Lebesgue Outer Measure and Lebesgue Measure

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Lebesgue Outer Measure and Lebesgue Measure.

A. Basic notions of measure.


Our goal is to define a set function m defined on some collection of sets and taking
values in the nonnegative extended real numbers that generalizes and formalizes the notion
of length of an interval. Such a set function should satisfy certain reasonable properties
m is defined on a sufficiently rich -algebra.
m(I) = `(I) where I is any interval, and `(I) denotes the length of I.
m is translation invariant.
m is countably additive.
Remark 0.1 Countable additivity is important because it implies that m is (1) monotonic
and (2) that m() = 0 as long as m is not identically infinity.
B. Outer Measure.
Definition 0.1 Let E R. The (Legesgue) outer measure of E, denoted m (E) is defined
to be
(
)
X

m (E) = inf
`(Ik )
k=1

where the infimum is taken over all countable collections of open intervals {Ik } with the
property that E

Ik .

k=1

Remark 0.2 (1) Outer measure is defined for every subset of R.


(2) Outer measure is monotonic, that is, if A B the m (A) m (B). This is because any
covering of B by open intervals is also a covering of A so that the latter infimum is taken
over a larger collection than the former.
(3) m () = 0, and m is translation invariant.
Example. If C is a countable set then m (C) = 0. In particular, the outer measure of the
rational numbers is zero.
Proposition 0.1 The outer measure of any interval is its length.
Proof: It is sufficient to prove this result for closed bounded intervals of the form [a, b],
a, b R, for if we know the result for such intervals then (1) we know it for unbounded
intervals, for if I were such an interval, then given any number M > 0 there is a closed
bounded interval J I such that `(J) M and by the monotonicity of outer measure,
m (I) m ( J) = `(J) M , so that m (I) = , and (2) we know it for arbitrary bounded
intervals.
1

Proposition 0.2 Outer measure is countably subadditive, that is, if {Ek } is any countable
collection of subsets of R, then

Ek

k=1

m (Ek ).

k=1

C. Measurable Sets.
Definition 0.2 A set E R is said to be (Legesgue) measurable provided that for any set
A,
m (A) = m (A E) + m (A E C ).
Remark 0.3 (1) The criterion in the previous definition is sometimes called the Caratheodory
criterion.
(2) Outer measure is countably subadditive but is not countably additive, and indeed there
are disjoint sets A and B such that m (A B) < m (A) + m (B). What the Caratheodory
criterion says is that a set is measurable if and only if it can be used to split any set A into
two disjoint pieces for which outer measure is additive.
(3) Since m is countably subadditive, and since for any sets A and E, A = (AE)(AE C ),
always m (A) m (A E) + m (A E C ). Hence to show that a set E is measurable we
have only to show that m (A) m (A E) + m (A E C ) for every A.
(4) It is clear that if E is measurable then so is E C .
(5)
Proposition 0.3 If m (E) = 0 then E is measurable.
Proposition 0.4 Let M denote the collection of all Lebesgue measurable subsets of R.
Then M is a -algebra that contains the -algebra of Borel sets.

You might also like