Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 4 views

    Deana M. Love Moore v. Carolyn Colvin, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Deana M. Love Moore appealed the district court's order upholding the denial of her claim for disability benefits by the Social Security Administration. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    Deana M. Love Moore v. Carolyn Colvin, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    1) Deana M. Love Moore appealed the district court's order upholding the denial of her claim for disability benefits by the Social Security Administration. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its opinion.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2014-10-10 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 13-2296

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    1) Deana M. Love Moore appealed the district court's order upholding the denial of her claim for disability benefits by the Social Security Administration. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    4 views2 pages

    Deana M. Love Moore v. Carolyn Colvin, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Deana M. Love Moore appealed the district court's order upholding the denial of her claim for disability benefits by the Social Security Administration. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 13-2296

    DEANA M. LOVE MOORE,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Dever III,
    Chief District Judge. (7:12-cv-00104-D)

    Submitted:

    September 30, 2014

    Decided:

    October 10, 2014

    Before SHEDD, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    William
    Lee
    Davis,
    III,
    Lumberton,
    North
    Carolina,
    for
    Appellant.
    Thomas G. Walker, United States Attorney, R. A.
    Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Elisa Donohoe,
    Special
    Assistant
    United
    States
    Attorney,
    Raleigh,
    North
    Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Deana M. Love Moore appeals the district courts order
    accepting

    the

    recommendation

    of

    the

    magistrate

    upholding the denial of disability benefits.


    the record and find no reversible error.

    dispense

    No.

    7:12-cv-00104-D

    with

    contentions

    are

    oral

    (E.D.N.C.

    argument

    adequately

    Accordingly, we affirm
    Love-Moore v.

    Sept.

    24,

    2014).

    the

    facts

    and

    legal

    materials

    before

    because

    presented

    and

    We have reviewed

    for the reasons stated by the district court.


    Colvin,

    judge

    in

    the

    We

    this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like