Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 1 views

    Key v. Clarke, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Alonzo Key filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Wayne Clarke and Thomas Golardi which was denied by the district court. 2) Key appealed the district court's decision to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the lower court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny Key's complaint.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    Key v. Clarke, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    1) Alonzo Key filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Wayne Clarke and Thomas Golardi which was denied by the district court. 2) Key appealed the district court's decision to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the lower court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny Key's complaint.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-02-26 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 95-7628

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    1) Alonzo Key filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Wayne Clarke and Thomas Golardi which was denied by the district court. 2) Key appealed the district court's decision to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the lower court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny Key's complaint.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    1 views2 pages

    Key v. Clarke, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Alonzo Key filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Wayne Clarke and Thomas Golardi which was denied by the district court. 2) Key appealed the district court's decision to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the lower court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny Key's complaint.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 95-7628

    ALONZO KEY,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    WAYNE CLARKE; THOMAS GOLARDI, in
    individual and official capacities,

    their
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Columbia. David C. Norton, District Judge.
    (CA-94-1836-3-18BC)
    Submitted:

    February 7, 1996

    Decided:

    February 26, 1996

    Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior


    Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Alonzo Key, Appellant Pro Se. James Michael Holly, Gary Hudson
    Smith, III, BRAITHWAITE, MCCANTS & SMITH, Aiken, South Carolina,
    for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the
    record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate
    judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
    we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Key v. Clarke,
    No. CA-94-1836-3-18BC (D.S.C. Sept. 27, 1995). We dispense with
    oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like