shy happy smile on her face the money she spent must have
meant something to her and how well she was dressed, as if she believed one had to
dress elegantly to buy a Rachmaninoff cassette. Writing a comment on this almost (or
completely) male-only comment thread, all I can say is she was as likely to be right
about the necessity of elegance as me, if not more so. If she is reading this, I dont
remember the town, but it was somewhere just north of Pleasanton).
It doesnt matter what the post was, that is from another vote another time zone, if only E. Harding
were so eloquent
http://marginalrevolution.com/
Page 1 of 9
8/15/16, 6:31 PM
http://marginalrevolution.com/
Page 2 of 9
8/15/16, 6:31 PM
http://marginalrevolution.com/
Page 3 of 9
8/15/16, 6:31 PM
Page 4 of 9
8/15/16, 6:31 PM
pursue its energy revolution beyond merely replacing nuclear fuel towards a territory
where it can also crowd out fossil fuel.
Here is yet another NBER paper on this topic. You may recall the recent JPE paper estimating that
the costs of solar intermittency are higher than the costs of carbon.
Overall the message seems to be that not going nuclear was an even bigger mistake than we had
been thinking.
Page 5 of 9
8/15/16, 6:31 PM
student who reads books. Sadly, more and more politicians and indeed professional Ph.d.
economists need this wisdom too.
Page 6 of 9
8/15/16, 6:31 PM
displaces some private sector capital, the marginal cost there is still five percent.
You can read Brad DeLongs take on my post yesterday on the opportunity cost of extra
government projects. Brad longs for that cross-sector equalization down to one percent on both
sides of the ledger and he makes many fine points. But there is nothing in his argument which
rebuts, or even tries to rebut, the claim that, given current imperfections the marginal opportunity
cost is still five percent.
So the message of my original post stands as well, and you will note that is simply the mainstream
micro take on this question which has been around since the 1970s, with the commonly understood
answers pretty much crystallized by the early 1980s.
Addendum: Here is me, from the comments: It is amazing how much free lunch economics one
can read in these comments. Of course we should in fact apply multiplier analysis to the
percentage of previously unemployed resources targeted by the new project, and a higher hurdle
rate to the rest. You can argue over what is the percentage mix here, but please dont pretend
scarcity is no longer a ruling economic principle.
Page 7 of 9
8/15/16, 6:31 PM
I would say Italy should not be on that list, as they have some fiscal troubles, plus plenty of other
sources of national pride. And there is this:
other countries offer alternative bait like military exemptions (South Korea), a
lifetime supply of beer (Germany) and unlimited sausages (Belarus).
Here is the article, via James Crabtree.
http://marginalrevolution.com/
Page 8 of 9
8/15/16, 6:31 PM
Rothwells results also very much downplay the roles of trade and China, compared to some other
estimates. Here is a link to Rothwell summarizing some of these results, I am not sure if there is a
link to the full study proper.
http://marginalrevolution.com/
Page 9 of 9