WRC Buletine 330 Related

ISSN 13921320 MATERIALS SCIENCE (MEDIAGOTYRA). Vol. 13, No. 2.
2007
The Influence of Temperature-Time Parameter of Welded Joints Thermal

Treatment on Strength-Related Characteristics of Chromium-Molybdenum
and Low-Alloy Manganese Steels
Vigantas KUMLYTIS, Algirdas Vaclovas VALIULIS, Olegas ERNAJUS
Materials Science and Welding Department, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University,
Basanaviiaus 28, LT-10225, Vilnius, Lithuania
Received 10 November 2006; accepted 21 March 2007
The article deals with the analysis of the dependence of strength-related characteristics of welded joints from
chromium-molybdenum steel (ASTM A335 Grd. P5) and low-alloy manganese steel (S355J2G3 EN10025-2) upon the
parameters of heat treatment. Steel mechanical properties after post-weld heat treatment were analyzed. Chromiummolybdenum (Cr 5 %) steel and structural low-alloy manganese steel (Mn 1.4 %) was selected as a target. The
steels of various classes widely applicable in oil industry were selected.
At the beginning, samples were welded applying the same process. When welded, all the samples were heat treated.
Tempering for each sample was performed by applying different temperature and exposure time. For analysis
systemization the parameter of temperature-time P was applied. It was calculated for each heat treatment mode. After
post-weld heat treatment each sample was tested subject to tensile and impact strength.
P-dependence of mechanical properties of each steel sample was examined. It was determined that tensile strength
and impact strength decreases by increasing P value. It showed the drop of mechanical properties value upon
considerable increase of tempering temperature or application of a very long exposure time.
Keywords: welded joints, temperature-time parameter, tempering, tensile strength, impact strength.
INTRODUCTION
tempering and showed the deleterious effects of 650 C for

just 5 hours to be a 7 C shift in the transition temperature
[6]. As a matter of convenience, and because data seemed
to fit, the conventional Larson-Miller parameter (LMP
without dimension value) has been used to compare post
weld heat treatment cycles [5, 6]. This formula is shown as:
When welding or mechanically deforming of various

constructions the residual internal stresses can reduce the
reliability of structure or can provoke the structures
disintegration. In order to reduce of such internal stresses
influence, the most welded or deformed structure are cured
by heat treatment operation tempering [1, 2]. Heat treatment, once performed after welding, provides welded
joints with numerous positive properties such as softened
hardened areas of metal, increased ductility, positively
modified microstructures of heat treated areas of metal,
reduced internal stresses. Heat treatment improves corrosion resistance as well as stress-corrosion cracking
resistance under the influence of internal stresses. Heat
treatment of welded may also have some negative impacts
such as reduced tensile and impact strength, precipitation
hardening of certain steels which may cause fractures on
heat-exposed areas of metal. The cumulative effects of
time and temperature during post weld heat treatment have
a deleterious effect on normalized base metal properties
[2]. Some scientific works report that mechanical properties of various steels are strongly connected to their complex microstructure obtained after heat treatment that are
generally performed in order to achieve a good hardness
and/or tensile strength with sufficient ductility [3, 4]. The
deterioration of mechanical properties caused by post weld
heat treatment in carbon steels has been well documented
in 1972, as has the association of those changes with timetemperature parameters [5]. During the later eighties
studies by Konkol detailed the effects on carbon steels of
LMP = (T (F) + 460)(C + log t ) 10 4 ,
(1)
where C equals 20 and t is the time held in hours at

temperature T.
For quantitative evaluation of the heat treatment
parameters, European Union normative documents [6]
provide temperature-time dimensionless parameter P
analogous to LMP parameter, which is calculated
according to the formula:
P = T (20 + lg t ) 10 3 ,
(2)
where T is the thermal treatment temperature (Kelvin), t is

the time (hours) of exposure to thermal treatment
temperature.
When executing the tests required to certify welding
procedures for the particular steels (the tests were executed
at Mechanical Testing Laboratory of AB Maeiki
Nafta), the changes of strength-related characteristics of
welded joints in response to varying parameters of the heat
treatment were noticed.
The aim of analysis is to determine the mechanical
properties dependence of chromium-molybdenum and lowalloy manganese steel welded joints upon thermal
treatment parameters: i. e. the variation of tensile strength
and impact strength of joints by ranging of temperature
time parameter P and the variation of mechanical
properties of joints when thermal treatment parameters are
different but P parameter is steady.
Corresponding author. Tel.: +370-687-77219; fax: +370-443-92974.

E-mail address: [email protected] (V. Kumlytis)
123
(141 process LST EN 24063). BHLER EMK 8 electrode

wire was used, manufacturer Bhler Schwetechnik
Austria Gmbh. Wire type EN 1668: G4Si1. Specimens
from ASTM A335 P5 steel were welded in the same
process (141 LST EN 24063 process). Auxiliary wire type
EN12070: W CrMo5 Si (BHLER EMK 5-IG electrode
wire) was used.
Chemical composition as well as mechanical
properties of the weld metal is presented in Tables 3, 4.
MATERIALS
Chromium-molybdenum steel (ASTM A335 Grd. P5)
and low-alloy manganese steel (S355J2G3 EN10025-2)
were selected for the analysis [7, 8]. These different
alloyed structural steels were selected in order to determine
the influence of heat treatment on the welded joints from
differently graded steels. Structural low-alloy manganese
steels are mostly used for manufacture of units operated
within the range of 40 C to +475 C temperature. Heatresistant chromium-molybdenum steels are used for
manufacture of structures operated at higher temperatures.
The experimental research was performed on specimens
made from a 12 mm thick sheet S355J2G3 EN10025-2
steel and a weldless hot-rolled pipe ( 219.1 12.7) steel
ASTM A335 Grd. P5 (Tables 1 2).
RESEARCH TECHNIQUE
All 6 specimens from S355J2G3 EN10025-2 steel and
7 specimens from ASTM A335 P5 steel were welded. All
the samples were welded at the same position (PF
ISO6947, vertical upward weld). When welded, all the
specimens were heat treated under different regimes
(Tables 5 and 6). Heat treatment modes for low-alloy
manganese steel samples were selected the same as in
WRC bulletin 481 in order to compare the results with the
analysis performed by K. E. Orie and Ch. R. Roper [2].
Heat treatment modes for chromium-molybdenum steel
samples were selected the ones commonly applied by
Mazeikiu nafta in repair of piping of such steel.
The temperature-time parameters of each regime were
calculated according to formula (2). After evaluating the
possible tolerances of postweld heat treatment temperature
and time measures, the tolerance of parameter P should be
equal 0.026.
After thermal treatment process, the analyses of
welded metal listed below were carried out:
to check the quality of the weld the radiographic
X-rays analysis was used (level B) [9]. The analysis
was performed using X-ray generator RAPAN
M200/100.
to check the tensile properties then cross-tensile test
[10, 11] was used. Specimens were cut mechanically.
3 specimens were cut out of each welded joint. The
tensile test was carried out in a MIRI-500K tensile
machine. The tolerances of cross-tensile test are 1 %.
strenght properties wereevaluated by impact strength
test [12, 13]. 3 specimens were cut out of each welded
joint. Specimen type KVWS 0/1 (Charpy pendulum
V-notch, weld-metal notch, notched surface parallel to
the specimens surface, notch over central area of
weld). The tolerances of impact strength test are 1 %.
Table 1. Chemical composition of the main component of the

specimens, manufacturer's data
Steel
grade
Composition (mass), %
C
Si
Al
S355J2G3
EN 10025
0.18
0.26 0.032
P5 ASTM
A335
0.13
0.34
Cr
Mn
Mo
1.39
4.31
0.46
0.014 0.021
0.51 0.003 0.012
Table 2. Mechanical properties of the main component of the

specimens, manufacturer's data
Steel grade
Tensile
strength, Rm,
N/mm2
Yield
strength, Re,
N/mm2
Elongation,
A5,
%
S355J2G3
EN10025
600
467
21
P5 ASTM
A335
515
333
40
Table 3. Chemical composition of the weld metal, manufacturer's

data
Wire
grade
Composition (mass), %
C
Si
Mn
Cr
Mo
BHLER
EMK 8
0.10
1.0
1.7
BHLER
CM 5-IG
0.08
0.4
0.5
5.8
0.6
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

After the X-rays analysis we can state that all welded
joints conform to technical requirements. We didnt detect
any defects, influencing the results.
As shown in Fig. 1 the tensile strength decreases
uniformly with the increase of parameter P. After the heat
treatment (tempering) of welded joints from steel
S355J2G3, change of parameter P by one unit results the
tensile strength decrease by ~18 N/mm2, that is approximately 3 %. Analyzing results of impact strength test of
steel S355J2G3 welded joints (Fig. 3) it is evident that the
impact strength decreases almost linearly with the increase
of parameter P.
Analyzing the test results of the samples having equal
or similar parameter P (samples 3 and 4) the attention
Table 4. Mechanical properties of the weld metal, manufacturer's

data
Wire
grade
Yield
Tensile
Elongation, Impact work
strength
strength
ISO-V KV, J
A5, %
2
2
Rm, N/mm Re, N/mm
BHLER
EMK 8
600
470
26
50
(at 40 C)
BHLER
CM 5-IG
620
510
20
200
(at +20 C)
Specimens from S355J2G3 EN10025-2 steel were

welded using gas shielded tungsten arc welding process
124
Table 5. Heat treatment parameters of welded specimens from S355J2G3 EN10025-2 steel
Specimen
No.
Equipment used for

heat treatment
Preheat rate
starting from
300 C, C/h
Temperature of heat
treatment, C (K)
Time of
exposure, h
Cooling rate,
C/h
Temperature-time
parameter P
Electric furnace
150
620 (893)
150
17.86
Electric furnace
150
650 (923)
150
18.16
Electric furnace
150
620 (893)
16
150
18.94
Electric furnace
150
680 (953)
150
19.06
Electric furnace
150
650 (923)
16
150
19.57
Electric furnace
150
680 (953)
16
150
20.20
Table 6. Heat treatment parameters of welded specimens of specimens from ASTM A335 P5 steel
Specimen
No.
Equipment used for

heat treatment
Preheat rate
starting from
300 C,C/h
Temperature of heat
treatment, C (K)
Time of
exposure, h
Cooling rate,
C/h
Temperature-time
parameter P
Electric furnace
250
750 (1023.15)
150
21.17
Electric furnace
250
750 (1023.15)
150
20.95
Electric furnace
250
750 (1023.15)
150
21.38
Flexible elements
100
750 (1023.15)
200
20.46
Flexible elements
400
750 (1023.15)
2.5
200
20.87
Flexible elements
100
740 (1013.15)
200
20.56
Flexible elements
100
730 (1003.15)
200
20.54
Tensile strength Rm,

N/mm2
for the sample 4 temperature was T = 680 C and

exposure time t = 1 h.
Tensile test results for the steel P5 (Fig. 2) show that
the tensile strength decreases with the increase at P as well.
When P value change from 20.46 to 20.87 the change of a
value Rm compounds is ~40 N/mm2 per one unit of the
parameter P. The average rate of variation tensile strenght
of steel P5 on equal ~70 N/mm2 per unit P, that is
approximately 10%.
540
520
500
480
17.5
18
19
20
Fig. 1. The dependence of the tensile strength of welded joints

from S355J2G3 steel on the temperature-time parameter
P
Impact strength KV, J/cm2
260
Tensile strength Rm,

N/mm2
660
640
620
600
580
20.5
21
21.5
240
220
200
180
160
150
Temperature- time parameter P
Fig. 2. The dependence of the tensile strength of welded joints

from ASTM A335 P5 steel on the temperature-time
parameter P
17.5
18
19
20
should be paid that values of the tensile and impact

strength are similar.
However, the samples tempering temperatures and
exposure time differ (Table 5):
for the sample 3 temperature was T = 620 C and
exposure time t = 16 h;
Fig. 3. The dependence of the impact strength of welded joints

from S355J2G3 steel on the temperature-time parameter
P
Steel P5 impact strength varies almost linearly with the

parameter P (Fig. 4). By increase of parameter P value in
one unit, the impact strength decreases ~ 24 J/cm2.
125
Impact strength KV, J/cm2
treatment must be in the interval 20.4 20.6. Such

particular value of the temperature-time parameter secure
the optimal strength-related characteristics of welded
joints.
200
190
180
170
REFERENCES
160
1.
21
20.5
21.5
2.
Fig. 4. The dependence of the impact strength of welded joints

from ASTM A335 P5 steel on the temperature-time
parameter P
American scientists K. Orie and Ch. R. Roper [2]

investigated the behavior of low-alloy manganese steel
plate (ASTM A516 Grade 70) subjected to post weld heat
treatment.They found, that the cumulative effects of time
and temperature during post weld heat treatment have a
deleterious effect on base metal properties. Each increase
1.0 magnitude in parameter P above 17.5 in general lowers
tensile strength by approximately 2 %. Our results are bit
different because studied materials are different, but
quantitavely they are agreement with [2].
3.
4.
5.
CONCLUSIONS
1. More intensive (at higher temperature or longer time
of exposure than typically) heat treatment with the
increasing temperature-time parameter P has a negative
impact on strength-related characteristics of welded joints
from S355J2G3 EN10025-2 and ASTM A335 P5 steels.
Such heat treatment regime decreases the tensile and
impact strength of welded joints.
2. The values of strength characteristics of welded
joints are alike, when the temperature-time parameter P is
similar, though the temperature and time of exposure
differs.
3. For heat treatment of welded joint from S355J2G3
EN10025-2 steel, it is necessary to apply the processing
regime with the temperature-time parameter which would
not exceed 19. In case the value of the temperature-time
parameter is higher, the tensile strength of the heat treated
steel is smaller than the minimum one specified in the
standard. The latter is to be taken into account when precalculating the strength of constructions.
4. When heat treatment (after welding) is applied to
chromium-molybdenum steels with 5 % chromium
content, the temperature-time parameter of selected heat
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
126
Bernshtein, M., Rahshtadt, A. Metals Science and Heat

Treatment of Metals. Manual Book. Moscow:
Mashinostroenije, 1991: 384 p. (in Russian).
Orie, K., Roper, Ch. R., Upitis, E. The Effect of Post Weld
Heat Treatment and Notch Toughness on Welded Joints and
on Normalized Base- Metal Properties of A516 Steel. WRC
bulletin 481. New York Welding Research Council, Inc.
2003: 83 p.
Mebarki, N., Delagnes, D., Lamesle, P., Delmas, F.,
Levaillant, C. Relationship between Microstructure and
Mechanical Properties of a 5 % Cr Tempered Martensitic
Tool Steel Materials Science and Engineering A 387 389
2004: pp. 171 175.
Thomson, R. C., Miller, M. K. Carbide Precipitation in
Martensite during the Early Stages of Tempering Cr- and
Mo-containing Low Alloy Steels Acta Metallurgica Inc.
46 (6) 1998: pp. 2203 2213.
Gulvin, T. F. The Influence of Stress Relief on the
Properties of C and C-Mn Pressure-Vessel Plate Steels
Presented at the West of Scotland Iron &Steel Institute One
Day Conference, 1972.
Konkol, P. J. Effect of Long-Time Postweld Heat
Treatment on the Properties of Constructional-Steel
Weldments. WRC Bulletin 330
New York Welding
Research Council, Inc. 1988: pp. 11 26.
LST EN 10025. Hot Rolled Products of Non-Alloy
Structural Steels.
ASTM A335. Specification for Seamless Ferritic Alloy-steel
Pipe for High-temperature Service.
LST EN 25817. Arc-welded Joint in Steels. Guidance on
Quality Levels for Imperfections.
LST EN 895. Destructive Tests on Welds in Metallic
Materials. Transverse Tensile Test.
LST EN 10002-1. Metallic Materials. Tensile Testing. Part
1: Method of Test.
LST EN 875. Destructive Tests on Welds in Metallic
Materials. Impact Tests. Test Specimen Location, Notch
Orientation and Examination.
LST EN10045-1. Metallic Materials. Charpy Impact Test.
Part 1: Test Method.

WRC Buletine 330 Related

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

WRC Buletine 330 Related

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

WRC Buletine 330 Related

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

ISSN 13921320 MATERIALS SCIENCE (MEDIAGOTYRA). Vol. 13, No. 2.

The Influence of Temperature-Time Parameter of Welded Joints Thermal

tempering and showed the deleterious effects of 650 C for

When welding or mechanically deforming of various

LMP = (T (F) + 460)(C + log t ) 10 4 ,

where C equals 20 and t is the time held in hours at

where T is the thermal treatment temperature (Kelvin), t is

Corresponding author. Tel.: +370-687-77219; fax: +370-443-92974.

(141 process LST EN 24063). BHLER EMK 8 electrode

Table 1. Chemical composition of the main component of the

0.51 0.003 0.012

Table 2. Mechanical properties of the main component of the

Table 3. Chemical composition of the weld metal, manufacturer's

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Table 4. Mechanical properties of the weld metal, manufacturer's

Specimens from S355J2G3 EN10025-2 steel were

Equipment used for

Equipment used for

Tensile strength Rm,

for the sample 4 temperature was T = 680 C and

Fig. 1. The dependence of the tensile strength of welded joints

Tensile strength Rm,

Temperature- time parameter P

Fig. 2. The dependence of the tensile strength of welded joints

Temperature- time parameter P

should be paid that values of the tensile and impact

Fig. 3. The dependence of the impact strength of welded joints

Steel P5 impact strength varies almost linearly with the

Impact strength KV, J/cm2

treatment must be in the interval 20.4 20.6. Such

Temperature- time parameter P

Fig. 4. The dependence of the impact strength of welded joints

American scientists K. Orie and Ch. R. Roper [2]

Bernshtein, M., Rahshtadt, A. Metals Science and Heat

You might also like