Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 43 views

    Bookblog Reviewrubric

    Uploaded by

    api-323583490
    This rubric evaluates book reviews on several criteria: elements included, sentence structure, grammar/mechanics, oral presentation skills, engaging the audience, and a book review blog post. Elements are rated on a scale of 1 to 4, with 4 being best. Criteria include accuracy, structure, errors, rehearsal, eye contact, and "netiquette". The rubric provides descriptors to distinguish scores of 4, 3, 2, and 1 on each criteria to guide scoring book reviews.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Bookblog Reviewrubric

    Uploaded by

    api-323583490
    43 views1 page
    This rubric evaluates book reviews on several criteria: elements included, sentence structure, grammar/mechanics, oral presentation skills, engaging the audience, and a book review blog post. Elements are rated on a scale of 1 to 4, with 4 being best. Criteria include accuracy, structure, errors, rehearsal, eye contact, and "netiquette". The rubric provides descriptors to distinguish scores of 4, 3, 2, and 1 on each criteria to guide scoring book reviews.

    Original Title

    bookblog reviewrubric

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This rubric evaluates book reviews on several criteria: elements included, sentence structure, grammar/mechanics, oral presentation skills, engaging the audience, and a book review blog post. Elements are rated on a scale of 1 to 4, with 4 being best. Criteria include accuracy, structure, errors, rehearsal, eye contact, and "netiquette". The rubric provides descriptors to distinguish scores of 4, 3, 2, and 1 on each criteria to guide scoring book reviews.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    43 views1 page

    Bookblog Reviewrubric

    Uploaded by

    api-323583490
    This rubric evaluates book reviews on several criteria: elements included, sentence structure, grammar/mechanics, oral presentation skills, engaging the audience, and a book review blog post. Elements are rated on a scale of 1 to 4, with 4 being best. Criteria include accuracy, structure, errors, rehearsal, eye contact, and "netiquette". The rubric provides descriptors to distinguish scores of 4, 3, 2, and 1 on each criteria to guide scoring book reviews.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 1

    Name _____________________________________________________ Date________________

    Rubric-Book Review
    CATEGORY

    Elements

    Book review contains all


    required elements and they
    are accurate (title, author,
    genre, summary, favorite
    part, and overall
    recommendation).

    Book review contains all


    required elements but
    they are not all
    accurate or
    developed.

    Book review contains


    most required elements
    and parts included may
    not be accurate or
    developed.

    Book review is missing


    several parts and the
    parts are inaccurate
    and not developed.

    Sentence Structure
    (Sentence Fluency)

    All sentences are well


    constructed with varied
    structure on the written
    book review. They flow well
    for the reader.

    Most sentences are well


    constructed with varied
    structure. They have
    pretty good flow for the
    reader.

    Most sentences are well


    constructed but have a
    similar structure.
    Sentence flow is not
    what it could be.

    Sentences lack
    structure and appear
    incomplete or
    rambling. Sentences
    do not flow well.

    Grammar
    Mechanics, etc.
    CUPS =
    Capitalization
    Usage
    Punctuation
    Spelling

    Very few errors in CUPS (13) on the written book


    review.

    Several errors (4-5) but


    they do not interfere
    with reading or
    understanding the
    writing.

    More errors (6-7) and


    some interfere with the
    reading.

    Filled with errors


    (above 7)

    The presentation
    was well rehearsed
    and clear. The
    presenter was able
    to answer questions
    about the book.

    The presentation
    was rehearsed
    and relatively
    clear. The
    presenter answered
    most of the
    questions about the
    book.

    The presentation
    was not
    rehearsed and
    somewhat
    unclear. The
    presenter could
    answer few of
    the questions.

    The presentation
    was not
    rehearsed and
    unclear. The
    presenter could
    not answer
    questions
    related to the book.

    The student did not


    simply read the
    book review from
    his/her paper.
    He/she made
    eye contact with
    the audience, used
    gestures and
    emotion to enhance
    the book review,
    and added
    his/her own
    comments to
    engage the
    audience.

    The student read


    the book review
    from his/her paper.
    He/she made
    eye contact with
    the audience and
    attempted
    gestures and
    emotion to enhance
    the book review.

    The student read


    the book review
    from his/her paper.
    He/she made little
    eye contact with
    the audience and
    did not attempt
    gestures and
    emotion to
    enhance
    the book review.

    The student read


    the book review
    from his/her paper
    but many parts
    could not be
    understood.
    He/she made no
    eye contact with
    the audience and
    did not attempt
    gestures and
    emotion to
    enhance
    the book review.

    The blog post uses


    the highest level of
    netiquette and was
    posted on time
    with zero errors.

    The blog post uses


    good netiquette
    and was posted
    on time with 1-3 errors.

    The blog post uses


    minimal netiquette
    and was posted
    late with 4-5 errors.

    The blog post uses


    minimal netiquette
    and was posted
    late with more than
    5 errors, or not
    posted at all.

    Oral
    Presentation

    Engaging
    the Audience

    Book Review Blog

    Comments:

    Total ______/24

    You might also like