Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 324 views

    IMs Rubric

    Uploaded by

    Lanvin De Laneau
    - This rubric evaluates instructional materials (IMs) created by student teachers for lessons. It assesses creativity, content accuracy, implementation of IMs, and presentation. The rubric contains criteria for very good, good, fair, and poor performance in each category. Points are assigned for each level of performance, with very good receiving the most points and poor receiving the fewest points. The cooperating teacher evaluates the student teacher's IMs and signs the rubric.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    IMs Rubric

    Uploaded by

    Lanvin De Laneau
    324 views2 pages
    - This rubric evaluates instructional materials (IMs) created by student teachers for lessons. It assesses creativity, content accuracy, implementation of IMs, and presentation. The rubric contains criteria for very good, good, fair, and poor performance in each category. Points are assigned for each level of performance, with very good receiving the most points and poor receiving the fewest points. The cooperating teacher evaluates the student teacher's IMs and signs the rubric.

    Original Description:

    b dfgyd

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    - This rubric evaluates instructional materials (IMs) created by student teachers for lessons. It assesses creativity, content accuracy, implementation of IMs, and presentation. The rubric contains criteria for very good, good, fair, and poor performance in each category. Points are assigned for each level of performance, with very good receiving the most points and poor receiving the fewest points. The cooperating teacher evaluates the student teacher's IMs and signs the rubric.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    324 views2 pages

    IMs Rubric

    Uploaded by

    Lanvin De Laneau
    - This rubric evaluates instructional materials (IMs) created by student teachers for lessons. It assesses creativity, content accuracy, implementation of IMs, and presentation. The rubric contains criteria for very good, good, fair, and poor performance in each category. Points are assigned for each level of performance, with very good receiving the most points and poor receiving the fewest points. The cooperating teacher evaluates the student teacher's IMs and signs the rubric.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    Saint Louis College

    City of San Fernando, La Union


    College of Teacher Education
    CENTER OF EXCELLENCE
    Name: ____________________________________________
    Course & Year:
    __________________________
    CRITERION
    Creativity
    (15 ts.)

    Content &
    Accuracy of
    Information in
    Material
    (15 pts.)
    Implementati
    on
    Maximizing of
    IMs to teach
    the lesson
    (10 pts.)
    Presentation
    (10 pts.)

    Cooperating Teacher: _______________________________


    Laboratory School: __________________________________

    RUBRIC FOR INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS


    GOOD
    FAIR

    POOR

    - Shows proper
    creativity and
    resourcefulness in
    preparing and
    presenting the IMs
    - Variety of materials is
    excellent which captures
    students attention and
    interests (15 pts.)
    - IMs are clearly related
    to the subject matter.

    - Shows proper creativity and


    resourcefulness in preparing
    and presenting the IMs

    - Shows some creativity


    in preparing and
    presenting the IMs.

    - Little creativity and


    resourcefulness are
    shown.

    - Good variety and blending of


    IMs which captures attention
    of some of the students. (11
    pts.)

    - Little variety of IMs; few


    students are interested.
    (7 pts.)

    - No variety of IMs.
    (3 pts.)

    - IMs are related to the subject


    matter.

    - Topics are clearly


    explained and
    understood using the
    IMs (15 pts.)
    - IMs are well developed
    aid for implementation
    (4 or more senses are
    being used)
    - IMs can be easily
    utilized in other topics /
    subject matter
    - Clear articulation and
    proper volume of voice
    in presenting the
    relevance of the IMs.
    - Very smart and
    rational on explaining
    and answering
    questions (10 pts.)

    - Sufficient pieces of
    information are gathered
    through the use of IMs. (11
    pts.)
    - IMs are developed aid for
    implementation (3 senses are
    being used)

    - IMs are a little bit


    related to the subject
    matter.
    - There is a great deal of
    information that is not
    clearly connected to the
    IMs. (7 pts.)
    - IMs are for
    implementation (2
    senses are being used).

    - IMs are not related to


    the subject matter.
    (Not applicable in the
    subject)
    (3 pts.)

    VERY GOOD

    - IMs can be utilized in other


    topics / subject matter. (7
    pts.)
    - Clear articulation, but no
    proper volume of voice in
    presenting the relevance of
    the IMs.
    - Smart and rational in
    explaining and answering
    questions.
    (7 pts.)

    - IMs can be partly


    utilized in other topics /
    subject matter (5 pts.)
    - Some mumbling and no
    proper volume of voice
    in presenting the
    relevance of the IMs.
    - Smart in explaining the
    importance of the IMs,
    but not good in
    answering questions.
    (5 pts.)

    - IMs are not an aid for


    implementation (1
    sense is being used)
    - IMs cannot be used in
    other topics / subject
    matter.
    (3 pts.)
    - No articulation and
    with an audible voice
    and the rate is too fast
    or too slow.
    - Cannot explain the
    relevance of the IMs
    and cannot answer
    questions properly.
    (3 pts.)

    SCOR
    E

    Signature of the Cooperating Teacher:


    ___________

    _______________________________________

    Total:

    You might also like