2015 - June 2BR ER PDF
2015 - June 2BR ER PDF
2015 - June 2BR ER PDF
Summer 2015
Publications Code UG040907
All the material in this publication is copyright
Pearson Education Ltd 2015
Question 2
Question 2 presented a diagram showing a human foetus developing in the
uterus.
In part (a) candidates were asked to describe the function of the amniotic
fluid surrounding the foetus. Most responses gained both marks for
describing how the fluid protects the foetus from physical damage acting as
a shock absorber.
Part (b) (i) asked candidates to name two substances, required by the
foetus, that move from the mothers blood into the blood of the foetus. Most
were able to name oxygen, glucose or amino acids as suitable substances.
In part (b) (ii) almost all responses could name the two waste substances
that move from the blood of the foetus into the mothers blood.
In part (c) candidates were required to Use information from the diagram to
help explain how the placenta is adapted for the efficient exchange of
substances. This item produced a full range of marks with most gaining all 3
for reference to villi increasing surface area, short diffusion distance and a
rich capillary network that maintains the concentration gradient.
Question 3
In question 3 (a) candidates had to complete a table about food products
produced by microorganisms. Most scored at least 3 out of the 5 marks
available with the most difficult items proving to be the substrate used in
yoghurt production (lactose) and the chemical product (lactic acid).
In part (b) most were able to explain a precaution to that should be taken
when making yoghurt so that it is safe for humans to eat.
Question 4
Question 4 described an investigation using eggs to study osmosis.
In part (a) (i) students had to identify the dependent variable in the
experiment. The majority were able to correctly identify mass.
In part (ii) most were able to explain the result for the egg placed in
distilled water in terms of water entering down a water potential gradient.
In part (b) (i) students needed to use the data from the graph to calculate
the percentage change in mass for the egg placed in 15% salt solution.
Almost all gained 1 or 2 marks with the majority correctly calculating -10%.
Some lost credit by not indicating a loss in mass.
In part (ii) students then had to plot their calculated value on the axis
provided. Most were able to do this but some having calculated -10% then
plotted it as 10%.
In part (c) almost all candidates could correctly give one way in which
osmosis differs from diffusion.
Question 5
Question 5 gave candidates a graph to show the biomass of the plants in 3
different areas in g per m2 each year for a period of 20 years.
In part (a) candidates had to calculate the increase in biomass in g per m2
per year for area C. Most gained full marks for this with the most frequent
reason for error was failing to deduct the original mass of the plants of 200g
per m2.
In part (b) (i) candidates had to explain how abiotic (non-living) factors
could cause the difference in biomass. A whole range of responses was seen
with many gaining full marks for referring to more sunlight, more
photosynthesis and higher temperatures for optimum enzyme action. Other
credit was given for identifying a suitable mineral on and explaining its use.
In part (ii) candidates did less well at explaining how biotic factors could
cause this difference. The best responses referred to fewer herbivores in A
and to other species competing for light or other resources. A worrying
number of candidates seem to believe that herbivores can be described as
predators.
Finally part (c) gave candidates a formula requiring calculation of energy
transfer efficiency. Most responses scored both marks.
Question 6
The last question 6 provided students with description of and data from an
experiment on the effect of varying pH on the action of amylase on starch
agar.
In part (a) candidates had to measure the diameter of the clear zones from
the plate. Almost all gained the mark for this.
In (b) (i) most could explain why there is a clear zone around some of the
wells containing amylase.
In part (ii) fewer gained high marks as they failed to refer to pH data to
explain why the clear zones have a range of different diameters. Only the
best responses mentioned that the optimum was at pH 7 or that the
enzymes denatured at pH 2 or pH 13.
In part (c) most could identify pH as the independent variable in this
investigation.
In part (d) candidates had to suggest 3 variables that should be controlled.
Very few responses identified 3 variables correctly but most responses
gained some credit for: the volume of amylase, the concentration of
amylase, the source of amylase, the depth of the agar and the time the
plate was left for.
Finally part (ii) required students to draw on the diagram the results they
would expect if the experiment was repeated at a higher temperature. Most
gained both marks available.
Grade Boundaries
Grade boundaries for this, and all other papers, can be found on the website on
this link:
http://www.edexcel.com/iwantto/Pages/grade-boundaries.aspx