Tubine Bypass System

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 12

VELOCITY CONTROL TECHNOLOGY

Turbine Bypass
Systems

Applications:
HP to cold reheat
HRH (Hot Reheat) to condenser,
also known as:
- IP/ LP bypass to condenser

HP bypass
station

- LP bypass to condenser
HP to condenser
Purpose: Turbine bypass systems
increase the flexibility in operation
of steam power plants. They assist
in faster start-ups and shutdowns
without incurring significant damage
to critical and expensive components
in the steam circuit due to thermal
transients. In some boiler designs,
turbine bypass systems are also used
for safety function.

Figure 1. Locations of turbine bypass systems.

Major hardware components of


turbine bypass systems are:
Steam pressure-reducing valve
Desuperheater
Spraywater control valve
Spraywater isolation valve
Dump tube/sparger (only for
bypass to condenser)
Actuator
Performance of the turbine bypass
system has a strong influence on
plant heat rate and capacity, effective
forced outage rate (EFOR) and longterm health of critical components
such as boiler tubes, headers and
steam turbines. Therefore, correct
sizing and selection of all components
in turbine bypass systems is esential
for smooth operation of a steam plant.

Front cover: Custom engineered turbine bypass system


for a 600 MW supercritical unit. One of two HP bypass
systems and four LP bypass systems supplied.

Figure 2. Typical layout of an LP bypass system for a 500 MW


supercritical unit

Table 1. Typical range of sizes and capacities of HP bypass to Cold Reheat


systems for fossil plants
Unit size (MW) x % bypass

Bypass
flow

1000 MW x 30% (supercritical)

1000 MT/hr

# of
lines

Inlet/
outlet

Capacity (Cv)
required

14 / 20

461

800 MW x 30% (supercritical)

800 MT/hr

12 / 18

367

800 MW x 60% (supercritical)

1600 MT/hr

12 / 18

367

600 MW x 30% (supercritical)

600 MT/hr

10 / 16

278

600 MW x 60% (sub-critical)

1200 MT/hr

14 / 22

845

500 MW x 60% (sub-critical)

1000 MT/hr

14/ 20

740

250 MW x 60% (sub-critical)

500 MT/hr

12/ 18

369

350 MW x 100% (sub-critical)

1150 MT/hr

14/ 22

820

Table 2. Typical range of sizes and capacities of HRH bypass to condenser


systems for fossil plants
Unit size (MW) x % bypass

Bypass
flow

1000 MW x 30% (supercritical)

1160 MT/hr

800 MW x 30% (supercritical)

930 MT/hr

800 MW x 60% (supercritical)

# of
lines

Inlet/
outlet

Capacity (Cv)
required

16 / 24

1894

14 / 20

1517

1856 MT/hr

14 / 20

1517

600 MW x 30% (supercritical)

695 MT/hr

14 / 18

1136

600 MW x 60% (sub-critical)

1390 MT/hr

16 / 24

2273

500 MW x 60% (sub-critical)

1160 MT/hr

16/ 24

1894

250 MW x 60% (sub-critical)

580 MT/hr

12/ 16

947

350 MW x 100% (sub-critical)

1350 MT/hr

24/ 36

4419

Table 3. Typical range of sizes and capacities of HP bypass to condenser


systems (combined cycle plants)
Steam turbine MW x % bypass

Bypass
flow

# of

valves

Inlet/

outlet

Capacity (Cv)
required

150 MW x 100%

500 MT/hr

14/ 24

563

90 MW x 100%

300 MT/hr

12/ 18

338

60 MW x 100%

200 MT/hr

10/ 14

221

Table 4. Typical range of sizes and capacities of HRH bypass to condenser


systems (combined cycle plants)
Unit size (MW) x % bypass

Bypass
flow

# of
valves

Inlet/
outlet

Capacity (Cv)
required

150 MW x 100%

580 MT/hr

12/ 16

1100

90 MW x 100%

350 MT/hr

8/ 12

660

60 MW x 100%

230 MT/hr

8/ 10

440

Notes:
(1) The tables above only for the purposes of illustration of typical configurations, sizes, flows, Cvs etc. There will be
differences with specific installations.
(2) The bypass systems referenced in the tables above refer to the steam PRV and the downstream desuperheater
combined. The inlet/outlet sizes stated are the typical steam PRV inlet and DSH outlet sizes respectively. These can
be fitted with reducers to match the pipe sizes for ease of installation.

Kosos 530D/540D bypass system


provides a cost-effective solution
in this severe duty application.
It meets applicable codes in the
power industry and is engineered
taking a wealth of industry
experience into account. The
530D/540D design meets the
critical functional requirements of
turbine bypass systems which are:
High reliability necessary to
achieve high plant availability
Low vibration and noise for
personnel and equipment safety
Fine control for smoothness
of start-ups and shutdowns,
as well as for long-term life of
critical high-pressure, hightemperature components
Tight shutoff necessary to
avoid penalty in heat rate and/or
reduction in plant output;
class V or MSS SP-61 shut-off is
available upon request
Excellent, reliable
desuperheating performance
for long-term protection of the
downstream equipment
Ease of maintenance
no welded seat or cage
Turbine bypass systems are
generally sized for a specific
percent bypass, which depends on
the end-users intent and desire for
functionality. Common practices
for bypass capacity are 30 35%,
60 70% and 100% of the design
flow. Each of these reflects differing
intent of how the plant will be
operated and/or the functionality
desired in operation.
Kosos 530D/540D bypass systems
are configured with pneumatic
actuators; electro-hydraulic
actuation is available upon request.
Electric actuators are generally not
used for this application unless
slower response is permitted by the
steam system design.

Steam pressure reducing


valve (PRV):
The steam pressure-reducing valve in
turbine bypass systems is the primary
mechanism of controlling the upstream
pressure. It is available in different configurations in the Koso system (a) in-line
globe body (530D) or angle body (540D),
and (b) flow-to-open or flow-to-close.
This results in four combinations. The final
choice should be made based on the plant
layout and users preferences. Any of the
combinations, when correctly designed,
can meet the critical functional requirements for turbine bypass service.
Angle-body, with flow-to-open configuration, generally results in the most compact
and lower weight package. This configuration is advantageous in several other
respects including:
Supporting requirements are less
demanding
Pre-warming requirements are simpler
Valve and upstream pipe condensate
drainage requirements are simpler
Special treatment to eliminate noise at
the outlet pipe is less likely

Figure 3. Cross-section of a steam pressure reducing valve with a VECTOR A trim.

Table 5. Typical materials of construction


Design temperature

Typical flow conditions at full flow for


modern turbine bypass systems are:
HP bypass inlet - 180 bar A pressure
for subcritical Units and 260 bar A
for supercritical Units; temperature of
550C
IP/HRH bypass inlet - Pressure of
40 bar A and temperature of 560C

For bypass to condenser, pressure at the


outlet is determined by capacity of the
dump tube or the device discharging into
the condenser; typically, it ranges from
4 - 15 bar A at full flow condition The
trim in Koso steam PRVs is specially
designed to keep noise and vibration
within acceptable limits. The outlet cage
dissipates the large high energy jet,
which would otherwise form from the
seat ring region into the outlet piping.
This outlet cage is part of the quick
change trim and can be easily inspected
during regular maintenance. This is a
major advantage over designs where
similar baffles are welded in the body
outlet region. Screwed in seat or cage
should be avoided in this application.

Up to 540 C (1005 F)

Above 540 C (1005 F) and


up to 600 C (1132 F)

Body

A182 F22/A 217 WC9

A182 F91/ A217 C12A

Bonnet

A182 F22/A 217 WC9

A182 F91/ A217 C12A

Inlet cage

10CrMo910/A182 F22

X20CrMoV121

Plug

10CrMo910/A182 F22

X20CrMoV121

Stem

Inconel 718

Inconel 718

Seat

10CrMo910/A182 F22

X20CrMoV121

Outlet cage

10CrMo910/A182 F22

10CrMo910/A182 F22

Alternate materials are available to met specific design requirements.

(Looking down from the top)


Photograph of a broken baffle
plate in an HP bypass steam
valve. When this type of failure
occurs, it requires cutting and
replacing the whole valve.

Spraywater control valve: The function


of the spray water valve is to regulate the
correct amount of spraywater flow into the
desuperheater. These are generally small
valves, typically 2 to 4 inch in size and are
available in angle-body or in-line globe body
configurations. Direction of flow-to-close is
preferred because this is a liquid service.
Critical functional requirements for the
spraywater control valve are:
High rangeability
Quick response
Good controllability
Tight shutoff
Correct sizing of spraywater valves is
critical to proper operation of turbine
bypass systems. Excessive over-capacity in
spraywater valves results in poor control at
low flow rates.

Example of a spraywater valve.

Kosos VECTOR trim delivers reliable control,


long life and freedom from cavitation, erosion,
vibrations and noise problems.

Equal percentage or modified equal


percentage characteristics is recommended
to achieve good controllability. High thrust for
seating is recommended to achieve repeatable
tight shutoff in service.
VECTOR velocity control trim: The
HP bypass spray application requires a
velocity control trim like the type shown
in Figure 4. Fluid kinetic energy along the
flow path, within acceptable limits, which
eliminates potential problems (cavitation,
vibration, noise, premature erosion etc).
LP bypass spray and spraywater isolation
usually are not severe services.
Spraywater isolation valves: These
are recommended as protection for the
desuperheater. They are intended to prevent
cold spraywater from dripping on to, or
coming into direct contact, with hot metal in
the desuperheater, in case that the spraywater
control valve develops a leak.

Figure 4. Velocity control valve eliminates cavitation.

Actuation: Pneumatic actuators are


common in modern turbine bypass systems.
Actuators are sized to provide fine control
and the high thrust that is required to ensure
tight shutoff.
Special pneumatic control circuit, which is
local to the control valve, controls action of
the actuator according to the DCS signals;
this includes fast open/close action and
trip modes.
KOSO also offers electrohydraulic (EH)
actuators for this service where requested.
Actuator type is one of the key descriptors
of turbine bypass systems. Choice of
actuation system is typically made by the
end-user based on their prior experience
and on the plant design. Until the mid1980s, most of the turbine bypass valves
featured unbalanced trim designs, which
require very high actuator thrust. As a
result, EH actuators were the only practical
solution. There was no choice even when
users experienced problems with their EH
actuators, the typical problems being: high
maintenance requirement, potential for fires,
unreliability, limited tolerance for extreme
environment (dust, humidity, heat, etc.).

Table 6. Comparison of actuator options (typical performance)


Attribute
Stroke time
Positioning accuracy

Pneumatic
(Double-acting, piston)

Electrohydraulic

Electric
(fast)

< 2 seconds
(< 1 second possible)

< 1 seconds

< 5 seconds

< 2%

< 0.5%

< 2%

< 1% overshoot

No overshoot

No overshoot

Very high

Moderate to
high

High

Maintenance requirement

Low

High

Moderate

Maintenance cost

Low

High

Moderate

Step change response


Reliability

Pneumatic piston actuator

Electro-hydraulic actuator

Double-acting pneumatic actuators have


been around for a very long time. They
are simple in construction that means
potential for high reliability. Also, the
devices that control these actuators had
been well-known and readily available,
in the industry. The evolution of modern
turbine bypass designs with balanced trim
designs resulted in thrust requirements that
were within the capability of the pneumatic
actuators. With that development, doubleacting-pneumatic actuators found easy
acceptance in the industry. It provided a
viable option for end users who do not prefer
EH systems.
Today, with the added benefits of easier
maintenance and economy, pneumatic
actuators have been accepted as a standard
for turbine bypass systems in many power
plant designs, although electro-hydraulic
actuators continue to be used in some
cases. A comparison of actuator options is
shown in Table 6.

Custom engineered turbine bypass system for a


supercritical plant with a low-volume, double-acting piston
type pneumatic actuator

Thick
rim

Rim breaks
into
ligaments

Bubble
bursts

Fragments
of bubble
in center

Steam
flow

Drop
Forms
flattens cup

Halfbubble

Final breakup into


drops of various sizes

Figure 5. Break-up of a water droplet by interaction with steam when Weber


number (We) is greater than 14. We = U2d/ where = steam density, U = relative
velocity of steam, d = droplet diameter, = surface tension of water.

Desuperheater: Desuperheating for turbine


bypass applications is challenging because the
amount of spraywater is huge. Typical requirement
for LP turbine bypass service is 30 35% of the
incoming steam flow. Even for a 30% bypass
system in a 600 MW station, this means a
spraywater flow rate of about 100 t/h, or the
equivalent of five fire-hydrants, spraying in the pipe
downstream of the LP bypass steam valve. Within
the envelope of the pipe the desuperheater design
has to ensure that:
the cold spraywater does not impinge on the
hot pipe wall this is important for avoiding
excessive thermal stresses and the resulting
potential for cracking of pipes
all the spraywater has to be evaporated within the
short distance downstream that is available
For HP bypass to cold reheat systems, the
situation is similar, even though the spraywater is
about half that for the LP bypass systems.

Figure 6. Schematic of penetration of spraywater in a cross-flow of steam.


h = spray penetration, qL = momentum of spraywater jet, qG = momentum of steam, d = jet diameter

The performance goals described above require


fine atomization and proper dispersion of the
spraywater. Large drops are not beneficial for
the system. They tend to impinge on the side
walls and/or fall out of the steam flow due to
their high inertia. Even when they dont drop out
of the steam flow, they require a long time to
evaporate. Generation of small drops depends
on the inherent nozzle injection characteristics
(or primary atomization) as well as the energy of
the steam flow into which the spray is injected
(secondary atomization).
Atomization of liquid in a steam is governed
primarily by Weber Number (We), which is defined
in Figure 5. This relationship shows the importance
of the relative kinetic energy (1/2 U2) of the steam
in achieving fine atomization. It is the key principle
used in the design of spray water nozzles as well as
for the spray nozzle-steam system as a whole.
Droplet size rule: The droplet diameter needs to be
less than 250 m under all operating conditions for
optimum desuperheater performance.
Two other important considerations in
desuperheater design is spray penetration and
coverage. Spray penetration depends primarily on
the momentum ratio of the injected spraywater
and steam, initial size of the injection jet and
downstream distance. See Figure 6.
Spray penetration rule: The spray penetration
is controlled within 15 and 85% of the pipe
diameter in a well-designed desupereheater.
7

Coverage is controlled by the number


of spray nozzles used, their inherent
characteristics, as well as their
placement in the steam flow. This
is important for thorough mixing of
spraywater in steam, which is essential
for efficient evaporation.
The selected desuperheater must
meet all operating conditions for a
system not just the full-load or sizing
condition. This requires recognition of the
differing characteristics of each system.
Secondary atomization of large drops
from spray nozzles requires that the
steam flow has sufficient energy. From
the We relationship described earlier,
250 m droplet size corresponds to
about 2 kPa (0.3 psi) of steam kinetic
energy. This limits the performance
capability of the desuperheater at low
flow rates. This effect is more severe for
HP bypass to cold reheat (CRH) than for
turbine bypass to condenser.
A spray ring type desuperheater is bestsuited for steam bypass to condenser
service. It offers both simplicity and
economy, while meeting all performance
requirements. Kinetic energy of the
steam at the outlet of the steam valve is
sufficiently high at all operating conditions
in bypass-to-condenser systems; as
a result, all the injected spraywater is
broken up into fine drops. Spraywater
injection from a large number of jets is
especially beneficial in achieving proper
coverage across the steam pipes, which
tend to be large in low pressure turbine
bypass applications. (See Figure 7.)
Multi-nozzle ring desuperheaters have
discrete spraywater nozzles distributed
around the steam pipe circumference.
This design is well-suited especially for
HP bypass to CRH. Spraywater is injected
through the variable-area, spring-loaded
spray nozzles in this design. These
specially designed spray nozzles ensure
that a pre-determined P, which is
sufficient for atomization, is available
for spraywater injection- this ensures
that the spraywater does not dribble at
low spraywater flow requirements. (See
Figure 8.)
8

Figure 7. Spray-ring desuperheater

Figure 8. Multi-Nozzle Ring Desuperheater schematic

Figure 9. Cross-section of a variable-area, spring-loaded spray nozzle

Dump tube: The function of the dump tube (see


Figure 10) is to dump the bypass steam safely
into the condenser. Proper sizing, selection and
design of the dump tube is necessary to ensure
that the potential for excessive noise and vibration
is eliminated.
Typical maximum pressure at full flow condition used
for sizing dump tubes ranges from 4 to 15 bar A.
Selection of this pressure is an important part of
turbine bypass sizing and has a major impact on the
overall cost. It affects the size of the valve outlet,
outlet pipe size, spraywater valve size, desuperheater
design, size of the dump tube, etc.

Figure 10. Dump tube installation schematic

stage pressure

Reheater
outlet pressure

PT

PT

Dump tube
pressure
Reheater
outlet
temperature

f{x}

Dump tubes should be sized for the highest pressure


practical. This means smaller size pipe between the
steam valve and the condenser, less demand on
support structures etc., all of which leads to lower
cost. Care has to be taken so that the selection of
dump tube design pressure does not compromise the
spraywater system.

TT

PT
TT

PT

PT

LP bypass steam
enthalpy setpoint
A

Max set pt

Spraywater

<

Min set pt
>

kf

kf

T
A

LP bypass
steam PRV

LP bypass
spraywater
control valve

T
A

C%
A

T
0%
A

F(x)
LP bypass
steam PRV

F(x)
LP bypass
spraywater
block valve

Figure 11. Typical control logic for turbine bypass to condenser

Noise generated by the discharge from dump tubes is


a major consideration in the design of turbine bypass
systems. It can be controlled within acceptable limits
with good designs. This is generally not a concern with
water-cooled condensers. However, dump tubes for
air-cooled condensers require special attention. Koso
has low-noise technologies to meet such requirements.

100%
T

Dump tube design must also consider the potential


for erosion due to two-phase flow from the bypass
systems. An optimal design avoids the failure risks
associated with an under-sized dump tube system as
well as the unnecessary additional cost of an oversized system.

F(x)
LP bypass
spraywater
control valve

Control algorithm: Good control of turbine bypass


systems is essential both for smooth operation of
power stations and to avoid premature failure of
high-pressure, high temperature components in the
system. Signal generation for the sprayflow flow
control valve is a critical link from the stand-point of
control of turbine bypass systems. A typical control
algorithm is shown in Figure 11.
For turbine bypass steam valves, the plant
control system provides the signal to maintain the
respective upstream system pressure. The signal
for the spraywater valve in the HP bypass system
is based on a feedback control loop to maintain
the downstream temperature set-point. A feedforward control algorithm for spraywater flow is
recommended for steam bypass to condenser. Koso
technical experts are available to assist in the proper
set-up of controls on site.
9
1

Customization of turbine bypass


systems:
Customization is more of a rule than
an exception in the power industry.
Customization may be driven by
the system operation or by special
performance requirements. Common
instances requiring customizations
are pre-defined piping layout, noise
requirements, system operation, etc.
Special attention may be required for
transitions between the steam valve
and the desuperheater, and from the
desuperheater to the outlet pipe, to
ensure that excessive noise will not
be a problem. Similar materials of
construction are preferred at the pipe
joint to avoid welding of dissimilar
materials in the field.
A collaborative effort between the plant
designers and turbine bypass system
providers is essential in practically all
situations. It results in cost-effective
solutions that meet all the requirements
and achieve optimum performance.
Most importantly, it reduces the risk
during the commissioning and for the
long-term operation.

A custom VECTOR velocity control HP turbine bypass steam pressure-reducing valves


with desuperheater for a power station in Eastern Europe featuring two inlets and faststroking electric actuators as requested by the customer.
10
1

Related technical literature from KOSO (available upon request):


1. Guidelines for Selection and Sizing of steam pressure-reducing valves in turbine bypass systems
2. Desuperheating for turbine bypass systems
3. Actuation for Turbine Bypass Systems - A Review of Requirements, Options and Recommendations
4. Installation Guidelines for Turbine Bypass Systems
5. Turbine Bypass Systems - FAQs (Frequently Asked Questions)
6. Turbine Bypass Systems - Common Problems, Their Root Causes and Solutions

11
1

Headquarters
Nihon KOSO Co., LTD.
1-16-7, Nihombashi, Chuo-Ku
Tokyo, Japan, 103-0027
Tel: 81.3.5202.4100
Fax: 81.3.5202.1511
www.koso.co.jp/en/

12
1

Worldwide locations
China
France
India
Russia
Singapore
South Korea
United Arab Emirates
United Kingdom
United States of America
2010 Nihon Koso Co. Ltd.

You might also like