Acct1120-Final Paper
Acct1120-Final Paper
Acct1120-Final Paper
ACCT 1120-400
Financial Analysis Part II
Financial Analysis Amazon
The purpose of this financial analysis is to evaluate Amazons business
value based on the following five criteria: profitability, efficiency in their use
of assets, their ability to pay current liabilities, their ability to pay long-term
debt, and the value of their stock as an investment. This analysis takes into
account the financial statements for both 2011 and 2012 and compares
these against the online retail sales industry averages.
Profitability:
Ratio
Ratio Description
Amazo
n 2012
Amazo
n 2011
Profit Margin
Ratio
-0.06%
1.31%
Industr
y
Average
2.87%
0.18%
3.16%
4.76%
-0.49%
8.63%
11.39%
-0.09
1.39
Not
Available
24%
22%
33.55%
Rate of
Return on
Total Assets
Rate of
Return on
Common
Stockholders
Equity
Earnings Per
Share
Gross Profit
Percentage
When comparing Amazons profitability for both 2011 and 2012 the
numbers come in well below the industry averages. Amazons profit margin
for 2011 was 1.31% and then dropped down to -0.06% in 2012 meaning that
in 2012 Amazon was losing money overall on their sales whereas the
industry average was a profit of 2.87%. In regards to Amazons ability to earn
income using their assets, they had a success rate of 3.16% in 2011 which
then fell to 0.18% in 2012, which tells us that Amazon was not very efficient
at producing income using their assets. The rate of return to stockholders
also fell from 2011 to 2012 with the returns being 8.63% and -0.49%
respectively. Indicating that stockholders were losing money in the year
2012. This conclusion is also supported by the looking at Amazons earnings
per share for these years. In 2011 stockholders were earning $1.39 per share
then in 2012 they began losing $0.09 per share. Gross profit however, did
experience and increase from 2011 to 2012 going from 22% up to 24%.
Though these percentages are still well below the industry average of
33.55% this does indicate some improvement in regards to Amazons overall
profitability.
Efficiency in use of Assets:
Ratio
Ratio Description
Amazo
n 2012
Amazo
n 2011
Asset
Turnover
Ratio
Inventory
Turnover
Ratio
2.11
Times
2.18
Times
Industr
y
Average
1.66
Times
8.34
Times
9.10
Times
4.8
Times
Days Sales
in Inventory
Accounts
Receivable
Turnover
Ratio
Days Sales
in
Receivables
43.76
Days
40.11
Days
75.42
Days
20.59
Times
23.13
Times
10.11
Times
17.7
Days
15.8
Days
36.11
Days
Ratio Description
Amazo
n 2012
Amazo
n 2011
Industr
y
Working
Capital
Current Ratio
Cash Ratio
Acid Test
Ratio
2294
2594
Average
Not
Available
1.12:1
1.17:1
1.54:1
42.5%
35.4%
Not
Available
0.78
0.82
1:82
Based on the ratios above we can determine that Amazon does have a
strong ability to pay their current liabilities. Amazon is close to the industry
averages provided for their ability to pay current liabilities from current
assets as well their ability to pay all the current liabilities if they came due
immediately. In addition Amazons working capital and the cash ratio (which
determines the companys ability to pay current liabilities from cash and
cash equivalents) suggest a strong ability to pay those current liabilities
throughout 2011 and 2012.
Ability to Pay Long-Term Debt:
Ratio
Ratio Description
Amazo
n 2012
Amazo
n 2011
Debt Ratio
74.8%
69.3%
Industr
y
Average
34%
297%
226%
52%
5.23
Times
15.18
Times
5.33
Times
Debt to
Equity Ratio
Times
Interest
Earned Ratio
When evaluating Amazons ability to pay their long-term debts we
compare 3 criteria: their debt ratio or the proportion of their assets which
have been financed with debt, their debt to equity ratio which gives us the
percentage of debts (or liabilities) in comparison to their equity, and finally
the times-interest-earned ratio which tells us the ability a business has to
pay their interest expense. When looking at these numbers for Amazon we
see a large percentage of assets financed with debt: 69.3% in 2011 then up
to 74.8% in 2012 both of which are more than double the industry average of
34%. Amazons percentage of debt in comparison to their equity is nearly 4
times the industry average with 226% in 2011 and 297% in 2012. We did
however, see improvement with Amazons ability to pay their interest
expenses from 2011 or 2012. Having earned interest 15.18 times in 2011
and only 5.23 times in 2012 which actually fell below the industry average of
5.33.
Stock as an Investment:
Ratio
Ratio Description
Amazo
n 2012
Amazo
n 2011
Price/Earning
s Ratio
-0.56
3.60
N/A
N/A
Not
Available
N/A
N/A
Not
Available
Dividend
Yield
Dividend
Payout
Industr
y
Average
47.17