Case Reflection Pregnant Woman With Mitral Valve Prolapse: William Ray Cassidy 08/268114/KU/12814
Case Reflection Pregnant Woman With Mitral Valve Prolapse: William Ray Cassidy 08/268114/KU/12814
Case Reflection Pregnant Woman With Mitral Valve Prolapse: William Ray Cassidy 08/268114/KU/12814
Instructor:
Prof. dr. Djaswadi Dasuki, MPH, Ph.D, SpOG(K)
Case
A 30 years old woman (G2P1A0) came to outpatient clinic in RSUP Dr Sardjito
to check her pregnancy, with EGA 29 weeks. She came with diagnosis of mitral valve
prolapse, diagnosed 1 year ago in the same hospital (after her first delivery). Her only
symptom was episodes of palpitations, exaggerated by physical or emotional stress. She
received bisoprolol 2,5 mg, taken only when she felt the palpitation. The patient
underwent 4D USG for research purposes, with result revealing normal fetus.
How should we evaluate and manage pregnant women with mitral valve prolapse?
Clinical Problem
Mitral valve prolapse (MVP) occurs in an estimated 15 million Americans.
Becauseits clinical manifestations areextremely variable, MVP maybedifficult to
recognize.Theabnormalcomponentsofthemitralvalveapparatusarepossiblesitesfor
endocarditis, and severe mitral regurgitation can result from endocarditis, ruptured
chordae,orboth. Valvular heart disease in young women is most commonly due to
rheumatic heart disease, congenital abnormalities, or endocarditis and may increase the
maternal and fetal risks associated with pregnancy. The likelihood of an adverse
outcome is related to the type and severity of maternal valvular disease and the resulting
abnormalities of functional capacity, left ventricular function, and pulmonary pressure.
Although the prevalence of mitral valve prolapse was once thought to be as high
as 15 percent in the general population, more recent studies using new
echocardiographic criteria for diagnosis have suggested a prevalence of approximately
2.4 percent. Itisthemostcommonformofvalvularheartdisease,occurringin3to6
percent of the population, it is also the most frequent cause of significant mitral
regurgitationandthemostcommonsubstrateformitralvalveendocarditisintheUnited
States. Mitral valve prolapse possess low risk to both the mother and fetus, but left
ventricular dysfunction associated with mitral regurgitation is unlikely to improve after
surgery and will increase maternal risk during pregnancy.
All patients with signs or symptoms of mitral valve prolapse should have an initial
echocardiograph. Serial echocardiography is usually not necessary unless mitral
regurgitation is present.
Management and Discussion
Patients should be reminded of the low incidence of serious complications
associated with mitral valve prolapse, and physicians should attempt to allay fears of
serious underlying heart disease.Inmoststudies,MVPhasacomplicationrateofless
than2percentperyear.
into the systemic circulation. The cardiovascular adaptations associated with pregnancy
regress by approximately six weeks after delivery.
Murmurs develop in nearly all women during pregnancy. These murmurs are
usually soft, midsystolic, and heard along the left sternal border. Their intensity may
increase during pregnancy as cardiac output increases. Minor degrees of atrioventricular
valve regurgitation are normal. Left-sided regurgitant valve lesions carry a lower
pregnancy risk than stenotic valve lesions because the decreased systemic vascular
resistance reduces regurgitant volume. Severe regurgitation with LV dysfunction is
poorly tolerated, as is acute severe regurgitation. No increased risk of obstetric
complications has been reported. In symptomatic regurgitation the risk of offspring
complications is increased.
Drugs used in management of MVP are mostly symptomatic. The most
commonly used are beta-blockers, which can relieve the palpitation episodes. The
benefit in using beta-blockers outweighs the possible risks for the fetus. Bisoprolol as
selective 1 adrenergic antagonist is preferred in this patient as it will not cause
unwanted effects such as bronchoconstriction. In severe regurgitation in which surgical
intervention is performed, mechanical valves carry the risk of valve thrombosis which is
increased during pregnancy. In a large review, this risk was 3.9% with OACs throughout
pregnancy, 9.2% when UFH was used in the first trimester and OACs in the second and
third trimester, and 33% with UFH throughout pregnancy. All anticoagulation regimens
carry an increased risk of miscarriage and of haemorrhagic complications, including
retroplacental bleeding leading to premature birth and fetal death.
Areas of Uncertainty
Evidence is still lacking in guidelines for management of pregnant patients with MVP or
MR, and their effects and outcome after treatment in obstetric cases.
Conclusion
MVP is common in women, it has benign prognosis and only carry small chance of
serious complications. Thus, it is necessary to educate the patient on the prognosis and
risks of complications of MVP as it the disease itself will not cause serious negative
effects on labor and delivery. However, drug therapy must be chosen carefully, only if
the benefits outweigh the risks to both the mother and the fetus.
Reference
Reimold, S C and Rutherford, J D. Valvular Hear Disease in Pregnancy. N Engl J Med
2003;349:52-9.
ESC Guidelines on the management of cardiovascular diseases during pregnancy. The
Task Force on the Management of Cardiovascular Diseases during Pregnancy of the
European Society of Cardiology (ESC). European Heart Journal (2011) 32, 31473197
Shipton, B and Wahba H. Valvular Heart Disease: Review and Update. Am Fam
Physician 2001;63:2201-8
Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease (version 2012) The Joint Task
Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of
Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS).
European Heart Journal (2012) 33, 24512496
Bouknight, D P and Orourke, R A. Current Management of Mitral Valve Prolapse. Am
Fam Physician. 2000 Jun 1;61(11):3343-3350