Population and Respondents
Population and Respondents
Population and Respondents
Sampling Design
To gather the needed data through the use of survey questionnaires, two-step
sampling technique have been employed which are purposive sampling and random
sampling. Purposive sampling is a non-probability sampling technique which selects
units from a population to be investigated by the researcher. The objective using
purposive sampling is to concentrate in evaluating the characteristics of a
population. Correspondingly, the population is respondents which conformed to the
research requirements imposed on the different universities and auditing firms.
Through purposive sampling, the researchers were able to analyze the response of
educators and practitioners. On the other hand, simple random sampling, which is
the integration of statistical methods, has been applied through all the members of
the population of selected universities and auditing firms in obtaining equal chances
of selection the advantage of simple random sampling is that it reduces human bias
in selecting respondents in the population to obtain results that were highly
representative of the population and make generalizations hereafter. As a result, the
data has been interpreted better.
The sample size was computed using Slovins formula:
n=
N
2
1+N
n = number of sample
N = total population
E = error tolerance
The table below will show how many respondents this research will need.
Table 2: Sample Size Distribution of Respondents
Research Procedures
To achieve the objectives of the study, survey questionnaires have been
designed and administered to the academicians and to the accounting practitioners.
In addition, the questionnaires have been developed from an understanding of the
literature reviewed and modified from Albrecht & Sacks and Wally-Dimas survey
questionnaires to be applicable in a Philippine setting. The researchers adapted the
questionnaires based on their studies because it had already been done in other
countries and the questionnaires have already passed a series of tests to determine
its effectivity and applicability.
The main focus of the questionnaires was on the relevance of the accounting
program of the three selected universities towards the development of required
skills and knowledge in the accounting profession. The surveys have been given to
the representatives of each institution, the representatives then distributed these to
each respondent through random sampling. Respondents had been asked to specify
on a scale of one to five (1-5) ranging from extremely relevant (5), very relevant (4),
relevant (3), not relevant (2) to very irrelevant (1), the relevance of the different
universities accounting program towards the development of knowledge and skills
required for the accounting profession. Consequently, the practitioners
questionnaire sought views from the respondents regarding the importance of the
courses offered under the accountancy program. The importance was rated on a
scale of one to five (1-5) ranging from very important (5), important (4), neutral (3),
unimportant (2) to very unimportant (1). Open-ended questions had also been
included in the survey to express their ideas freely.