Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study
Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study
Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study
K. Craig
Fluid Power
Dynamic System Investigation
K. Craig
Dynamic System
Investigation
Process
Fluid Power
Dynamic System Investigation
K. Craig
Fluid Power
Dynamic System Investigation
K. Craig
Fluid Power
Dynamic System Investigation
K. Craig
K. Craig
K. Craig
K. Craig
K. Craig
K. Craig
10
K. Craig
11
Efficiency
A pump-controlled system is much more efficient
since both pressure and flow are closely matched to
load requirements.
A valve-controlled system is much less efficient ( 2/3)
because of the constant supply pressure regardless of
load, the large pressure drop across the control valve,
and significant leakage.
Size
A pump-controlled system has a bulky power element
which makes the application difficult if the pump is
close coupled to the actuator.
A valve-controlled system has a small and light power
element but a bulky hydraulic power supply is
required.
Fluid Power
Dynamic System Investigation
K. Craig
12
Heat Dissipation
A pump-controlled system requires an auxiliary
pump and valving to provide oil for
replenishment and cooling.
A valve-controlled system has a build-up of oil
temperature because of inefficiency which
necessitates heat exchangers to dissipate the
wasted energy.
Cost and Complexity
A pump-controlled system generally requires
an electrohydraulic servo to stroke the pump
which increases system cost and complexity.
Several valve-controlled systems can be
powered by a single hydraulic power supply.
Fluid Power
Dynamic System Investigation
K. Craig
13
K. Craig
14
Physical System
Fluid Power
Dynamic System Investigation
K. Craig
15
K. Craig
16
System Description
This system is one of the most basic hydraulic control
systems.
It uses a standard four-way, three-position valve to
control the output characteristics of a single-rod,
double-acting linear actuator by controlling the
volumetric flow of hydraulic fluid into and out of the
actuator.
The load to be moved by the actuator is shown as a
single mass-spring-damper system with a loaddisturbance force.
A fixed-displacement pump provides a constant
volumetric flow rate into the supply line to the valve.
Fluid Power
Dynamic System Investigation
K. Craig
17
Fluid Power
Dynamic System Investigation
K. Craig
18
Fluid Power
Dynamic System Investigation
K. Craig
19
Fluid Power
Dynamic System Investigation
K. Craig
20
Analysis
Force Analysis
F = load force = dynamic term that represents the
force of the load on the actuator
m = inertia of the load; we often neglect the inertia
of the actuator itself because it is much smaller
than the actual forces that are generated by the
actuator. This high force-to-inertia ratio is one of
the principle advantages of using a hydraulic
system as opposed to an electric system.
c = equivalent viscous damping constant
representing energy dissipation effects associated
with the load and moving parts of the actuator.
Fluid Power
Dynamic System Investigation
K. Craig
21
K. Craig
22
Ps
Ps
d2 y
dy
m 2 c ky af A A PA A B PB F
dt
dt
2
2
We see that the required inputs for adjusting the position
of the load are PA and PB. These pressures result from
the changing flow and volume conditions within the
actuator itself.
Fluid Power
Dynamic System Investigation
K. Craig
23
Fluid Power
Dynamic System Investigation
K. Craig
24
Fluid Power
Dynamic System Investigation
K. Craig
25
PA Q A
AAv
v
QA
F
f
PA A A
v f
K. Craig
26
Pressure Analysis
We assume that the pressure transients that result from
fluid compressibility are negligible.
This assumption is especially valid for a system
design in which the transmission lines between the
valve and the actuator are very short, i.e., small
volumes of fluid exist on either side of the actuator.
The omission of pressure transient effects is also valid
for systems in which the load dynamics are much
slower than the pressure dynamics themselves.
Since the load dynamics typically occur over a range
of seconds and the pressure dynamics typically occur
over a range of milliseconds, it is usually safe to
neglect the time variation of the pressure in favor of
the time variation of the overall systems.
Fluid Power
Dynamic System Investigation
K. Craig
27
A A dy
QA
av dt
A B dy
QB
av dt
K. Craig
28
The net rate of mass efflux
0
dV vdA
through the control surface plus
t CV
CS
the rate of change of mass
V Q
0 CV V
inside the control volume
CV
CV CV
net
equals zero. Velocity is
VCV Q
measured relative to the control
0V
CV
net
volume.
Here we assume that all of the densities of the system (inlet
flow, outlet flow, and control volume) are the same and equal
to .
This assumption is justified for incompressible fluids and is
quite accurate for compressible fluids if pressure variations
are not too large and the temperature of flow into the control
volume is almost equal to the temperature of the flow out of
the control volume.
dP 0
P
P dt
Fluid Power
Dynamic System Investigation
0 V PCV Q net
K. Craig
29
Q A Q2 Q1
Fluid Power
Dynamic System Investigation
QB Q4 Q3
K. Craig
30
2
P
Q A
2 A
Cd
P
A x 0
x 0
ACd
Q
Kc
P 0
2P
Ps
K q x K c PA Pr
2
P
Q2 K c s K q x K c Ps PA
2
P
Q3 K c s K q x K c Ps PB
2
P
Q4 K c s K q x K c PB Pr
2
Q1 K c
K q 2P A
P
Q / x
Kp
x 0 Q / P 0 K c
A x 0
K. Craig
31
Q A 2K q x 2K c PA
2
Ps
QB 2K q x 2K c PB
2
A A dy
QA
av dt
Ps
A A dy
PA
Kp x
2
2K c av dt
A B dy
QB
av dt
Ps
A B dy
PB
K p x
2
2K c av dt
Fluid Power
Dynamic System Investigation
K. Craig
32
K. Craig
33
Analysis Summary
Ps
A A dy
PA
Kp x
2
2K c av dt
Ps
A B dy
PB
K p x
2
2K c av dt
d2 y
dy
m 2 c ky af
dt
dt
Substitution into
Ps
Ps
A A PA 2 A B PB 2 F
Result is:
d2y
A 2A A B2 dy
m 2 c
ky af A A A B K p x F
dt
2K c dt
Fluid Power
Dynamic System Investigation
K. Craig
34
Fluid Power
Dynamic System Investigation
K. Craig
35
Design
Actuator Design
We start by sizing the linear actuator in accordance with
the expected load requirements.
Usually for a given application the working load force is
known and can be used to determine the required
pressurized areas that are needed within the actuator to
develop this load for a specified working pressure.
Ps
Ps
d2 y
dy
m
c
ky
A
P
A
P
0=
F
af A A
B B
2
dt
dt
2
2
steady state
Ps
Ps steady
F af A A PA A B PB working
2
2 force
Fluid Power
Dynamic System Investigation
K. Craig
36
K. Craig
37
3
PA Ps
4
F Fw
Substitution:
1
PB Ps
4
into
Ps
Ps
F af A A PA A B PB
2
2
Result is: A A A B 4
and
Fw
af Ps
af (A A A B )
AA AB 2
Ps
F0
2
F0
af Ps
AA
Fluid Power
Dynamic System Investigation
2Fw F0
af Ps
AB
2Fw F0
af Ps
K. Craig
38
Fluid Power
Dynamic System Investigation
K. Craig
39
Valve Design
Once the actuator has been designed to generate
the necessary working force for the control
application, the next step is to design a control
valve that will provide sufficient flow and pressure
characteristics for the linear actuator.
These characteristics are designed by specifying
the appropriate flow gain Kq and pressure-flow
coefficient Kc for the valve.
Combine:
Ps
A A dy
Kp x
PA
2
2K c av dt
Result is:
Fluid Power
Dynamic System Investigation
and
Kp
Kq
Kc
Ps
A A dy
K c PA K q x
2
2av dt
K. Craig
40
K. Craig
41
Substitution:
1
x u
4
3
PA Ps
4
dy
0
dt
Result is:
Ps
A A dy
K c PA K q x
2
2av dt
K cPs K qu
2A A
K c PA K q x
0 K qu
v0
2
2
dt
av
av
Fluid Power
Dynamic System Investigation
K. Craig
42
Simultaneous solution:
K cPs K qu
and
2A A
0 K qu
v0
av
2A A v 0
Kc
Ps av
Kq
Ps
Kp
Kc
u
Q A
2 A
Cd
P
A x 0
x 0
Fluid Power
Dynamic System Investigation
Kc
ACd
Q
P 0
2P
K. Craig
43
Ps
Kc
uhCd
Ps
uav
Ps av
Ps
Result is:
Fluid Power
Dynamic System Investigation
uh
2A A v 0
Cd
Ps
av
K. Craig
44
K. Craig
45
Pump Design
Now that the linear actuator and control valve
have been designed, it is time to specify the
hydraulic pump that will be used to power the
hydraulic control system.
The pump is a fixed-displacement pump that
produces a volumetric flow rate that is proportional
to the angular input speed of the pump shaft .
Within the pump itself there is internal leakage that
results in a reduction of the pump volumetric
efficiency pv.
Lets review some details on pump efficiency (see
slides 52-56 .)
Fluid Power
Dynamic System Investigation
K. Craig
46
K. Craig
47
Ps
A A dy
PA
Kp x
2
2K c av dt
Ps
A B dy
PB
K p x
2
2K c av dt
PA PB Ps
Substitution:
PA PB Ps
A A A B dy
Result is:
Qs 2K cPs
2K c av
A A A B dy
Fluid Power
Dynamic System Investigation
2K c av
dt
Qs 3K cPs K c PA PB
dt
2av
A A A B dy
dt
supplied volumetric
flow rate to the valve
K. Craig
48
Substitution:
Qs 2K cPs
A A A B dy
2av
dt
Qs pv Vp
Vp
v0
pv
2pv av
K. Craig
49
Power
VpPs
v t
Fluid Power
Dynamic System Investigation
Qd
v
Vd
VdPd
t
T
K. Craig
50
K. Craig
51
Fluid Power
Dynamic System Investigation
K. Craig
52
K. Craig
53
PdQd
T
We can use the volumetric displacement of the pump Vd
to separate the overall efficiency into two components:
the volumetric efficiency v and the torque efficiency t.
Fluid Power
Dynamic System Investigation
v t
K. Craig
54
Qd
v
Vd
VdPd
t
T
K. Craig
55
Case Study
Fluid Power
Dynamic System Investigation
K. Craig
56
Fluid Power
Dynamic System Investigation
K. Craig
57
Fluid Power
Dynamic System Investigation
K. Craig
58
Fluid Power
Dynamic System Investigation
K. Craig
59
Control
Position Control
One control objective is to accurately position the load at
a prescribed location within the trajectory range of the
actuator.
Typically, this control function is carried out under slowly
moving conditions of the actuator; therefore, the plant
description for this control problem may neglect safely
any transient contributions that normally would be
significant during high-speed operations.
d2y
A 2A A B2 dy
ky af A A A B K p x F
m 2 c
dt
2K c dt
Fluid Power
Dynamic System Investigation
Neglect
K. Craig
60
x K e y d y K i y d y dt
yd is the desired position of the load.
The most practical way to enforce the control law
is to use an electrohydraulic position control of the
four-way spool valve coupled with a
microprocessor that is capable of reading
feedback information and generating the
appropriate output signal for the valve actuator.
See diagram on the next slide.
A block diagram for the position control system is
also shown on the slide after that.
Fluid Power
Dynamic System Investigation
K. Craig
61
K. Craig
62
K. Craig
63
K. Craig
64
Velocity Control
Another common control objective is velocity
control. The objective is to establish a specific
output velocity for the load based on a desired
velocity that is prescribed by the application. This
objective typically is carried out for load systems
that do not include a load spring.
The equation of motion (with k = 0) for the
velocity-controlled system is:
dv
A 2A A B2
m c
v af A A A B K p x F
dt
2K c
v is the instantaneous velocity of the load.
Fluid Power
Dynamic System Investigation
K. Craig
65
d
x K e v d v K i v d v dt K d v d v
dt
vd is the desired velocity of the load.
Again, the most practical way to enforce the
control law is to use an electrohydraulic position
control of the four-way spool valve coupled with a
microprocessor that is capable of reading
feedback information and generating the
appropriate output signal for the valve actuator.
The system block diagram for the velocity control
is shown on the next slide.
Fluid Power
Dynamic System Investigation
K. Craig
66
K. Craig
67
d2 v
dv
2
2
2
v
n
n
nvd
2
dt
dt
Fluid Power
Dynamic System Investigation
K. Craig
68
Fluid Power
Dynamic System Investigation
K. Craig
69
Force Control
Another control objective that is used for a hydraulic
control system is force control.
Force-controlled systems usually are configured very
much like a velocity-controlled system without a load
spring, and when they are used, they often switch
between velocity and force control depending on the
immediate needs of the application.
Furthermore, force-controlled systems typically are
operated in slow motion so as to gradually apply the load
force to whatever the application is trying to resist.
The equation of motion is:
d2y
A 2A A B2 dy
ky af A A A B K p x F
m 2 c
dt
2K c dt
Fluid Power
Dynamic System Investigation
Neglect
K. Craig
70
x K e Fd F K i Fd F dt
Fd is the desired force that is to be exerted on the
load. In most applications, the instantaneous load
force F is measured by sensing the fluid pressures
in sides A and B of the linear actuator and
calculating the load force according to the
following equation:
Ps
Ps
F af A A PA A B PB
2
2
Fluid Power
Dynamic System Investigation
K. Craig
71
Fluid Power
Dynamic System Investigation
K. Craig
72
Ki
dt
F Fd
1
Ke
af A A A B K p
Fluid Power
Dynamic System Investigation
K. Craig
73
Case Study
Fluid Power
Dynamic System Investigation
K. Craig
74
Fluid Power
Dynamic System Investigation
K. Craig
75
K. Craig
76
K. Craig
77
K. Craig
78
speed controlled
double-acting
Comments:
Speed-controlled (driven by an input shaft rotating at a
variable angular velocity ) fixed-displacement pump
with volumetric displacement per unit of rotation Vd
Double-rod linear actuator to facilitate symmetric action
of the actuator
Pressurized areas are the same on both sides of the
actuator
Load is a single mass-spring-damper system with a loaddisturbance force
Rod connects the load to the actuator piston
Volumetric flow of hydraulic fluid into the actuator is
controlled by the output flow of the pump
For positive , pump flow is to side A of the actuator; the
load moves down and flow exits the actuator from side B
Fluid Power
Dynamic System Investigation
K. Craig
80
K. Craig
81
Fluid Power
Dynamic System Investigation
K. Craig
82
Analysis
Load Analysis
cy ky af A(PA PB ) F
my
af is the force efficiency of the actuator
F
af
PA A A
Pressure Analysis
Assume that the pressure transients that result
from fluid compressibility in the transmission
lines are negligible. This assumption is
especially valid for a system design in which
the transmission lines between the valve and
actuator are very short, i.e., small volumes of
fluid exist on either side of the actuator.
Fluid Power
Dynamic System Investigation
K. Craig
83
av
Fluid Power
Dynamic System Investigation
K. Craig
84
Qs pv Vp
PA
pv Vp
K
A
av K
The shuttle valve is used to connect the lowpressure side of the hydraulic circuit to the
reservoir. The pressure on side B of the
actuator is therefore 0 gage pressure.
Fluid Power
Dynamic System Investigation
K. Craig
85
PA
pv Vp
K
A
av K
Analysis Summary
af pv Vp A
af A 2
c
my
F
y ky
av K
K
Fluid Power
Dynamic System Investigation
K. Craig
86
Fluid Power
Dynamic System Investigation
K. Craig
87
Design
Actuator Design
We start the mechanical design of the hydraulic
control system by sizing the linear actuator in
accordance with the expected load requirements.
We usually know the maximum working load and
maximum working pressure. Use these two
quantities along with the steady-state form of the
load equation:
cy ky af A(PA PB ) F
my
K. Craig
88
F Fw
Pa Ps
PB 0
af Ps
K. Craig
89
Pump Design
The pump is a fixed-displacement pump that
produces a volumetric flow rate that is proportional
to the angular input speed of the pump shaft .
In order to size the required volumetric
displacement of the pump, it is common to specify
a no-load velocity v0 requirement for the linear
actuator and to size the pump in such a way as to
achieve this velocity requirement.
Set PA equal to zero for the no-load case,
efficiencies equal to unity, and equal to the
maximum pump speed. Then the equation below
becomes:
PA
pv Vp
K
Fluid Power
Dynamic System Investigation
av K
y Vp
Av 0
K. Craig
90
Fluid Power
Dynamic System Investigation
K. Craig
91
Power
Vp Ps
p
K. Craig
92
Control
Position Control
The control objective is to position the load
accurately at a prescribed location within the
trajectory range of the actuator.
Typically, this control function is carried out under
slowly moving conditions of the actuator.
The plant description may safely neglect any
transient contributions that normally would be
significant during high-speed operations.
Neglect
af pv Vp A
af A 2
c
my
F
y ky
K
av K
Fluid Power
Dynamic System Investigation
K. Craig
93
K e y d y K i y d y dt
y y y d
Fluid Power
Dynamic System Investigation
1
kK
Ke
K i af pv AVp
K. Craig
94
Velocity Control
Another possible control objective for the system
is velocity control. The objective seeks to
establish a specific output velocity for the load
based on a desired velocity. This objective is
carried out for load systems that do not include a
load spring. Therefore set k = 0.
2
af pv Vp A
af A
c
F
my
y ky
av K
K
Neglect
af pv Vp A
af A 2
F
mv c
v
av K
K
Fluid Power
Dynamic System Investigation
K. Craig
95
d
K e v d v K i v d v dt K d v d v
dt
Fluid Power
Dynamic System Investigation
K. Craig
96
v 2n v n2 v n2 y d
n
Ki
mK
Kd
af pv AVp
Fluid Power
Dynamic System Investigation
af A 2 af av AVp
Ke
c K
K
av
af av AVp
2m
K d n
K
K. Craig
97
Force Control
Another control objective that is occasionally used
for the hydraulic control system is that of force
control.
Force-controlled systems are usually configured
very much like a velocity-controlled system without
a load spring, and when they are used, they often
switch between velocity and force control
depending on the immediate needs of the
application.
Furthermore, force-controlled systems typically
are operated in slow motion so as to apply the
load force gradually to the object that the
application is trying to resist.
Fluid Power
Dynamic System Investigation
K. Craig
98
af pv Vp A
af A 2
c
F
my
y ky
av K
K
Neglect
Us a standard PI controller.
K e y d y K i y d y dt
Fluid Power
Dynamic System Investigation
K. Craig
99
F af A(PA PB )
Fluid Power
Dynamic System Investigation
K. Craig
100
F F Fd
1
K
Ke
K i af pv AVp
Summary
We have considered 3 control objectives: position,
velocity, and force control.
For position and force control, an important slowspeed assumption has been employed. Under
high-speed conditions, higher-order dynamics may
manifest and may produce an undesirable result.
Fluid Power
Dynamic System Investigation
K. Craig
101