Faculty Handbook 2009
Faculty Handbook 2009
Faculty Handbook 2009
FACULTY OF ENGINEERING
Revised June, 2009
TABLE OF CONTENTS.................................................................................................... ii
I. COMPOSITION OF THE FACULTY OF ENGINEERING COUNCIL
A.
Membership ...................................................................................................5
B.
Chair ..............................................................................................................5
C.
Recording Secretary ......................................................................................5
II. MEETINGS
A.
Regular Meetings ..........................................................................................7
B.
Special Meetings ...........................................................................................7
C.
Quorum ..........................................................................................................7
D.
Access ............................................................................................................7
III. AGENDA, REPORTS, MINUTES
A.
Preparation.....................................................................................................8
B.
Agenda of Regular Meetings .........................................................................8
C.
Agenda of Special Meetings..........................................................................8
D.
Distribution of Agenda ..................................................................................8
E.
Reports...........................................................................................................8
F.
Minutes ..........................................................................................................8
IV. PROCEDURES
A.
Chart on Parliamentary Motions ...................................................................9
B.
Guideline to Effective Parliamentary Procedure .........................................11
C.
Informal Consideration of a Question
(1) Rules .............................................................................................13
(2) Establishment and Termination ....................................................13
V.
iii
L18
L21
L22
L23
L25
L26
L28
L29
L36
L38
L39
L40
L41
L47
APPENDIX M
L48
APPENDIX N
L49
APPENDIX O
L50
APPENDIX P
L53
APPENDIX R
L57
L58
APPENDIX S
iv
I.
The Faculty of Engineering Council is the ruling body of the Faculty of Engineering. The
meeting of the Faculty of Engineering Council is the vehicle through which the Faculty
affairs are conducted.
A. Membership
The membership of the Faculty of Engineering Council shall consist of:
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
Faculty of Engineering Council is elected by its membership for a one-year term. The
office of the Dean maintains all records of the Council.
II. MEETINGS
A. Regular Meetings
These are normally held every month at times agreed upon by the Faculty for the full
academic year.
B. Special Meetings
These are held at appropriate times. The Dean of the Faculty may at any time call a
meeting of the Faculty of Engineering Council, and must do so when ten or more
members of the Faculty of Engineering Council shall so request in writing.
C. Quorum
The quorum for the meeting is set at 20. Representation by proxy or voting by proxy is
not permitted.
D. Access
The Meetings of the Faculty of Engineering are open to all interested persons unless the
Faculty of Engineering Council shall, with respect to specific items of business, decide
otherwise. Non-members may be recognized by the Chair to speak, provided that there is
no objection by a member of the Faculty of Engineering Council. In certain cases the
Chair should decide if the Council is to hold a session In Camera .
The Chair declares that: The (Faculty of Engineering Council) session will now go In
Camera. Would all non-Council members please leave the meeting. The purpose of this
In Camera session is to (e.g.: consider a motion to ......). Again, I remind the Members of
the Council that all discussion and comments are confidential and will not be minuted.
Comments made during this In Camera session therefore, should not be transmitted to
anyone who is not a member of the (Dalhousie Faculty of Engineering Council). Council
members are expected to respect the confidentiality of their colleagues= views or to leave
the meeting for the duration of the In Camera session.
IV. PROCEDURES
A. Chart on Parliamentary Motions
The attached Chart on Parliamentary Motions" is a summary of Privileged, Subsidiary,
Main and Incidental Motions.
10
11
12
13
Dean - appointment procedures and the terms of reference are given in Appendix
A.
B.
Associate Dean, Undergraduate Studies and Associated Universities appointment procedures and the terms of reference are given in Appendix B.
C.
D.
Assistant Dean - appointment procedures and the terms of reference are given in
Appendix D.
E.
Assistant Dean for Student Affairs - appointment procedures and the terms of
reference are given in Appendix E.
F.
G.
H.
I.
J.
K.
L.
Director, Core Division- appointment procedures and the terms of reference for
Director, Core Division are given in Appendix L.
14
VI.
A.
B.
In the event of a vacancy and until the position is filled through the appropriate
procedure, the Dean, after consulting with the appropriate Faculty committee or
the personnel affected by the vacancy, shall recommend or appoint, as
appropriate, an Acting or Interim Faculty Officer.
15
VII.
FACULTY COMMITTEES
A. Establishment
The Faculty of Engineering Council may at any time establish a committee by motion
regularly seconded and passed. Committees shall be of two types:
(1) Standing Committees deal with recurring business; once established they serve until
abolished by the Faculty of Engineering Council.
(1) Ad Hoc Committees deal with specific questions; if the life of a committee of this
type is not defined in its terms of reference, it shall become defunct when it has failed to
report to the Faculty of Engineering Council for a period exceeding one year.
B. Terms of Reference
(1) A committee is bound by its terms of reference. The first task of a newly formed
committee is to draft precise terms of reference and submit them to the Faculty of
Engineering Council for approval. Should a committee believe it desirable that its terms
of reference be modified, explicit approval of the Faculty of Engineering Council must be
sought and secured for any change.
(2) Terms of reference of existing standing committees are given in Appendix L.
(3) The following general terms of reference apply except where the terms of reference of
a committee include explicit provisions to the contrary:
(a) Composition
The membership and chair of standing committees shall be subject to progressive change.
New members normally start their term on a committee on July 1 of the year in which
they are elected. The membership and the chairs of ad hoc committees normally shall be
fixed by the Faculty of Engineering Council for the life of such committees. Except
where there is a specific exclusion, the Dean shall, ex-officio, be a member of all
committees of the Faculty of Engineering Council and shall have discretion to delegate
this responsibility. Ex-officio members are full voting members of the committees.
16
(b) Procedures
1.
2.
3.
Each committee shall take care to ensure appropriate access to its deliberations by
interested individuals, departments, and students.
(c) Reports
A standing committee shall submit written reports directly to the Faculty of Engineering
Council once annually. If necessary, it may report more frequently.
17
18
X. APPENDICES
DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY
FACULTY OF ENGINEERING
APPENDIX A: DEAN - APPOINTMENT AND TERMS OF REFERENCE
______________________________________________________________________________
The procedure for the Appointment, Review and Reappointment of the Dean, Faculty of
Engineering is described in the document Administrative Appointments, approved by the
Dalhousie University Senate, November 24, 1997 (revised June 26, 2001).
COMPOSITION OF THE REVIEW/SEARCH COMMITTEE FOR DEAN, FACULTY
OF ENGINEERING
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
B.
The Dean of the Faculty of Engineering is the senior officer of the Faculty. The Dean shall be
responsible for the academic and financial administration of the Faculty. He/she shall chair the
Steering Committee, and the Administrative Heads Committee.
X1
DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY
FACULTY OF ENGINEERING
APPENDIX B:
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
B.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
X2
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g.
h.
j.
i.
k.
l.
X3
DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY
FACULTY OF ENGINEERING
APPENDIX C:
(1).
(2).
(3).
(4).
(5).
(6).
B.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
X4
(8)
Undertakes such other duties and responsibilities as the Dean may assign. These
currently include the following:
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g.
(9)
X5
DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY
FACULTY OF ENGINEERING
APPENDIX D:
The procedure for the Appointment, Review and Reappointment of the Assistant Dean,
faculty of Engineering is described in the document Administrative Appointments,
approved by the Dalhousie University Senate, November 24, 1997 (revised June 26,
2001).
Since this is an administrative assistant to the Dean, performing specified tasks assigned
by the Dean the appointment is left entirely to the Dean (though as a matter of courtesy
and in the interest of good relations the Administrative Heads Committee, and the Faculty
Council should be kept fully informed on this matter).
X6
DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY
FACULTY OF ENGINEERING
APPENDIX E:
The procedure for the Appointment, Review and Reappointment of the Assistant Dean
for Student Affairs, faculty of Engineering is described in the document Administrative
Appointments, approved by the Dalhousie University Senate, November 24, 1997
(revised June 26, 2001). Appointment is normally for four years. At the conclusion of a
second term there will be an open search.
A.
(1).
(2).
(3).
(4).
(5).
(6).
B.
(2)
Act as advisor for students in the Faculty of Engineering on matters that affect
their academic performance and well being which cannot be resolved at the
Departmental level.
(3)
(4)
Offers to students counseling and the appropriate referral advice to deal with
X7
(6)
Act as an advocate for the students interests at Faculty and academic unit
deliberations.
(7)
Act as liaison with student groups to convey, when appropriate and the point of
view to the faculty administration, through, for example, attendance at
engineering student society executive meetings.
(8)
X8
DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY
FACULTY OF ENGINEERING
APPENDIX F:
Procedure
Presently the procedure for the Appointment, Review and Reappointment of the
Department Heads within the Faculty of Engineering has been developed by the Faculty
of Engineering as described in the document Administrative Appointments, approved
by the Dalhousie University Senate, November 24, 1997 (revised June 26, 2001).
Within the last year of an initial appointment (normally four years) of a Department Head
the Dean should ask the incumbent whether he/she wishes to be considered for
reappointment. If the incumbent wishes to stand for reappointment the Dean shall ask the
appropriate bodies to select representatives for the review/search committee with the
purpose to review the performance of the incumbent. In case the incumbent does not wish
to re-offer, the committee shall review the office. The Dean shall be its chair and the
committee shall appoint its own secretary. At the conclusion of a second term there will
be an open search.
The committee shall publicize its existence and make known that it is prepared to receive
comments from any member of the Faculty community concerned with the
appointment/reappointment; and it shall consult with the Administrative Heads
committee of the Faculty of Engineering. After considering the comments made to it and
seeking any outside advice as it considers necessary, the committee shall decide and
recommend or not recommend reappointment of the incumbent. The person reappointed
must be acceptable to the Dean.
If the committee recommends reappointment, the Dean shall recommend his or her
reappointment to the President.
If the committee does not recommend reappointment of the incumbent, the committee
shall publicize that it is prepared to receive nominations for the position of the Head in
the concerned Department. The consultation procedure is the same as with the review of
the incumbent. After considering all nominations and the comments made to it and
seeking any outside advice as it considers necessary, the committee shall decide upon the
most appropriate candidate and the Dean shall recommend his or her appointment to the
President.
The person appointed must be acceptable to the Dean.
X9
A.
(1)
(4)
B.
(1)
The Head provides leadership for the Department and its programmes and is
generally responsible to the Dean for the organization and administration of
his/her Department.
Supervises the academic programmes of the Department;
Makes known to the Academic Programme Chairs and/or carry out Faculty
policies as appropriate as they affect the Department,
Advises Members of the Department on their teaching, research, and other
responsibilities, and brings to the attention of colleagues concerning any reported
neglect of such responsibilities;
Engages in teaching at reduced load and normal research load or as otherwise
stipulated;
Reports in writing to the Dean as required, with a copy to the Member concerned,
on the performance of the Member=s duties. This report shall be discussed with
the Member, who shall have the right of written comment;
Prepares, after consultation with the Academic Programme Chairs where
appropriate of the Department, a written recommendation to the Dean concerning
allocation of teaching responsibilities;
Calls and chairs meetings of the Academic Programme Chairs and the
Department as need arises;
Makes arrangements, agreeable to the Dean, for the discharge of his/her duties as
a Head during annual vacations and other casual absences;
He/she is responsible for Department budgets and receives a stipend calculated as
per University policy.
Initiates selection/recruitment of Faculty and Staff in collaboration with
appropriate search committees and the Office of Human Resources.
Provides coordination of research and teaching efforts of the Department
including securing funds for scholarships, bursaries, grants, and contracts.
Ensures that University regulations and guidelines in areas of research and
academics are respected within the Department.
(2)
(3)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
X10
(14)
X11
DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY
FACULTY OF ENGINEERING
APPENDIX G:
Procedure
Presently the procedure for the Appointment, Review and Reappointment of the
Academic Programme Chairs within the Faculty of Engineering has been developed by
the Faculty of Engineering as described in the document Administrative Appointments,
approved by the Dalhousie University Senate, November 24, 1997 (revised June 26,
2001).
Within the last year of an initial appointment (normally four years) of an Academic
Programme Chair the Dean should ask the incumbent whether he/she wishes to be
considered for reappointment. If the incumbent wishes to stand for reappointment the
Dean shall ask the appropriate bodies to select representatives for the review/search
committee with the purpose to review the performance of the incumbent. In case the
incumbent does not wish to re-offer, the committee shall review the office. The
Department Head shall be its chair and the committee shall appoint its own secretary. At
the conclusion of a second term there will be an open search.
The committee shall publicize its existence and make known that it is prepared to receive
comments from any member of the Faculty community concerned with the
appointment/reappointment; and it shall consult with the Administrative Heads
committee of the Faculty of Engineering. After considering the comments made to it and
seeking any outside advice as it considers necessary, the committee shall decide and
recommend or not recommend reappointment of the incumbent. The person reappointed
must be acceptable to the Dean and the Department Head .
If the committee recommends reappointment, the Dean shall recommend his or her
reappointment to the President.
If the committee does not recommend reappointment of the incumbent, the committee
shall publicize that it is prepared to receive nominations for the position of the Academic
Programme Chair in the concerned Department. The consultation procedure is the same
as with the review of the incumbent. After considering all nominations and the
comments made to it and seeking any outside advice as it considers necessary, the
committee shall decide upon the most appropriate candidate and the Dean shall
recommend his or her appointment to the President.
The person appointed must be acceptable to the Dean and the Department Head.
X12
A.
(1)
(2)
(3)
B.
be responsible for co-ordinating and preparing the accreditation report for, and
advising the Head on relevant issues related to the assigned academic programme;
work with the Head to ensure the quality and reputation of the programme;
report annually to the Department Head upon the progress and efficiency of the
work of the academic programme and make such recommendations thereon as
he/she considers necessary;
provide counseling to students on their academic programmes as the undergraduate
studies coordinator;
make recommendations to the Department Head on programme teaching and
assigning of teaching duties;
promote the well-being and orderly conduct of the programme;
perform such other duties as assigned by the Department Head.
not have Departmental fiscal responsibilities.
X13
DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY
FACULTY OF ENGINEERING
APPENDIX H:
Procedure
Presently the procedure for the Appointment, Review and Reappointment of the Directors of
Research Centres within the Faculty of Engineering has been developed by the Faculty of
Engineering as described in the document Administrative Appointments, approved by the
Dalhousie University Senate, November 24, 1997 (revised June 26, 2001).
Within the last year of an initial appointment (normally four years) of a Director of a Centre the
Dean should ask the incumbent whether he/she wishes to be considered for reappointment. If the
incumbent wishes to stand for reappointment the Dean shall ask the appropriate bodies to select
representatives for the review/search committee with the purpose to review the performance of the
incumbent. In case the incumbent does not wish to re-offer, the committee shall review the office.
The Dean shall be its chair and the committee shall appoint its own secretary. At the conclusion of a
second term there will be an open search.
The committee shall publicize its existence and make known that it is prepared to receive comments
from any member of the Faculty community concerned with the appointment/reappointment; and it
shall consult with the Research Directors committee of the Faculty of Engineering. After
considering the comments made to it and seeking any outside advice as it considers necessary, the
committee shall decide and recommend or not recommend reappointment of the incumbent. The
person reappointed must be acceptable to the Dean.
If the committee recommends reappointment, the Dean shall recommend his or her reappointment
to the President.
If the committee does not recommend reappointment of the incumbent, the committee shall
publicize that it is prepared to receive nominations for the position of the Director of the Centre.
The consultation procedure is the same as with the review of the incumbent. After considering all
nominations and the comments made to it and seeking any outside advice as it considers necessary,
the committee shall decide upon the most appropriate candidate and the Dean shall recommend his
or her appointment to the President.
The person appointed must be acceptable to the Dean.
X14
A.
(1).
(2).
(3).
(4).
(5).
B.
The Director of the Research Centre, Faculty of Engineering is the senior officer of the Centre. The
Director shall be responsible for the financial administration of the Centre. The Director shall chair
the Centre meeting.
C.
ADVISORY BOARDS
In most instances, the Research Centres use Advisory Boards to advocate research direction and to
suggest new opportunities for research and collaboration with industry and government
associations. The Advisory Board consists of individuals from industry, professional associations
and government agencies with specific interests in the research and development activities of the
Centres. Each Advisory Board member is appointed by the Dean upon the recommendation of the
Director in consultation with the Board for a period of three years.
The Advisory Boards elect their own Chair and meet on a regular basis (generally twice each year)
to review the activities and financial reports of the individual Centres.
X15
DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY
FACULTY OF ENGINEERING
APPENDIX I:
consultation procedure is the same as with the review of the incumbent. After considering all
nominations and the comments made to it and seeking any outside advice as it considers necessary,
the committee shall decide upon the most appropriate candidate and the Dean shall recommend his
or her appointment to the President.
The person appointed must be acceptable to the Dean of Engineering and the Dean of Medicine.
Presently there are no Schools wholly within the Faculty of Engineering. The School of Biomedical
Engineering is an academic unit shared by the Faculties of Engineering, Medicine and Dentistry.
A. COMPOSITION OF THE REVIEW/SEARCH COMMITTEE FOR DIRECTOR OF
THE SCHOOL OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING
The
Director
of
the
School
of
Biomedical
Engineering
(for normally a five year term)
will
be
selected
following
procedures
in
accordance
with
the
regulations
of
the
Faculties
of
Medicine
and
Engineering.
The
Director
will
hold
an
academic
appointment
in
either
the
Faculty
of
Engineering
or
the
Faculty
of
Medicine.
B. DUTIES OF DIRECTOR OF THE SCHOOL OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING
The
Director
shall
report
to
the
Deans
of
Medicine
and
Engineering.
The
Director
must:
Ensure
that
the
goals
and
objectives
of
the
School
are
consistent
with
those
of
the
Faculties
of
Engineering
and
Medicine
and
those
of
the
University;
(1)
(2)
The Director provides leadership for the School and is generally responsible to the Deans for
the organization and administration of his/her School.
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
X17
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
X18
DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY
FACULTY OF ENGINEERING
APPENDIX J:
X19
advice as it considers necessary, the committee shall decide upon the most appropriate candidate
and the Dean shall recommend his or her appointment to the President.
The person appointed must be acceptable to the Dean.
A.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
B.
(1)
Responsible for the administration and fiscal matters of the full fee-paying programme
Master of Engineering in Internetworking, and any outgrowths from the programme.
Student recruitment, admissions, and programme enrollment growth planning and
implementation.
Industrial liaison, partnership building, fund raising, marketing of the programme,
recruitment of faculty and staff placement, and recruitment of part-time instructors.
Academic responsibility for programme content, programme facilities, and for running
the programme in a business-like manner.
All faculty and staff report directly to the Director.
The Director reports to the Dean of Engineering.
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
X20
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
B.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
X22
DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY
FACULTY OF ENGINEERING
APPENDIX L:
Appointment is normally for four years followed by a review should the incumbent wish
to reoffer. At the conclusion of the second term there will be an open search
A.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
C.
(1)
(2)
(3)
Shares in developing philosophies, policies, and plans for the Core Division,
Faculty of Engineering (Years 1 and II);
(4)
Provides leadership for the advancement of the Core Division, including the
Annual AU Workshop;
(5)
(6)
(7)
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
Provides leadership for the Core Division (Years I and II), Faculty of
Engineering
Recommends teaching responsibility and class sectioning requests to the
Associate Dean, Undergraduate and Associated Universities
Represents the Core Division at meeting of the Directors of Engineering
Committee
Represents the Core Division at the weekly meetings of the Department
Heads Committee
Helps with the preparation of annual surveys regarding Faculty statistics
X24
L. APPENDICES
DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY
FACULTY OF ENGINEERING
APPENDIX L1:
The Administrative Heads Committee (AHC) shall be a standing committee of the Faculty of
Engineering subsidiary to and responsible to the Faculty.
B.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
C.
(1)
The Administrative Heads Committee shall have standing authority to recommend the
appointment of Adjunct and FGS status faculty members.
The Administrative Heads Committee shall have standing authority to recommend the
appointment of Emeritus faculty.
The Administrative Heads Committee shall have the standing authority to distribute the
travel funds as is required of it by the Articles of the Collective Agreement.
The Administrative Heads Committee shall have standing authority to approve the NSERC
Undergraduate Research Awards.
The Administrative Heads Committee shall meet as Planning Committee of the Faculty of
Engineering to discuss matters that are predominantly concerned with the finance and
budget of the Faculty of Engineering.
The Administrative Heads Committee shall be an authoritative body whose opinion and
advice the Dean may seek on any matter.
On its own initiative, the Administrative Heads Committee may engage in financial and
academic planning. This activity includes:
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
L18
a. Advice to the Dean, and, where appropriate, Faculty of Engineering Council, on matters
concerning the Faculty relating to: the optimizing of revenue, the means of increasing
efficiency in the operations of the Faculty, the financial implications to the Faculty of
Engineering of all proposed new or altered programmes of study and matters relating to
financial constraint or exigency.
b. An examination of the long-range or wide-range implications of significant trends that
are currently underway and of particular decisions that may be taken.
c. The proposal of specific measures from which long-range advantages might be expected
to accrue to the Faculty of Engineering, or by which impending problems might be
averted or alleviated.
d. The Administrative Heads Committee may create sub-committees to examine and advise
upon business, which does not fall under the jurisdiction of other standing or ad hoc
committees of the Faculty of Engineering. Such subcommittees may include Faculty
members and others. The Administrative Heads Committee shall receive reports of its
subcommittees and it may take such action with respect to these reports as does not
significantly change, conflict with, or involve questionable interpretations of policy
established by the Faculty of Engineering Council.
e. On the direction of the Faculty of Engineering Council, an ad hoc committee of the
Faculty may report to the Administrative Heads Committee. Unless Faculty of
Engineering Council instructs otherwise all such reports shall be transmitted without
delay to all members of the Faculty of Engineering. The Administrative Heads
Committee may take such action with respect to such reports as is consistent with the
terms of reference establishing the ad hoc committee.
f. The Faculty of Engineering Council may refer any business to the Administrative Heads
Committee for consideration, reformulation, redrafting, or other purpose.
D. PROCEDURES OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEADS COMMITTEE
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
The Administrative Heads Committee shall meet every week. The Dean of the Faculty of
Engineering shall be responsible for providing the agenda for each Administrative Heads
Committee meeting.
There shall be a quorum of 50% plus 1 voting members.
Faculty of Engineering standing and ad hoc committee chairs may seek advice from and
confer with the Administrative Heads Committee whenever the need arises.
If the Administrative Heads Committee is considering a request or proposal from a
committee, members of the committee in addition to the chair may be present and express
their views.
L19
L20
DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY
FACULTY OF ENGINEERING
APPENDIX L1a:
SPACE COMMITTEE
The Space Committee shall be an advising committee of the Faculty of Engineering subsidiary to
and responsible to the Dean.
B.
The committee shall be composed of three members, elected by the Administrative Heads
Committee and the appropriate person from the Facilities Management as a resource person. The
Committee shall be chaired by the Assistant Dean.
C.
The Space Committee shall be an advisory committee to the Dean with responsibility for
formulating guidelines governing the allocation, utilization and development of space in Sexton
Campus, for the needs of the Faculty of Engineering. Copies of current guidelines should be
available in the Deans Office.
E. REPORTING BY THE SPACE COMMITTEE
The Space Committee shall report, in writing, to the Dean of Engineering and the Administrative
Heads Committee.
L21
DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY
FACULTY OF ENGINEERING
APPENDIX L2:
FACULTY STEERING COMMITTEE
______________________________________________________________________________
A. COMPOSITION
Membership
The Committee shall consist of the Dean of Engineering (ex-officio), two tenured members elected
annually from Faculty of Engineering Council and the Chair and the Recording Secretary of the
Faculty of Engineering Council. The committee may also call upon the Associate and Assistant
Deans as needed. The Chair of Steering Committee is selected annually by and within the
membership of the Committee.
B. TERMS OF REFERENCE
The Faculty Steering Committee shall:
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
L22
DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY
FACULTY OF ENGINEERING
APPENDIX L3:
______________________________________________________________________________
A. COMPOSITION
The committee shall consist of
(1)
The Dean of Engineering (ex-officio)
(2)
One faculty member from each academic program
(3)
An undergraduate student named by the Engineering Undergraduate Society
(4)
The Associate Dean (Undergraduate and Associated Universities)
(5)
The Assistant Dean for Students Affairs
(6)
A representative of the Registrar (ex-officio)
(7)
A representative of the Associated Universities Directors Committee (ex-officio)
(8)
The Chair and Secretary are to be elected by the members of the Committee for a two-year
term.
(9)
There shall be a quorum of 50% plus 1 voting members
(10) The Committee may establish sub-committees or ad hoc committees as the need arises.
B. TERMS OF REFERENCE
The Undergraduate Studies Committee (USC) shall receive and review recommendations from the
Departments of the Faculty of Engineering, and make recommendations to Faculty Council
concerning the following areas of Undergraduate Education:
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
C.
(1)
L23
(2)
(3)
The chair, secretary or designated substitute has the responsibility to represent the USC at
faculty meetings and present USC submissions and respond to faculty questions as required.
The Faculty of Engineering has the final say on any issue presented by USC and has the
right to reject submissions approved by USC or send them back for further review.
D.
MEETING TIMES
(1)
The USC will meet once a month. Special meetings may be called by the chair to discuss
urgent matters.
The days and time of the meetings will be decided by the members of the committee at the
beginning of each term in order to avoid conflicts.
(2)
E.
SUBMISSIONS
(1)
(2)
The deadline for submissions to USC is one week (7 days) before the next committee
meeting.
Members are strongly requested to respect this deadline.
F.
SPECIFIC ISSUES
(1)
(2)
L24
DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY
FACULTY OF ENGINEERING
APPENDIX L3a:
A. COMPOSITION
The committee shall consist of one member from each academic program, two undergraduate
students as nominated by the EUS, the Associate Dean (Undergraduate Studies and Associated
Universities), and resource people as appropriate. The Chair and Secretary are to be elected by the
members of the Committee for a two-year term. The committee may establish sub-committees or
ad hoc committees as the need arises.
B. TERMS OF REFERENCE
The Recruitment Committee shall review, develop, and update policies, and make
recommendations to Faculty Council concerning the following areas:
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
L25
DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY
FACULTY OF ENGINEERING
APPENDIX L4:
A.
COMPOSITION
TERMS OF REFERENCE
This Graduate Studies Committee shall receive and review recommendations from the Departments
of the Faculty of Engineering and shall be responsible for all matters pertaining to the planning and
implementation of graduate courses and graduate students programmes of study. In particular, the
Committee shall act on and make recommendations to Faculty of Engineering concerning the
following:
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
C.
(1)
(2)
(3)
D.
MEETING TIMES
(1)
The GSC will meet once a month. Special meetings may be called by the chair to discuss
urgent matters.
The days and time of the meetings will be decided by the members of the committee at the
beginning of each term in order to avoid conflicts.
(2)
E.
SUBMISSIONS
(1)
(2)
The deadline for submissions to GSC is one week (7 days) before the next committee
meeting.
Members are strongly requested to respect this deadline.
F.
SPECIFIC ISSUES
(1)
(2)
L27
DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY
FACULTY OF ENGINEERING
APPENDIX L5:
UNDERGRADUATE
A. COMPOSITION
The Appeals Committee shall consist of the Associate Dean (Undergraduate and Associated
Universities) as Chair, the Head of the Department of the student concerned, and the Assistant Dean
of Student Affairs.
B. TERMS OF REFERENCE
(1)
(3)
An Appeals Committee will be initiated by the Associate Dean when a request is received
from the student for academic action which can not be handled by the normal application of
the Faculty regulations;
An Appeals Committee may be formed to deal with a request for:
a. An examination re-read,
b. A special examination.
The Committee is directly responsible to Faculty of Engineering Council.
II.
GRADUATE
(2)
A. COMPOSITION
The Appeals Committee shall consist of the Associate Dean (Graduate and Research) as Chair, the
Head of the Department of the student concerned, and the Assistant Dean of Student Affairs.
B. TERMS OF REFERENCE
(1)
(2)
(3)
An Appeals Committee will be initiated by the Associate Dean when a request is received
from the student for academic action, which cannot be handled by the normal application of
the Faculty regulations;
An Appeals Committee may be formed to deal with a request for:
a. An examination re-read,
b. A special examination.
The Committee is directly responsible to Faculty of Engineering Council.
L28
DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY
FACULTY OF ENGINEERING
APPENDIX L6:
Relevant Documents
These terms of reference conform to the 2004 2007 Collective Agreement between the Board of
Governors and the Dalhousie Faculty Association. Key sections of the Collective Agreement are
Article 15 (Tenure, Continuing Appointment and Appointment Without Term), Article 16
(Promotion), Article 18 (Personal Files), Clause 20.04 (Workloads), and Article 36 (Fairness and
Natural Justice). Information has also been obtained from the Dalhousie Faculty Association (DFA)
document Under the Microscope: TENURE, PROMOTION and REAPPOINTMENT (as revised
from time to time).
(2)
Principles of Operation
all candidates have the right to receive notices of all meetings which they should attend or
have the right to attend.
all candidates have the right to see and/or hear all evidence presented in their case. To this
end, if any person wishes to make a presentation to any committee (formally known as a
hearing), the candidate shall have the right to be present (Clause 36.03).
all candidates have the right to confront and challenge negative witnesses or evidence.
all anonymous evidence is excluded (e.g. student evaluations as per Clauses 18.08 and
18.09).
all candidates have the right to be assisted by a person of their choice.
all candidates have the right to be given detailed reasons for a committees decision, if the
decision is to not recommend tenure or promotion.
(3)
Timing
The timing for applications for tenure and/or promotion is specified in Clauses 16.10 and 16.11.
Because the date of submission by the candidates for both tenure (Clause 15.19(a)) and promotion
(Clause 16.01) is September 15, and because the same information is normally used in both tenure
and promotion considerations by both the Departmental and Faculty Committees, the deadlines for
recommendations will be the same for both tenure and promotion; i.e., the Departmental Committee
recommendations must be made by November 15, the Faculty Committee recommendation must be
made by December 15, and the Deans recommendation must be made by January 15. These
deadlines have been set to ensure that the Collective Agreement deadlines can be met (see Clauses
15.12, 15.24(b), 16.01, 16.02, 16.03).
If there are difficulties in meeting these earlier deadlines so that the Collective Agreement deadlines
might not be met, the Dean should be immediately advised, as an extension of the Collective
Agreement deadlines may have to be requested under Clause 15.34. A request for extension is made
by the Vice-President Academic and Provost to the Association-Board Committee.
(4)
Members from Assistant Professor Rank Eligible for Tenure
Faculty members at the rank of Assistant Professor who are being considered for tenure may also
request to be considered for promotion to the rank of Associate Professor at the same time.
(5)
that pattern; and (C) teaching awards or recognitions given by a faculty or university or
national or international organizations. A balance of strong performance in some of these
aspects against relatively weaker performance in others may be considered.
(iii) The candidate has produced since his/her first professorial appointment scholarly or
professional works which are deemed of good quality or have had demonstrable impact in a
particular field or discipline and have been recognized both internally and externally. The
following aspects will be considered in assessing a candidates scholarly performance: (A)
knowledge dissemination in the public domain, such as books, presentations and publications
in recognized conferences and reputable peer-reviewed journals; (B) potential for establishing
independent research programs, as evidenced by graduate students supervised and completed,
research funding secured, collaboration with others, publications made independently or in
leading roles, and patents granted; (C) recognized contributions to a high-impact engineering
project, design or technology development; and (D) awards for scholarly works. A balance of
strong performance in some of these aspects against relatively weaker performance in others
may be considered.
(iv) The candidate has been involved in either academic service or administrative activities. Any
involvement at a Departmental, Faculty or University level, or outside communities or
professional organizations may be considered.
(5b) Criteria and Standards for Promotion to the Rank of Associate Professor
The criteria are given in general in Clause 16.06(a): Except for instructor Members, the criteria for
promotion of Members of the teaching and research staff shall be the same as those for tenure.
Promotion is based upon positive evidence of actual achievement and accomplishment in those
duties and responsibilities, which in accordance with Clause 20.04 constitute the individual
Members workload and not on years of service. In other words, criteria and standards for the
promotion to the rank of Associate Professor are the same as those for tenure, except with the
emphasis on positive evidence of actual achievement and accomplishment.
(5c) Criteria and Standards for Promotion to the Rank of Professor
Clause 16.11 states: Subject to Clause 16.06(a), promotion to the rank of Professor shall be
recommended only when solid evidence is established that the Member has attained standards of
competence in both teaching and scholarship appropriate to a new full Professor and that the
Member has attained and is likely to maintain a high level of effectiveness in teaching and/or
scholarship and that his or her teaching or scholarship represents a significant contribution to
his/her discipline or to the University.
The Faculty may establish more specific criteria and standards (Clauses 16.06(b) and 16.06(c)). For
the Faculty of Engineering, for promotion to the rank of Professor, these are:
(i)
The candidate holds a doctoral degree or equivalent. By equivalent it is meant that the
candidate has produced written works or engaged in other confirmed professional activities
that have contributed in a substantial manner to the advancement of knowledge or practice in
L31
the candidates discipline. In the recognition of the equivalent of a doctorate, the positive
written opinions of three external referees who hold doctoral degrees should be obtained.
(ii) The candidate has demonstrated, since appointment or promotion to the rank of Associate
Professor, a teaching performance as described in (5a)(ii) above.
(iii) The candidate has produced, since appointment or promotion to the rank of Associate
Professor, scholarly or professional works which are deemed to have a significant and valuable
impact in a particular field or discipline, and that has been recognized both internally and
externally. This recognition must be confirmed by a majority of the external referees. The
following aspects will be considered in assessing a candidates performance in the continuous
and significant expansion of knowledge or technological developments: (A) knowledge
dissemination in the public domain, such as books, publications in reputable peer-reviewed
journals, and presentations at recognized conferences; (B) establishment of independent
research programs, as evidenced by Masters students, doctoral students and postdoctoral
fellows supervised and completed, research funding secured, collaboration with others,
publications made independently, patents granted and research facilities developed; (C)
recognized significant contributions or leadership to a high-impact engineering project, design
or technology development; and (D) major awards or honors for scholarly works, such as
involvements in learned societies or professional organizations, presentations at major
conferences or platforms. A balance of outstanding performance in some of these aspects
against relatively weaker performance in others may be considered.
(iv) The candidate has made recognized contributions to the administration and development of
his/her Department, Faculty or University, based upon evaluations by peers, senior Faculty
members and administrative personnel. Any significant and major involvement or role in
outside communities or professional organizations may also be considered; for example, a long
service or administration record and a significant contribution in establishing a high-impact
university program.
(6)
Information
(6a) At the beginning of the tenure and/or promotion application process, the candidate shall
submit the following documents:
(i)
(ii)
A letter of application highlighting how the candidate believes he/she has met the
criteria and standards.
Five copies of a complete Curriculum Vitae including all information that he/she feels is
relevant (Clauses 15.19(a) and 16.01) and bears directly on the established criteria (four
of these copies are for the external referees). The Curriculum Vitae should include the
candidates educational background, papers published and presented, patents applied for
and awarded, training of highly qualified personnel, students graduated, funding
secured, interaction with industry and government, evidence of recognition of his/her
work (awards etc.), professional activities, and administrative responsibilities or services
to communities.
L32
(iii)
(iv)
(v)
One set of a teaching dossier or information that demonstrates the candidates teaching
ability. All courses taught by the candidate in each year of the candidacy period, along
with course syllabus, number of registered students, average grades the students
received for each course, number of student failures, and an evaluation summary report
for each course should be provided. For each course, sample comments by three students
who gave high appraisal and sample comments by three students who were critical
should also be provided if available.
NSERC Form 100 or written explanations of a maximum of the five most significant
pieces of scholarly or research work produced by the candidate.
Any other evidence showing the impact of the candidates teaching, research or service
activities; for example, the significance of research or design activities or leadership in a
particular field as recognized by others, or economic activities as the result of a
discovery or patent.
(6b) The candidate may submit any additional information in writing at any time during the
process. However, the information will be considered only by those Committees and/or persons
who have not already submitted their recommendations.
(6c) The candidate may also make a verbal presentation to any Committee or person, for the
purpose of adding insight and information not already in the file. Such presentations shall be noted
in the report submitted by the Committee.
(6d) The Committees have the right to seek additional information on the candidate. They do not,
however, have the right to seek verbal input, unless the candidate is present to hear it (Clause
36.03).
(6e) The candidate shall submit names of up to four potential referees. For tenure and/or
promotion to the rank of Associate Professor, all referees shall have (or have had) a full-time
Associate or Full Professorial appointment at an academic institution. For promotion to the rank of
Professor, all the referees shall have (or have had) a full-time Full Professorial appointment at an
academic institution. These referees must be at arms length, following the most current NSERC
guidelines, reproduced here:
A Referee must not:
(i) be from the same university as the applicant;
(ii) have been a research supervisor or graduate student of the applicant within the past six
years;
(iii) have collaborated with the applicant within the past six years or have plans to collaborate
in the immediate future;
(iv) be an employee of an non-academic organization with which the applicant has had
collaboration within the past six years;
(v) be in any potential conflict of interest (e.g. personal, financial).
L33
The candidate should not contact any potential referees prior to and during his/her tenure and
promotion process for his/her case.
Relevant sections of the Collective Agreement concerning referees are Clauses 15.19(b), 16.10,
16.11 and 18.12.
(6f)
For the benefit of prospective applicants, aggregated data will be kept, in statistical form, for
the previous four years' successful candidates in the Faculty. These data will be available to
candidates, enabling them to rate their own chances of success. To capture any changes of standards
over time, the approach of four-year moving averages is chosen. Aggregating data over all
successful candidates in the Faculty for four years is intended to preserve the anonymity of
individual candidates
(7)
Process
The full process is provided for in the Collective Agreement (Articles 15 and 16). The following
points have been extracted and interpreted to clarify the process for simplicity. Candidates,
committees and other persons involved in making recommendations are encouraged to read the full
text of the Collective Agreement.
(7a)
(7b)
(7c)
(7d)
The Dean shall advise all members who are eligible for promotion by August 15 of the year
specified in Clauses 16.10 and 16.11.
The candidate shall submit to the Dean by September 15, in the year specified in Clauses
15.19(a), 16.01, 16.10 and 16.11, his/her letter of application with supporting information
and documents (see above), as well as the names of at least four potential referees who
currently have an arms length relationship to the candidate.
The Dean shall request the Department Head to consult formally, at a meeting convened for
that purpose, with all the members of the candidates Department, excluding those under
consideration for tenure and/or promotion. The purpose of the meeting is to establish the
Departmental Committee that shall select two names from the list of referees supplied by the
candidate and also draw up a list of at least two other names. These two or more other
referees should not be from the list supplied by the candidate and should have at least one
from the list suggested by the Dean. The candidate has the right to refuse any potential
referee with written justification. The Chair of the Departmental Committee will contact
four referees, advising them of the policy of openness and noting their right to withhold
their name from the candidate.
After all the referee reports have been received, the Departmental Tenure and Promotions
Committee will deliberate. The candidate has the right to make a presentation to the
Committee. If other Faculty members wish to make a presentation to the Committee, the
candidate shall have the right to be present (Clause 36.03). (Written assessments of a
member by other Faculty members shall be in accordance with Clause 18.12(d).) The
L34
(7e)
(7f)
(7g)
Departmental Committee shall then make its report and send it to the candidate and to the
Department Head, who will then make his/her independent report. In the case of promotion,
the report should delineate specifically reference to how the Member stands with respect
of the criteria for promotion (Clause 16.04(a); i.e. meeting the same standard as required
of the President) and with sufficient particularity to assist the Member to understand the
decision... (Clause 16.04(a)). A copy of the Department Heads report should also be sent
to the Departmental Committee. The two reports, from the Departmental Committee and
from the Department Head, will then be sent to the Dean, with a copy to the candidate. A
copy of each of the two reports will be included with the candidates application and
materials, which will then be sent to the Faculty Tenure and Promotions Committee. The
Departmental Committee and the Department Head are required to carefully maintain the
file and to update a file inventory sheet, which describes the content of the file of
information submitted by the candidate, along with any additions to or deletions from the
file.
When the Faculty Tenure and Promotions Committee receives the information, the files will
be examined individually before the Committee meets as a whole to discuss the case and
deliberate. Again, the candidate has the right to make a presentation to the Committee as a
whole. If other Faculty members wish to make a presentation to the Committee, the
candidate shall have the right to be present (Clause 36.03). (Written assessments of a
candidate by other Faculty members shall be in accordance with Clause 18.12(d).) Care will
be exercised to give particular reasons for the decisions for promotion; and to maintain the
file and update the file inventory sheet. The Faculty Tenure and Promotions Committee will
forward its recommendations to the Dean, with copies to the candidate, the Departmental
Committee and the Department Head.
The Dean shall make his/her own recommendation and forward it to the President or
Vice-President Academic and Provost, with copies to the candidate, the Departmental
Committee, the Department Head and the Faculty Tenure and Promotions Committee.
Appeals are permitted as per the Collective Agreement, Clauses 15.27-30 and 16.13-17.
COMPOSITION
Membership
All members of a Department who are not going to be considered for tenure and/or promotion in
the current year shall be consulted formally at a meeting for all the tenure and/or promotion
applications. These members are eligible to be members of the Departmental Tenure and
Promotions Committee, which must have at least three members. In order that the sentiments of
untenured Faculty members be expressed, an untenured Faculty member must be on the Committee.
L35
TERMS OF REFERENCE
(1)
to follow the principles of operation set out in the Collective Agreement and the Faculty of
Engineering Guidelines for Tenure and Promotions;
to select external referees appropriate for each candidate and to confer with the candidate to
determine which referees are acceptable;
to contact acceptable referees and to provide them with the appropriate documentation;
to evaluate the candidates performance, based on the documents provided by the candidate
and other written or confirmed evidence;
to listen to presentations by the candidate or other Faculty members on the candidates own
application. If evidence is presented to the Committee by another Faculty member, the
candidate shall have the right to be present (Clause 36.03);
to forward its recommendation to the Department Head, with a copy to the candidate;
to maintain the candidates file and update the file inventory sheet.
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
L36
COMPOSITION
Membership
All members of the Faculty of Engineering who are not going to be considered for tenure or
promotion in the current year and who hold a tenured appointment as Associate Professor or
Professor are eligible to be members of the Faculty Tenure and Promotions Committee, which must
have at least five members. The Faculty has the responsibility to elect the five members of the
Faculty of Engineering Tenure and Promotion Committee, with a majority of them being in the rank
of Professor, and with no more than one member from any particular Department.
The Committee will be limited to those members who are present at the first and every meeting
where candidates are interviewed. If there is a resignation from the Committee after it has begun to
interview candidates, the resulting vacancy shall remain unfilled, as long as a quorum of two-thirds
of the members of the initial committee still remains (See Clause 15.26 concerning tenure decisions
and Clauses 16.01 and 16.02 concerning promotion decisions). The Committee should therefore
ensure, as far as possible, the availability of its members before the process begins.
Exclusions
As stated above, no Faculty member who is to be considered for tenure and/or promotion in the
current year may sit on the Committee. Also excluded are any Faculty members who will
participate in any other forum to give their opinion on the candidate - e.g., the Department Head or
any member of the Departmental Tenure and Promotions Committee.
Chair
The Committee elects its own Chairperson for an indefinite period until the Chair steps down from
the position, or the Committee completes its process.
B.
TERMS OF REFERENCE
(1)
to follow the principles of operation set out in the Collective Agreement and the Faculty of
Engineering Guidelines for Tenure and Promotions;
to evaluate the candidates performance, based on documentation provided by the candidate
and other written or confirmed evidence;
to listen to presentations by the candidate or other Faculty members on the candidates own
application. If evidence is presented to the Committee by another Faculty member, the
candidate shall have the right to be present (Clause 36.03);
(2)
(3)
L37
(4)
(5)
to forward its recommendation to the Dean, with copies to the candidate, to the
Departmental Committee and to the Department Head;
to maintain the candidates file and update the file inventory sheet.
L39
DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY
FACULTY OF ENGINEERING
APPENDIX L7:
______________________________________________________________________________
A.
COMPOSITION
The Engineering Research Centres Directors Committee is composed of the Directors of the
following research centres:
(1).
(2).
(3).
(4).
(5).
(6).
(7).
The Directors of the research centres elect a Chairperson for a term of 3 years and report to the
Dean of Engineering. The directors normally meet at least twice per year to discuss current issues
affecting all or some of the centres. The structure and function of each centre has developed in
response to the circumstances of its origin and the needs of the constituency which it serves. The
common elements shared by all of the centres include:
(1)
all centres currently in existence were established by the TUNS Board of Governors
(2)
all centres report to the Dean of Engineering and receive support services from the
Engineering Research Office and Associate Dean, Graduate Studies and Research
(3)
all centres have financial accountability and operate on a cost-recovery basis
(4)
all centres receive research accounting and financial services provided by a Faculty of
Engineering Research Centres Administrator
(5)
all centres share an entrepreneurial approach to identification and development of
opportunities to apply technical solutions to problems of concern to the industries with
which each identify
(6)
although all centres contribute to the academic activities of the Faculty, none have any
direct academic mandate or responsibility
(7)
all centres have established and rely upon Industry Advisory Boards for guidance and
advice
L40
The duties and responsibilities of the Faculty of Engineering Research Directors Committee is
summarized as follows:
(1) to advise the Dean of Engineering on problems or issues facing the research Centres
and to assist the Faculty in pursuing emerging new technologies related to research
in the Centres
(2) to work together with the Dean, Associate Dean, Graduate Studies and Research and
the Faculty Research Office to solve common problems facing or involving the
Centres
(3) to provide Nova Scotia and Canada with specialized technical R & D capabilities
(4) (to provide a forum for planning and collaboration in multi-disciplinary research
(5) to advocate and provide mentoring for graduate students in the Faculty of
Engineering
(6) wherever possible, to coordinate the marketing of the research services provided by
the Centres
L41
DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY
FACULTY OF ENGINEERING
APPENDIX L8:
L42
DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY
FACULTY OF ENGINEERING
APPENDIX 9:
A.
COMPOSITION
The committee shall consist of one member from each academic program and is chaired by the
Associate Dean (Undergraduate and Associated Universities). For the awarding of scholarships for
which students from the Faculties of Architecture and Computer Science are also eligible to apply,
the Committee is augmented by one representative from each Faculty. Members of the Committee
are appointed by the Department Heads. For the awarding of the Nova Scotia Women in
Engineering Scholarship, the Committee is augmented by a member of the public.
B.
TERMS OF REFERENCE
The Scholarships and Awards Committee is responsible for recommending terms of reference for
new scholarships, shall review the scholarship applications, and make the awards based on the
specific criteria for each award.
L43
DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY
FACULTY OF ENGINEERING
APPENDIX 10: CO-OPERATIVE EDUCATION COMMITTEE
A.
COMPOSITION
The committee shall consist of one representative (faculty) from each accredited undergraduate
program, two representatives (staff) from the Technical Co-Operative Education Office (designated
by the Director of the Technical Co-Operative Education Office), two representatives (student)
from the undergraduate student community in the Faculty of Engineering (designated by the
Engineering Undergraduate Society), one representative (professional engineer) from the profession
of engineering (designated by the Association of Professional Engineers of Nova Scotia), preferably
a Co-Op employer external to the university and the Associate Dean of Engineering, Undergraduate
and Associated Universities (ex officio).
Other Co-Op advisors may participate as non-voting members (designated by the Department Head
responsible for that program; preferably the representative will be the Co-Op Faculty Advisor for
the program, where applicable).
B.
TERMS OF REFERENCE
The Committee will elect its own Chair and Vice Chair. The length of office for the Chair and Vice
Chair is two (2) years. One member of the Co-Op office will be the secretary. The quorum is 50%
plus one of all voting members, including at least one Co-Op Office representative.
The linkage between the Undergraduate Studies Committee and the Co-Op Committee is seen as
being very important. The respective Chairs will maintain close contact by exchange of minutes,
highlighting relevant issues that each sees to be important.
The Co-op Education committee is responsible to advise the Faculty of Engineering on academic
matters, requirements and regulations pertaining to co-operative education programs; advise the
Faculty of Engineering on the formulation, implementation and operation of co-operative education
programs; advise the Faculty of Engineering and the Technical Co-operative Education Office on
matters related to the placement of students in co-op work terms; assist the Technical Co-operative
Education Office in the design and implementation of programs aimed at the professional
development of co-operative education students; interact with the engineering profession in matters
pertaining to the relationship between co-operative education and fulfillment of the engineering
experience requirements for professional registration.
L44
DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY
FACULTY OF ENGINEERING
APPENDIX L11:
Dean of Engineering
Dr. E. El-Masry (Chair)
Dr. E. Gunn
Faculty Chairman
Faculty Recording Secretary
Associate and Assistant Deans (as required)
Co-op Committee
L45
Meeting Chairman
Recording Secretary
L46
Recruitment Committee
L47
Associated Universities'
Directors of Engineering Committee
L48
FACULTY REPRESENTATIVES
ASEE Representative
Senate
Dr. D. Chen
L49
DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY
FACULTY OF ENGINEERING
APPENDIX L12:
A. COMPOSITION
(1).
(2).
(3).
(4).
All faculty members of the Faculty of Engineering with an active commitment to education
and research relating to the particular Programme shall be eligible for membership in the
Programme Academic Committee of that Programme.
Members shall be appointed to the Programme Academic Committee by the Associate Dean
of Engineering, Graduate Studies and Research, in consultation with the Programme
Academic Committee.
The Director of the Programme, the Dean of Engineering, and the Associate Dean for
Graduate Studies and Research shall be ex-officio members of the Programme Academic
Committee.
The Programme Academic Committee shall be chaired by the Director of the Programme.
B. TERMS OF REFERENCE
(1).
(2).
(3).
DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY
FACULTY OF ENGINEERING
APPENDIX M: EMERITUS FACULTY
The procedure for the Appointment of Emeritus faculty is described in the Senate Policy on
Academic Titles as approved by the Senate of Dalhousie University on February 24, 1997 and by
the Board of Governors on April 15, 1997.
L51
DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY
FACULTY OF ENGINEERING
APPENDIX N: ADJUNCT FACULTY
The procedure for the Appointment, Review and Reappointment of Adjunct faculty of Engineering
has been developed by the Faculty of Engineering and involves the nomination of qualified
individuals by the Department concerned to the Administrative Heads Committee, which decides
on the appointment. If the adjunct appointee is to perform duties related to graduate studies the
Dean of Engineering submits the file to the Faculty of Graduate Studies for approval.
L52
DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY
FACULTY OF ENGINEERING
APPENDIX O:
Introduction
The Senate APC document of 23 May 1985 sets the main objectives of the unit review mechanism
as the improvement of the quality of the University's academic offerings and the provision of
information for academic planning and subsequent budgetary activities. The success of a review
process depends on the departments assessing for themselves their own strengths and weaknesses
and the departments and review committees seeking to work closely together in order to initiate a
fruitful exchange of information and ideas. Reviews should provide a comprehensive appraisal of
all aspects of a department's activities.
The Faculty of Graduate Studies according to its own review process reviews graduate
programmes. The reviews in the Faculty of Engineering have been integrated into this process.
From financial perspective, the link between graduate and undergraduate programmes is close. The
joint nature of the process is reflected in the requirement, set out below, that Graduate Studies
appoint two of the members of the review committee.
Review Procedures
1. Overseeing the Reviews
An Associate/Assistant Dean shall serve as non-voting resource member to each review committee
and in this capacity can aid the development of procedures, and assist the Dean and Faculty to
assess the review process.
2. Review Committees
(a)
Composition
The Committee shall consist of seven members, as follows: one undergraduate student selected by
their society, one graduate student selected by their society, an Associate/Assistant Dean as nonvoting resource member, and four faculty members. After appointment, members of Unit Review
Committees no longer represent any particular constituency, but are bound to apply their own
independent judgment to the task at hand.
L53
(b)
Selection
Two of the four faculty members shall be nominated by the Steering Committee of the Faculty of
Engineering and selected from a list of at least eight names submitted by the Department under
review. The remaining two members will be nominated by Faculty Council of Graduate studies and
selected from the same list. In the case where there is no graduate programme in the Department
under review, all four faculty members shall be nominated by the Steering Committee of the
Faculty of Engineering. Their respective Engineering Societies shall nominate the student members.
The undergraduate nominee should have successfully completed five full credits beyond the second
year in a programme in the Faculty and should not be currently registered in a programme in the
Department under review. The nominees must be ratified by Faculty.
The Committee, selected as indicated above, must be agreeable to the Faculty of Engineering.
For obvious reasons, the following criteria ought to govern the selection of faculty nominees:
(i) they shall not be members of the unit under review; (ii) they shall be tenured members of
Faculty; and (iii) one nominee from another Faculty or appropriate institution may be selected.
3. External Reviewers
There shall normally be two external reviewers for each unit under review.
(a) Selection The Review Committee will solicit names of potential external reviewers put forward
by the unit under review. Names from Industry shall also be included. It will select the name(s)
from these lists and the final choice requires the agreement of the unit under review, the Dean and,
where appropriate, the Dean of Graduate Studies. The invitation letters to conduct the review shall
come from the Dean or Deans as appropriate.
(b) The external reviewer(s) is/are meant to provide a broad and objective evaluation, including an
assessment of the relationship of the Dalhousie Unit with those elsewhere. At the same time, he or
she is/are required to work with the Committee in order that a final report of considerable authority
be produced. Any external reviewer, or any Committee member, is free to write a dissenting
opinion.
(c) The report(s) of the external reviewer(s) shall be forwarded to the Committee as
soon as each reaches the Dean's Office. A copy of each report shall be sent to the
Dean of Engineering and, where the unit has a graduate programme, to the Dean of Graduate
Studies.
The Review Committees shall inform both faculty (including those on sabbatical or other leave) and
students of the unit under review that members of the Committee are willing to meet with them,
individually or in groups, will arrange for such meetings and are also willing to receive written or
oral input;
The Review Committees shall produce a report within six months of commencement of the review'
The Review Committees shall submit their report(s), the report(s) of the external reviewers and any
attached documents (see 5 below) to the chair of the Unit under review on a confidential basis. The
chair shall first consult, in confidence, with all those in the unit whose work is the subject of
comment in the report. The chair shall then report within three weeks to the Committee on any
errors detected in the reports and any portion of the reports, which may be unwittingly harmful to
the department, or members of the department
In the light of the report of the chair, the Committee may modify its report and shall then submit the
Committee report(s), the external reviewer(s) report(s) and any supporting documents to the Dean,
to Faculty and to the Faculty for information and discussion. For units with a graduate programme,
copies of all the submissions to Faculty shall, at the same time, be sent to the Dean of Graduate
Studies.
Specific recommendations arising out of the reports and needing Faculty action, can be approved at
any time once the report has been presented to Faculty. At least six months after, and no more than
ten months after the report has been submitted to Faculty, the unit under review must report to
Faculty what actions it has taken concerning the reviews and concerning each recommendation in
the reviews.
5. Obligations of Units Under Review
In the first instance any unit under review shall examine and prepare an assessment of its own
activities. This assessment shall be submitted to the Unit Review Committee. It should take into
account, but not be restricted to, such matters as staffing, curriculum, research, library and other
facilities and proposed developments. Review Committees may request additional information and
will have made them selves available to meet with staff and students. Units are expected to
cooperate fully with the Committees, especially on organizational and information matters.
6. Cycle of Review
The Science reviews, combined with Graduate Studies' reviews, shall run on an approximately
seven year cycle with one, or occasionally two, departments in the Faculty of Engineering being
reviewed each year.
L55
DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY
FACULTY OF ENGINEERING
APPENDIX P:
(A)
The general objectives of the Facultys review process of the centres/institutes are:
(i)
(ii)
The principal focus of the review of a centre/institute is the role and the functioning of the
centres and institutes. The review of a centre/institute should consider and where
appropriate make explicit recommendations to the Faculty on the following matters:
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
(B)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
Canada and the world. The potential contribution of the centre/institute within this
public policy and private sector environment and means of increasing this
contribution are also reviewed.
The current state and potential future development of continuing education;
relations with the Dalhousie College of Continuing Education.
The quality of research activities within the centre/institute and, if appropriate, the
means of achieving improvements.
The involvement of the centre/institute in interprofessional and interdisciplinary
collaboration in service, teaching, learning, and research activities.
Issues and strategies related to the maintenance and enhancement of student
projects, co-op placements, and similar field work experience.
The quality and cost of service both provided to the centre/institute from other
units in the Faculty of Engineering and provided by the centre to other units.
The application of the Universitys equity policies within the centre/institute.
Physical facilities (adequacy, suitability, anticipated needs) of the centre/institute.
The implications of labour market conditions affecting clients of the
centre/institute, and current or anticipated government policy for the size of
activities in the various programs of the centre/institute.
Current and prospective finances of the centre/institute including benefits to other
Faculty of Engineering units or Dalhousie at large;
Future plans (objectives for the next five years) of the centre/institute.
Any other issues which arise during the deliberations of the Review Committee.
Procedure
The Dean shall request from each Director of a centre/institute a name for
potential Chair(s) of the Review Committee(s) for the centres/institutes. For cost
effective reasons the Dean will decide which centres/institutes should be reviewed
by a particular review committee.
After appropriate consultation with the Directors of the centres/institutes the Dean
shall select the Chair(s) for the Review Committee(s) for the centres/institutes.
The Dean of Engineering and the Chair of the Review Committee for the
centres/institutes will approve the names of the prospective committee members.
Normally each committee shall comprise three members plus the Chair, none of
which shall have a principal appointment in the Centre under review.
Each Review Committee shall consult with the Dean (or Deans in the case of
reviews of inter-Faculty centres/institutes), the President, the Vice-President
(Academic & Research) and the Vice-President of Research to identify any
specific issues which should be addressed in the review.
The Review Committee shall select one external reviewer from outside the
University with the agreement of the Director of the Centre (or Directors if
L57
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
appropriate). If the Review Committee and the Director(s) are unable to reach an
agreement on the selection of external reviewers, the Dean shall select reviewers
from lists of names proposed separately by the Review Committee and by the
Director.
The Committee shall request and receive from the centre or institute, the
following information:
(a.)
A self-study report which includes a new or revised plan;
(b.)
Responses on specific issues identified above and
(c.)
Identification of and commentary on issues about which
centre/institute would welcome the advice of the Committee or the
external reviewer, or both.
The external reviewer shall review his/her Terms of Reference and the material
prepared by the centre/institute. The external reviewer shall then visit the campus
and interview appropriate individuals and groups, and shall independently prepare
and submit to the Review Committee reports containing commentary and explicit
recommendations. In those reports reviewers are asked to avoid references to
identifiable individuals. The reports shall be submitted within six weeks of the
site visit. External reviewers shall be paid an honorarium of $500 from the budget
of the Deans Office and be reimbursed for reasonable travel expenses.
In addition to the information provided by the centre/institute the Review
Committee is free to collect other pertinent information, including written and oral
input from individuals and groups within and outside the University. The Review
Committee must contact all Faculty members in the centre/institute (individually
by letter) to indicate its existence and purpose and its willingness to meet with
members ( and receive written submissions, at the option of the member). The
Review Committee shall also normally meet with the Director, staff, students
(graduate and undergraduate), the President, Vice Presidents and representatives
of external constituencies. It shall widely advertise its existence and its
receptiveness to submissions from concerned individuals and groups.
For the review to succeed and gain full cooperation from the participants, it should
be seen to be conducted fairly. Therefore, the Review Committee should
communicate as openly and regularly as possible with the centre/institute
throughout the process, and shall treat all submissions as confidential. For
confidentiality reasons, the names of a specific client of centres and institutes in
the Faculty of Engineering may be withheld from the Review Committee and the
external Reviewer. In that case the name of the client shall be replaced by the
expression Name withheld, client # . The nature of some activities of the
centres and institutes may, at the discretion of the Director, also be withheld from
the Review Committee and the external Reviewer and be replaced by the
expression Name of activity withheld, project # . In both cases the validity of
the financial transactions shall be verified in in-camera sessions that the Review
Committee and the external reviewer have with the Faculty of Engineering
Administrator.
L58
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
The Review Committee shall prepare a confidential draft report based on the
information available to it. This draft report should address all matters identified
in these Terms of Reference and shall contain explicitly-identified
recommendations to the Faculty. Before finalizing its recommendations, the
review committee shall discuss with other relevant units at Dalhousie their
potential impact that implementation of the recommendations might have on those
units.
The Review Committee shall transmit its draft report, along with the external
reviewers to the Director who shall respond within two weeks with corrections to
errors of fact, and any concerns regarding personal references.
The Review Committee shall revise the draft report as appropriate to produce the
final report, and shall black out any personal references contained in any external
reviewers reports. It shall submit this final report along with the external
reviewers report, amended necessary, to the Dean.
The final composite report (including external reviewers reports) will be copied
to the Director or Directors as appropriate who shall make it available to all
members of the Centre or Institute, and shall arrange for the units response to be
submitted to the Dean as soon as possible. The Director (or Directors) and
members of the Review Committee will be invited to meet with the Dean when
the report is to be discussed. The Dean will discuss the report, paying particular
attention to any Faculty wide implications of the report. The Dean will forward to
Faculty any recommendations resulting from the discussion of the report which
require action by Faculty Council. A copy of the final report will also be sent to
the external reviewer.
Members of the Faculty Council will be informed that the report is complete and
that it is available for reading in the Deans Office. Any recommendations by
Faculty Council coming from the report or related to it, will be discussed and
voted on by the Faculty Council. The Dean of Engineering will inform the Senate
as to the status of the recommendations contained in the Review Committees
report from or related to that report that were adopted by the Faculty Council.
L59
DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY
FACULTY OF ENGINEERING
APPENDIX R:
The conditions of appointment and terms of reference for all Post Doctoral Fellows, Research
Associates and Visiting Scholars in the Faculty of Engineering including those who do not receive
funding from or through the University (for the sake of brevity, collectively referred to as
VISITOR in the rest of this document) shall be according to the current policies and procedures
in effect at Dalhousie University with the additional requirements noted herein.
The current policies and procedures in effect at Dalhousie University are stated in the Dalhousie
University document Policies and Procedures for Administration of Postdoctoral Fellows, at the
Research Office - http://www.dal.ca/~research/PDFJune24,2003.pdf. Faculty Members who are
planning to hire or host a VISITOR must familiarize themselves with this document and must
follow the policies and procedures described therein.
In addition to the policies and procedures stated in the current Policies and Procedures for
Administration of Postdoctoral Fellows document, the Faculty of Engineering requires that:
-
Details of the proposed VISITOR appointment, including duration, salary, funding source,
research focus, and duties, along with a copy of the curriculum vitae, should be provided to
the Faculty Administratorss Office, with the approval of the Department Head.
The Faculty Administrators Office will confirm through the Office of Graduate Studies and
Research, Faculty of Engineering, that the research account(s) have sufficient funds, or
satisfactory confirmation of funding, to cover the salary commitment and associated
expenses for the duration of the VISITORs term of appointment.
A draft letter of invitation will be prepared for the Faculty Members signature and
submitted for the Deans Approval. Copies must be sent to the Dean, Department Head, and
Faculty Administrator. Because the letter is sent under the signature of the faculty member,
the member bears full financial responsibility of the VISITOR.
L60
DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY
FACULTY OF ENGINEERING
APPENDIX S:
L61