Twinbrook Sector Plan: July 12-14 Workshop Series Summary
Twinbrook Sector Plan: July 12-14 Workshop Series Summary
Twinbrook Sector Plan: July 12-14 Workshop Series Summary
Introduction
The July 14 meeting held at Twinbrook Elementary School concluded a series of
workshops held on July 12 and 13 at the Twinbrook Recreation Center. Their topics
included Workshop 1: Establishing Adequate Services, Workshop 2: Building an
Advanced Technology/Biotechnology Center, and Workshop 3: Opportunities in the
Light Industrial Areas.
These meetings were part of an outreach strategy developed to integrate public insight,
opinions and concerns into the Sector Plan process. Several business and community
members attended the workshops and the final session. Representatives from various
agencies included the Department of Public Works and Transportation, the City of
Rockville, and Montgomery County Public Schools. The Conflict Resolution Center of
Montgomery County and Search for Common Ground helped facilitate the discussions
with the community, which were led by members of the Community-Based Planning
Division staff.
The workshops included presentations on relevant information about existing policy
frameworks, new data and other important guidelines or considerations. Following the
presentations, attendees were invited to identify issues that should be addressed in the
Sector Plan, ask questions and voice concerns. These comments were recorded and are
included in this document.
After the three workshops, staff held a larger evening meeting on July 14 to summarize
the topics discussed and thoughts contributed, and gather any additional input in these
categories from businesses and community members unable to attend the daytime
workshops. It began with an overview of information covered in the workshops and
attendees were invited to record any additional comments, suggestions and questions
about the topic. The meeting closed with a discussion of the process ahead, and the next
opportunity for involvement in the scenario building exercise planned for September. A
summary of each meeting follows.
Growth Policy (AGP), and Transportation Demand Management efforts. Staff outlined
several tools that the transportation planners will use to develop a strategy, including the
EMME/2 Travel Demand Model and the Local Area Model (LAM). Several key issues
already identified as problematic include Rockville Pike, Veirs Mill Road, and the
intersections at Twinbrook Parkway and MD 355, Twinbrook Parkway and Veirs Mill
Road, and Parklawn Drive and Montrose Parkway.
After the presentation, the floor was opened for questions and comments. Community
members and agency representatives mentioned several things about these topics and
their input follows.
Housing
Increased demand for larger units (two and three bedroom)
Need for affordable housing
More moderately priced dwelling units (MPDUs)
Need for three-bedroom units in MPDUs
Schools
Concern that there will be overcrowding in schools from new housing in the study
area (especially the elementary schools)
Developers should provide funding for schools
Road Congestion
Twinbrook Parkway (Veirs Mill Road to Rockville Pike), 5:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.
Along Rockville Pike (from White Flint to Route 28)
Edmonston Road/Route 28/Twinbrook Parkway/First Street
Need another east/west connection
Parking
Parking at Metro is impossible after 8:30 a.m.
No parking at Rockville Metro
Parking problems in Twinbrook started when the Grosvenor parking lot was closed
for construction
Metro
Lack of capacity, no seats on Metro cars at Twinbrook
Need for lighting in community around the Metro station
Lack of Ride-On service, need to extend service
Ride-On can be considered disruptive by neighbors (noise, speed, frequency)
Cut-Through Traffic
Neighborhood street traffic
Coordination with the State Highway Administration
Bicycle Routes
Two lanes of parked cars (Crawford, Lewes, Ardennes) leaves no room for bikeways
Bus Stops
Need to assess placement of bus stops
Final Meeting
July 14, 7:30 p.m.
Twinbrook Elementary School
Purpose
The July 14 meeting reviewed the information covered during the workshops held and
presented workshop information for those who did not attend. It was also another
opportunity for comments and questions.
Summary
The audience included community members, interested individuals, representatives from
the JBG Company, City of Rockville, Department of Public Works and Transportation,
small business owners, and planning staff. Facilitators from the Conflict Resolution
Center of Montgomery County and Search for Common Ground were also present to
gather community input.
Staff presented the 1992 North Bethesda/Garrett Park Master Plan, the 2000 Charrette,
and the outreach and planning process. Staff also presented and summarized workshop
information. After the housing and transportation presentations, audience members added
comments regarding information that was missing or any questions that had not been
answered. These comments and questions were recorded as follows.
Housing
What is affordable housing?
What about the working poor
MPDU vs. affordable, and How do you distinguish levels of affordability
Experience verifies need for larger, affordable units
Development planned 12.5 percent MPDUs; should include two-bedroom, onebedroom, efficiency units (Twinbrook Commons)
North Bethesda area has surplus of units MPDUs are available
Want two- and three-bedroom units in new developments for families and community
building
One bedroom units encourage singles, transients, and two-car households
Increase of investor/owners; positive cash flow
More county oversight of MPDUs
Restricted/managed buyout of MPDU program
Transportation
Morning congestion in general and specifically on Twinbrook Parkway
WMATA maintenance needs to be increased at Metro station and bus stops
Increased parking at Metro needed
Veirs Mill Road has evening congestion
Additional connections across rail tracks (pedestrian, bike, vehicular)
Ride-On bus needs additional hours (#44)
Traffic lights or pedestrian crossings needed at bus stops and Metro
Pedestrian access to Metro is not used in part because the length of Twinbrook
Parkway is unfriendly to pedestrians
Better road and pedestrian connections to Metro in general
Financial incentives to use public transportation
More walkable amenities to connect workplace, home, shopping, restaurants, et
More shuttles that hit the places where people work and live
Impact on congestion of planned residential and retail developments