CBT Dysfunctionnal Attitude
CBT Dysfunctionnal Attitude
CBT Dysfunctionnal Attitude
A.E. Zaretsky1, V. P. Velyvis 2 3, & S. V. Parikh2 3 4 on behalf of the PE/CBT Study Consortium
Sunnybrook & Womens Health Science Centre1
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health2, University Health Network3, and University of Toronto4, Toronto, Canada.
Abstract
Method
Introduction: The Dysfunctional Attitude Scale (DAS) is 40 item self-report psychological inventory
that measures dysfunctional depressogenic cognitions. Although the DAS is mood-state dependent, it
has also been shown to predict vulnerability to depression relapse in unipolar patients as well as in some
studies of bipolar patients. Our previous research found that even after successful CBT treatment for
bipolar depression, DAS scores remained elevated whereas successful CBT treatment for unipolar
depression resulted in DAS normalization. Unfortunately, there is a paucity of data on the DAS in the
maintenance phase of bipolar illness. We therefore examined baseline DAS scores in our sample of
bipolar I and II patients undergoing maintenance psychosocial treatment for their bipolar illness. We
attempted to evaluate whether baseline DAS scores were elevated and whether baseline DAS scores
correlated with depressive and manic mood symptoms as well as other specific clinical and demographic
features of bipolar illness.
Study Design
Method: Our baseline DAS scores (n=193) were drawn from a sample of 204 bipolar outpatients
(n=140 bipolar I, n=53 bipolar II, 57% female) undergoing an 18 month multi-site Canadian randomized
controlled prospective study comparing adjunctive individual CBT to adjunctive group psychoeducation
in the maintenance treatment of bipolar disorder.
Results: Our data show normative values of the baseline DAS with only mild elevation above normal.
After controlling for baseline level of depression, we found no correlation between DAS and bipolar
subtype, gender, duration of illness, number of previous depressive, hypomanic or manic episodes,
medication compliance and intensity of pharmacotherapy. The DAS was found to be significantly
related with both depressive and manic symptom severity.
Conclusions: The positive relationships between the DAS and depression as well as mania rating scores
lends support to the cognitive theory of affective disorders which suggests that dysfunctional or
distorted cognitive beliefs underlies affective mood symptomatolgy in bipolar disorder.
Introduction
What is the Cognitive Theory of Affective Disorders?
According to Becks cognitive theory of affective disorders, individuals with dysfunctional
attitudes and beliefs are more prone to developing affective disorders. Depressed individuals are
presumed to have negative and distorted views regarding the self, the world, and the future.
Recently, Lam and colleagues, have extended the cognitive model to include dysfunctional
attitudes specifically for mania which they identified as excessive goal-attainment and antidependency. In general, one of the assumptions according to the cognitive model is that people
suffer from emotional disorders because they have more distorted (dysfunctional) beliefs which
interfere with their ability to cope with stress effectively.
Many studies have demonstrated support for the importance of dysfunctional attitudes in
depression as evidenced by significant associations between the Dysfunctional Attitude Scale
(DAS; Weismann, 1980), a self-report measure of dysfunctional attitudes, and other measures of
depression. In addition, several studies have noted that DAS scores tend to decrease in conjunction
with decreasing levels depressive symptoms, both over time, as well as in response to treatment.
Where is the Evidence for Dysfunctional Attitudes in Bipolar Disorder?
Relative to the wealth of published studies investigating cognitive factors in unipolar depression,
these factors have only been given lip service in studies of bipolar disorder. Moreover, the few
studies that have investigated the DAS in relation to bipolar disorder have not demonstrated a
consistent pattern of results, which makes it difficult to advance understanding of cognitive
vulnerabilities in bipolar disorder in a systematic way. For example, in one study, 79 bipolar
participants were found to have a negative cognitive style which was similar to those found in a
unipolar depression comparison group (Reilly-Harrington., 1998). In another study, Zaretsky and
colleagues (1999) did not find consistent relationships between DAS scores and symptom
improvement. Lam et al. (2004) performed a principal components analysis of the DAS in a
sample of 143 Bipolar I patients. Three new factors were derived for bipolar patients: GoalAttainment, Dependency, and Acheivement. Goal attainment successfully differentiated a bipolar
group from a unipolar depressed group and was predictive of hosptilizations due to mania.
Rationale and Hypotheses for our study
This study seeks to test the cognitive model as it pertains to bipolar disorder by examining the
relationships between dysfunctional attitudes and reported levels of mood symptom severity.
Previous studies examining this relationship suffered partially from small sample sizes which
places limits on the ability to find a reliable effect (i.e., decreases statistical power). The current
study is able to overcome this limitation, and will be able to report in a more conclusive way,
whether dysfunctional attitudes as measured by the DAS are related to symptom severity in both
depressive and manic mood states.
(1)
(2)
Results
HAM-D 17
CARS-M
DAS
Sample Characteristics
193 Bipolar Disorder I/II (SCID-I)
Bipolar I = 140
Bipolar II = 53
Marital Status
Married/common-law = 35%
Divorced/separated = 24%
Single = 41%
Duration of Illness
Mean = 18.7 years
Occupational Status
Unemployed = 21% Employed = 79%
Mean
SD
6.79
1.96
133.33
4.84
in remission
3.07
in remission
35.33 consistent with remission status
Interpretation
Sex
Males = 82 (43%) Females = 111 (57 %)
DAS
# depressive
# manic
#hypomanic
-0.017
-0.033
ns
ns
0.081
ns
Measures
DAS
0.071
ns
-0.132
ns
-0.103
ns
0.071
ns
Manic symptom severity was assessed using the Clinician Administered Rating Scale for Mania (CARS-M;
Altman et. Al, 1994). The CARS-M is a 15 item semi-structured interview and rating scale which assesses
symptoms of mania over the last 7 days. Most of the items on the scale reflect DSM-IV criteria for mania. All
items are rated on a 6-point scale based on increasing severity (0-5). This scale has been normed on a large
sample and has demonstrated adequate validity and is the only mania rating scale to show test-retest reliability.
Bipolar I/II
Gender
marital status
education
occupation status
Sig.
1.45
1.44
1.53
1.72
1.53
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
DAS
HAM-D 17
CARS-M
0.249**
p<.001
.200**
p<.005
This lends support to the cognitive theory of affective disorders as applied to bipolar disorder.
Further research is warranted to investigate which specific types of cognitive beliefs are important for bipolar
depression as well as for bipolar mania. Such research should include assessment of Lam et al.s (2004)
proposed goal attainment factor of the DAS.
Data was obtained as part of a larger Canada-wide psychosocial clinical trial evaluating the benefits of group
psycho-education versus individual cognitive-behavioral therapy directed toward bipolar disorder. The current
study data was obtained from the pre-treatment (baseline) interview in order to avoid possible confounding
effects from the differential treatment conditions.