THPCH010
THPCH010
THPCH010
INTRODUCTION
Electron beam – laser interaction near the cathode
surface could be important in case of short and strong
laser pulses, when the involved field becomes high and
the electrons have a very low momentum (emission is Figure 1: P-polarized plane wave incident on a lossy
achieved slightly overcoming the cathode work-function medium [3].
to reduce thermal emittance). We consider in this study
the case of a metal photocathode. Other kinds of The expression of the electromagnetic field of a plane
photocathodes, such as high Quantum Efficiency (QE) wave incident on a lossy medium for a p-polarized wave
Cs2Te have no need to be driven at high power, in is the following, see also Fig. 1:
addition their response is slower (some ps), and the Bi = yˆ ( E i / c)cos(k i .r t + i )
considerations that will be made in this framework
require some slight adjustments to fit the alternative case E i = E i [ xˆ cos + ˆz sin ] cos(ki .r t + i )
of semiconductor cathodes. A large laser field at the Br = yˆ R( E i / c)cos(k r .r t + R )
cathode can produce “heating” of the electron beam
through the induced wiggling motion. The degree to E r = E i R[ xˆ cos + ˆz sin ] cos(k r .r t + R ) .
which the laser field causes emittance growth can be
estimated as [1]: Assuming a cathode reflection coefficient constant
within the laser wavelenght spectrum. The previous
l expressions can be easily extended to the general case of
n = al x Z 0 Pl a real laser pulse, without operating integration over the
2m e c 2
spectrum. It is sufficient to substitute the incoming
Here al is the peak normalized vector potential of the laser envelope expression into the amplitude of the incoming
field, Pl is the peak laser power and l the laser field Ei.
wavelength (note the independence of the beam size x ). Dealing with lossy media (i.e. radiation must be
For example a laser pulse 300 fs long with an energy of absorbed to generate photo-electrons) the p-polarization is
0.2 mJ as required by a blow out experiment [1], able to reflected again as p, but with a phase shift due to the
extract 0.33 nC charge from a 10-5 quantum efficiency complex index of refraction n. Photoemitted electrons
cathode, results in a 0.04 μm induced emittance growth. experience a field that is sum of incoming and reflected
wave. Inside photocathode the field amplitude is the plot, after a time of 1 ps the emittance growth due to
attenuated exponentially in direction normal to the space charge prevails.
surface, and propagates at a slightly different angle, this
effect will be include in a future work.
Both normal and oblique laser incidence (at 70 degrees)
have been taken in consideration in HOMDYN simula-
tions. A laser field amplitude of 190 MV/m is assumed,
the RF field experienced by the electrons injected in the
gun with 26 phase degrees is 53 MV/m, (120 MV/m peak
field). Laser wavelength was fixed at 266 nm, able to
drive Cu and other metal photo-cathodes.
The first case considered here is a 10 ps long laser
pulse at normal incidence and a 1 nC e-bunch charge,
corresponding to the nominal SPARC parameters [4]. An
integration time step of 0.1 fs (corresponding approxi-
mately to 10% of the laser central wavelength period) and
1000 slices 40 nm long (about /7) were used. As was
expected, each slice experiences the fast varying field of
the laser, as a cosequence slice centroids undergoes a fast
oscillation in space. The amplitude of the oscillations
grows with the time, and so this effect is enhanced in the Figure 3: Electron trajectories for different injection
first emitted slices compared to the last ones as shown in phases in a laser field with grazing incidence. (Trans-
Fig. 2. verse displacement [m] versus time [s]).
REFERENCES
[1] J.B. Rosenzweig et al., “Experimental testing of
dynamically optimized photoelectron beams”, Proc.
of the ICFA workshop “The Physics and applications
of high brightness electron beams”, Erice, 2005.
[2] M. Ferrario et al., “HOMDYN study for the LCLS
photoinjector”, SLAC-PUB-8400 (2000).
Figure 6: Normalised beam current modulation at the end [3] T. Plettner, SLAC-PUB-11800 (2006).
of the photo-emission process, blow up of Fig. 5. Notice [4] D. Alesini et al., “Status of the SPARC project”,
the deep current modulation (40%) on the laser these proceedings.
wavelength scale. [5] M. Boscolo et al., “Laser comb: simulations of pre-
modulated e- beams at the photocathode of a high
This effect could be important when a magnetic brightness rf photoinjector”, these proceedings.
compressor is installed in the downstream beam line [6] Z. Huang et al., Phys. Rev. STAB 7, 074401 (2004).