27-0 - Joint Motion To Continue and Enforce

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 7
At a glance
Powered by AI
The parties have agreed to jointly petition the court to continue matters for 60 days to allow time to explore settlement options without further legal fees being incurred.

The lawsuit challenges certain alleged practices and procedures at the Alexander City Municipal Court and seeks equitable relief as well as damages.

The City has stipulated to not incarcerate anyone solely due to nonpayment of fines/costs and to provide plaintiffs' counsel with jail logs and court records. These stipulations will remain in effect until December 31st, 2015 or a ruling on the motion for preliminary injunction.

Case 3:15-cv-00647-WKW-SRW Document 27 Filed 09/17/15 Page 1 of 7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
EASTERN DIVISION
DANGELO FOSTER and AMANDA
UNDERWOOD, on behalf of themselves
and those similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,
v.
CITY OF ALEXANDER CITY and
WILLIE ROBINSON, in his official and
individual capacities,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
) Case No. 3:15-CV-647-WKW-SRW
)
)
)
)
)
)

JOINT MOTION TO CONTINUE AND


TO ENFORCE AGREED STIPULATION
COME NOW the parties to this action and respectfully request that the
Court postpone for a period of approximately sixty (60) days the following
matters: (1) the hearing on and adjudication of plaintiffs motion for temporary and
preliminary injunctive relief; (2) the hearing on and adjudication of the plaintiffs
motion to certify a class pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(b)(2); and (3) the deadline
for defendants to file an answer or other response to the complaint. In support of
this motion, the parties state as follows:

Case 3:15-cv-00647-WKW-SRW Document 27 Filed 09/17/15 Page 2 of 7

1.

This putative class action lawsuit was just filed on September 8, 2015.

(Doc. 1). The lawsuit includes challenges to the constitutionality of certain alleged
practices / procedures at the Alexander City Municipal Court and seeks equitable
relief as well as damages. A motion for temporary and preliminary injunctive
relief was filed on the same day the complaint was filed, as was a motion for
certification of a class of plaintiffs on the request for equitable relief. (See Docs. 2,
4). The Court has set a hearing on the motion for injunctive relief for September
25, 2015, and has ordered briefing on certain matters in advance of that hearing.
(See Doc. 20.) An answer is presently due on behalf of the City on September 29,
2015.
2.

In response to the complaint, counsel for all parties discussed the

issues presented by the lawsuit and determined that all parties would like to
explore, in detail, the possibility of settlement. Accordingly, the parties have
agreed to jointly petition the Court to continue generally all matters identified in
the opening paragraph of this motion in order to facilitate consideration of a
settlement without prejudice to any partys position and without the unnecessary
accrual of attorneys fees.
3.

To permit the parties to explore settlement of this matter, the City of

Alexander City hereby stipulates that it will not act to incarcerate any municipal
court defendant on the sole basis of nonpayment of fines or costs imposed during

Case 3:15-cv-00647-WKW-SRW Document 27 Filed 09/17/15 Page 3 of 7

Alexander City Municipal Court proceedings.

This stipulation applies to any

nonpayment of payment plans. The City also stipulates that it will provide to
plaintiffs counsel a copy of jail logs for the Alexander City Jail showing persons
processed into the Jail on the date Municipal Court proceedings were held, for
verification purposes. A copy of the jail logs will be delivered by facsimile or
electronic mail to plaintiffs counsel by no later than close of business the day after
Municipal Court proceedings are held.

The City will also, upon request by

plaintiffs counsel, make available court records pertaining to any individual


defendant whose name appears on the jail log. The stipulations articulated in this
paragraph will remain in effect until the earlier of December 31, 2015, or the date
this Court rules on the motion for preliminary injunctive relief.
4.

Other than as expressly set out above, the City retains full rights to

enforce the law, to arrest offenders, to prosecute offenses, to reach plea agreements
with municipal court defendants, to jail those defendants who are arrested or
sentenced on grounds other than the nonpayment of fines or costs, and to otherwise
carry on the efficient administration of justice within the City. Furthermore, this
stipulation is not to be understood to prevent Alexander Citys independent
municipal judge from ordering payment plans or community service, where
appropriate; from continuing court dates or appearances to times beyond December

Case 3:15-cv-00647-WKW-SRW Document 27 Filed 09/17/15 Page 4 of 7

31, 2015; or from otherwise presiding over municipal court dockets during this or
any other time.
5.

Finally, all parties to this lawsuit agree and hereby stipulate that

nothing contained within this motion is to be construed as an admission of liability


on behalf of any defendant; that the filing of this motion shall not be used against
any party; and that no party to this filing shall be held to have waived any
argument, position, or defense as a result of the agreements recited herein or as a
result of the Courts order on this motion to continue.
6.

The parties stipulate that the Court shall have the authority to enforce

the stipulations contained within this document by appropriate order.


WHEREFORE, the foregoing premises considered, the parties respectfully
request that the Court enter an order that specifies that it will exercise its
jurisdiction to enforce the stipulations contained in paragraphs three to five, above.
The parties further request that the Court enter an order that terminates all
previously set hearings and deadlines, and specifies that: (1) Defendants shall file
a brief in response to the motion for preliminary injunction (Doc. # 4) and the
motion for class certification (Doc. # 2) on or before November 30, 2015; (2)
Defendants shall file a responsive pleading to the complaint on or before
December 7, 2015; and (3) Plaintiffs may file reply briefs to the motion for
preliminary injunction and class certification on or before December 7, 2015. The

Case 3:15-cv-00647-WKW-SRW Document 27 Filed 09/17/15 Page 5 of 7

parties request that the Court also set a hearing on the motions for preliminary
injunction and class certification as soon thereafter as is practicable.

s/Samuel Brooke
Samuel Brooke
Sara Zampierin
Valentina Restrepo
Southern Poverty Law Center
400 Washington Avenue
Montgomery, AL 36104
E-mail: [email protected]
E-mail: [email protected]
E-mail: [email protected]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
s/ David J. Canupp
David J. Canupp
(asb-3731-d46c)
LANIER FORD SHAVER & PAYNE, P.C.
P. O. Box 2087
2101 West Clinton Avenue, Suite 102 (35805)
Huntsville, AL 35804
Phone: 256-535-1100 / Fax: 256-533-9322
E-mail: [email protected]
s/ William Larkin Radney, III
William Larkin Radney, III
(asb-1474-r81w)
BARNES & RADNEY, P.C.
P.O. Drawer 877
5

Case 3:15-cv-00647-WKW-SRW Document 27 Filed 09/17/15 Page 6 of 7

Alexander City, AL 35011-0877


Phone: 256-329-8438 / Fax: 256-329-0809
E-mail: [email protected]
Attorneys for Defendants

Case 3:15-cv-00647-WKW-SRW Document 27 Filed 09/17/15 Page 7 of 7

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I certify that I have filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the
ECF System, which will send notification of such filing to the following parties of
record who are registered for electronic filing:
David J. Canupp
Brad A. Chynoweth
LANIER FORD SHAVER & PAYNE, P.C.
P. O. Box 2087
2101 West Clinton Avenue, Suite 102 (35805)
Huntsville, AL 35804
William Larkin Radney, III
BARNES & RADNEY, P.C.
P.O. Drawer 877
Alexander City, AL 35011-0877
on this the 17th day of September, 2015.
s/ Samuel Brooke
Samuel Brooke

You might also like