BR J Ophthalmol 1990 Benson 103 5
BR J Ophthalmol 1990 Benson 103 5
BR J Ophthalmol 1990 Benson 103 5
com
103
Abstract
There are conflicting reports on the value of
cyclocryotherapy in the management of
glaucoma. This retrospective study was carried
out to assess the efficacy and complication rate
of this procedure. The case notes of all
patients undergoing cyclocryotherapy at a
single centre over a 10-year period were
reviewed. Case records were available for 68
eyes of 64 people. Thirty-eight eyes had
neovascular glaucoma, nine had aphakic
glaucoma, nine had angle closure glaucoma,
three had primary open angle glaucoma, and
nine had secondary open angle glaucoma. The
mean follow-up periods for these groups varied
from 2*0-6-3 years. The mean reduction in
intraocular pressure following treatment varied
from 7*9 mm Hg in the secondary open angle
glaucoma group to 24-3 mm Hg in those with
angle closure glaucoma. Pressure was
controlled in 29-4% overall, ranging from 66 7%
in the angle closure and primary open angle
groups to 0% in the secondary open angle
group. Of the painful eyes 71% were rendered
comfortable, indicating that pain relief from
cyclocryotherapy is not due solely to pressure
control. 30% of the patients lost their vision
following the procedure, phthisis occurred in
11-8% and four eyes (5.9%) went on to
enucleation. Our results indicate that cyclocryotherapy affords good pain relief, without
good pressure control, in various types of
glaucoma. While there is an apparent high
complication rate, visual loss and phthisis
cannot be ascribed directly to the procedure,
since these are eyes with a poor prognosis.
Since its description by Bietti in 1950' cyclocryotherapy has retained a place in the management of certain types of glaucoma. It is noninvasive and relatively easy to perform, but there
are conflicting reports of its efficacy, and some
series show a high incidence of visual loss and
progression to phthisis in treated eyes. It was
therefore decided to carry out a retrospective
review of all cases undergoing cyclocryotherapy
at our unit over the past 10 years to assess the
efficacy and complication rate of this procedure.
Department of
Ophthalmology, Royal
Hallamshire Hospital,
Sheffield S10 2JF
M T Benson
M E Nelson
Correspondence to:
Mr M T Benson.
Category
Neovascular glaucoma
Aphakic glaucoma
Angle closure glaucoma
Primary open angle glaucoma
Secondary open angle glaucoma
38
9
9
3
9
67
72
75
75
51
16-9
13-5
10-8
9-2
27-6
104
Benson, Nelson
Aphakic
glaucoma
Secondary
glaucoma
IOP
Mean
SD
54 8
12-4
39-5
14-1
46-4
11-2
27-3
4-6
39-6
94
Acuity
6/12+
6/18-6/60
CF
HM
PL
NPL
0
0
4
9
6
19
1
0
3
3
1
1
0
1
2
2
0
4
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
I
1
4
0
3
Pain
33
Follow up:
Mean (years)
Range
2-83
0-08-9
2-44
1-5-5
1-98
0-02-10
6-33
5-8
2-31
0-02-8
Aphakic
glaucoma
Secondary
glaucoma
Mean IOP
reduction'
(mm Hg)
20-4
(17.8)
11-8
(12-8)
24-3
(22 0)
8-0
(3 6)
7-9
(8 3)
IOPt
<21 mm Hg
10
26-3%
2
22.2%
6
66-7%
2
66-7%
Comfortable
24/33
72.7%
5/6
83-3%
3/4
75%
3/6
50%
Vision:
Worse
Same
Improved
13
25
0
2
6
1
3
6
0
2
1
0
2
6
1
Repeat
treatment
Phthisis
Enucletion
fAt 1 month.
*SD in parentheses.
270
360
Unknown
Angle closure
0
glaucoma
Aphakic
glaucoma
Neovascular
glaucoma
105
doi: 10.1136/bjo.74.2.103
Updated information and services can be found at:
http://bjo.bmj.com/content/74/2/103
These include:
Email alerting
service
Receive free email alerts when new articles cite this article. Sign up in the
box at the top right corner of the online article.
Notes