Seismic Analysis of Steel Liquid Storage Tanks by API-650

See
discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259867125
Seismic analysis of steel liquid storage tanks by

API-650
CONFERENCE PAPER SEPTEMBER 2013
READS
767
2 AUTHORS, INCLUDING:
Abdullah Gedikli
Istanbul Technical University
25 PUBLICATIONS 218 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Available from: Abdullah Gedikli

Retrieved on: 05 April 2016
Seismic analysis of steel liquid storage tanks by API-650
H. A. Altun1, 2, A. Gedikli3
1
Corresponding author,
Tecnicas Reunidas, TUPRAS - Residium Upgrading Project, Kocaeli, Turkey
3
Civil Eng. Department, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey
Abstract
In the past earthquakes, damage and failure of various ground supported liquid storage
tanks had been reported. The failure occurred mainly due to buckling of tank wall due to
excessive compressive stress, tearing of anchorage systems and plastic deformation of base
plate. The seismic behaviour of liquid storage tanks is highly complex due to
liquidstructure interaction leading to a tedious design procedure from
earthquake-resistant design point of view. API 650 Appendix E has been widely used
around the world for seismic design of steel storage tanks. However, there is not more
comprehensive study which introduces API-650 specification with details. Also, there is not
any Turkish design code for the seismic analysis and design of liquid storage tanks. The
aim of the study was to introduce the API-650 specification which is used for seismic
analysis of these structures. To achieve these goals summary of API-650 was presented and
a numerical example was followed. Impulsive and convective component of the seismic load
were calculated by using API-650. According to graphics which are calculated along the
tank elevation the effect of the impulsive component increased at the bottom part of the
tank and the effect of convective component which is called as sloshing effect increased at
the top part of the tank. After maximum stresses was gained to be combined impulsive and
convective component of the seismic load for each tank shells. According to graphics
results we saw that the effect of the impulsive component is more effective than convective
components effect. Therefore it could lead to elephant foot buckling on the tank shell after
possible earthquake effect.
Keywords: Liquid storage tanks, fluid structure interaction, API 650
1.0
INTRODUCTION
Liquid storage tanks are important components of lifeline and industrial facilities. They are
critical elements in municipal water supply and fire fighting systems, and in many industrial
facilities for storage of water, oil, chemicals and liquefied natural gas. Behaviour of large tanks
during seismic events has implications far beyond the mere economic value of the tanks and their
contents. So engineers have to know that these special structures behave differently when
induced seismically and also damaged due to different reason.
The aim of the study was to introduce the API-650 specification which is used for seismic
analysis of these structures. To achieve these goals summary of API-650 was presented and a
numerical example was followed.
2.0
SPECIFICATION
API 650 Appendix E has been widely used around the world for seismic design of steel storage
tanks. API 650 Standard establishes minimum requirements for material, design, fabrication,
erection, and testing for vertical, cylindrical, aboveground, closed- and open-top, welded storage
tanks in various sizes and capacities for internal pressures approximating atmospheric pressure.
For instance, diesel storage tanks fall under the category of tanks subjected to internal pressures
approximating atmospheric pressure.
3.0
ANALYSIS PROCEDURE
3.1
Basis of the analysis
The most commonly applied idealization for estimating liquid response in seismically excited
rigid, rectangular and cylindrical tanks was formulated by Housner in 1957. He divided
hydrodynamic pressures of contained liquid into two components: the impulsive pressure caused
by the portion of the liquid accelerating with the tank and the convective pressure caused by the
portion of the liquid sloshing in the tank.

According to API-650, the methods use an equivalent lateral force analysis that applies
equivalent static lateral forces to a linear mathematical model of the tank based on a rigid wall,
fixed based model. The equivalent lateral seismic force and overturning moment applied to the
shell as a result of the response of the masses which are impulsive and convective to lateral
ground motion are determined.
4.0
RESULTS ANALYSIS
Impulsive and convective component of the seismic load were calculated by using API-650.
According to graphics which are calculated along the tank elevation the effect of the impulsive
component increased at the bottom part of the tank and the effect of convective component
which is called as sloshing effect increased at the top part of the tank. After maximum stresses
was gained to be combined impulsive and convective component of the seismic load for each
tank shells.
Figure 1 -
variation of impulsive load on the wall along to elevation.
Figure 2 -
Figure 3 -
variation of convective load on the wall along to elevation.
variation of maximum normal stress on the wall along to elevation.
5.0
DISCUSSION
5.1
Assumption for the possible failure situation
According to graphics results we saw that the effect of the impulsive component is more
effective than convective components effect. Therefore it could lead to elephant foot buckling
on the tank shell after possible earthquake effect.
Elephant foot buckling has small amplitude. It is realized under the critical buckling load. It has
a non-elastic characteristic. In the event of a possible failure, first material of the shell will start
to yield. Therefore, damage could be occurred in the structure before failure. Failure will be
carried out later. In this way, possible failure will have a ductile character. This failure form
could be desirable for the earthquake resistant structure design. In this scope, while structure is
taking damage, seismic energy can be absorbed.
6.0
CONCLUSIONS
Impulsive and convective component of the seismic load were calculated by using API-650.
According to graphics which are calculated along the tank elevation;
1. The effect of the impulsive component increased at the bottom part of the tank.
2. The effect of convective component which is called as sloshing effect increased near to the
top part of the tank.
3. Maximum stresses were gained to be combined impulsive and convective component of the
seismic load for each tank shells. According to graphics results we saw that the effect of the
impulsive component is more effective than convective components effect. Therefore it
could lead to elephant foot buckling on the tank shell after possible earthquake effect.
Acknowledgements
I would like to express my deepest gratitudes and thanks to my supervisor Assoc. Prof. Dr.
Abdullah GEDIKLI and my colleagues from Tecnicas Reunidas who gave me their suggestions,
supports and encouragements which made it possible for me to accomplish this study.
REFERENCES
API-650. 2009: Welded Tanks for Oil Storage. 11th Ed., API Publishing Services, 1220 L Street,
N.W., Washington, D.C. 20005.
Housner, G., 1957: Dynamic Pressure on Accelerated Fluid Containers, Bulletin of the
Seismological Society of America, 47, 15-35. 103

Seismic Analysis of Steel Liquid Storage Tanks by API-650

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Seismic Analysis of Steel Liquid Storage Tanks by API-650

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Seismic Analysis of Steel Liquid Storage Tanks by API-650

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

See

Seismic analysis of steel liquid storage tanks by

Available from: Abdullah Gedikli

Seismic analysis of steel liquid storage tanks by API-650

Basis of the analysis

portion of the liquid sloshing in the tank.

variation of impulsive load on the wall along to elevation.

variation of convective load on the wall along to elevation.

variation of maximum normal stress on the wall along to elevation.

Assumption for the possible failure situation

You might also like