Levels of Authority Through Which Decisions Are Passed in The Organization

Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 6

Fayol was a key figure in the turn-of-the-century Classical School of management theory.

He saw a manager's job as:

• planning
• organizing
• commanding
• coordinating activities
• controlling performance

Notice that most of these activities are very task-oriented, rather than people-oriented.
This is very like.

Fayol laid down the following principles of organization (he called them principles of
management):

1. Specialization of labor. Specializing encourages continuous improvement in


skills and the development of improvements in methods.
2. Authority. The right to give orders and the power to exact obedience.
3. Discipline. No slacking, bending of rules.
4. Unity of command. Each employee has one and only one boss.
5. Unity of direction. A single mind generates a single plan and all play their part in
that plan.
6. Subordination of Individual Interests. When at work, only work things should
be pursued or thought about.
7. Remuneration. Employees receive fair payment for services, not what the
company can get away with.
8. Centralization. Consolidation of management functions. Decisions are made
from the top.
9. Scalar Chain (line of authority). Formal chain of command running from top to
bottom of the organization, like military. Scalar Chain is the number of different
levels of authority through which decisions are passed in the organization.
10. Order. All materials and personnel have a prescribed place, and they must remain
there.
11. Equity. Equality of treatment (but not necessarily identical treatment)
12. Personnel Tenure. Limited turnover of personnel. Lifetime employment for good
workers.
13. Initiative. Thinking out a plan and do what it takes to make it happen.
14. Esprit de corps. Harmony, cohesion among personnel.

Out of the 14, the most important elements are specialization, unity of command, scalar
chain, and, coordination by managers (an amalgam of authority and unity of direction).
Fayol (1841-1925) Functions and Principles of Management

Henri Fayol, a French engineer and director of mines, was little unknown outside France
until the late 40s when Constance Storrs published her translation of Fayol's 1916
“Administration Industrielle et Generale ".

Fayol's career began as a mining engineer. He then moved into research geology and in
1888 joined, Comambault as Director. Comambault was in difficulty but Fayol turned the
operation round. On retirement he published his work - a comprehensive theory of
administration - described and classified administrative management roles and processes
then became recognized and referenced by others in the growing discourse about
management. He is frequently seen as a key, early contributor to a classical or
administrative management school of thought (even though he himself would never have
recognized such a "school").

His theorizing about administration was built on personal observation and experience of
what worked well in terms of organization. His aspiration for an "administrative science"
sought a consistent set of principles that all organizations must apply in order to run
properly.

F. W. Taylor published "The Principles of Scientific Management" in the USA in 1911,


and Fayol in 1916 examined the nature of management and administration on the basis of
his French mining organization experiences..

Fayol synthesized various tenets or principles of organization and management and


Taylor on work methods, measurement and simplification to secure efficiencies. Both
referenced functional specialization.

Both Fayol and Taylor were arguing that principles existed which all organizations - in
order to operate and be administered efficiently - could implement. This type of assertion
typifies a "one best way" approach to management thinking. Fayol's five functions are
still relevant to discussion today about management roles and action.

1. to forecast and plan - purveyance


examine the future and draw up plans of action
2. to organize
build up the structure, material and human of the undertaking
3. to command
maintain activity among the personnel
4. to co-ordinate
bind together, unify and harmonies activity and effort
5. to control
see that everything occurs in conformity with policy and practice

Fayol also synthesized 14 principles for organizational design and effective


administration. It is worthwhile reflecting on these are comparing the conclusions to
contemporary utterances by Peters, Kanter and Handy to name but three management
gurus. Fayol's 14 principles are:

• Specialization/division of labor
A principle of work allocation and specialization in order to
concentrate activities to enable specialization of skills and
understandings, more work focus and efficiency.
• Authority with corresponding responsibility
If responsibilities are allocated then the post holder needs the
requisite authority to carry these out including the right to require
others in the area of responsibility to undertake duties. Authority
stems from:
• that ascribed from the delegation process (the job holder
is assigned to act as the agent of the high authority to
whom they report - hierarchy)
• Allocation and permission to use the necessary resources
needed (budgets, assets, and staff) to carry out the
responsibilities.
• Selection - the person has the expertise to carry out the
responsibilities and the personal qualities to win the
support and confidence of others.

The R = A correspondence is important to understand. R = A


enables accountability in the delegation process. Who do we cope
with situations where R > A? Are there work situations where our
R< A?

"Judgment demands high moral character, therefore, a good


leader should possess and infuse into those around him courage to
accept responsibility. The best safeguard against abuse of
authority and weakness on the part of a higher manager is
personal integrity and particularly high moral character of such a
manager..... This integrity is conferred neither by election nor
ownership. “1916

A manager should never be given authority without


responsibility--and also should never be given responsibility
without the associated authority to get the work done.

• Discipline
The generalization about discipline is that discipline is essential
for the smooth running of a business and without it - standards,
consistency of action, adherence to rules and values - no
enterprise could prosper.

"in an essence - obedience, application, energy, behavior and


outward marks of respect observed in accordance with standing
agreements between firms and its employees " 1916

• Unity of command
The idea is that an employee should receive instructions from one
superior only. This generalization still holds - even where we are
involved with team and matrix structures which involve reporting
to more than one boss - or being accountable to several clients.
The basic concern is that tensions and dilemmas arise where we
report to two or more bosses. One boss may want X, the other Y
and the subordinate is caught between the devil and the deep blue
sea.
• Unity of direction
The unity of command idea of having one head (chief executive,
cabinet consensus with agree purposes and objectives and one
plan for a group of activities) is clear.
• Subordination of individual interest to the general interest
Fayol's line was that one employee's interests or those of one
group should not prevail over the organization as a whole. This
would spark a lively debate about who decides that the interests
of the organization as a whole are. Ethical dilemmas and matters
of corporate risk and the behavior of individual "chancres" are
involved here. Fayol's work - assumes a shared set of values by
people in the organization - a unitary where the reasons for
organizational activities and decisions are in some way neutral
and reasonable.
• remuneration of staff

“The price of services rendered. " 1916

The general principle is that levels of compensation should be


"fair" and as far as possible afford satisfaction both to the staff
and the firm (in terms of its cost structures and desire for
profitability/surplus).

• Centralization
Centralization for HF is essential to the organization and a natural
consequence of organizing. This issue does not go away even
where flatter, devolved organizations occur. Decentralization - is
frequently centralized-decentralization!!! The modes of control
over the actions and results of devolved organizations are still
matters requiring considerable attention.
• Scalar chain/line of authority
the scalar chain of command of reporting relationships from top
executive to the ordinary shop operative or driver needs to be
sensible, clear and understood.
• Order
The level of generalization becomes difficult with this principle.
Basically an organization "should" provide an orderly place for
each individual member - who needs to see how their role fits
into the organization and be confident, able to predict the
organizations behavior towards them. Thus policies, rules,
instructions and actions should be understandable and
understood. Orderliness implies steady evolutionary movement
rather than wild, anxiety provoking, unpredictable movement.
• Equity
Equity, fairness and a sense of justice "should” pervade the
organization - in principle and practice.
• Stability of tenure
Time is needed for the employee to adapt to his/her work and
perform it effectively. Stability of tenure promotes loyalty to the
organization, its purposes and values.
• Initiative
At all levels of the organizational structure, zeal; enthusiasm and
energy are enabled by people having the scope for personal
initiative. (Note: Tom Peters recommendations in respect of
employee empowerment)
• Esprit de corps
Here Fayol emphasizes the need for building and maintaining of
harmony among the work force, team work and sound
interpersonal relationships.

In the same way that Alfred P Sloan, the executive head of General Motors reorganized
the company into semi-autonomous divisions in the 1920s, corporations undergoing
reorganization still apply "classical organization" principles - very much in line with
Fayol's recommendations.

1. Division of Work. Specialization allows the individual to build up experience, and to


continuously improve his skills. Thereby he can be more productive.
2. Authority. The right to issue commands, along with which must go the balanced
responsibility for its function.
3. Discipline. Employees must obey, but this is two-sided: employees will only obey orders if
management play their part by providing good leadership.
4. Unity of Command. Each worker should have only one boss with no other conflicting lines of
command.
5. Unity of Direction. People engaged in the same kind of activities must have the same
objectives in a single plan. This is essential to ensure unity and coordination in the enterprise.
Unity of command does not exist without unity of direction but does not necessarily flows from
it.
6. Subordination of individual interest (to the general interest). Management must see that
the goals of the firms are always paramount.
7. Remuneration. Payment is an important motivator although by analyzing a number of
possibilities, Fayol points out that there is no such thing as a perfect system.
8. Centralization (or Decentralization). This is a matter of degree depending on the condition of
the business and the quality of its personnel.
9. Scalar chain (Line of Authority). A hierarchy is necessary for unity of direction. But lateral
communication is also fundamental, as long as superiors know that such communication is
taking place. Scalar chain refers to the number of levels in the hierarchy from the ultimate
authority to the lowest level in the organization. It should not be over-stretched and consist of
too-many levels.
10. Order. Both material order and social order are necessary. The former minimizes lost time
and useless handling of materials. The latter is achieved through organization and selection.
11. Equity. In running a business a ‘combination of kindliness and justice’ is needed. Treating
employees well is important to achieve equity.
12. Stability of Tenure of Personnel. Employees work better if job security and career progress
are assured to them. An insecure tenure and a high rate of employee turnover will affect the
organization adversely.
13. Initiative. Allowing all personnel to show their initiative in some way is a source of strength for
the organization. Even though it may well involve a sacrifice of ‘personal vanity’ on the part of
many managers.
14. Esprit de Corps. Management must foster the morale of its employees. He further suggests
that: “real talent is needed to coordinate effort, encourage keenness, use each person’s
abilities, and reward each one’s merit without arousing possible jealousies and disturbing
harmonious relations.”

You might also like