Omsk DGN SNHL
Omsk DGN SNHL
Omsk DGN SNHL
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Received: 17 June 2010 / Accepted: 16 March 2011 / Published online: 30 March 2011
Association of Otolaryngologists of India 2011
Introduction
Chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM) has assumed a
world-wide importance. For instance, the United States
government spends over 2 billion dollars yearly to treat
acute and chronic ear infections [1]. In the developing
countries, it has continued to constitute a heavy disease
burden, with the prevalence of chronic ear infections being
up to 72 cases per 1,000 inhabitants [2].
In spite of the fact that the complications of CSOM can
be fatal [3, 4], hearing impairment is regarded the main
health issue. Furthermore, the conductive hearing impairment resulting from this condition has been well
acknowledged in the literature [5]. However, the relationship between sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) and
CSOM remains a controversial issue. For instance, some
workers have consistently reported the presence of SNHL
in patients with this condition [610]. On the contrary,
some investigators have reiterated the fact that little or no
such relationship exist [11, 12]. Ironically, though the
prevalence of this disease is still high in the developing
countries; there is a dearth of information on its effect on
hearing. The question is: what is the effect of this disease
on the cochlear function of our patients? An analysis of this
will help to bridge the gap in the current literature.
123
60
Chronic suppurative otitis media is a persistent inflammation of the middle ear or mastoid cavity, and is characterised by recurrent or persistent ear discharge through a
perforation of the tympanic membrane [13]. The treatment
of this condition can be medical; with therapy directed at
eradicating pathogenic aerobic and anaerobic organisms
[14]. Those cases that are resistant to medical treatment
might need surgical intervention. The objectives of this
study were to assess the association between SNHL and
CSOM, and to investigate some clinical factors if any that
might affect the sensorineural component in patients with
this disease.
0.5, 1.0, 2.0, and 4.0 kHz were considered for this study. In
order to increase the sensitivity of the study, we defined
SNHL as an intensity of 30 dB or more for the BC
thresholds in two or more frequencies (those with significant cochlear damage) [6]. The main outcome measures
were the BC threshold averages for the frequencies 0.5,
1.0, 2.0, and 4.0 kHz; and with comparison between the
control and diseased ears. The chi-square test was used to
compare proportions and the differences between the diseased and control ears BC thresholds were analyzed with
the Wilcoxon test. The association between age, duration
of otorrhea, and degree of SNHL were tested by the
Pearson correlation test. A P-value of \0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Methods
This was a retrospective analysis of the clinical records of
patients with CSOM who attended the Otolaryngologic
clinics of Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital (Northern
Nigeria), over a 5-year period; from January 2003 to
December 2008. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the hospital.
The case notes of all patients with diagnosis of CSOM
seen in the ENT out patient clinic were retrieved using
their registration numbers in the ENT clinic register. Their
respective pure tone audiograms were then retrieved. The
Pure Tone Audiometry (PTA) was performed on dry ears in
a sound proof booth by a trained and experienced audiologist; and with the same audiometer (calibrated Kamplex
AD 229 with TDH 39P headphones). A 5 dB step procedure was employed, and a narrow band noise was used for
masking.
Patients were recruited into the study if they met the
following inclusion criteria: unilateral continuous otorrhea
through a perforated tympanic membrane for at least
2 months, normal tympanic membrane in the contralateral
ear based on otoscopy, no history of head trauma or
meningitis, no previous tympanomastoid surgery, no systemic ototoxic drug therapy, no family history of congenital or acquired SNHL, and no post-traumatic tympanic
membrane perforation. They were excluded if their clinical
records were incomplete, or if they had no audiograms. The
age, gender, duration of ear disease, and PTA results were
all recorded.
Results
A total of 106 CSOM patients clinical notes were
retrieved; however only 69 met the inclusion criteria and
were analyzed. The clinical and demographic characteristics of these 69 patients are shown in Table 1.
The mean BC thresholds of the disease and control ears
across the frequencies (0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz) are shown in
Table 2.
The mean BC threshold in the diseased ear was
39.07 dB (SD = 12.028), and 10.26 dB (SD = 2.620) in
the control ear (P \ 0.05).
Table 3 shows the mean BC threshold differences
between the diseased and control ears range from 21.69 to
34.52 dB across the four frequencies. These differences
tended to increase with increasing frequency and were all
significant (P \ 0.05).
Number (n)
Percentage (%)
Sex
Male
39a
56.52
30b
43.48
Female
Age (years)
Range
473
Mean
Duration of otorrhea
Data Analysis
All the data obtained were entered into a specialized form
designed for this study. They were analyzed using the
Statistical Package for Social Sciences software version 13
(SPSS 13). The contralateral ear (paired) acted as a control.
Bone conduction (BC) thresholds for the frequencies of
123
Range
2 months20 years
Mean
Affected ear
Right
42
60.87
Left
27
39.13
a,b
No significant difference
SD standard deviation
0.5
32.46 (14.587)a
10.14 (4.470)
36.06 (14.140)
10.14 (5.208)
42.18 (15.183)
9.97 (4.585)
45.51 (15.384)
10.99 (3.930)
Standard deviation
0.5
Standard deviation
0.5
40.48 (26.311)a
36.43 (19.567)
27.25 (18.671)
28.50 (17.925)
Standard deviation
61
Discussion
Conclusion
Although numerous studies have documented the association between SNHL and CSOM, opinions still differ
regarding the significance of this concept. In this study, we
found a significant degree of SNHL amongst patients with
CSOMthe mean BC thresholds across the speech frequencies were significantly higher in the diseased ears
compared to the control ears. Also, the higher frequencies
tend to be more affected. This is in support of the findings
of MacAndie [7] and Redaelli et al. [15] in a similar study.
123
62
References
1. Bluestone CD (1981) Recent advances in the pathogenesis,
diagnosis, and management of otitis media. Pediatr Clin N Am
28(4):727755
2. Ologe FE, Nwawolo CC (2002) Prevalence of chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM) among school children in a rural
community in Nigeria. Niger Postgrad Med J 9(2):6366
3. Miura MS, Krumennauer RC, Lubianca Neto JF (2005) Intracranial complications of chronic suppurative otitis media in
children. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 71(5):639643
4. Mostafa BE, El Fiky LM, El Sharnouby MM (2009) Complications of suppurative otitis media: still a problem in the 21st
century. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 71(2):8792
5. Mills RP (1997) Management of chronic suppurative otitis media.
In: Kerr AG, Booth JB (eds) Scott-Browns otolaryngology,
vol. 3, 6th edn. Butterwoth-Heinemann, Oxford, p 3/10/4
6. de Azevedo AF, Pinto DCG, Alves de Souza NJ, Greco DB,
Goncalves DU (2007) Sensorineural hearing loss in chronic
suppurative otitis media with and without cholesteatoma. Braz J
Otorhinolaryngol 73(5):671674
7. MacAndie C, OReilly BF (1999) Sensorineural hearing loss in
chronic otitis media. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 24(3):220222
8. da Costa SS, Rosito LP, Dornelles C (2009) Sensorineural
hearing loss in patients with chronic otitis media. Eur Arch
Otorhinolaryngol 266(2):221224
9. Lasisi AO, Sulaiman OA, Afolabi OA (2007) Socio-economic
status and hearing loss in chronic suppurative otitis media in
Nigeria. Ann Trop Paediatr 27(4):291296
10. Feng H, Chen Y (2004) Analysis of sensorineural hearing loss in
chronic suppurative otitis media. Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke
Za Zhi 18(10):579581
123