Kesten CH 8 10.21
Kesten CH 8 10.21
Kesten CH 8 10.21
Rotational
Motion
Revisited
Rotational Quantities
Falling cats usually land on their feet. The physics behind this graceful motion
is a complex dance of rotations. By bending in the middle, the cat can rotate
her front and hindquarters separately. Extending her front legs and tucking
in her rear legs allows her back legs to turn more rapidly. Later in the fall, she
extends her back legs, which slows down their rotation and leaves them in
the landing position as her front legs come vertical. Each of these motions
can be described by the rotational quantities uncovered in this chapter.
275
KESTEN-08_275-332hr.indd 275
10/21/11 11:32 AM
mi
riq
ri
The position of each small element of the blade is changing versus time, so each
has a defined velocity and therefore kinetic energy. The ith element, shown in the
figure, moves a distance ri q in time Dt, so its speed is
ri q
(8-1)
t
(The relationship between the distance along the arc of a circle its radius, and the
angular extent of the arc is presented in Figure 3-32.) The kinetic energy of this
element is
vi =
Ki =
ri q 2
1
1
mi v 2i = mi a
b
2
2
t
1
q 2
mi r 2i a
b
2
t
(8-2)
Notice that the term in parentheses in the last step doesnt depend on which element of the blade we selected, because both the angle through which the blade
rotates and the time it takes are the same for all parts of the blade. For a rigid
object, this angular velocity serves as a convenient way to characterize the rotation
in a way that is independent of size or shape. The Greek letter omega (v) is the
conventional symbol for angular velocity:
q
v=
(8-3)
t
KESTEN-08_275-332hr.indd 276
The units of angular velocity are radians per second (rad>s). As a reminder, radians
are a unit of angle; there are 2p radians in a circle. By convention, v is positive
when q is counterclockwise and negative when q is clockwise.
At any instant, the rate at which the rotation angle changes is the same across
all pieces of a rigid object, so angular velocity v is also the same. This does not
mean, however, that v is constant over time, but rather, unlike (linear) velocity,
angular velocity does not vary across a rotating, rigid object. If the rotation rate
varies with time, then Equation 8-3 defines the average angular velocity. We define
the angular velocity at any instant, instantaneous angular velocity, by letting the
time interval Dt be infinitesimally small:
v = lim
S
t
q dq
=
t
dt
(8-4)
10/21/11 11:32 AM
See Mathbox 8-1.
1
1 m r 2 2v2
2 a i i
(8-6)
So for K =
of the sum:
1
2 2
a 2 mi r i v ,
n=3
n=3
1
2
or
K=
KESTEN-08_275-332hr.indd 277
1 2
v
m r2
2 a i i
1
a m r 2 b v2
2 a i i
10/21/11 11:32 AM
We choose to write the v2 term after the sum only to make this expression have the
same form as the expression for linear kinetic energy
K=
1
something 1rate2 2.
2
I = a mi r 2i
(8-7)
Equation 8-7 requires that the separate elements of mass mi and distance ri from
the rotation axis be small. Moment of inertia is the topic of the next section. The SI
units of I are kilogram-square meters (kg m2).
We will call the kinetic energy of a rigid object rotating around a fixed axis
rotational kinetic energy to differentiate it from the translational (or linear) kinetic
energy K translational = 12 mv 2. By substituting our definition of moment of inertia
(Equation 8-7) into Equation 8-6, we define rotational kinetic energy as
K rotational =
1 2
Iv
2
(8-8)
KESTEN-08_275-332hr.indd 278
10/21/11 11:32 AM
When both rotate at the same angular velocity, the ring has greater rotational kinetic energy.
More of its mass is farther from the rotation axis, resulting in a larger moment of inertia
around that axis.
Figure 8-3 The two wheels have the same mass and size, but one is a uniform disk
and the other is a ring with none of its mass in the center. When the wheels slide
with the same velocity, without rotating, they have the same kinetic energy. When
they rotate at the same angular velocity, the uniform disk has less rotational
kinetic energy and a smaller moment of inertia because more of its mass is closer
to the rotation axis.
The more mass there is farther from the rotation axis, the larger the moment of inertia,
and the larger the rotational kinetic energy for any given angular velocity.
Tie a cell phone to the end of a very light thread. Holding on to the other end
of the thread, would you be able to swing the cell phone around in a horizontal
circle? (Careful, the answer might not be what you expect!)
KESTEN-08_275-332hr.indd 279
10/21/11 11:32 AM
The physics which underlies the flight characteristics of birds and flying insects
is complicated. Their maneuverability has as much to do with the contributions their wings make to the moments of inertia around their roll, pitch, and
yaw axes (Figure 8-5) as with the aerodynamic characteristics of the wings.
A birds wings can be as much as 15% of the total body mass, while an insects
wings are typically considerably less. In general, would you expect a flying
insect or a bird to be able to maneuver more quickly in flight?
Pitch
Yaw
x
Roll
Figure 8-5 Flying objects such as insects, birds, and planes can rotate around the
x, y, and z axes. A rotation around the x axis is called a roll, a rotation around
the y axis is called a pitch, and a rotation around the z axis is called a yaw.
(Dudley, R. (2002). Mechanisms and Implications of Animal Flight
Maneuverability. Integrative and Comparative Biology , 42:135140.)
K rotational =
I = a mi r 2i = mobject r 2object
KESTEN-08_275-332hr.indd 280
SOLVE
The rotational kinetic energy of the small red object is
K rotational =
1
m
r 2object v2
2 object
10/21/11 11:32 AM
=
s
s
1 rev
1
10p rad 2
10.20 kg2 10.30 m2 2 a
b = 8.9 J
s
2
REFLECT
The physicist must supply nearly 9 J of energy to rotate the small red objectnot
a lot of energy, but not a little, either. From what height would he need to drop the
object to impart the same energy? Setting gravitational potential energy U = mgh
equal to the result of 8.9 J gives h = 4.5 m. Thats probably almost two and a half
times the physicists height, so its reasonable to conclude that it takes a modest
amount of effort on his part to swing the object.
Practice Problem 8-1 When the physicist in Figure 8-6 whirls a small red object
of mass 0.20 kg in a nearly horizontal circle at the end of a 0.30-m-long string,
he imparts 15 J of energy to the object. Treating the object as if all its mass were
concentrated at a single point and neglecting the mass of the string, how many
revolutions per second does the object make?
The kinetic energy of a rigid object rotating around a fixed axis is called
rotational kinetic energy. It depends not only on the mass and angular velocity
of an object, but also on how the mass of the object is distributed with respect
to the axis of rotation.
I = a mi r 2i
(8-7)
KESTEN-08_275-332hr.indd 281
10/21/11 11:32 AM
(a)
(b)
I2 = M2L22
L2
rotation
axis
(b)
r1
r2
r3
(c)
L2
I = M1L12 + M2L22
L1
The moment of inertia is additive. If you know the moments of inertia of two
objects around some rotation axis and you attach them to form a single object, the
moment of inertia of the new objectaround the same axisis the sum of the
moments of inertia of the two separate objects.
In Figure 8-9a, a small sphere that has a mass M1 is attached to a Styrofoam
rod that has a negligible mass and a length L1. The moment of inertia of the
sphere when it rotates around the axis passing through the end of the rod is
I1 = M1 L 21. Similarly, the moment of inertia of another small sphere that has a
mass M2 and rotates at the end of a rod that has a negligible mass and length L2
is I2 = M2 L 22 (Figure 8-9b). When the ends of the two rods are attached and the
combined object is rotated around the same axis, as in Figure 8-9c, the moment
of inertia is
I = I1 + I2 = M1 L 21 + M2 L 22
I = a mi r 2i
(8-7)
where we have imagined the object broken into many small pieces identified by the
subscript i. Each piece must be so small that the distance from the rotation axis to all
points on the piece is the same. To guarantee that this is always true, the pieces must
be of infinitesimal size. To remind us that each piece is of infinitesimal mass, we write
the mass term as dm. This allows us to write the sum in Equation 8-7 as the integral:
I = 3 dm r 2
KESTEN-08_275-332hr.indd 282
I = 3 r 2 dm
(8-9)
10/21/11 11:33 AM
Again, note that in converting the sum to an integral, the mass mi of each piece of
an object becomes dm, the mass of an infinitesimally small mass element. The
bounds on the integral are set up so that every bit of mass of an object is included
in the integration.
To get some hands-on experience finding the moment of inertia of an object
that can rotate, lets consider a thin, uniform rod of length L and mass M that
rotates around one end. Such a rod is shown in Figure 8-10. An arbitrarily selected,
infinitesimal slice of the rod of mass dm is shown. Note that we exaggerated the
size of dm in the figure; in reality, even the thinnest line we could draw would be
too thick because mathematically dm must be infinitesimally small. To emphasize
this we have labeled the width of dm as dr, a differential element of distance along
the rod.
To carry out the integral in Equation 8-9, we need to assign an upper bound
and a lower bound to sweep up every possible mass element in the rod. Warning!
Dont be too quick to insert 0 to L as the bounds; the values of the bounds of an
integral must match the differential variable of integration. As it stands, the differential is dm, so the differential variable is m, and 0 and L are not valid values of
mass. We can, however, directly change the variable of integration from mass to
length. Because the rod is uniform, the length of the infinitesimal slice of the rod is
the same proportion to the total length of the rod as the mass of the slice is to the
total mass of the rod:
L
dm
M
r
dr
length of slice
mass of slice
=
total length
total mass
dr
dm
=
L
M
M dr
dm =
L
M
dr
L
(8-10)
This relationship is valid whenever the mass of a rodor any object we can treat
as one-dimensionalis uniformly distributed.
Inserting Equation 8-10 into the expression for the moment of inertia
(Equation 8-9) gives
I=
r2
M
M
dr =
r 2 dr
L
LL
The distance from the rotation axis of the mass of the slice at one end of the rod is
r = 0, and at the other end, r = L, so 0 and L are the lower and upper bounds of
the variable over which the integral is evaluated:
L
I=
M
r 2 dr
L L0
(8-11)
M r 3 L M L3 03
ML2
` =
a
- b =
L 3 0
L 3
3
3
The moment of inertia of a thin rod that has a mass M and a length L and rotates
around one end is ML2 >3.
KESTEN-08_275-332hr.indd 283
10/21/11 11:33 AM
Watch Out!
An object does not have a moment of inertia. Rather, it has
a moment of inertia defined for rotation around each specific
choice of rotation axis.
If your friend asks, What is the moment of inertia of that object? it could be
a trick question! To determine the different values of radius in Equation 8-7
requires that we first specify the axis around which the object rotates. Any
object can be made to rotate around any number of axes, even one like a
DVD that commonly rotates around a particular axis. The axis does not even
have to pass through the object that rotates around itimagine tying a string
to the edge of a DVD and swinging it around in a circle above your head. The
DVD would be rotating around an axis that does not pass through it. Three
possible rotation axes are shown for a DVD in Figure 8-11. Make sure you
identify the axis of rotation before determining the moment of inertia of
an object.
KESTEN-08_275-332hr.indd 284
10/21/11 11:33 AM
L
dm
+L>2
M
I=
r 2 dr
L L-L>2
=
=
3 +L>2
Mr
`
L 3 -L>2
3
1 -L>22
M 1 +L>22
=
a
b
L
3
3
3
M L
-L
ML
a
b =
L 24
24
12
L
r =
2
+L
r =
2
The moment of inertia of a thin rod of mass M and length L that rotates
around its center is ML2 >12. This value is one-fourth the value of the moment
of inertia of the rod when it rotates around one end. We expect the moment of
inertia to be smaller in this case because moment of inertia varies as the square of r, and
the mass of the rod is distributed closer to the rotation axis when the rod rotates
around its center. When the rod rotates around its center no part of it is farther than
L>2 from the axis, but when the rod rotates around one end, half of it is farther than
L>2 from the axis.
Two thin, uniform rods that each have a mass M and a length L are attached
at their centers to form an X shape. What is the moment of inertia when this
configuration is rotated around the axis which passes through their centers,
perpendicular to the plane of the two rods?
Four thin, uniform rods that each have a mass M>2 and a length L>2 are
a ttached at their ends to form an X shape. What is the moment of inertia
when this configuration is rotated around the axis which passes through the
center of the X perpendicular to the plane of the rods?
KESTEN-08_275-332hr.indd 285
10/21/11 11:33 AM
dm
dq
M
dq
2p
(8-12)
M
M
dq =
r 2 dq
2p L
L 2p
Note that the variable r is the radial distance to any particular infinitesimal piece
of the object over which we integrate. Be careful to distinguish between the
variable and the value that variable takes in any specific case. For this ring, the
distance from the rotation axis to any piece is always R, which can be taken out
of the integral because it is constant. Also, to include in the integral every infinitesimal slice of the ring, we need to integrate in a complete circle, so q ranges
from 0 to 2p:
I=
r2
2p
I=
MR2
dq
2p L0
(8-13)
So
I=
MR2 2p MR2
q` =
12p - 02 = MR2
2p
2p
0
The moment of inertia of a thin, uniform ring of mass M and radius R that
rotates around an axis perpendicular to the plane of the ring and through its
center is MR2.
KESTEN-08_275-332hr.indd 286
10/21/11 11:33 AM
dm
dq
r
r+dr
r+dr
dr
r dq
Figure 8-15 Because both the width of the annulus and the
M
r dr dq
pR2
(8-14)
We have been careful to distinguish between r, the radial distance to any particular
infinitesimal patch of the disk over which we will integrate, and R, the constant
radius of the entire disk. The relationship for dm in Equation 8-14 is valid because
the mass of the disk is uniformly distributed.
Inserting Equation 8-14 into the expression for the moment of inertia
(Equation 8-9) gives
I=
KESTEN-08_275-332hr.indd 287
LL
r2
M
M
r dr dq =
r 3 dr dq
2
pR
pR2 L L
10/21/11 11:33 AM
It is necessary to write two integrals because the expression for dm involves two
differentials. However, the r and q variables are independent of one another, so we
can treat the expression as two separate integrals or
I=
M
r 3 dr dq
pR2 L
L
Finally, we set the bounds to include every possible infinitesimal slice of the disk.
The smallest and largest values of radius are r = 0 and r = R, respectively, and angle
runs from 0 to 2p:
R
I=
2p
M
r 3 dr
dq
pR2 L0
L0
(8-15)
So
I=
=
M r 4 R 2p
M R4
` q` =
a
- 0 b 12p - 02
2 4
pR
pR2 4
0 0
M 2pR4 MR2
=
2
pR2 4
The moment of inertia of a thin, uniform disk of mass M and radius R that rotates
around an axis perpendicular to the plane of the disk and through its center is MR2 >2.
When rotating about the same axis, the moment of inertia of a thin, uniform
disk is half that of a thin, uniform ring of the same mass and radius. You should
expect the disk to have a smaller moment of inertia, because the moment of inertia
of an object is strongly influenced by how far the mass is from the rotation axis.
All of the mass of the ring is located a distance R from the axis, while only a fraction of the mass of the disk is that far from the axis. Therefore, the moment of
inertia of the ring must be larger than the moment of inertia of the disk.
dA =
Disk
L0
r dr
L0
2p
dq
r 2 R 2p
R2
` q` = a
- 0 b 12p - 02 = pR2
2 0 0
2
Although this is not a proof, it gives us confidence that the differential element of
area we constructed is correct.
KESTEN-08_275-332hr.indd 288
10/21/11 11:33 AM
The moments of inertia of a variety of objects and rotation axes are given in
Table 8-1.
Rotational inertia is the tendency of an object to resist a change in rotational motion. It depends not only on the mass of an object but also on how
the mass is distributed with respect to the axis of rotation.
Table 8-1
Moments of Inertia of Uniform Bodies of Various Shapes*
Thin cylindrical shell about
axis
L
R
R1
R1
1
I = 12 MR2 + 12
ML2
I = MR2
Solid cylinder about axis
I=
1
2
12ML
1
I = 4 MR2+ 12
ML2
1
2
2 MR
2
2
3 MR
I=
I=
I=
1
2
3 ML
I=
2
2
5 MR
R2
R2
R1
R1
I=
1
2
2 M(R1
+ R22)
I=
1
2
4 M(R1
+ R22) + 12ML2
I = 12 M(a2 + b2)
*A disk is a cylider whose length L is negligible. By setting L = 0, the above formulas for cylinders hold for disks.
KESTEN-08_275-332hr.indd 289
10/21/11 11:33 AM
(a)
I = ICM + Mh 2
(b)
dq
Rotation axisperpendicular to page
r
r + dr
q
ML2
12
KESTEN-08_275-332hr.indd 290
(8-16)
ML2
L 2
+ Ma b
12
2
ML2 ML2
+
12
4
ML2 3ML2
+
12
12
4ML2
12
ML2
3
10/21/11 11:33 AM
The parallel-axis theorem does indeed reproduce the correct moment of inertia for
the rod rotating about its end.
The parallel-axis theorem is particularly useful for determining the moment of
inertia when the shape of an object or the orientation of the axis makes the integral
in Equation 8-9 difficult, as in the next example.
I=
REFLECT
Finding the moment of inertia of the disk rotating around a point on its edge was
straightforward using the parallel-axis theorem. The integral definition of moment
of inertia (Equation 8-9) would not be. Although the integral would be similar to
the one we used to find the moment of inertia for the disk rotating around its center
(Equation 8-15), determining the bounds would be challenging! As suggested by
the differential patch of area shown in Figure 8-16b, the mass dm would be the
same as that in Equation 8-15. But what, for example, are the upper bounds on r
and q to cover the entire disk? As you can see from the figure, the largest value of r
depends on the angle q and the largest value of q depends on the size of the disk. As
a result the integral approach is not nearly as straightforward as using the parallelaxis theorem.
Practice Problem 8-2 Find the moment of inertia of a thin, uniform disk of radius
R and mass M that rotates around a pin pushed through a small hole halfway
between the center and the edge of the disk.
KESTEN-08_275-332hr.indd 291
10/21/11 11:33 AM
(6-31)
Which type of wheels would allow a soapbox derby car to go faster, uniform disks
or wheels that look like conventional bicycle tires where most of the mass is along
the rim of the wheels? Assume that both types of wheels have the same mass.
KESTEN-08_275-332hr.indd 292
10/21/11 11:33 AM
KESTEN-08_275-332hr.indd 293
(a) Sliding
2R
(b) Rolling without slipping
Figure 8-18 A disk can slide, roll without slipping, or slide and roll
at the same time. (a) An object does not rotate when itslides, so it
acquires no rotational kinetic energy. (b) When a disk rolls
without slipping relative to the surface, in one rotation the disk
moves a distance exactly equal to the circumference of the disk.
N
(a) Completely rigid object
The leading edge of the rolling
object is coming down to the
surface, while the trailing edge
is lifting off the surface. The
net normal force can be taken
as acting in front of the
rotation axis.
Figure 8-19 (a) A completely rigid, rolling disk only contacts the
surface ata point directly below the rotation axis. The normal
force therefore points toward the rotation axis and has no
effect on the rotation. Under ideal conditions a completely rigid
object experiences no rolling friction. (b) Anonrigid, rolling
disk contacts the surface at more than one point below the
rotation axis. The net normal force acts in front of the rotation
axis and opposes the motion.
10/21/11 11:33 AM
the surface while the trailing edge is lifting off the surface, the net normal force can
be taken as acting in front of the rotation axis. This force counters the rotation, and
has the effect of opposing the motion. Rolling friction arises from the deformation
of a rolling object.
Lets compare the speed of a uniform disk to that of a hoop, when both rolling
without slipping down a ramp. Both the disk and the hoop have the same radius R
and mass M and both traverse a vertical distance H (Figure 8-20).
Total energy is conserved in both cases. The frictional forces will be negligibly
small for typical materials, so we can neglect the last term in Equation 8-17 the
expressions of energy conservation for the disk and the hoop have the same form:
K translational, i + K rotational, i + Ui = K translational, f + K rotational, f + Uf
Because both the disk and the hoop are initially at rest, Ktranslational, i and Krotational, i
equal zero for both the disk and the hoop. So the previous expression for either the
disk or hoop becomes
1
1
Mv 2f + Iv2f + Mgh f
2
2
Here, hi and hf are the heights of the top and bottom of the ramp, vf is the translational speed at the bottom of the ramp, and vf is the rotational velocity at the bottom of the ramp. The height of the ramp H is hi - hf, so
Mgh i =
1
1
1
Mv 2f = Mgh i - Mgh f - Iv2f = MgH - Iv2f
2
2
2
(8-18)
To compare the speeds of the disk and hoop at the bottom of the ramp, we need to
solve this equation for vf in terms of the variables that define the problem: R, M,
and H. This requires that both I and vf be expressed in terms of those variables as
well.
The moment of inertia of a uniform disk that has radius R, mass M, and rotates
around an axis through the center and perpendicular to the plane of the object is
Idisk =
MR2
2
KESTEN-08_275-332hr.indd 294
10/21/11 11:33 AM
The moment of inertia of a hoop that has a radius R and a mass M and
rotates around an axis through the center and perpendicular to the plane of the
object is
Ihoop = MR2
The angular velocity term can be understood by using Figure 8-18b, in which
a circular object of radius R rolls at a constant rate through one full rotation without slipping. As we noted above, the disk moves linearly a distance equal to the
circumference when it rolls through one full rotation. The change in position of the
center of the object is then equal to 2pR. Let the time for one full rotation be Dt,
so that the linear velocity is
v=
x 2pR
=
t
t
q 2p
=
t
t
so
v= a
2p
b R = vR
t
(8-19)
Equation 8-19 is a general relationship between the linear velocity and angular
velocity of a circular object rolling without slipping.
We can now write Equation 8-18 for the disk and the hoop separately, using
the appropriate moment of inertia (either Idisk or Ihoop) and the relationship
between the linear velocity and angular velocity (v = v>R, from Equation 8-19).
For the disk,
vdisk, f 2
1
1
1 MR2 vdisk, f 2
Mv 2disk, f = MgH - Idisk a
b = MgH a
b
2
2
R
2 2
R
1
v 2disk, f = 2gH - v 2disk, f
2
3 2
v disk, f = 2gH
2
4
vdisk, f =
gH
A3
vhoop, f 2
vhoop, f 2
1
1
1
Mv 2hoop, f = MgH - Ihoop a
b = MgH - MR2 a
b
2
2
R
2
R
v 2hoop, f = 2gH - v 2hoop, f
2v 2hoop, f = 2gH
vhoop, f = 2gH
As we should expect, the speed of the hoop as it comes off the ramp is smaller than
the speed of the disk ( 2gH compared to 24gH>3), because more of the hoops
initial gravitational potential energy is converted into rotational kinetic energy as
the hoop rolls down the ramp. Both objects will accelerate, but at any given
moment, the speed of the hoop will be smaller than that of the disk. In a race, the
disk would win.
KESTEN-08_275-332hr.indd 295
10/21/11 11:33 AM
A hoop and a block are released from rest down adjacent ramps that have
identical angles. The hoop rolls without slipping and the block slides without
friction, both starting from the same height. Which one reaches the bottom of
the ramp first?
L
H
q
H = L sin q
Figure 8-21
SET UP
We can treat the spider as an object that rolls without slipping down a ramp of
angle 15. As shown in the sketch in Figure 8-21, the spider travels a distance L
while dropping a vertical distance H. Energy is conserved as the spider rolls down
the sand dune, so we start from Equation 8-17. Note that the spider has no
kinetic energy at the instant it starts to roll. Well also neglect frictional forces,
which we would expect to be small. If we declare the initial height of the spider
to be H, then the final height is zero; the initial potential energy Ui then equals the
sum of the final translational and rotational kinetic energies Ktranslational, f and
Krotational, f:
Ui = K translational, f + K rotational, f
or
Mspider gH =
1
1
M
v 2 + Ispider v2
2 spider
2
where Mspider is the mass of the spider, v is the translational speed of the spider, and
v is its angular velocity.
We can approximate the spider as a uniform disk rotating around its central
axis. Even when the spider sticks out its legs as spokes, most of its mass is concentrated near the rotation axis, and the spider is also relatively flat. The effective
radius Reff of the disk is equal to that of the main part of the spiders body. From
Table 8-1, the moment of inertia of the spider is then
Ispider =
Mspider R 2eff
2
SOLVE
Conservation of energy therefore leads to
Mspider gH =
2
1
1 Mspider R eff 2
Mspider v 2 +
v
2
2
2
Notice that the mass of the spider appears in each term, so it can be canceled. Also,
from Equation 8-19, v is equal to vR, where R is the radius of the spider including
its spokelike legs. So
gH =
KESTEN-08_275-332hr.indd 296
1 2 1 R 2eff v 2
v +
2
2 2 R2
10/21/11 11:33 AM
or
v=
2gH
B 1 + R 2eff >2R2
From Figure 8-21, H equals L sin 15, where L is given as 1 m. We want to use
round, but reasonable, values in doing estimations; based on our experience with
spiders lets take Reff equal to 0.2 cm and R equal to 0.5 cm. To the level of significance of these values, we can also use 10 m>s 2 as an approximate value for g. Then
v
= 2.2 m>s
1
1
dx 2
mv 2 = ma b
2
2
dt
1 2 1 dq 2
Iv = I a b
2
2 dt
The form of these equations reveals both a similarity and a difference between mass
and moment of inertia. Both are properties of an object, and moment of inertia is
related to mass. But while mass quantifies the tendency of an object to resist a
change in linear motion, moment of inertia quantifies the tendency of the object to
resist a change in rotational motion. This is inferred from the presence of m and
linear velocity dx>dt in Ktranslational, but I and angular velocity in Krotational. The relationship between x and q is also apparent: x measures linear displacement and q
measures angular displacement, the angle through which an object has rotated.
We can extend the relationship between x and q to the derivatives of these
quantities with respect to time. The rotational equivalent of linear velocity v is
KESTEN-08_275-332hr.indd 297
10/21/11 11:33 AM
angular velocity v; this result can be seen by comparing Ktranslational and Krotational, or
by taking the derivatives of x and q with respect to time:
dx
dt
dq
v=
dt
And finally, as linear acceleration is the derivative of linear velocity with respect
to time, we can define an analogous quantity angular acceleration a for objects that
are rotating:
dv
a=
dt
dv
a=
(8-20)
dt
Angular displacement is measured in radians. The SI units of v are
rad
3v 4 =
s
Therefore, the units of a are radians per square second (rad>s 2). We can also
describe both angular displacement and angular velocity in terms of the number of
revolutions an object makes. Another useful set of units for v is therefore
rev
3v 4 =
s
A full circle is 2p rad, so a rate of 1 rev>s is equal to 2p rad>s. In addition, angular
velocity can be converted into an equivalent linear speed by recognizing that a
point at radius r from the rotation axis travels a distance 2pr in one revolution. So
an angular velocity of 1 rev>s is also equal to 2pr m>s.
The correspondence between the linear variables x, v, a, and m and the rotational variables q, v, a, and I enable a translation of sorts between the equations
that describe linear kinematics and equations that describe rotational kinematics.
In Chapter 2, we developed two fundamental equations that describe motion in
one dimension under constant acceleration:
v=
v = v0 + at
1 2
x - x0 = v0 t + at
2
(2-23)
(2-26)
We can now use similar equations to describe rotational motion under constant
angular acceleration:
v = v0 + at
1
q - q0 = v0 t + at 2
2
(8-21)
(8-22)
As we did for linear kinematics, we set the initial value of angular velocity to be v0.
We let the time variable start at t0 = 0 in accordance with the standard convention.
We also define an initial angular position 0, so that angular displacement is - 0.
Information recorded on a DVD is evenly spaced along a long spiral that spans
most of the surface of the disk. DVD players read the information at a constant
rate. Should the disk rotate faster, slower, or at the same rate as the player reads
information recorded closer and closer to the center of the DVD?
KESTEN-08_275-332hr.indd 298
10/21/11 11:33 AM
Equations 2-23 and 2-26 completely describe linear motion when acceleration
is constant and enable us to solve a wide range of problems. Using just the two
equations we could, for example, find the distance a hockey puck travels given its
initial velocity or we could find the constant acceleration required for a car to
attain a certain velocity after starting from rest. In the same way, Equations 8-21
and 8-22 fully describe rotational motion when angular acceleration is constant.
The variables are different, but the physics is exactly the same as that of linear
motion discussed in Chapter 2.
Table 8-2
Variable Know/Dont Know
0
25 rad/s
0 rad/s
42 s
SOLVE
We can choose to solve either of the rotational motion equations for a to eliminate
angular acceleration, but its more straightforward to solve Equation 8-21. We can
also set the final value of angular velocity (v) to zero, as indicated in the Know/
Dont Know table, leading to
v0
a= t
Substituting this expression into Equation 8-22 gives
q - q0 = v0 t +
v0
1
1
a - b t 2 = v0 t - v0 t
2
t
2
1
v t
2 0
All of the variables on the right side of the resulting equation
are known, so we can compute a numeric answer:
=
1
rad
a 25
b 142 s2 = 5.3 102 rad
s
2
The question asks us to express our answer in terms of revolutions, so we also write
(a)
Height = w
w0
Base = t
q - q0 =
q - q0 =
1
rev
a4
b 142 s2 = 84 rev
s
2
REFLECT
The result, q - q0 = 12v0 t, can be interpreted graphically.
Because the angular deceleration is constant, the angular
velocity decreased linearly, as shown in Figure 8-22a. In any
short time interval Dt such as the one shown in the figure,
KESTEN-08_275-332hr.indd 299
Time
t
(b)
w0
Time
Figure 8-22
10/21/11 11:33 AM
the number of revolutions the top makes is the product of Dt and the angular
velocity v during that time (or the average angular velocity, if the time interval is
not infinitesimally short). As you can see, the product is the area of a narrow rectangle, and adding the areas of the rectangles over the total stopping time of the top
(Figure 8-22b) gives the area under the v versus t line. The shape of that area is a
triangle, the area of which is 12 base height, or 12 v0t.
Practice Problem 8-3 A top spinning at 25 rad>s (4.0 rev>s) slows down and comes
to a stop after making 36 revolutions. Assuming the top decelerates at a constant
rate, how long does it take to come to a stop?
8-6 Torque
Where do you push on a door to open it easily? Perhaps without knowing why,
youve learned that its easiest to open a door by pushing on a spot far from the
hinges. You would never push near the hinges, such as the person in Figure 8-23a,
because you learned a long time ago that its nearly impossible to open a door that
way. In which direction do you push on a door? The best choice is perpendicular to
the plane of the door and far from the hinges (Figure 8-23b). In this section, we will
see why opening the door depends not just on the magnitude of the applied force,
but also on both the direction of the force vector and the distance between the rotation axis and the position at which the force is applied.
Torque t is the rotational analog of force and takes into account the distance r
between a force F and the rotation axis as well as the angle j between the sr vector
s vector. (The sr vector points from the rotation axis to the point at which
and the F
the force is applied.) The magnitude of torque is
t = rF sin w
(8-23)
KESTEN-08_275-332hr.indd 300
(a)
(b)
10/21/11 11:33 AM
terms taken together describe the perpendicular distance from the axis of rotation to the line along which the force acts. Applying a given force for a large value
of this distance, called the lever arm or moment arm, provides a mechanical
advantage that, for example, allows you to open a massive door with relatively
little effort.
The SI units of torque are evident from Equation 8-23:
3 t 4 = 3 r 4 3 F 4 3 sin w 4 = m # N
By convention, the units are written in the opposite order, as N m, and referred to
as newton-meters.
Rotation axis
A socket wrench can be used to loosen a bolt. A common trick to turn a bolt
that has become frozen in place is to slide a section of pipe over the handle of
the wrench and turn the bolt while gripping the end of the pipe. Why does this
work? Why do many experienced mechanics tend to avoid using this trick?
Using the definition of torque (Equation 8-23), we see that the lever arm can
either amplify or reduce the effect that an applied force has on rotating an object.
When the lever arm is large (for example, when the application of the force is relatively far from the rotation axis), a small force generates a large torque. Humans
and other animals take advantage of the power of the lever arm in the arrangement of muscles and bones as shown in Figure 8-25. The point at which the muscle is attached to the lower jawbone, for example, is far from the joint around
which the jaw rotates, resulting in a torque large enough to crack a nut between
your back teeth. In contrast, one end of the biceps muscle attaches to the bone of
the upper arm and the other to the lower arm just below the elbow (Figure 8-26).
This musclejoint arrangement doesnt generate a large torque relative to the size
of the muscle because the length of the lever arm is relatively small. The anatomy
Masseter
muscle
Lever arm
Lower jaw
KESTEN-08_275-332hr.indd 301
10/21/11 11:33 AM
Biceps
Rotation axis
of lower arm
Lever arm
does provide an advantage, however; a small change in the length of the biceps
produces a large, fast movement of the hand at the end of the arm.
In Section 8-5, we described a translation between quantities necessary to
describe linear motion and those used to describe rotational motion. The quantities mass m and moment of inertia I play analogous roles, as do linear and angular
displacements (x and q, respectively), linear and angular velocities (v and v),
andlinear and angular accelerations (a and a). We now see that force and torque
are also analogs. This conclusion allows us to write a rotational equivalent of
Newtons second law by substituting rotational analogs for the linear quantities:
becomes
s
sdir
a Fdir = ma
(4-1)
s
s
a t = I
(8-24)
Dont treat this expression as something new; the physics supporting it is still
Newtons second law. We have simply applied Newtons second law to rotational
motion.
You may be surprised to find that both torque and angular acceleration are
vectors. We will look more carefully at the vector nature of rotational quantities in
Section 8-8; until then, we will consider only the magnitudes of the quantities.
KESTEN-08_275-332hr.indd 302
10/21/11 11:33 AM
(8-25)
Cylinder
Thread
Block
t = RT sin w
(8-26)
t = Ia
(8-27)
We now have three equations, all of which depend on either tension, acceleration,
or both. Yes, the last equation depends on angular acceleration rather than linear
acceleration, so we will also need to find a way to relate these two quantities.
SOLVE
Because the thread unwinds without slipping, the linear acceleration of the edge of
the disk is equal to the downward acceleration of the box. We can find a relationship between the linear acceleration and angular acceleration of the cylinder by using
Equation 8-5, which directly relates a linear quantity to a rotational quantity:
v
v=
r
Using the definition of angular acceleration (Equation 8-20),
a=
dv
d v
1 dv
a
=
a b =
=
dt
dt R
R dt
R
KESTEN-08_275-332hr.indd 303
a
R
t = RT sin w
Mbox g - T = Mbox a
t=I
T
y
T
M box g
Figure 8-28 A free-body diagram
The second of the two torque equations (Equation 8-27) can now be written
in terms of linear acceleration using a = a>R. Together with Equation 8-26 and
Equation 8-25, we now have three equations and two unknowns, a solvable problem. For convenience, here are the three equations:
(8-28)
10/21/11 11:33 AM
The first equation gives t in terms of a. The second equation gives T in terms of t
(step 2 below), and the last equation gives a in terms of T (step 1 below). Were
done, except for the algebra!
Mbox g - T
T
=gMbox
Mbox
t
2: T =
R sin w
1:
a=
Using the expression for t from Equation 8-28, the relationship in step 2 becomes
T=
Ia
R sin w
2
Ia
2
R Mbox sin w
All of the variables other than a are known. From Table 8-1, the moment of inertia
of the rotating cylinder is McylinderR2 >2. The angle w between the direction in which
the thread is pulled and the vector that extends from the center of the cylinder to
the point at the thread comes off the cylinder is 90. As shown in Figure 8-29,
whenever an object that has been wrapped around a circular surface is pulled, the
tension force is always tangential to the edge, so sin w equals 1 regardless of the
direction in which the thread is pulled. By using all this information,
or
a=g- a
Mcylinder R2
2
a=g-
ba
a
b
R Mbox
2
Mcylinder a
2Mbox
KESTEN-08_275-332hr.indd 304
Thread is pulled
in this direction.
10/21/11 11:33 AM
Gather the terms that contain a on the left side of the equation
aa 1 +
and then solve for a
a=
Mcylinder
2Mbox
b =g
2Mbox
g
2Mbox + Mcylinder
REFLECT
The acceleration of the box is proportional to g. Lets test the result for limiting
cases of the mass of the cylinder. When the cylinder has negligible mass, the multiplicative factor is 1 and a g. That is surely reasonable; when the cylinder is
treated as having no mass, the box undergoes free-fall motion. A consideration of
energy supports this result; no kinetic energy is required to rotate a cylinder that
has no mass, so all of the boxs initial potential energy transforms into translational
kinetic energy as the box falls. When Mcylinder is very large compared to Mbox, the
denominator of the multiplicative factor overwhelms the numerator and results in
a fraction tending to 0, so a 0. This result also makes sense. A large mass results
in the cylinder having a large moment of inertia around the rotation axis, so the
torque (t = Ia) produces only a small angular acceleration.
The human jaw can rotate around three axes as shown in Figure 8-30. Chewing is accomplished primarily by rotations around the axis labeled y. The moments of inertia around each of the axes have been measured. For a lower jaw
that has a mass approximately equal to 0.4 kg, typical values for the moments
of inertia are Iy = 3 10-4 kg m2 and Iz = 9 10-4 kg m2. Does the anatomy of the jaw favor updown motions or side-to-side motions? Is more or less
torque required to open your jaw or to rotate it from side to side?
z
Figure 8-30 The human jaw rotates to some degree about the x, y, and z axes.
KESTEN-08_275-332hr.indd 305
10/21/11 11:33 AM
Torque is the rotational analog of force. Torque depends on the magnitude of the applied force, and also on the lever (or moment) arm, the per
pendicular distance between the axis of rotation and the line along which the
force is applied. Torque is maximum when the force is applied in the direction
perpendicular to the direction of the lever arm.
When a child runs across the playground and jumps onto a merry-go-round, they
both rotate together (Figure 8-31). This situation seems very much like the inelastic
collisions we discussed in Section 7-3, in which a moving object collided with an
initially stationary one and the two stuck together afterward. We approached those
inelastic collisions by demanding that linear momentum is conserved. In the collision that takes place on the playground, however, the merry-go-round has zero
linear momentum both before and after the girl jumps on. It is certainly moving
afterward, however. How can momentum be conserved? To resolve this issue, we
will need to define a new quantity, one similar to linear momentum that applies to
rotating objects.
The rotational analog of linear momentum is angular momentum, traditionally
represented by either a lowercase or uppercase L. We will use L to represent angular momentum. Using the translation between linear quantities and rotational
quantities described in Section 8-5, we can write a rotational equivalent of linear
momentum by substituting rotational analogs for the linear quantities. Just as linear momentum is defined by
s = mv
s
p
we define angular momentum as the product of angular velocity and moment of
inertia:
s = IV
s
L
(8-29)
As with torque and angular acceleration, angular momentum and angular velocity
are vectors. We will look more carefully at the vector nature of rotational quantities in Section 8-8; until then, we will consider only the magnitudes of these
quantities.
To understand angular momentum L, lets extend the analogy between linear
momentum and angular momentum to other linear quantities. We determined linear momentum through its relationship to force, for example,
s
dp
(7-23)
dt
s , so torque and angus is the rotational analog of force F
We have seen that torque
lar momentum are related by
s=
F
s
dL
(8-30)
dt
s >dt is zero and angular momentum is
In cases in which the net torque is zero, dL
constant. In the same way that linear momentum is conserved when the net force
on a system is zero, angular momentum is conserved when the net torque on a
system is zero. In particular, angular momentum is conserved in rotating systems
that experience no external forces or torques.
KESTEN-08_275-332hr.indd 306
s=
10/21/11 11:33 AM
In the childrens game of tetherball, a rope attached to the top of a tall pole is
tied to a ball. Players hit the ball in opposite directions in an attempt to wind
the rope around the pole. As the ball circles the pole, does the speed of the ball
decrease, stay the same, or increase? Explain in terms of rotational kinematics.
Treat the rope as having negligible mass and neglect any resistive forces.
SET UP
We treat the ice as frictionless so that the ice skaters angular momentum can be
considered constant. Her moment of inertia is not constant, however, because the
distribution of her mass around the rotation axis changes as she brings in her arms.
The magnitude of angular momentum is then L = Istartvstart (from Equation 8-29)
at the start of the spin and L = Iendvend at the end. The two expressions are equal
because angular momentum is conserved.
SOLVE
We begin by setting the expressions for angular momentum at the start and end of
the spin equal:
Istart vstart = Iend vend
The ratio of the moments of inertia is
vstart
Iend
=
vend
Istart
So, the factor by which her moment of inertia around her central axis changes as
she pulls in her arms is
Iend
1.5 rad s
1
=
Istart 19 rad>s
13
REFLECT
The skaters moment of inertia decreases by a factor of approximately 13. This
might seem large, because her arms (and one leg) are a relatively small fraction of
her total mass. Moment of inertia depends on the square of distance (Equations 8-7
and 8-9), however, so holding her arms and leg close to her body rather than
extended has a significant effect on the skaters moment of inertia.
Practice Problem 8-5 A figure skater executing a scratch spin starts spinning on
one skate at 1.5 rad>s (approximately 1 revolution every 2 s) and gradually pulls
her arms in toward her body. If this reduces her moment of inertia by a factor of
four (from I0 to I0 >4), what is her angular velocity after she has pulled her arms in
completely?
KESTEN-08_275-332hr.indd 307
10/21/11 11:33 AM
dL = r dp sin w
s vectors. Integrating both sides gives
where w is the angle between the sr and p
L = rp sin w
(8-31)
The angular momentum that an object has as it moves with respect to a rotation
axis depends on the distance from the axis and direction of motion, as well as the
linear momentum.
We can now address the problem posed in the opening paragraph of this section, in which a girl runs across the playground and jumps onto a merry-go-round
that was initially at rest. The girl and the merry-go-round begin to rotate rapidly.
We now understand that the girl and merry-go-round have angular momentum
while rotating. We have also seen that angular momentum is conserved for a system
which experiences no external forces. Is there angular momentum in this system
before the collision, so that we can apply a conservation statement? Yes, objects
moving linearly have angular momentum with respect to a fixed point. You might
think of an object moving along a straight line as if it were rotating around a fixed
point with an ever-changing radius from the axis.
In Figure 8-33, the girl moves in the direction shown at constant momentum p.
We apply Equation 8-31 and sr points from the center of the merry-go-round to the
position of the girl at any instant in time, which defines w as shown in the figure.
Notice that the radius R of the merry-go-round and the distance r form one leg and
the hypotenuse of a right triangle, so at any instant of time:
R = r sin w
Although r and are continually
changing as the girl runs towards
the merry-go-round
R
r
Figure 8-33
KESTEN-08_275-332hr.indd 308
10/21/11 11:33 AM
By using Equation 8-31, the girls angular momentum with respect to the center of
the merry-go-round is
L = Rp
(8-32)
Not only does the girl have angular momentum with respect to the merry-go-round,
but because both R and p are constant, L is also constant. The magnitude of the
angular momentum of the girl and merry-go-round is therefore constant both
before and after the collision. If this were not true it would not be possible to apply
a requirement that angular momentum is conserved.
mmgr R2
2
SOLVE
Setting the initial and final angular momenta equal gives
Rmgirl vi = a mgirl R2 +
or
v=
mmgr R2
2
bv
bv
mgirl vi
mmgr
a mgirl +
bR
2
For our estimate, we want to use big, round, but reasonable values. Let the mass
and speed of the girl be 30 kg and 3 m>s, respectively, both reasonable guesses. The
merry-go-round must be much more massive, say, 100 kg. We estimate the radius
of the merry-go-round to be 2 m. Then
v
Notice that angular velocity carries units of radians per second, and because there
are 2p radians in one revolution of the merry-go-round, this is
v 0.56 rad>s 11 rev>2p rad2 0.09 rev>s
REFLECT
Our answer, about 1 rev every 11 s, seems reasonable. However, the mass we
usedfor the merry-go-round is really just a best guess. No doubt we could have
chosen from a range of reasonable values for mmgr, which would in turn result in a
KESTEN-08_275-332hr.indd 309
10/21/11 11:33 AM
KESTEN-08_275-332hr.indd 310
10/21/11 11:33 AM
(a)
The most natural and easiest way to understand this property of angular momentum is to consider angular momentum as a vector.
s point? We need to
In which direction does the angular momentum vector L
account for the direction of rotation, but as shown in Figure 8-35a, there is no way
to align a single vector in the plane of the rotation to indicate the direction. The
angular momentum points along the axis of rotation, but in which of the two directions? By convention, the specific direction is given in a right-handed sense, often
summarized by the right-hand rule (Figure 8-36). Curl the fingers of your right
hand in the direction of motion and stick your thumb straight out. By the righthand rule, your thumb points in the direction of the angular momentum vector.
Figure 8-35b shows the angular momentum vector for a rotating disk. How does
this apply to the long jumper? If more than one element of a system is rotating, the
z
Right hand rule: Curl
the fingers on your
right hand from A to B
along the closest path.
Stick out your thumb;
it points in the direction
of C
C, the result of the
cross product A B.
B
C=AB
C
A
y
B
KESTEN-08_275-332hr.indd 311
ruleallows us to determine
thedirection of the angular
momentum vector of a
rotatingobject.
10/21/11 11:33 AM
Everyone knows that a falling cat usually lands on his feet. This result requires
the cat to rotate itself into an upright position while falling. The keys to a cats
ability to start and stop rotating in midair is bending his body in the middle at
the start of the fall, and either pulling in or extending his legs. Explain how the
actions help the cat right himself while falling.
KESTEN-08_275-332hr.indd 312
10/21/11 11:34 AM
After a falling cat bends in the middle (see Got the Concept 8-11) he pulls in
his front legs, extends his rear legs, and rotates the front and back segments of
his body. After a moment, the cat extends his front legs and pulls in his rear legs
while continuing to rotate the front and rear parts of his body. Explain how
this helps the cat right himself while falling. Consider the moment of inertia of
each part around its rotation axis.
Tides
Ocean tides are evidence that Earth and the Moon are connected by the forces
each exerts on the other (Figure 8-38). The rotation of Earth, the rotation
of the Moon, and the orbit of the Moon around Earth all contribute to the
angular momentum of the EarthMoon system. The rotation rate of the Moon
is stable (it doesnt change) but the distance between Earth and the Moon is
changing, and the rate at which Earth rotates is slowing down. Is the Moon
getting farther from or closer to Earth? Explain your answer.
Watch Out!
The Moon is getting farther, not closer, to Earth.
When confronted with the previous problem (Got the Concept 8-13) many students guess that the Moon, over time, will get closer and closer to Earth, much the
way old satellites eventually spiral down and burn up in Earths atmosphere. The
orbits of the Moon and of those satellites are different, however. Satellites experience air resistance as they move through the atmosphere, which is thin but still
exists at the altitude at which they orbit Earth. This drag force saps the kinetic
energy of a satellite, causing the satellites orbit to have a smaller and smaller
radius. The Moon does not experience such resistive forces, but the Moon and
Earth are connected by gravitational forces. The forces allow the transfer of angular momentum, or, alternatively, energy, between the two parts of the system. As
the Moon gains the energy that Earth loses, its orbit is pushed farther from Earth.
s and torque s
Angular momentum L
t are vectors. In Section 8-7, we saw how
the two are related (in Equation 8-30). We also defined torque in terms of lever arm
r sin w and force F
t = rF sin w
(8-23)
This statement gives the magnitude of the torque as a function of the distance r
from the rotation axis at which a force F is applied. Both the distance and the force
are vectors, leading to the vector equivalent of Equation 8-23:
s
s = sr F
(8-33)
We can also write angular momentum in vector notation by taking the vector
equivalent of Equation 8-31:
KESTEN-08_275-332hr.indd 313
s = sr p
s
L
(8-34)
10/21/11 11:34 AM
(8-35)
s to B
s. C
s points
where w is the angle defined according to convention to go from A
s and B
s and is defined by the right-hand
in the direction perpendicular to both A
s
rule. When you curl the fingers on your right hand along the shortest path from A
s, your outstretched thumb points in the direction of C
s . The elements of the
to B
cross product and the right-hand rule are shown in Figure 8-36.
s
s is perpendicular to both sr and F
As defined in Equation 8-33, the torque
according to the definition of the cross product. This is an ambiguous statement,
however; the torque could point in either of the two directions away from the plane
s . The ambiguity is resolved according to the convention embodformed by sr and F
s along the shortest
ied by the right-hand ruleby curling your fingers from sr to F
s. This is demonstrated
path, your outstretched thumb points along the direction of
in Figure 8-39 for two different forces applied to the end of a rod that can rotate
around an axis through the other end.
sB
s = AB sin w is defined
By convention, the angle w in the cross product A
s to B
s. This is also shown for the two cases in Figure 8-39.
counterclockwise from A
Notice how the angle convention affects the result. In the first case, in which w is
less than 180, the cross product is positive because the sine of an angle less than
180 is positive. In the second case, w is greater than 180, and because sinw is
negative, the cross product is as well. The difference in sign is simply another way
s is in opposite directions for the two forces
to tell that the cross product sr F
shown in the figure.
It is important to recognize that no motion and no change in motion occur in
the direction of the torque vector. In fact, the vector direction associated with the
s, V
s, and
s, L
s,
s ) is a mathematical convention only. For
rotational quantities (
example, a net torque will result in a change in motion, but that angular accelera-
Rotation axis
F1
r
s is
Figure 8-39 The torque vector
s.
perpendicular to both sr and F
The perpendicular direction
could be either up or down
relative to the plane formed by sr
s; the ambiguity is resolved
and F
according to the convention
embodied by the right-hand rule.
In these examples, torque points
upward when the object rotates
counterclockwise and downward
when it rotates clockwise.
KESTEN-08_275-332hr.indd 314
Rotation axis
r
Angle j counterclockwise
from r to F2.
j
F2
10/21/11 11:34 AM
tion does not take place in the direction of the torque vector. The direction of the
torque vector is a mathematical tool that ensures that the relationships between
angular quantities remain consistent.
(8-24)
Alan
OA
Bob
rB
Direction
of r B
KESTEN-08_275-332hr.indd 315
OB
rA
WA
WB
Direction
of r A
10/21/11 11:34 AM
When OB = OA + 180...
180
tA = tB
or
rA WA sin wA = rB WB sin wB
OB
OA
SOLVE
Solving for rB
rB =
The sines of the two angles are equal in
magnitude but opposite in sign:
sin OA = sin OB
Figure 8-41 When two angles differ by 180,
rA WA sin wA
WB sin wB
Bob must sit 1.2 m from the center in order to balance Alan. The minus sign tells
us that Bob must sit on the opposite side of the center from Alan.
REFLECT
Notice the advantage of the lever arm in this problem. Bob, who is lighter than
Alan, can balance the seasaw by sitting farther from the center. A small force can
give rise to a large torque when the lever arm is large.
Something happened in the process of solving this problem that is also important to note. Although our first step in solving a problem is to plan out (Set Up) the
solution, it isnt always possible to anticipate every variable or relationship well
need. In solving this problem, we didnt anticipate the need to know wA and wB.
When we got stuck, however, we asked, What else do we know? which lead to
the realization that the angles wA and wB are related, and that, in turn, provided the
last step in solving the problem.
Practice Problem 8-6 Alan and Bob sit on a seesaw. When Alan, who weighs 1.5
times as much as Bob, sits 1.2 m from the center of the seesaw, Bob sits 1.8 m from
the center. If Alan changes his position so that he is half as far from the center,
where must Bob move to keep the seesaw balanced?
KESTEN-08_275-332hr.indd 316
10/21/11 11:34 AM
8-3 18 s
KESTEN-08_275-332hr.indd 317
10/21/11 11:34 AM
8-10 The ball speeds up. Striking the ball imparts a fixed
amount of angular momentum, and because we neglect
resistive forces, there is no external torque on it. (Yes,
there is a force on the ball due to tension in the rope. This
force is nearly radial, however, so the angle between sr
s in the definition of torque in Equation 8-23 is
and F
nearly zero, resulting in a torque that is nearly zero.)
Angular momentum is therefore conserved, or nearly
so, but because the distance of the ball from the rotation axis decreases as the rope loops around the pole,
s = IV
s
its moment of inertia is decreasing. From L
(Equation 8-29), when I decreases the magnitude of v
must increase in order for the magnitude of L to remain
constant.
8-11 By bending in the middle, the cat divides his body
into two segments, each of which can rotate around a
different axis. The cat uses his muscles to rotate his front
section into an upright position while simultaneously
rotating his hindquarters slightly. This small twist cancels the angular momentum generated by the rotation of
the front part of his body. Next, the opposite situation
occurs: as the rear of the animal rotates into alignment
with the front, he slightly twists his forequarters. Because
the net angular momentum of the cat must remain zero,
the cats body must twist to cancel the angular momentum associated with the front and rear of his body
separately.
SUMMARY
Topic
Summary
Equation or Symbol
angular
acceleration
angular
momentum
angular velocity
average angular
velocity
KESTEN-08_275-332hr.indd 318
s = IV
s
L
(8-29)
L = rp sin w
(8-31)
s = sr p
s
L
(8-34)
v
v=
r
v=
q
t
(8-5)
(8-3)
10/21/11 11:34 AM
Summary 319
instantaneous
angular velocity
lever arm
moment arm
moment of inertia
parallel-axis
theorem
right-hand rule
rolling friction
rotational inertia
rotational kinetic
energy
torque
KESTEN-08_275-332hr.indd 319
v = lim
S
t
0 t
dq
dt
(8-4)
I = 3 r 2 dm
(8-9)
I = a mi r 2i
(8-7)
I = ICM + Mh 2
(8-16)
I
K rotational =
1 2
Iv
2
(8-8)
t = rF sin w
(8-23)
s
s = sr F
(8-33)
10/21/11 11:34 AM
Conceptual Questions
12. Describe any inconsistencies in the following statement: The units of torque are N m, but thats not the
same as the units of energy.
Hoop
Cube
Solid cylinder
Solid sphere
Hollow sphere
KESTEN-08_275-332hr.indd 320
10/21/11 11:34 AM
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
t
(i)
t
(ii)
t
(iii)
t
(iv)
t
(v)
(a)
(c)
F
(b)
(d)
KESTEN-08_275-332hr.indd 321
10/21/11 11:34 AM
Multiple-Choice Questions
27. A solid sphere of radius R, a solid cylinder of radius R,
and a rod of length R all have the same mass, and all three
are rotating with the same angular velocity. The sphere is
rotating around an axis through its center. The cylinder is
rotating around its long axis, and the rod is rotating around
an axis through its center but perpendicular to the rod.
Which one has the greatest rotational kinetic energy?
A. the sphere
B. the cylinder
C. the rod
D. the rod and cylinder have the same rotational
kinetic energy
E. they all have the same kinetic energy
28. How would a flywheels (spinning disks) kinetic
energy change if its moment of inertia were five times
larger but its angular speed were five times smaller?
A. 0.1 times as large as before
B. 0.2 times as large as before
C. same as before
D. 5 times as large as before
E. 10 times as large as before
29. You have two steel spheres; sphere 2 has twice the
radius of sphere 1. What is the ratio of the moment of
inertia I2:I1?
A. 2
B. 4
C. 8
D. 16
E. 32
30. A solid ball, a solid disk, and a hoop, all with the
same mass and the same radius, are set rolling without
slipping up an incline, all with the same initial energy.
Which goes farthest up the incline?
A. the ball
B. the disk
C. the hoop
D. the hoop and the disk roll to the same height,
farther than the ball
E. they all roll to the same height
31. A solid ball, a solid disk, and a hoop, all with the
same mass and the same radius, are set rolling without
slipping up an incline, all with the same initial linear
speed. Which goes farthest up the incline?
A. the ball
B. the disk
C. the hoop
D. the hoop and the disk roll to the same height,
farther than the ball
E. they all roll to the same height SSM
32. Bob and Lily are riding on a merry-go-round. Bob
rides on a horse at the outer circular platform and Lily
rides on a horse at the inner circular platform. When the
KESTEN-08_275-332hr.indd 322
Pivot
Push
Top view
Estimation/Numerical Analysis
37. Estimate the angular speed of a car moving around
a cloverleaf on ramp of a typical freeway. Cloverleafs are
10/21/11 11:34 AM
(rad)
t (s)
0
1
2
0
0.349
0.700
5
6
1.75
2.10
3
4
1.05
1.40
7
8
9
2.44
2.80
3.14
KESTEN-08_275-332hr.indd 323
(rad)
t (s)
t (s)
(rad)
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
3.50
3.50
3.49
3.50
3.51
3.51
3.98
5.01
(rad)
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
6.48
8.53
11.0
14.1
17.6
21.6
26.2
31.0
Problems
8-1: Rotational Kinetic Energy
48. What is the angular speed of an object that completes 2 rev every 12 s? Give your answer in rad>s.
49. A car rounds a curve with a translational speed of
12 m>s. If the radius of the curve is 7 m, calculate the
angular speed in rad>s.
50. Convert the following:
45 rev>min = 10________rad>s
3313 rpm = ________rad>s
2p rev>s = ________rad>s
51. Calculate the angular speed of the Moon as it orbits
Earth (recall, the Moon completes one orbit about Earth in
27.4 days and the EarthMoon distance is 3.84 108 m).
SSM
52. If a 0.25-kg point object rotates at 3 rev>s about an
axis that is 0.5 m away, what is the kinetic energy of the
object?
53. What is the rotational kinetic energy of an object
that has a moment of inertia of 0.28 kg m2 about the
axis of rotation when its angular speed is 4 rad>s?
54. What is the moment of inertia of an object that
rotates at 13 rev>min about an axis and has a rotational
kinetic energy of 18 J?
55. What is the angular speed of a rotating wheel that
has a moment of inertia of 0.33 kg m2 and a rotational
kinetic energy of 2.75 J? Give your answer in both rad>s
and rev>min. SSM
1.8 kg
28 cm
3.0 kg
42 cm
10/21/11 11:34 AM
m2
m3
2m
3m
Iz = ?
ri
ro
I=
MR2
I=?
L
R
R
I=
MR2
I=?
350 g
KESTEN-08_275-332hr.indd 324
3L
3L
L = 1.25 m
10/21/11 11:34 AM
7 cm
M
M
r=?
M
R
2R
r = 12 R
M
2R
R
M
3R
A
L
R
M
KESTEN-08_275-332hr.indd 325
4M
1
L
2
10/21/11 11:34 AM
2 m/s
B
10 cm
60 cm
8-6: Torque
8-5: Rotational Kinematics
82. Calc A rotating disc starts from rest. How many
radians will the disc rotate in 18 s if the angular acceleration is given by the following relation?
KESTEN-08_275-332hr.indd 326
(SI units)
10/21/11 11:34 AM
75 N
75 N
(a)
25
(b)
75 N
75 N
70
(c)
(d)
F = 120 N
20
25 cm
350 g
10 cm
50 cm
70 cm
50 g
100 g
200 g
KESTEN-08_275-332hr.indd 327
10/21/11 11:34 AM
KESTEN-08_275-332hr.indd 328
yn
Ay
By
zn
Az
Bz
General Problems
110. The outside diameter of the playing area of an
optical Blu-ray disc is 11.75 cm and the inside diameter
is 4.5 cm. When viewing movies, the disc rotates so that
a laser maintains a constant linear speed relative to the
disc of 7.5 m>s as it tracks over the playing area.
(a) What are the maximum and minimum angular speeds
(in rad>s and rpm) of the disc? (b) At which location of the
laser on the playing area do the speeds occur? (c) What is
the average angular acceleration of a Blu-ray disc as it
plays an 8.0-h set of movies?
10/21/11 11:34 AM
KESTEN-08_275-332hr.indd 329
10/21/11 11:34 AM
the humerus and the biceps are nearly vertical and the
forearm is horizontal, if a person wishes to hold an
object of mass M so that her forearm remains motionless, what is the relationship between the force exerted
by the biceps muscle and the mass of the object? (In
other words, find a mathematical expression between
force and mass.)
Muscle
Humerus
Radius
M
Elbow
Ulna
Hand
m1
Fbody
KESTEN-08_275-332hr.indd 330
m2
8 kg
10/21/11 11:34 AM
KESTEN-08_275-332hr.indd 331
(a)
(b)
10/21/11 11:34 AM
KESTEN-08_275-332hr.indd 332
10/21/11 11:34 AM