APEC Architect

Operations Manual

2005

CONTENTS
Glossary of Terms
Foreword
1. The APEC Architect Framework an Overview

2. Registration as an APEC Architect

APEC Architect Registration Criteria

Entitlement to Registration
Competence of an APEC Architect
3. APEC Architect Register

12

4. Monitoring Committees

13

Authorization of Monitoring Committees

5. The APEC Architect Central Council

16

6. Administrative Arrangements the Secretariat

18

Glossary of Terms
Accreditation:

Also validation - the granting of approval/recognition to a course

or program of study, which has been tested to produce results of
an acceptable standard against set criteria.

Authorization:

Approval granted by the Central Council to a Monitoring

Committee to maintain a section of the APEC Architect Register

Benchmark Criteria:

Agreed standards by which other standards can be measured.

Central Council:

The joint governing body of the APEC Architect project

composed of nominees of Monitoring Committees of participating
economies, with ultimate responsibility for a range of matters,
including the approval of Monitoring Committees, strategic
directions and administrative arrangements.

Consensus:

Agreement without dissent.

Home Economy:

Economy of permanent residence and primary registration/

licensure as an architect.

Host Economy:

Economy of secondary registration/licensure as an architect.

Monitoring Committee: Independent committee formed by a participating economy, with

delegated authority of the Central Council to maintain a section of
the APEC Architect Register in its economy and to act as
nominating body for the Central Council
Participating Economy: An APEC economy with an authorized Monitoring Committee
Provisional Council:

Interim governing body comprising nominees of newly formed

Provisional Monitoring Committees established as a transitional
measure to authorize Monitoring Committees.

Provisional Monitoring
Committee:
Newly formed Monitoring Committee that has not yet been
authorized by the Central Council to act on its behalf in a
participating economy.
Recognition:

Also professional recognition - acceptance by a regulatory

authority of compliance with requirements.

Registration:

Also licensure, certification - legal admission to the right to

practice as an architect.

Regulatory Authority:

Authority responsible for the registration/licensure or recognition

of persons permitted to offer professional services as an architect.
Note: In economies with multiple domestic jurisdictions, the
regulatory authority referred to in these Briefing Notes is taken
to be the national organization composed of representatives of
regional jurisdictions to formulate national standards and
procedures for the professional recognition of architects. It is
understood that the ultimate legal decision for the application of
these standards rests with the individual jurisdictions.

APEC Architect Operations Manual

FOREWORD
Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) is an international forum composed of
twenty-one member economies that have undertaken to act collectively to promote economic
and technical cooperation within the Asia-Pacific region. Its purpose is to sustain the growth
and development of the region for the common good of its peoples. APEC builds on WTO
General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) principles for the progressive liberalization
of trade in services through the reduction of regulatory restrictions, leading to reciprocal
agreements between member economies where appropriate.
The APEC Architect project is an initiative of the APEC Human Resources Development
Working Group (HRDWG), one of a number of sectoral groups established to implement
APEC programs. The project was endorsed by the HRDWG at its year 2000 meeting in
Brunei as a direct response to the Groups strategic priority of facilitating mobility of
qualified persons by developing a means for the mutual recognition of skills and
qualifications.
A Steering Committee was formed by the APEC economies participating in the project to
develop a mechanism by which current restrictions on the professional recognition of
architects from other economies would be reduced or removed. Through the positive
commitment of those involved, and fruitful negotiation in the intervening period, a set of
principles and an operational framework for the creation of an APEC Architect Register has
been agreed by all participants. Registration as an APEC Architect provides evidence of the
achievement of professional standards that may satisfy some, or all, of the requirements for
the recognition of architects by host APEC economies
This Manual sets out the organizational structure of the APEC Architect framework and the
rules and criteria that underpin its operation. The contents of the Manual are subject to
continued scrutiny by the APEC Architect Central Council, which jointly manages the project,
to ensure its currency and continued response to changes that develop in the practice of
architecture. It is a document that will continue to evolve as it is tested, reviewed and
amended as necessary.
The GATS identifies four modes of service provision, of which the third, establishment of a
commercial presence, and the fourth, the presence of natural persons, are those that are
essentially addressed by the APEC Architect framework. However the project will have
relevance for all means by which architectural services are exported.
APEC is a cooperative association between regional economies; it is not bound by treaty.
Although participating economies are guided by APEC objectives and the GATS principles
that inform them, decisions taken by the Central Council are reached by consensus, they do
not place a mandatory obligation on any economy.

Member Economies of the APEC Architect Central Council 2005

Australia, Canada, Peoples Republic of China, Hong Kong China, Japan, Malaysia,
Republic of Mexico, New Zealand, Republic of the Philippines, Chinese Taipei,
Thailand, United States of America

1. THE APEC ARCHITECT FRAMEWORK

AN OVERVIEW
APEC Architect participating economies acknowledge the public benefit of the mobility of
architects in the provision of architectural services, the positive value of cultural diversity
and the mutual benefits of cooperation in developing a framework to facilitate these goals.

Purpose
The aim of the APEC Architect framework is to establish a mechanism to facilitate the
mobility of architects for the provision of architectural services throughout the APEC region
by reducing current barriers to the export of professional services. Its central function is to
maintain a Register of APEC Architects who have fulfilled common elements of the education
and training requirements for professional recognition in participating economies and are
currently registered/licensed as architects, and who have a proven record of professional
experience as registered practitioners.
Through the identification of these common aspects of professional recognition, reinforced by
a period of professional experience, registration as an APEC Architect defines a level of
competence that will satisfy designated registration criteria in other participating economies
without further assessment. A host economy may additionally adopt special requirements for
the recognition of APEC Architects to address aspects of professional practice specific to that
economy, such requirements however must be fully transparent.

Structure
Overall responsibility for operation of the APEC Architect Register rests with a Central
Council composed of nominees of independent Monitoring Committees established for this
purpose in each participating economy, and authorized by the Central Council to carry out its
functions. Policies governing the operation of the APEC Architect Register and strategies
adopted for its implementation are determined jointly by the representatives of participating
economies appointed to the Central Council.
The APEC Architect Register is divided into sections, each administered by the Monitoring
Committee of a participating economy, for the enrolment of architects registered/licensed in
that economy who meet APEC Architect criteria. Monitoring Committees are responsible for
the management of their respective sections of the Register on behalf of the Central Council.

APEC Architects
An APEC Architect is a person who is registered, licensed or otherwise professionally
recognized as an architect in a participating economy, and whose name is enrolled on a
section of the APEC Architect Register maintained by that economy. APEC Architects are
bound by host economy codes of professional conduct to protect public health, safety and
welfare.
The criteria adopted by the Central Council for admission to the APEC Architect Register,
and use of the description APEC Architect, are based on identification of a common
sequence and elements in the education, training and assessment of architects as qualified to
provide professional architectural services in the home economy. These consist of:

an accreditation or recognition procedure for education programs in architecture;

a minimum period of post-graduate practical experience, with specified requisites;
fulfillment of registration, licensing or other requirements for full professional
recognition,
a minimum period of professional practice as a registered or licensed architect, with
specified requisites.

Architects deemed by the Central Council to fulfill these requirements are eligible for
registration as an APEC Architect. To retain their registration, APEC Architects must comply
with obligations imposed by their home economies for maintaining professional competence
and observing codes of professional conduct. Host economies may choose to impose special
requirements for the recognition of APEC Architects for practice in their economies, but any
such requirements must be fully transparent. (See p. 8 for further details).

Monitoring Committees
Each participating economy is required to establish a Monitoring Committee to take
responsibility for administration of the APEC Architect framework in that economy, after
receiving authorization by the Central Council to do so. Monitoring Committees act with
delegated authority from the Central Council to implement its policies and carry out it duties.
The primary duty of a Monitoring Committee is to operate a section of the APEC Architect
Register for the enrolment of APEC Architects registered/licensed in that economy. It must
confirm that candidates for APEC Architect registration have complied with criteria adopted
by the Central Council and assess the professional practice experience they have obtained as
registered/licensed architects. Each Monitoring Committee is also responsible for ensuring the
continued maintenance of required standards.
Monitoring Committees are the constituent bodies of the Central Council. They must
nominate one or more representatives to the Council, with each Monitoring Committee
entitled to one vote. They are called upon to contribute from time to time to the administrative
and review functions of the Central Council and generally to act as centres of information on
all APEC Architect matters, and to promote its purposes.
The decisions taken by the Central Council are reached by consensus and are not binding on
the regulatory authority of any participating economy. (See p. 13 for further details).

Authorization of Monitoring Committees

Newly formed Monitoring Committees wishing to establish a section of the APEC Architect
Register must first be authorized by the Central Council to do so. Applications for
authorization must be accompanied by information on the professional recognition/
accreditation systems in place in the economy and details of its proposals for assessment of
APEC Architect criteria, and any other information the Council deems necessary. Advice on
the structure of the Monitoring Committee and its arrangements for administration of the
section of the APEC Architect Register within its economy will also be required.
Monitoring Committees that have been granted authorization may establish a section of the
APEC Architect Register. (See p. 14 for further details)

Central Council
The Central Council has ultimate responsibility for all matters relating to the APEC Architect
framework. The Council comprises at least one representative appointed by the Monitoring

Committee of each economy authorized to operate a section of the Register. Non-authorized

economies may also be invited to attend Council meetings as non-voting observers. The
Central Councils primary duty is to decide the standards and criteria required for registration
as an APEC Architect and to establish operational procedures for management of the APEC
Architect Register. These are reviewed periodically by the Council to ensure their continued
relevance to the practice of architecture within the APEC region and the effectiveness of the
systems employed to assess them. The Council is responsible for the authorization of
Monitoring Committees to maintain a section of the Register and for subsequent review of
their continued conformance with APEC Architect registration criteria.
Effective communication with relevant authorities in participating economies, architects and
consumers alike, is essential for successful operation of the APEC Architect Register. The
provision of information on its objectives and achievements, and promotion of the role it
plays in facilitating the mobility of architects within the region are also important functions of
the Central Council. (See p.16 for further details).

Administrative Provisions
Responsibility for providing administrative services for the APEC Architect Central Council
and acting as the project Secretariat is undertaken in rotation by participating economies.
The economy performing this role at any time may share its duties with other economies or it
may be exempted from them on request. During its term of office, the Secretariat is required
to administer all Council business, manage its meetings and coordinate the activities of the
independent Monitoring Committees. It acts as a centre of information for the project and
maintains the APEC Architect website.

Desired Outcomes Facilitating the Mobility of Architects

The introduction of the APEC Architect Register has created an effective mechanism for
achieving the strategic priority of the APEC Human Resources Development Working Group
to facilitate the mobility of qualified persons by developing a means for the mutual
recognition of their skills and qualifications. By providing evidence that agreed standards
of competence required for professional recognition have been satisfied, APEC Architects
may be exempt from many current restrictions on access to independent practice, such as
pre-registration examination and host economy experience, that are normally imposed on
architects from other countries. Even though they may still be tested on practice issues
specific to the host economy, the savings in time and costs for all involved, architects and
regulatory authorities alike, are substantial. It is expected that these benefits will increase as
the APEC Architect Register becomes widely known and accepted by APEC economies.
Through its identification of common standards of professional competence and the quality
assurance systems applied to ensure that they are maintained, the APEC Architect framework
provides a reliable and transparent basis for the further negotiation of reciprocal arrangements
between APEC economies for the mutual recognition of architects. The APEC goals of
progressive liberalization of access to markets for the provision of professional services will
become a reality as the benefits of the APEC Architect framework are recognized and
endorsed throughout the Asia Pacific region.

Termination
The APEC Architect Central Council will operate for so long as it is acceptable and desirable
to participating economies.

2. REGISTRATION AS AN APEC ARCHITECT

A candidate for registration as an APEC Architect must be currently registered/licensed or

otherwise professionally recognized as an architect in the economy that maintains the section
of the APEC Architect Register to which application for admission is made. Architects must
demonstrate to the appropriate Monitoring Committee that they have completed an
accredited/recognized program of architectural education, fulfilled pre-registration experience
requirements, have practiced for at least seven years as registered/licensed architects and
satisfied any additional requirements, all in accordance with criteria determined by the
Central Council. Architects may only be enrolled on the section of the APEC Architect
Register in their home economy, unless otherwise provided by this Manual.
(Note: APEC Architect Registration applies only to individual persons, not to architectural
practices or firms)
The statement on the Competence of an APEC Architect at 2.3 describes the scope of
practice and the skills and knowledge required of an APEC Architect.

2.1 APEC ARCHITECT REGISTRATION CRITERIA

The following set of principles satisfies Central Council criteria for admission to the APEC
Architect Register and the right to use the description APEC Architect.

1.

Architectural Education

Educational Benchmark Statement

Education as an architect shall comprise at least four years of full time study. The education
must be of university level, with architecture the principal component. It must maintain a
balance between theoretical and practical aspects of architectural training and lead to the
acquisition of the skills and knowledge necessary to underpin the required competence of an
APEC Architect. Structured experiential learning, determined by the regulatory authority
economy to be the equivalent of full-time architectural study as described above, would also
satisfy the APEC Architect education requirements.

Common Elements of Architectural Education Programs

The core subject areas in an accredited/recognized program of architectural education are:
Design, as the predominant subject category
Technology and Environmental Science
Social, Cultural & Environmental Studies, and
Professional Studies
Other subject areas within architectural educational programs may include:
Related Studies
General Education

Accreditation/Recognition Procedure for Educational Programs in Architecture

Processes incorporating the following principles of good governance will satisfy the
accreditation/ recognition criteria for educational programs for an APEC Architect.

The accrediting/recognizing body should:

have authority and, where appropriate, legal status and be transparent, independent and
publicly accountable.
have a structured process for the approval of qualifications and compliance with agreed
standards.

The Central Council agrees to respect the accreditation/recognition procedures of each

participating economy.

2.

Fulfillment of Period of Pre-registration or Pre-licensing Experience for

Recognition as an Architect in a Home Economy

Applicants for registration as an APEC Architect must have completed a prescribed period of
practical pre-licensure or pre-registration diversified experience, as defined by the home
economy, for a minimum period equivalent to a total of 2 years.

3.

Fulfillment of Registration/Licensing Requirements for Recognition as an

Architect in a Home Economy

The purpose of this criterion is, in the first instance, to establish eligibility for registration as
an APEC Architect, not for registration in another economy.
Fulfillment of registration/licensing requirements for recognition as an architect in a home
economy is accepted as meeting this criterion for an APEC Architect.

4.

Professional practice as a Registered/Licensed Architect

Applicants for registration as an APEC Architect must satisfy the home economy Monitoring
Committee that they have completed a minimum period of professional practice of 7 years;
after initial registration/licensure as an architect in any participating economy. This
experience must be gained in all of the following categories of architectural practice:

Preliminary studies and preparation of brief

Design
Contract Documentation
Administration

At least 3 years of that period must have been undertaken as an architect:

with sole professional responsibility for the design, documentation and contract
administration of buildings of moderate complexity
OR in collaboration with other architects, as an architect in charge of and professionally
responsible for a significant aspect of the design, documentation and/or contract
administration of complex buildings.

Practice Jurisdiction
Professional practice that satisfies the above requirements undertaken in any economy may be
accepted by the relevant Monitoring Committee.

Currency of Practice
To ensure competence, APEC Architect candidates who have not practiced in a position of
professional responsibility within for the preceding two years are subject to a requirement to
undertake a program of professional development or fulfill other prescribed conditions to be
admitted to the APEC Architect Register.

2.2 ENTITLEMENT TO REGISTRATION

1.

Admission to the APEC Architect Register

Candidates for registration as an APEC Architect must apply to the Monitoring Committee of
their home economy to determine their eligibility for enrolment on that economys section of
the Register. In addition to details on education, training and professional recognition in any
APEC jurisdiction, candidates will be required to submit a report on their
post-registration/licensure professional experience, outlining the categories of practice in
which it was undertaken and the level of their involvement.
APEC Architects must also agree to be bound by the code of professional conduct of their
home economy and of any jurisdiction in which they practice.
Particulars of APEC Architects to be recorded on the Register include:
name and business address;
home economy or jurisdiction in which architect is registered/licensed; and
any other economy in which the architect is registered/licensed.
The registration numbers assigned to APEC Architects by Monitoring Committees are
preceded by the following abbreviations of the name of the home economy:
Australia
Canada
Peoples Republic of China
Hong Kong, China
Japan
Republic of Korea
Malaysia

AU
CA
CN
HK
JP
KR
MY

Republic of Mexico
New Zealand
Republic of the Philippines
Singapore
Chinese Taipei
Thailand
United States of America

MX
NZ
PH
SG
CT
TH
US

Applications for admission to the APEC Architect Register are dealt with in a timely manner
and will not normally exceed three months for completion. On admission to the Register,
APEC Architects are issued Monitoring Committees with a Central Council Certificate of
Registration as an APEC Architect by the home economy Monitoring Committee and an
APEC Architect Identification Card bearing the architects name, name of home economy and
date and currency of APEC Architect registration. On request, Monitoring Committees also
provide relevant information to the regulatory authorities of other participating economies for
registration purposes.

2. Maintaining APEC Architect Registration

APEC Architect registration is to be renewed on payment of an administration fee to a
Monitoring Committee at intervals no greater than two years. Registration details are to be
reviewed and renewed on application to practice in a host economy.
Renewal of registration is subject to compliance with home economy regulatory authority or
Monitoring Committee requirements to undertake programs of continuing professional
development, or fulfill other tests of current competence. The Monitoring Committee
may impose conditions on architects who have not practiced as such in a position of
professional responsibility during the preceding two years.

The registration of an APEC Architect will be cancelled if the architect ceases to be

registered/licensed in the designated home economy. The registration of APEC

10

Architects found, subject to due process, to be in breach of the code of professional

conduct of either their home economy, or a host economy, may be suspended by their
home economy Monitoring Committee.
3. Acquired Rights
Should the authorization of a Monitoring Committee be discontinued for any reason, APEC
Architects enrolled in that economy may enroll on a database maintained by the Secretariat
for this purpose, for a maximum period of two years. Alternatively they may apply for
registration in a host economy and subsequent admission to the section of the APEC Architect
Register in that economy.

2.3 THE COMPETENCE OF AN APEC ARCHITECT

The skills and knowledge required for admission to the APEC Architect Register are defined
as follows:

An APEC Architect must be competent to create architectural designs that:

satisfy both aesthetic and technical requirements;

are informed by the history and theories of architecture and the related arts,
technologies and human sciences;
demonstrate an understanding of the relationship between people and buildings, and
between buildings and their environment, and the need to relate buildings and the spaces
between them to human needs and scale;
respond to environmental concerns and address sustainability issues;
show skill in land-use planning and the planning process;
take account of cultural and social factors and demonstrate an understanding of the
responsibility of an architect to society;

An APEC Architect must be competent to translate a design concept into built

form and be able to:

investigate and interpret design objectives and relevant issues and prepare the brief for a
design project;
advise on project evaluations, feasibility studies and programs;
evaluate and determine structural, constructional and engineering elements of a building
design and integrate the advice and design of specialist disciplines into a building
project;.
assess the physical influences on buildings and the technologies associated with
providing internal conditions of comfort and protection against the climate, and
coordinate and integrate services systems to control them;
meet building users' requirements within the constraints imposed by cost factors and
building regulations
provide advice on issues of construction, procurement and contract administration;
generate the documentation and information needed to translate a design concept into a
building;
manage the procurement of buildings, administer contractual arrangements and monitor
their construction.

11

An APEC Architect must be competent in the practice of architecture and:

observe legal and regulatory obligations related to the planning and construction of
buildings;
have adequate knowledge of the industries, organizations and procedures involved in the
management and realization of a design project as a building;
observe the standards of conduct expected of a professional by the community;
maintain competence in relevant aspects of the practice of architecture.

THE APEC ARCHITECT REGISTER

The APEC Architect Register is the means by which the names of architects who have
achieved common standards of professional competence are made publicly available.
To ensure that the information it contains is accurate and current, the APEC Architect Register
is divided into independent sections established in each participating economy for the
enrolment of architects who are registered/licensed in that economy. It consists of a series of
decentralized, linked electronic databases, constructed and operated by the Monitoring
Committee of each economy. The Monitoring Committee is responsible for maintaining and
regularly updating the section of the Register it administers.
The participating economy acting as Secretariat maintains the central APEC Architect domain
with hyperlinks to the individual APEC Architect database websites. Each website provides
information contains an introductory statement on the APEC Architect framework,
information on APEC Architect registration requirements, access to the list of APEC
Architects registered in its economy, and to relevant publications and forms for down-loading.
Monitoring Committees publish on their websites any special requirements that the home
economy places on APEC Architects from other economies.
A standard website format has been adopted by all economies to preserve the uniformity of
the APEC Architect Register and provide ready access to the registered particulars of APEC
Architects, whilst ensuring the security of the independent Register sections. An
opportunity is also provided for APEC Architects to indicate their willingness to consider
offers of professional alliance with other APEC Architects from other economies.
In addition to the links with each economys APEC Architect database, the Central Council
website contains information on the APEC Architect framework, contact details of
participating economies, and other relevant matters. Application forms for assessment and
registration are also available.
English has been adopted as the common language for exchanging information among APEC
economies, although each economy is also free to use the language of the home economy and
any other language of choice.
Advice on the registration of APEC Architects may be obtained electronically or from printed
records of each section of the Register published annually by Monitoring Committees.

12

4. MONITORING COMMITTEES

The policies of the Central Council are put into effect by independent Monitoring Committees
established in each participating economy for this purpose and authorized by the Central
Council to act on its behalf. Their primary responsibility is to manage the section of the APEC
Architect Register in that economy, in accordance with Central Council policy and rules of
procedure.

4.1 Composition
Whilst the composition of Monitoring Committees is a matter for each economy to decide, the
size and balance of its membership will be dictated by the functions it must perform,
particularly with regard to evaluation of the qualifications and professional experience of
candidates applying for admission to the section of the APEC Architect Register it maintains.
Monitoring Committees should be recognized as competent by the authorities responsible for
the professional recognition of architects within the economy. Their members are also
required to speak authoritatively on the issues of concern to the Central Council and would
normally represent appropriate bodies such as the regulatory authority, professional
associations and educational institutions in the sponsoring economy.

4.2 Functions
Monitoring Committees, when authorized, carry out the following functions and manage the
section of the APEC Architect Register, with delegated authority of the Central Council, for
which they are responsible, in accordance with Central Council policy, guidelines and rules of
procedure.

Constituent Bodies of the Central Council

Monitoring Committees that have been authorized to maintain a section of the APEC
Architect Register are the constituent bodies of the Central Council. Each Monitoring
Committee must nominate at least one representative to the APEC Architect Central Council,
although there is no restriction on the number of members they appoint. However, it is
expected that representatives will be able to speak on behalf of the regulatory authority in
their economy.
Each authorized Monitoring Committee is entitled to one vote on the Central Council.

APEC Architect Register

The central duty of an authorized Monitoring Committee is to establish and maintain a section
of the APEC Architect Register for the enrolment of APEC Architects registered/ licensed in
that economy. It is responsible for the enrolment and periodic renewal of the names of
architects on the Register who satisfy APEC Architect criteria, and the removal of the names
of those who no longer comply. Each Monitoring Committee must establish, monitor and
regularly update the database of the section of the Register for that economy and publish a list
of APEC Architects enrolled on that section.
Monitoring Committees issue Certificates of APEC Architect Registration and APEC
Architect Identification Cards, and provide advice on registered particulars of APEC
Architects, on request.

13

Assessment of Candidates for Registration

Monitoring Committees must authenticate the architectural education and practical experience
of each candidate and certify it as satisfying APEC Architect criteria. They are also required
to evaluate the subsequent seven-year period of professional experience as a registered /
licensed practitioner for compliance with APEC Architect requirements. Assessments are
conducted at least annually and applications dealt with in a timely manner, in accordance with
Central Council guidelines to ensure uniformity between economies.
Opportunities are provided for individuals to request a review of an adverse judgement.

Maintaining Standards
Monitoring Committees must equally ensure that the required standards continue to be
maintained by the architects enrolled on their sections of the APEC Architect Register. To
provide assurance that the professional competence of APEC Architects remains at an
acceptable level, the Central Council requires confirmation that renewal of registration in the
home economy is subject to compliance with professional development requirements or
similar tests of continued competence.
Similarly, Monitoring Committees have a duty to monitor the continued compliance of the
systems employed for accreditation/recognition of architectural education and the
professional recognition of architects in their economies with the standards originally
authorized by the Central Council. The procedures adopted by Monitoring Committees for
this purpose are subject to periodic review by the Central Council. Monitoring Committees
must immediately notify the Council of any changes to professional recognition requirements
that might conflict with APEC Architect criteria and policy.

Information and Communication

To ensure transparency of process in facilitating the mobility of architects throughout the
APEC region, each Monitoring Committee publishes on its website any requirements that its
economy places on APEC Architects from other economies.
Monitoring Committees report to the Secretariat at six-month intervals on their APEC
Architect registration activities and any other significant developments during the period, for
circulation to all participating economies. The Secretariat also posts updates of its activities
and other relevant information on the Central Council website every three months.
The APEC Architect Secretariat maintains regular dialogue with the APEC Secretariat.

4.3 Central Council Obligations

As the constituent bodies of the Central Council, Monitoring Committees act as the point of
contact and centre of information for the APEC Architect project in each economy. They have
responsibility for promotion of the project, and for the publication and distribution of relevant
documents and the provision of advice on all APEC Architect matters to architects,
government authorities and other external agencies. Monitoring Committees, or their
representatives, also contribute to the administrative and review functions of the Central
Council as required.
From time to time participating economies are called upon to act as Secretariat, on a rotating
basis, and to provide administrative services for the Central Council for a limited period.

4.4 Termination of Authorization

14

A Monitoring Committee may surrender its authorization to maintain a section of the APEC
Architect Register after giving due notice to the Central Council.

AUTHORISATION OF MONITORING COMMITTEES

An APEC economy seeking to operate a section of the APEC Architect Register must first
constitute a Monitoring Committee to submit an application to the APEC Architect Central
Council, through the Secretariat, for authorization to do so. (Note: In economies with
multiple domestic jurisdictions, where applicable, the professional standards and criteria
established by national organizations acting as councils of individual regulatory authorities
are those to be evaluated for the authorization of Monitoring Committees.)

4.5 Application for Authorization

To promote consistency and transparency of process, the Central Council has prepared
guidelines on the information to be provided by Monitoring Committees in support of their
applications for authorization to show conformance with APEC Architect criteria. It will
require advice on:

education and practical experience/training requirements for registration/licensure as an

architect in that economy;
the accreditation/recognition procedures employed to assess them;
procedures adopted to assess compliance with the required professional practice
experience as a registered/licensed architect.

Additional information required by the Central Council will include the composition of
Monitoring Committees, the procedures they will employ for management of the section of
the APEC Architect Register for which they will be responsible, and the resources available
for undertaking these responsibilities. In reaching its decision, the Council will assess the
professional recognition criteria and assessment systems in place in the economy applying for
authorization to determine their compliance with APEC Architect criteria. It will also take into
account quality assurance provisions adopted by the economy to monitor continued
conformance with required standards of competence and of professional conduct.
Economies, authorized to do so, may establish a section of the APEC Architect Register.
Economies not authorized to operate a section of the Register will receive guidance on
rectifying deficiencies and have the right to reapply.

4.6 Continued Authorization

Authorized Monitoring Committees, and the procedures they adopt, are subject to periodic
review by the Central Council to ensure that they continue to comply with agreed standards.
They must immediately notify the Central Council of any material changes in education
provision, accreditation/recognition systems and registration/licensure requirements to those
which were approved for initial authorization, or of any other significant developments
concerning the professional recognition of architects in their economies that might conflict
with Council policy.
A Monitoring Committee whose authorization has been suspended by the Central Council
because it no longer conforms with APEC Architect criteria may, with reason, request an
independent review of the decision.

15

5. THE APEC ARCHITECT CENTRAL COUNCIL

Overall authority for the control and management of the APEC Architect framework rests
with the Central Council. It is the responsibility of the Central Council to determine policy
and procedures for all matters relating to the APEC Architect Register and to promote its
objectives. The Central Council may delegate authority to authorized Monitoring Committees
in each participating economy to carry out its functions.
Architects wishing to export their professional services to other economies, and regulatory
authorities requiring evidence that they are competent to do so, may turn to the APEC
Architect Register to facilitate achievement of these objectives. It is important that the
policy adopted by the APEC Architect Central Council and the procedures employed to
implement them are readily accessible and equitable to all parties.

5.1 Constitution of the Central Council

The Central Council acts as the joint governing body for the APEC Architect framework and
is composed of at least one representative from the Monitoring Committee of each economy
authorized to operate a section of the Register. There is no limit to the number of members
appointed to the Council by Monitoring Committees but each authorized economy is entitled
to only one vote.
To promote the project and extend its benefits, economies that have not yet received
authorization to maintain a section of the APEC Architect Register are also invited by the
Council to appoint representatives to attend its meetings as non-voting observers. Although
observers are not entitled to take part in the decision making process, this provides an
opportunity for them to familiarize themselves with the APEC Architect framework with a
view to establishing a Monitoring Committee in their own economy.

5.2 Duties of the Central Council

The Central Council has ultimate responsibility for the operation of each aspect of the APEC
Architect framework. Its duties include the following:

Maintenance of the APEC Architect Register:

determine standards and assessment procedures for admission, renewal and termination of
the registration of an APEC Architect;
oversee and coordinate all sections of the Register operated by independent Monitoring
Committees, maintain the APEC Architect website;
establish and apply governance systems and quality assurance strategies to review and
maintain uniformity and compliance with agreed criteria.

Establishment of Monitoring Committees:

determine policy concerning the composition, authorization and responsibilities of

Monitoring Committees;
assess applications for authorization of Monitoring Committees to operate a section of the
APEC Architect Register, and to hear appeals;
conduct reviews of registration systems and standards in authorized participating
economies to ensure continued compliance;

16

Administration of the APEC Architect Project

make provision for a Secretariat to administer the business of Council, maintain records
and coordinate with Monitoring Committees;
act as a communications centre to provide information, documentation and advice on all
aspects of the project.

5.3 Standards and Criteria for Registration as an APEC Architect

The purpose of the APEC Architect Register is to establish authoritative and reliable evidence
of the achievement of common standards of professional competence by the architects
enrolled on it. Registration is reserved for experienced practitioners to provide an additional
level of assurance to consumers.
The criteria adopted for registration as an APEC Architect are based on a dynamic set of
principles that identify common elements of professional recognition in APEC economies and
reflect current practice norms. These standards and criteria are periodically reviewed by the
Central Council to ensure that they remain relevant to international best practice within the
profession.
Equally the Council must assure itself that APEC Architect standards are rigorously upheld
and uniformly applied by the Monitoring Committees authorized to assess them. Strategies
employed by the Council to ensure continued compliance by participating economies with
required standards rely on a system of regular reporting and notification of changes to agreed
process by Monitoring Committees, supplemented by informal visits and discussions when
necessary.

5.4 Information and Communication

An important role for the Central Council is to promote the APEC Architect Register
throughout the region and to provide advice and support to governments and regulatory
authorities to help streamline recognition procedures for APEC Architects. Understanding
current restrictions to the mobility of architects and developing strategies to address them play
a significant part in the effective operation of the APEC Architect framework. The Council
maintains regular communication between participating economies, and advises architects on
the significant benefits that registration as an APEC Architect provides in the export of
professional services
While much of the publication and dissemination of Council documents is handled by
Monitoring Committees, information provision and promotion of the project remains the
responsibility of the Central Council.

5.5 Council Proceedings

Council Meetings: The Central Council meets at least every two years, at a date and venue
determined by the members, to review its procedures and criteria, consider applications for
authorization of Monitoring Committees, receive reports from participating economies, and
deal with matters arising. Participating economies host the meetings on an alternating basis.
Membership: The selection of members to be appointed to the Council and their terms of
office is a matter for decision by Monitoring Committees, within the guidelines established by
the Central Council.

17

Meeting Chair: The Meeting Chair is normally appointed by the Monitoring Committee
acting as host for the Central Council general meeting, although this may be varied as
required.
Meeting Agenda: To provide an opportunity for all Monitoring Committees to have an input
into the topics to be discussed at Council meetings, draft meeting agendas prepared by the
Secretariat are circulated for comment to Central Council members, revised and recirculated
in the meeting Brief for final adoption by consensus at the start of the Central Council
meeting.
Meeting Quorum: The Central Council meeting quorum is two thirds of the Central Council
Monitoring Committee membership.
Attendance: Monitoring Committees whose representatives fail to attend three consecutive
meetings will be deemed to have withdrawn from the APEC Architect framework and may
need to reapply for activation of their authorization should they wish to continue as
participants.
Decision Making: All Central Council decisions in connection with changes to APEC
Architect criteria and registration policy, and the authorization or conditional suspension of
Monitoring Committees, require the two-third support of all Central Council member
Monitoring Committees for adoption. Council decisions on other matters are arrived at by the
consensus of members present. A Monitoring Committee must be represented in order to
vote. All decisions requiring voting must be notified in advance of the meeting for
pre-circulation with the agenda.

6. ADMINISTRATIVE ARRANGEMENTS THE SECRETARIAT

To provide an equitable system for sharing the provision of administrative services among
economies, Central Council business is conducted by participating economies, which take on
the role of Secretariat on a rotational basis. The minimum period for economies to act in
this capacity is two years and they may reapply to continue for a subsequent term of office.
The economy acting as Secretariat may delegate any of its functions to another economy by
mutual agreement, or participating economies may be exempted from the Secretariat
obligation at their request. Alternatively two or more participating economies may
undertake the Secretariat role jointly and Monitoring Committees may share Council meeting
expenses at the request of the host economy. Budgetary and resource information recorded by
Secretariats during their terms in office administering the APEC Architect framework, guide
the Council in developing financial strategies.
The Central Council Secretariat is responsible for the conduct of Council meetings and the
management of Council records, maintenance of the APEC Architect website and
administration of its finances during its term of office. It is also required to arrange for the
appointment of Council members, the authorization of Monitoring Committees and the
application of quality assurance provisions from time to time, and to act as a centre of
information for all APEC Architect matters.

18