Disclosure To Promote The Right To Information
Disclosure To Promote The Right To Information
Disclosure To Promote The Right To Information
Whereas the Parliament of India has set out to provide a practical regime of right to
information for citizens to secure access to information under the control of public authorities,
in order to promote transparency and accountability in the working of every public authority,
and whereas the attached publication of the Bureau of Indian Standards is of particular interest
to the public, particularly disadvantaged communities and those engaged in the pursuit of
education and knowledge, the attached public safety standard is made available to promote the
timely dissemination of this information in an accurate manner to the public.
1 +, 1 +
01 ' 5
Jawaharlal Nehru
! $ ' +-
Satyanarayan Gangaram Pitroda
! > 0 B
BharthariNtiatakam
( Reaffirmed 2002 )
El : 18664- 1983
Indian Standard
GUIDE FOR
SELECTION OF INDUSTRTAL SAFETY
EQUIPMENT FOR PROTECTION OF
FOOT AND LEG
Industrial Safety Advisory Committee,
Chairman
ISAC
Representing
Directorate
Labour
Bombay
DR S. S. RAMASWAMY
General Factory
Advice Service and
Institutes
( Ministry
of Labour ),
Members
SHRI P. R. SURENDRANATHAN( Alternate to
Dr S. S. Ramaswamy )
Ministry of Shipping and Transport
SHRI V. K. ARORA
SHRI T. P. P. NAMBIAR ( Alternate )
Hindustan Aeronautic Ltd, Bangalore
SHRI PREM BAVEJA
SHRI B. S. GROVER ( Alternate )
Indian Cotton Mills Federation, Bombay
SHRI S. P. BHATIA
Chief Controllerate
of Explosives, Nagpur
SHRI CHARANJIT LAL
SHRI B. R. DAVE ( AIternate )
Indian National
Trade Union Congress,
New
SHRI N. CHAKRAVARTY
Delhi
SHRI KARAN SINGH ( AIternate )
Indian Society of Engineers. Calcutta
SHRI P. K. CHAUDHURI
DR D. K. NAG ( Alternate )
Sandoz ( India 1 Ltd, Thane
SHRI N. CHAWLA
Central Boilers Board, New Delhi
SHRI S. C. DEY
SHRI S. M. PRASAD ( Alternate )
Central Electricity Authority, New Delhi
DIRECTOR ( COMMERCIAL )
DEPUTY DIRECTOR (COMMERCIAL) (Alternate)
Directorate
General of Mines Safety, Dbanbad
DIRECTOR GENERAL OP MINES
SAFETY
DIRECTOR, MINES SAFETY
EQUIPMENT ( Alternate )
Century Rayon, Kaiyan
SHRI DURGESH CHANDRA
SHRI JAYANT ADHIA ( Alternate )
Institution of Fire Engineers India, New Delhi
SHRI P. N. GHOSH
National Safety Council, Bombay
SHRI K. C. GUPTA
SHR~ N. RAGHAVAN ( Alternate )
Indian Jute Mills Association, Calcutta
SHRI R. P. JHA
( Continued on page 2 )
@ Copyright
INDIAN
STANDARDS
1984
INSTITUTION
This publication is protected under the Indian Copyright Act (XIV of 1957) and
reproduction in whole or in part by any means except with written permission of the
publisher shall be deemed to be an infringement of copyright under the said Act.
IS : 10667- 1983
( Continued from page
1)
Representing
Members
Inspectorate,
Government
of Maharashtra.,
Ltd,
SURI B. S. MATHUR
Steel
SHRI S. R. C. RAO
Steel Authority of India Ltd, New Delhi
SHRI R. N. DAS ( Alternate )
REPRESENTATIVE
Ministry of Defence ( DGI )
The Safetv First Association of India, Bombay
SHRI Y. K. SAPRU
SHRTA. A. JASDENVALA( Alternate )
The Project & Development ( India ) Ltd, Sindri
SHRI K. K. SARKHEL
Employees
State Insurance Corporation,
New
SHRI I. C. SARIN
-Ddlhi
DR K. M. SAXENA ( Alternate )
Ministry of Petroleum & Chemicals
SHRIP. SESHADRI
SHRIJAGJITSINGH( Alternate )
DR B. SINGH
CengianEting
Research
Station
( CSIR ),
SHRIP R. ROY ( Alternate )
SHRI D. K. S~RKAR
Indian Chemical
Calcutta
SHRI S. VENKA~WAMY
SHRI S. P. VIDYARATHI
SHRI S. K. MATHUR,
Director ( Chem )
Manufacturers
Association,
Secretary
SHRI K. K. TRIPATHI
Senior Deputy Director ( Chem ), ISI
( Continued on page 8 )
IS : 10667- 1983
Indian Standard
GUIDE FOR
SELECTION OF INDUSTRIAL SAFETY
EQUIPMENT FOR PROTECTION OF
FOOT AND LEG
0. FOREWORD
0.1 This Indian Standard was adopted by the Indian Standards Tnslitution
on 30 September 1983, after the draft finalized by the Industrial Safety
Advisory Committee had been approved by the Executive Committee.
0.2 Foot injuries are caused due to: (a) Striking against stationary object,
(b) Striking by moving object; (c) Stepping on hot objects, (d) Stepping
on sharp objects, (e) Heat radiation and welding sparks, and (fj chemicals.
To protect the foot from hazards (a) to (f) above, leather safety boot
should be used; for hazard (e) asbestos, safety boots should be used.
0.3 Main differences between the safety boot and the ardinary shoe are as
follows:
Safety Boot
Ordinary Shoe
a) Provided with a carbon steel
toe cap
b) Ankle height is 115 mm
c) Sole hardness is above 55
IRHD
0.4 For foot protection it is also necessary for the employer to provide
washrooms, showers, and locker facilities so that employees can conveniently bathe their feet and change into clean, dry footwear after the
days work.
0.5 In the formulation of this standard, assistance has been derived from
the following publications:
DCRKSM. BALDEVIN.A foot hold on safety. Job Safety Health, May
1976.
Conservation of Personal Protective Equipment, Safety Practices
Pamphlet No. 106. National Safety Council, Chicago.
Protective Clothing, Safety Practice Pamphlet No, 14, National Safety
COUncil
A.2 Chicago.
.
IS : lo667 - 1983
1. SCOPE
1.1 This standard provides guidance for selection, use and maintenance
safety boots, shoes and leg guards.
of
2. TYPES
2.0 The protective footwear should suit the job, that is, their construction
and materials should provide adequate defence against all hazards the
workers may encounter.
2.1 Safety shoes have the widest application in industry. The metal cap
built into the shoe is meant to shield the toes from impact and compression.
When there is a heavy liftfruck traffic in a plant, or other added risk of
injury to the toe/foot metatarsal guards offer additional protection.
2.2 Safety boots and rubber shoes offer protection against wet, cold or
slippery conditions such as in outdoor work, refineries and food processing
plants. If worn over safety shoes, overboots do not need any reinforcement
in the toe area. If worn over bare feet shots, overboots should have builtin toe caps.
2.3 Conductive shoes and over-shoes, worn round explosive gases or
material, permit the static electricity that builds up in the body of the
wearer to drain off harmlessly into a conductive, grounded floor. Employee
should not be allowed to wear them outdoors because any accumulation
of dirt impairs effectiveness of conductive shoes. Electrical resistance of
the shoes should be tested periodically while they are in service.
2.4 Non-sparking
shoes are used in hazardous locations such as in
explosive operations or in the cleaning of tanks that have held gasoline or
volatile hydrocarbons.
2.5 Shoes for protection from electrical hazards should not have any
exposed metal; the toe box should be insulated from the shoe. Electrical
hazard shoes can be depended on for protection when they are dry and in
good condition; however, protection is diminished when they are wet from
perspiration or rain.
2.6 Foundry safety boots for moulders and welders are used whenever
there is a hazard from hot splashes, such as, in the pouring of molten
metals, or flying sparks. They fit snugly and should be as easy as possible
to remove in case a spark or hot metal gets inside. Instead of being closed
by laces, they should have other suitable fasteners to hold the top of the
shoe close to the ankle.
IS:10667-1983
2.7 Leather Safety Boots and Shoes - In safety shoes the sole and steel toe
are of prime importance. The sole leather used in safety shoes/boots shall
conform to IS : 579 ( Part 1 )-1973*.
2.8 Asbestos Safety Shoes - They should have a flame treated leather lining
as well as the sole. For heat as well as flame protection it is necessary that
asbestos used in the production
of such shoes is of suitable grade.
Asbestos having close weave will reduce penetration of heat from outside
to the inside. The laces of such shoes should be of leather of borax
tleated cotton laces. Plastic laces should never be used in this variety of
shoes.
2.8.1 SoYe - It is advisable that between
wool is inserted for protection against heat.
the
layers
of sole glass
2.9 PVC and Rubber Gumboots - There are two varieties in rubber
gumboots that is general purposes and industrial. Only industrial gumboots
should be employed for use when the hazard is handling stronger or mild
acids, alkalies and corrosive chemicals. PVC half gumboots made from
pure vinyl is also ideal for protection against acids and alkalies. Use of
PVC apron along with PVC half gumboots is recommended for obtaining
required frontal body protection.
3. LEG PROTECTION
3.1 Footguards
revision ).
3.5Where acids,
3.7 Knee pads of asbestos, fibre, felt or reinforced leather are used as
protection against heat and sharp edges encountered in steel mills, glass
plant operations, sheet metal plants, mines and similar industries. Knee
pads of rubber construction are also furnished to workers who are required
to remain on their knees for extended periods of time, such as cement
finishers, etc.
3.8 Leg Guard - Leather leg guard of 225 mm size should be used by
welders to protect the leg from welding sparks and to avoid entering of
sparks inside the safety boots. Leg guard of 400 mm size should be used by
workers engaged in loading the curled chips in the machine shop.
4. SELECTION,
FITTING
AND INSPECTION
4.1 Supervisors and employees should be advised to select the proper type
of safety shoe for each job. Recommend the proper type shoe. For
examp!e, workers on wet slip Boors may need non-slip sole shoes which
will not be harmed by water or acid. For more severe exposures of this
type, provide over-shoes, bdots, wooden sole shoes or wooden or rubber
mat sandals.
4.2 Select svnthetic rtibber or chrome leather soles for work on oily
ground or floors because ordinary rubber or leather deteriorates under
such exposure.
4.3 For excessively heated or sharp material on the floor, use sandal safety
shoes or wooden sole shoes.
4.4 Furnish external toe or foot guards when there is need for additiocal
protection because of heavy material handled or because of severe
exposure to abrasion and sharp metal which otherwise would cut the
leather uppers.
4.5 Al] employees buying shots should understand the need for proper
fitting. The workers feet will spread, especially if heavy loads are carried;
hence measurement of length and width should 1.~ taken
of the body op the feet.
6
4.6 Shoes that do not fit tempt the wearer to mutilate them in an effort to
secure comfort.
5. CLEANING,
DRESSING,
STERILIZATION
AND REPAIR
of the manufacturer.
wearer forces
better
other
ISAC S : 2
Representing
Steel Authority of India
Durgapur
( Durgapur
Steel Plant ),
Members
SHRI J. J. ADHIA
The
Stations
Chief Controllerate
of
of Explosives,
Committee,
India (Bihar
Nagpur
Central
Mining
Research
Station
( CSIR ),