Measuring Efficiency of Cloud Computing

Using ROI of CC
P.KALAI KANNAN, MCA., [M.Phil].,
Asst.Professor
Dept of M.Sc Software Systems, KG College of Arts and Science
Coimbatore, India
[email protected]
Abstract: This Paper presents the initial
conclusions on how to build and measure
Efficiency of Cloud Computing using Return on
Investment (ROI) from Cloud Computing. Datas
was collected from the Cloud Business Artifacts
(CBA) one of The Open Group Cloud Computing
Work Group.
Cloud Computing is a model for enabling
convenient, on-demand network access to a shared
pool of configurable computing resources (e.g.,
networks, servers, storage, applications, and
services) that can be rapidly provisioned and
released with minimal management effort or service
provider interaction. This enables users to avoid
over-provisioning and under-provisioning, to
improve cost, revenue, and margin, and to provide
new business services based on new ways of
operating. This Paper

Introduces the main factors affecting ROI

from Cloud Computing, and compares the
business development of Cloud Computing
with that of other innovative technologies
Describes the main approaches to building
ROI by taking advantage of the benefits
that Cloud Computing provides
Describes approaches to measuring this
ROI, absolutely and in comparison with
traditional approaches to IT, by giving an
overview of Cloud Key Performance
Indicators (KPIs) and metrics

The result is an analysis of how to build and

measure efficiency of Cloud Computing using ROI
that will help businesses to reap the benefits of
Cloud computing, and take advantage of its
potential for incremental improvement and
disruptive transformation of business processes.

Cloud computing has been described as a

technological change brought about by the
convergence of a number of new and existing
technologies.
The promise of Cloud Computing is primarily
the following key technical characteristics:

The ability to create the illusion of infinite

capacity; the performance is the same if
scaled for one, to a hundred, or a thousand
users
with
consistent
service-level
characteristics.

Abstraction of the infrastructure so

applications are not locked into devices or
locations.

Pay-as-you-go usage of the IT service; you

only pay for what you use and with no or
minimal up-front investment costs. You
typically just use the service through a
connection and device.

The service is on-demand; able to scale up

and scale down with near instant
availability. Typically, no forward planning
forecast is required.

Access to applications and information from

any access point.

But this is only half the story. These technical

characteristics can also be found in non-disruptive
technology solutions. The rate of change and
magnitude of cost reduction and specific technical
performance impact of Cloud Computing are not just
incremental, but can give a five to ten times order of
magnitude improvement.
The Capacity-Utilization Curve

INTRODUCTION

The famous graph used by Amazon Web

Services illustrating the capacity versus utilization

curve has become an icon in Cloud Computing. The

model illustrates the central idea around Cloud-based
services enabled through an on-demand business
provisioning model to meet actual usage.
The Capacity versus Utilization Curve

Figure 2: Iconic Business Models

Examples of these include:

Figure 1
Why this matters to business is that one of the
core precepts of Cloud Computing is to avoid the cost
impact of over-provisioning and under-provisioning.
This is in addition to the opportunity for cost,
revenue, and margin advantages of business services
enabled by rapid deployment of Cloud services with
low entry cost, and the potential to enter and exploit
new markets.
I contend that in years from now, when Cloud
Computing is seen in a historical context, the
capacity versus utilization curve will be seen as an
iconic model that had the same effect as previous
well known business models.

The Moores Law model that establishes the

concept of exponential growth in
computational power but has subsequently
been seen in other technology areas,
including storage and network
The technology hype cycle that established
the emergence of innovation lifecycles, and
is developed in publications by Charles H.
Fine and Clayton M. Christensen.
The Boston Consulting Group Growth-Share
Matrix that can be used to show how key
industrial markets and products and services
undergo transitions as the maturity lifecycles
emerge, grow, and recede

But what does this potential icon mean for

business? Matching capacity and actual utilization on
demand improves operational efficiency, but is that
all there is to it? Capacity and utilization are Key
Performance Indicators (KPIs). They measure how
much or how little something is being used. But is
this aligned and being used to generate Return on
Investment (ROI)?
Race to the Bottom versus Quality of Service
(QoS): The positioning of Cloud Computing, while
initially seen as a disruptive technology influence on
both buyer and seller prospects, is now evolving into
a trade-off between low-cost arbitrage and added
value Quality of Service (QoS).

Figure 3

The terms race to the bottom or similarly the

prisoners dilemma refer to the competing drive
between participants in a market driven by the need
to make the greatest cost savings. The term is often
seen in a negative context, as the lower costs and
margins are seen as a detriment to the participants.
Massively scalable services from Cloud Computing
providers have the effect of driving down costs and
prices, as the dynamics of competition are shifted by
the presence of potentially rapid cost reductions and
huge data center investments.
The counter-balance to this is the Quality of
Service (QoS), and the associated Cost of that
Service (CoS) that characterizes the value of the cost
per unit of performance provisioned.

is a recommended area of research going forward as

more products and services become Cloud-enabled.
Traditional IT Compared to Cloud Computing
The iconic capacity versus utilization curve of
Figure 1 provides a yardstick of current thinking in
Cloud Computing provisioning. It is shown here for
increasing demand, but the same model can be
applied to both growth and decline of capacity
demand in a periodic pattern typical of many
businesses.
The following table shows some of the
characteristics of traditional IT compared to CloudComputing.

The differentiator of Cloud Computing is not just

the utility infrastructure computing services, but
includes all the higher-level services that enhance and
build business service value. I see this as the
influence and scope of the movement from IT-centric
to business-centric services across a wider services
continuum, with utility services for infrastructure at
one end, and with business-centric software and
business processes delivered as a service from the
Cloud at the other.
In addition, the need to provide adequate security
should be considered. People are willing to pay a
little more for a service if they are assured that there
will be good security measures in placed.
This issue is highlighted in this Paper as it has a
direct bearing on the Cloud Computing ROI debate
and how it is measured:

Pricing and costing of Cloud services

Funding approaches to Cloud services

Return on Investment (ROI)

Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)

Total cost of ownership (TCO)

Risk management

Decisions and choices evaluation processes

for Cloud services

The discussion of the market dynamics of Cloud

Computing is not developed further in this Paper, but

Return on Investment from the Cloud

The central theme of this Paper is how to go
beyond the initial capacity and utilization benefits
described in Cloud Computing.
The view of capacity and utilization is a
technology provider/seller viewpoint which is
essentially based on key performance indicators
(KPIs) rather than business benefit metrics.

IT capacity, as measured by storage, CPU

cycles, network bandwidth, or workload
memory capacity is an indicator of
performance.

IT utilization, as measured by uptime

availability and volume of usage is an
indicator of activity and usability.

But effective cost/performance ratios and levels

of usage activity do not necessarily imply
proportional business benefits. They are just
indicators of business activity that are not in
themselves more valuable than lower operating cost.
There are, however, business metrics that translate
the indicators of the capacity-utilization curve to
direct and indirect benefits to the business, as
illustrated in Figure 4.
Figure 4

Business Metrics Derived From Capacity/Utilization

These metrics are described in the following sections.

Speed of Cost Reduction Cost of Adoption/DeAdoption
The introduction of Cloud Computing as an
option transforms cost of ownership and changes the
dynamics of the provisioning cycle in a number of
fundamental ways.
The speed and rate of change of cost reduction
can be much faster using Cloud Computing than
traditional investment and divestment of IT assets. In
Cloud Computing the buyer can move from a one
model to another model through purchasing the use
of the service rather than having to own and manage
the assets of that service. This responsibility is
transferred to the service provider.

Figure 5 Speed of Cost Reduction, Cost of Change

The use of Cloud Computing to the user also

potentially means a movement to a pay-as-you-go
style billing model which can have different tariffs
and contractual obligations compared to traditional IT
ownership. These can include minimum usage
periods and flexible pricing per usage profiling.
The key issue is the ability to adopt and remove
the service either at the point of use (to scale up and
down) or to make choices to use new services or
change service provider.
Migration between Cloud services is still a
challenge. There are portability and interoperability
issues.. And hosting corporate and personal data and
knowledge on the Cloud can make customers of
Cloud services dependent on the providers.
There is a trade-off between the benefits of
speed, cost, and Quality of Service (QoS) from a
particular Cloud service provider and their ecosystem
of services versus the flexibility and choice of
alternative services and Cloud solutions.
The cost of change in an ROI business case is
less in Cloud Computing as the choice of selected
Cloud services is more stable and more cost-effective
than traditional ownership.
Cloud Computing Key Performance Indicators
and Metrics
Cloud Computing introduces an expanded
context for service-oriented business and IT.
Developing ROI models that show how Cloud
Computing adoption can benefit both business and IT
consumers and providers involves examining the key
technology features and business operating model
changes.
This section gives an overview of ROI models to
support Cloud Computing assessments and business
cases in two aspects:

Key Performance Indicator ratios that target

Cloud Computing adoption, comparing
specific metrics of traditional IT with Cloud
Computing solutions. These have been
classified as cost, time, quality, and
profitability indicators relating to Cloud
Computing characteristics.

Key Return on Investment savings models

that demonstrate cost, time, quality,
compliance, revenue, and profitability
improvement by comparing traditional IT
with Cloud Computing

The overview of Cloud Computing ROI models

considers both indicators and ROI viewpoints.
Figure 6 shows an overview of Cloud Computing
ROI models and KPIs.

Figure 7 Cloud Computing ROI Models Cost

Indicator Ratios
Cloud ROI Profitability Indicator Ratios
Figure 8 shows the profitability indicator ratios, and
outline explanations are given below.

Figure 6 Cloud Computing ROI Models and KPIs

Cloud ROI Cost Indicator Ratios
Figure 7 shows the cost indicator ratios, and outline
explanations are given below.

Figure 8 Cloud ROI Profitability Indicator Ratios

Revenue efficiencies:

Ability to generate margin increase/budget

efficiency per margin
Rate of annuity revenue

Market disruption rate:

Rate of revenue growth

Rate of new market acquisition

Discussion
The Importance of a Business Perspective of the
Cloud
From a business perspective, the way an
organization operates differentiating business
processes and their Quality of Service (QoS) is key to
business operating success. Identifying competitive
business processes as well as standard commodity
operations will improve the focus of innovative
market growth and cost of service optimization
activities made possible by business models based on
Cloud Computing opportunities.
Just focusing on infrastructure improvements may
result in cost rationalization but may miss the impact
and value of applications and business processes to
the end customer. QoS is an essential ingredient in
evaluating the business effectiveness. The elements
of QoS are made up of infrastructure, resources,
activities, and services spanning the whole lifecycle
of business.
Amortization of Economies of Scale
In Cloud Computing the operating challenges
experienced from one customer can be proactively
fixed for all the other customers of the Cloud service
by using a shared platform. Amortization of problems
is just one example of how a Cloud solution can
achieve more favorable QoS levels. So, value can be
leveraged from amortizing economic economies of
scale across the collective membership potential of a
service ecosystem created by the Cloud.
Business Portfolio Focus
Just looking at Cloud Computing from a
technical infrastructure point of view is potentially
missing the wider picture of the impact of technology
on the business.
Overall, what matters is defining the value to
business. Value can be defined in many ways. It does
not just mean the financial values of Total Cost of
Ownership (TCO) and Return on Investment (ROI),
but can also mean customer value, seller provider
value, broker value, market brand value, corporate
value, as well as technical value of the investment.
Your business is a portfolio of business processes.
Using portfolio management techniques, group your
business processes into three domains where the
processes in each domain have common IT
enablement solution selection criteria (for example,
differentiating based on IT, differentiating not based
on IT, and not differentiating), and apply the solution
selection criteria.
The business perspective also includes
consideration of whether using Cloud services can

help facilitate interactions with business partners or

partner organizations for example, by using SOA or
EDI through the Cloud and whether using Cloud
services may endanger any existing interactions,
where suppliers of data impose particular conditions
for handling confidential data.
The datas of the Cloud Business Artifacts
(CBA) in The Open Group Cloud Computing Work
Group is seeking to identify the key Cloud buyer
questions and in a language business can understand
and use to target solutions to meet real business
requirements.
Conclusions
Cloud Computing is an important stage in the
development of IT systems, comparable with the
emergence of the mainframe, the minicomputer, the
microprocessor, and the Internet.
Cloud Computing can provide many advantages
over conventional approaches to IT provisioning,
which can translate into significant improvements in
ROI. But what makes it particularly exciting is that
its potential effect on business is not just incremental
improvement, but disruptive transformation through
new operating models.
This Paper provides an analysis of how to build
and measure ROI that will help businesses to reap the
benefits of Cloud Computing, and take advantage of
its potential for incremental improvement and
disruptive transformation of business processes.
Our understanding of Cloud Computing is
currently at an early stage. This is an initial analysis.
ROI models will evolve as the technology matures.
This evolution will be reflected, and key indicator
ratios will be described more detail in near future.
References
[1]
[2]

[3]
[4]

[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]

The NIST Definition of Cloud Computing; refer to

http://csrc.nist.gov/groups/SNS/cloud-computing/
Charles H. Fine: Clock Speed Winning Industry Control in the
Age of Temporary Advantage, Basic Books New Edition, 1999,
ISBN: 978-0738201535.
Clayton M. Christensen: The Innovators Dilemma, Harper,
1997, ISBN: 0875845851.
White Paper: Above the Clouds, RAD Lab., University of
California, Berkeley, February 2009;
refer to http://berkeleyClouds.blogspot.com/
Ivar Subrah: Why Buy the Cow, WebEx Communications, 2007,
ISBN: 978-0615163130.
Nicolas Carr: The Big Switch, Norton & Co., 2009, ISBN: 9780393333947.
Chris Anderson: Long Tail Future Business Selling, Hyperion,
2006, ISBN: 978-1401302375.
Clones your Phone in the Cloud: The Parallelization of Tasks,
The Register, June 2009;
refer to www.theregister.co.uk/2009/06/19/clone_cloud/ITEL