Introduction of HR Practices

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 5
At a glance
Powered by AI
The passage discusses the evolution of the role of human resources from an administrative function to a more strategic role. It also discusses some of the challenges facing HR managers today.

The main functions of human resource management discussed are recruitment & selection, training & development, performance evaluation, promotions, redundancy, industrial & employee relations, record keeping, compensation & benefits, and career development.

Human resource development aims to foster human resourcefulness through policies that enhance skills & knowledge at all levels, while human resource management aims to maximize return on investment from human capital and minimize financial risk.

INTRODUCTION OF HR PRACTICES

This study belongs to organization effectiveness through HR practice. In this we are


studying how organization is effected through HR practice.
The role of Human Resources is changing as fast as technology and the global
marketplace. Historically, the HR Department was viewed as administration, kept
personal files and other records, managed the hiring process, and provided other
administrative support to the business. Those times have changed.
The positive result of these changes is that HR professionals have the opportunity to play
a more strategic role in the business. The challenge for HR managers is to keep up to date
with the latest HR innovationstechnological, legal, and otherwise.
This special report will discuss the best practices in HR management for 2010in other
words, how HR managers can anticipate and address some of the most challenging HR
issues this year. This report will give you the information you need to know about these
current HR challenges and how to most effectively manage them in your workplace.
Human resources is an increasingly broadening term with which an organization, or
other human system describes the combination of traditionally administrative personnel
functions with acquisition and application of skills, knowledge and experience, Employee
Relations and resource planning at various levels. The field draws upon concepts
developed in Industrial/Organizational Psychology and System Theory. Human resources
has at least two related interpretations depending on context. The original usage derives
from political economy and economics, where it was traditionally called labor, one of
four factors of production although this perspective is changing as a function of new and
ongoing research into more strategic approaches at national levels. This first usage is
used more in terms of `human resources development', and can go beyond just
organizations to the level of nations. The more traditional usage within corporations and
businesses refers to the individuals within a firm or agency, and to the portion of the

organization that deals with hiring, firing, training, and other personnel issues, typically
referred to as `human resources management'. This article addresses both definitions.
The objective of human resources development (the `s' is important in human resource`s'
in that it underscores indiduality/variability) is to foster human resourcefulness through
enlightened and cohesive policies in education, training, health and employment at all
levels, from corporate to national (Lawrence 2000) Human resource management's
objective, on the other hand, is to maximize the return on investment from the
organization's human capital and minimize financial risk. It is the responsibility of human
resource managers in a corporate context to conduct these activities in an effective, legal,
fair, and consistent manner.
Human resource management serves these key functions:
1. Recruitment & Selection
2. Training and Development
3. Performance Evaluation and Management
4. Promotions
5. Redundancy
6. Industrial and Employee Relations
7. Record keeping of all personal data.
8. Compensation, pensions, bonuses etc in liaison with Payroll
9. Confidential advice to internal 'customers' in relation to problems at work
10. Career development

Modern analysis emphasizes that human beings are not "commodities" or "resources",
but are creative and social beings in a productive enterprise. The 2000 revision of ISO
9001 in contrast requires to identify the processes, their sequence and interaction, and to
define and communicate responsibilities and authorities. In general, heavily unionized
nations such as France and Germany have adopted and encouraged such job descriptions
especially within trade unions. The International Labour Organization also in 2001
decided to revisit, and revise its 1975 Recommendation 150 on Human Resources
Development. One view of these trends is that a strong social consensus on political
economy and a good social welfare system facilitates labor mobility and tends to make
the entire economy more productive, as labor can develop skills and experience in
various ways, and move from one enterprise to another with little controversy or
difficulty in adapting. Another view is that governments should become more aware of
their national role in facilitating human resources development across all sectors.
An important controversy regarding labor mobility illustrates the broader philosophical
issue with usage of the phrase "human resources": governments of developing nations
often regard developed nations that encourage immigration or "guest workers" as
appropriating human capital that is rightfully part of the developing nation and required
to further its growth as a civilization. They argue that this appropriation is similar to
colonial commodity fiat wherein a colonizing European power would define an arbitrary
price for natural resources, extracting which diminished national natural capital.
The debate regarding "human resources" versus human capital thus in many ways echoes
the debate regarding natural resources versus natural capital. Over time the United
Nations have come to more generally support the developing nations' point of view, and
have requested significant offsetting "foreign aid" contributions so that a developing
nation losing human capital does not lose the capacity to continue to train new people in
trades, professions, and the arts.

An extreme version of this view is that historical inequities such as African slavery must
be compensated by current developed nations, which benefited from stolen "human
resources" as they were developing. This is an extremely controversial view, but it echoes
the general theme of converting human capital to "human resources" and thus greatly
diminishing its value to the host society, i.e. "Africa", as it is put to narrow imitative use
as "labor" in the using society.
In a series of reports of the UN Secretary-General to the General Assembly, a broad intersectoral approach to developing human resourcefulness has been outlined as a priority for
socio-economic development and particularly anti-poverty strategies. This calls for
strategic and integrated public policies, for example in education, health, and
employment sectors that promote occupational skills, knowledge and performance
enhancement (Lawrence, J.E.S. 2000).
In the very narrow context of corporate "human resources" management, there is a
contrasting pull to reflect and require workplace diversity that echoes the diversity of a
global customer base. Foreign language and culture skills, ingenuity, humor, and careful
listening, are examples of traits that such programs typically require. It would appear that
these evidence a general shift through the human capital point of view to an
acknowledgment that human beings do contribute much more to a productive enterprise
than "work": they bring their character, their ethics, their creativity, their social
connections, and in some cases even their pets and children, and alter the character of a
workplace. The term corporate culture is used to characterize such processes at the
organizational level.
The traditional but extremely narrow context of hiring, firing, and job description is
considered a 20th century anachronism. Most corporate organizations that compete in the
modern global economy have adopted a view of human capital that mirrors the modern
consensus as above. Some of these, in turn, deprecate the term "human resources" as

useless. Yet the term survives, and if related to `resourcefulness', has continued and
emerging relevance to public policy.
In general the abstractions of macro-economic treat it this way - as it characterizes no
mechanisms to represent choice or ingenuity. So one interpretation is that "firm-specific
human capital" as defined in macro-economics is the modern and correct definition of
"human resources" - and that this is inadequate to represent the contributions of "human
resources" in any modern theory of political economy.

You might also like