Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 9 views

    Holder v. NC Attorney General, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Stephen Holder's appeal of a district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible errors in the district court's decision. It therefore denied Holder a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning provided by the district court in its previous denial of Holder's petition.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    Holder v. NC Attorney General, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Stephen Holder's appeal of a district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible errors in the district court's decision. It therefore denied Holder a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning provided by the district court in its previous denial of Holder's petition.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-11-25 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 97-6621

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Stephen Holder's appeal of a district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible errors in the district court's decision. It therefore denied Holder a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning provided by the district court in its previous denial of Holder's petition.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    9 views2 pages

    Holder v. NC Attorney General, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Stephen Holder's appeal of a district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible errors in the district court's decision. It therefore denied Holder a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning provided by the district court in its previous denial of Holder's petition.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    You are on page 1of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 97-6621

    STEPHEN WAYNE HOLDER,


    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    NORTH CAROLINA ATTORNEY GENERAL;
    FREEMAN; MARTIN J. MCDADE,

    FRANKLIN
    Respondents - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Richard C. Erwin, Senior
    District Judge. (CA-96-952-2)
    Submitted:

    November 6, 1997

    Decided:

    November 25, 1997

    Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior


    Circuit Judge.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Nora Henry Hargrove, Wilmington, North Carolina, for Appellant.
    Clarence Joe DelForge, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH
    CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying
    relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2254 (West 1994 &
    Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's
    opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning
    of the district court. Holder v. North Carolina Attorney General,
    No. CA-96-952-2 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 25, 1997). We dispense with oral
    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like