Continual Improvement of Energy

Performance with ISO 50001

International Workshop - ISO 50001

Energy management system
Tokyo, Japan
12 November 2012
Program Name or Ancillary Text

Aimee McKane
Lawrence Berkeley National
Laboratory
[email protected]
eere.energy.gov

Value of Energy Management

Time and again, industrial energy efficiency has been demonstrated

to be cost effective while having a positive effect on productivity

Despite this, energy efficiency improvements with very favorable

payback periods often do not get implemented

Even projects that are implemented may not be sustained due to

lack of supportive operational and maintenance practices
Problem:
Solution:

Energy efficiency is not integrated into daily

management practices.
Staff at all levels within an organization need to be
engaged in the management of energy on an
ongoing basis.

Energy management requires an organization to shift from a project-byproject approach to one of continual improvement in energy performance

2 | Industrial Energy Efficiency

eere.energy.gov

ISO 50001 Energy Management

System Standard
ISO 50001- Energy Management System Standard
establishes a framework for industrial and commercial
facilities and organizations to manage energy.
Published: June 15, 2011

Provides the requirements for energy management systems

Applies to any organization with energy uses

Uses collection and analysis of available energy data to

support energy management decision-making, and improve:

Ability to benchmark, measure and report

Transparency and communication to management

Operations and capital cost decisions

Status of ISO 50001

Global Reach and Impact

44 (now 49) countries involved in development, plus 14

observing

Many countries adopting ISO 50001 as national standard,

including the United States

Developed by ISO Project

Committee 242; United States
and Brazil lead effort with
United Kingdom and China

ISO PC 242 transitioned to TC

242, developing standards and
guidance related to
implementation of ISO 50001

3 | Industrial Energy Efficiency

eere.energy.gov

Implementation of ISO 50001

Shifts the energy efficiency focus from individual projects to a
systematic, data-driven management approach

Requires top management to be engaged on an ongoing basis.

Provides a context for informed decisions concerning proposed
energy efficiency projects, including new technologies.

Increases reliability of outcomes through emphasis on business

processes rather than reliance on a few individuals

Involves energy users and decision makers, not just facility

personnel and physical systems, to sustain the change.
Scope of energy management
facilities

4 | Industrial Energy Efficiency

equipment

personnel

systems

processes

eere.energy.gov

ISO 50001
Plan Do Check Act Cycle
Management
review

ACT

PLAN

CHECK
Measuring,
monitoring
Internal auditing
Evaluation of legal
and other compliance
Nonconformance,
corrective, preventive
Records

DO

Management
responsibility
Energy policy
Energy review
Energy planning

Training
Documents
Communication
Design
Operational controls
Procurement
Based upon Demings PDCA cycle

5
5 | Industrial Energy Efficiency

eere.energy.gov

Key Terms from ISO 50001

Energy Management System = EnMS
Energy Performance
measurable results related to energy efficiency, energy use and energy
consumption

Energy Performance Indicator

EnPI
quantitative value or measure of energy performance, as defined by the
organization
NOTE EnPIs could be expressed as a simple metric, ratio or a more complex model.

6
6 | Industrial Energy Efficiency

eere.energy.gov

ISO 50001 Certifications Worldwide

900+ known certifications

in 15 months since
publication (9/12)

Source: Esri Data & Maps Sept 2012

German Federal Environment Agency, R. Peglau

7 | Industrial Energy Efficiency

eere.energy.gov

ISO TC 242 Working Group Structure

WG 5
Energy
Services

Source: ISO TC 242 Draft Business Plan

8 | Industrial Energy Efficiency

eere.energy.gov

Ongoing Work of ISO TC 242

WG 1 EnMS
Project Team 1
CD for Comment - ISO 50004 Implementation Guidance
Project Team 2
CD ISO 50003 Energy Management System (EnMS Auditing)

WG 2 Energy Performance Metrics

Project Teams for EnPIs and Baselines have combined their WDs to be
released as a new WD 50006

JWG 3 Measurement and Verification

CD- Measurement and Verification of Organizational Energy Performance

WG 4 Opportunities for Improvement

CD ISO 50002 Energy Auditing

Chairmans Advisory Group

Task Group 1- Management System Standard (Guide 83)

9 | Industrial Energy Efficiency

eere.energy.gov

Implementing ISO 50001

Designed to be used independently, yet can be aligned or integrated
with other management systems (e.g., ISO 9001 and ISO 14001).
Certification is not required to benefit from use of ISO 50001
Does not prescribe specific performance criteria or results with
respect to energy.
Needs enabling policies to realize its global potential for GHG
emissions reductions
Requires a skilled energy management workforce to implement the
EnMS and conduct conformance audits

In the US, the enabling policy for ISO 50001 is

called Superior Energy Performancecm
10 | Industrial Energy Efficiency

eere.energy.gov

Superior Energy Performance

Certification
Certification Requirements:
An ANSI/ANAB-accredited Verification Body will conduct a thirdparty audit to verify that the following requirements are met:
1.Energy Management System conformance to ISO 50001
Energy Management System Standard.
2.Energy performance improvement, as specified by pathway and
sector
SuperiorEnergy
Performance
SinglefacilityISO50001conformancewith
verifiedenergyperformanceimprovement

ISO50001
Componentsinplace:
TopManagement
ISO50001isa
EnergyTeam
foundationaltool
Policy
thatanyorganization
Planning
canusetomanage
Baseline
energy.
PerformanceMetrics

ISO50001
Certified Partner
OR
Partner
(Self declared)

11 | Industrial Energy Efficiency

eere.energy.gov

SEP Performance Criteria

for Certified Partners
Performance
Characteristics
Energy
Performance
Pathway

Mature
Energy
Pathway

Energy
Performance
Improvement
Energy
Performance
Improvement

Silver

Gold

Meets a specified energy performance threshold over the last 3 years:

5%

10%

12 | Industrial Energy Efficiency

15%

Meets 15% energy performance improvement threshold

over the last 10 years.

Score on Best At least 35 points At least 61 points

Practice
Uses Best Practice Scorecard
Minimum of 30 points Minimum of 40 points for
Scorecard to earn

(out of 100 total

points for energy points)
management best
practices and
energy performance
improvements.

Platinum

for energy
management best
practices

energy management best

practices and 10 points for
energy performance
(beyond 15% over the last
10 years)

At least 81 points

Minimum of 40 points for

energy management
best practices and 20
points for energy
performance (beyond
15% over the last 10
years)

eere.energy.gov

Superior Energy Performance:

First Certified Partner Facilities
Facility Name

% Energy
Performance
Improvement

Performance
Level

Volvo Trucks, NA
Dublin, VA

25.8

Platinum

Dow Chemical Company

Texas City, TX: Manufacturing facility

17.1

Platinum

3M Canada Company
Brockville, Ontario, Canada

15.2

Platinum

Cook Composites and Polymers

Houston, TX

14.9

Gold

Allsteel
Muscatine, IA

10.2

Gold

Owens Corning
Waxahachie, TX

9.6

Silver

Dow Chemical Company

Texas City, TX: Energy systems facility

8.1

Silver

Nissan, NA
Smyrna, TN

7.2

Silver

Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.

West Austin, TX

6.5

Silver

3M Company
Cordova, IL

6.2

Silver

13 | Industrial Energy Efficiency

eere.energy.gov

Superior Energy Performance:

Piloting & Demonstrations
States, regions, and utilities are partnering
with U.S. DOE on Superior Energy
Performance demonstrations with companies
across the country. The program was initially
piloted by five facilities in Texas from 20082010 using ANSI/MSE 2000:2008.
Industrial Participants:

3M
Allsteel
Amcor PET
Ascend Performance
Materials
Bentley Prince Street
Bridgestone Tire
Coca-Cola
CCP Composites
Cooper Tire

Cummins
Curtiss-Wright Flow
Control Company
Didion Milling, Inc.
Dixie Chemical
Dow Chemical
Eaton
Freescale
Semiconductors
General Dynamics
Gerdau

Harbec Inc.
Haynes International
Ingersoll Rand
Kenworth Trucks
Land OLakes
Lockheed Martin
MedImmune
Neenah Foundry
Company
Nissan

North American Hgans

OLAM Spices
Owens Corning
Republic Conduit
Schneider Electric
Spirax Sarco
UTC/Sikorsky
United States Mint
Volvo
World Kitchen

http://www.eere.energy.gov/industry/energymanagementdemonstrations/
14 | Industrial Energy Efficiency

eere.energy.gov

Impact on Energy Cost Savings

for SEP-certified Industrial Facilities

15 | Industrial Energy Efficiency

eere.energy.gov

Key Success Factors for Certifying to

Superior Energy Performance
In addition to the general requirements of ISO 50001
facilities seeking SEP certification need to:
1.Establish EnMS Scope and Boundaries at the facility level that
include all energy sources
2.Collect data sufficient to establish a baseline year (12 month
period)
3.Establish significant energy uses that are truly representative of
facility operations and energy consumption
Improve monitoring and measurement of these uses
Establish robust operational controls and training
4.Identify Superior Energy Performance Indicators (SEnPIs) to
accurately track improvements in energy performance
5.Document methodologies used to support decisions made during
the planning process

16 | Industrial Energy Efficiency

eere.energy.gov

Key Success Factors for Certifying to

Superior Energy Performance
6. Prioritize and implement action plans / improve operational
processes to meet or exceed SEP energy performance
improvement requirements
7. Track, report on, and evaluate the effectiveness of action plans
toward meeting energy performance improvement requirements
8. Use sector-specific Measurement and Verification (M&V)
Protocol to determine SEP energy performance improvement
9. Plan beyond the current certification cycle- this is a long term
commitment to re-certify every three years, not an isolated
accomplishment
10. Prepare for a third-party audit of both EnMS and energy
performance
ANSI MSE 50021- Superior Energy Performance Additional
Requirements for Energy Management Systems
17 | Industrial Energy Efficiency

eere.energy.gov

Measurement and Verification (M&V)

Protocol
Results for both SEP tiers are assessed
using the SEP Measurement &
Verification Protocol for Industry,
which provides a methodology to:

M&V Program Context

ProposedM&VValidationRigor

1. Verify results and impact from

implementation of energy
management.
2. Track energy performance
changes over time for the overall
facility.

ISO50001
Conformance
SelfDeclaration
(SEPPartner)
ThirdPartyReview
(SEPCertifiedPartner)

3. Document energy performance

normalized to production.
UtilityValidationRequirements
CarbonTradingValidationRequirements

Latest version available:

http://www.superiorenergyperformance.net/pdfs/SEP_MV_Protocol.pdf
18 | Industrial Energy Efficiency

eere.energy.gov

Superior Energy Performance

Business Value Proposition

10 facilities certified in U.S. pilots/demonstrations; 1 in Canada

Evaluating cost/benefits and other drivers of SEP:
Costs: Energy management system implementation, preparation for audit,
consultants, metering, third-party audit.
Savings: Energy performance improvements ranging from 5% to 25% over three
years
Other motivations by companies to implement SEP

How to scale up Superior Energy Performance cost-effectively to

more than 10,000 facilities?
Increase benefits/reduce cost of participation:
Developing a corporate-level certification
Developing self-declared tier (Partner)
Third party technical assistance through utilities, MEPs, and Certified Practitioners

e- Guide for ISO 50001 developed as a web-based tool to assist

facilities in implementing ISO 50001 and preparing for Superior
Energy Performance https://save-energy-now.org/EM/SPM/Pages/Home.aspx

19 | Industrial Energy Efficiency

eere.energy.gov

Qualified Workforce
Training and skill are required for appropriate application of ISO 50001 and
verification of conformance and resulting energy performance improvement.
Superior Energy Performance is helping to build this workforce.
Certified Practitioners in Energy
Management Systems (CP EnMS):
Help facilities implement ISO 50001
and prepare for SEP certification
ISO 50001 Auditor
Perform third-party conformance
audits to ISO 50001

CP EnMS May 2012: Second

class & exam
ISO 50001 Auditor National Exam
Institute for Energy Management
Professionals (IEnMP)
http://www.ienmp.com/

Certified Practitioner in Systems:

SEP Lead Auditors and SEP
Four planned- perform compressed
Performance Verifiers:
air, process heating, pumping, or
Perform third-party audits to verify
steam system assessments using
that a facility meets Superior
ASME system assessment
Energy Performance
standards
requirements
http://www.superiorenergyperformance.net/certified_practitioners.html
20 | Industrial Energy Efficiency

eere.energy.gov

Global Superior Energy Performance

(GSEP) Partnership
GSEP Energy Management Working Group (EMWG) goal:
Implementation of an EnMS and ISO 50001 becomes common
practice as part of continual improvement of energy performance in
industrial and commercial facilities and companies.

EMWG Strategic Objectives:

1. Energy Management: Increase the implementation of
energy management in the industrial and buildings sectors
in order to improve energy efficiency and energy
performance on an ongoing basis
2. Measurement and Verification (M&V): Measure and verify
energy performance improvements on a consistent basis
3. Qualified Workforce: Build a qualified workforce of
professionals with expertise in the fields of energy
management, energy efficiency, and measurement and
verification

Australia

Canada

Denmark

European
Commission

India

Japan

Korea

Mexico

The Clean Energy Ministerial

(CEM) is a high-level global
forum to promote policies
and programs that advance
clean energy technology, to
share lessons learned and
best practices, and to
encourage the transition to a
global clean energy
economy.
The GSEP EMWG is one of
six working groups created
through the CEM.
http://www.cleanenergyministerial.org

South Africa

Sweden

21 | Industrial Energy Efficiency

United States
eere.energy.gov

Conclusions
Benefits of Superior Energy Performance

ISO 50001 ensures that a facility has adopted the operational structure,
systems, and practices to identify, prioritize, implement and measure the
impacts of energy-saving projects on a continuing basis (to ensure
persistence of energy benefits).

Superior Energy Performance provides added value through third-party

validation of a facilitys use of the energy management system to actually
achieve and sustain improved energy performance. Potential benefits:

Recognition from regional/national/international programs

Qualification for preferred supplier status and enhanced utility incentives

Positive public image with stockholders, customers and prospective employees

Certified Practitioner credentialing increases energy management expertise in

the workforce.

22 | Industrial Energy Efficiency

eere.energy.gov

For More Information

ISO 50001:
www.eere.energy.gov/energymanagement
Superior Energy Performance:
www.superiorenergyperformance.net/
Energy Management Demonstrations:
www.eere.energy.gov/industry/energymanagementdemonstrations/
Texas Pilot Program, Superior Energy Performance Case Studies:
www.superiorenergyperformance.net/texas_pilot.html

23 | Industrial Energy Efficiency

eere.energy.gov