Romanian Climate Data Impact On Passive Buildings Design

U.P.B. Sci. Bull., Series C, Vol. 73, Iss.
3, 2011
ISSN 1454-234x
ROMANIAN CLIMATE DATA IMPACT ON PASSIVE

BUILDINGS DESIGN
Nicolae ROTAR1, Viorel BDESCU2
Conceptul de cldire pasiv este temeinic studiat n Europa central i de
vest, unde a fost iniial adoptat. Exist, totui, o cunoatere limitat a aplicabilitii
conceptului atunci cnd este folosit la alte latitudini geografice i climate, n
Europa estic i de sud. Ar asigura soluiile empirice de proiectare constructiv
existente ndeplinirea cerinelor standardului cldirilor pasive n aceste regiuni?
Lucrarea prezint i compar performanele energetice ale unei cldiri pasive
imaginar plasat n diverse zone climatice: n Germania i, respectiv, Romnia.
Sunt folosite date constructive ale cldirii pasive cu destinaie administrativ
AMVIC (din localitatea Bragadiru, lng Bucureti) i date de climat, pentru un
total de douazeci i dou de localiti n cele dou ri.
The passive house (PH) concept is thoroughly studied in Central and
Western Europe, where initially adopted. There is, however, rather little knowledge
about the applicability of the current PH concept when used at other geographical
latitudes and climates, in Eastern or Southern Europe. Would the existing empirical
construction design solutions ensure, in these regions, the fulfilment of PH standard
requirements? The paper presents and compares the energetic performances of the
same PH as if built in various climatic zones, in Germany and Romania,
respectively. Constructive data of the non-residential AMVIC PH (from Bragadiru,
near Bucharest) are used and also climate data for a total of twenty-two towns in
the two countries.
Keywords: passive house (PH), climatic zones, building heating demand

1. Passive house energetic requirements and European climate
Passive houses (PH) have to reach, primarily, a target heating energy
demand less than 15 kWh/(m2.y) and a total primary energy demand less than
120 kWh/(m2 y), apart from other functional requirements [1]. This was possible
applying empirical design solutions, first in Germany, then these were considered
as appropriate for Central and West Europe (generally, between 40 and 60 N
latitude). When later analyzed, in the colder climate of North Europe, design
solutions with larger insulations and bigger internal heat gain proved necessary
1
Eng., Nuclearelectrica National Society, Bucharest, Romania, e-mail:

[email protected];
2
Prof., Chair of Applied Thermodynamics, University POLITEHNICA of Bucharest, Romania, email: [email protected]
288
Nicolae Rotar, Viorel Bdescu
[2]. At lower latitudes, with higher level of solar irradiation during the heating
season, more relaxed ones were considered [3]. German PH design solutions
(insulated wall structures, super insulated frames-triple glazed windows, etc.)
were promoted to East and South Europe, and more specific to Romania. Are they
to be applied unchanged? To answer, comparing climate data from Germany and
Romania seemed to be a good beginning [4], but proved to be inadequate without
a knowledge of the thermal properties of envelope components. Now we continue
the previous work, comparing energetic demands of a PH [5], as if imaginarily
re-located in towns of the two countries where different range-values of cold
temperatures and different cold clime distributions zones, Fig.1, can be seen.
Fig. 1A, B: Climate zones - conventional temperatures used in computing the heating demand
in Germany (A) and Romania (B)
Passive House Planning Package (PHPP), software developed by Passive House

Institute Darmstadt is used. One enters thermal properties for envelope, windows,
roof and basement and internal heat gains from [5] (human presence, domestic
appliances), climatic data from [8] (monthly temperature and solar irradiation on
different oriented N, S, W and E vertical walls); among results: the specific
heating energy demand and the specific total primary energy demand. The
variation of these energetic performances is studied and compared between the
various towns/climatic zones of Romania and between Germany and Romania.
2. PH energetic performance variation in European climate
The same number of 11 towns was chosen, in Romania, from [6] and in
Germany, from [7], together with some other specific data and put in Table 1.
They are almost evenly distributed on the two territories, between the limits of
longitude and latitude and also considered representative for the potential
Romanian climate data impact on passive buildings design
289
development of PH. Towns in Table 1 are differently indexed (for Romania - by

number of heating degree-days; for Germany- by latitude). One retrieves climate
zones from Fig. 1 (defined as borders of conventional temperatures used,
generally before 2008 in each country, in the heating demand calculus) and the
necessary heating degree-days, in the same range (from -12C exterior to 20C
interior) for the two countries, according to [6] respectively [7]. These reference
data are followed, in each last column, by the specific heating demand / total
primary energy demand, computed with PHPP, as previously described.
Table 1
Reference and computed data for localities in Romania and Germany
Romania /
Town
Lat.
(0N)
Clime
zone (0C)
/ Heating
degreedays
Iasi
Oradea
Cluj
Bacau
Timisoara
Brasov
Galati
Pitesti
Bucharest
Craiova
Constanta
47.16
47.06
46.76
46.56
45.74
45.63
45.45
44.85
44.43
44.31
44.18
-18 / 3510
-15 / 3150
-18 / 3730
-18 / 3630
-15 / 3180
-21 / 4030
-15 / 3190
-15 / 3420
-15 / 3170
-15 / 3170
-12 / 2840
Heating
demand /
Tot. primary
energy
(kWh/m2.y)
11 / 85
10 / 84
10 / 84
10 / 84
8 / 83
8 / 82
8 / 82
7 / 81
7 / 81
6 / 81
7 / 81
Germany /
Town
Lat.
(0N)
Hamburg
Berlin
Hannover
Dortmund
Leipzig
Dresden
Kln
Frankfurt/M
Darmstadt
Stutgart
Munchen
53.55
52.51
52.36
51.51
51.30
51.10
50.93
50.11
49.87
48.76
48.70
Clime
zone (0C)
/ Heating
degreedays
-12 / 3413
-14 / 3310
-12 / 3342
-12 / n.a.
-12 / 3435
-12 / 3485
-12 / n.a.
-12 / 3098
-12 / n.a.
-14 / 3463
-16 / 3543
Heating
demand / Tot.
primary
energy
(kWh/m2.y)
10 / 85
12 / 86
10 / 85
9 / 84
12 / 86
12 / 86
8 / 84
9 / 84
9 / 84
8 / 84
10 / 85
Fig. 2: Dependence of heating demand on latitude for various sites in Romania and Germany
Comparing the heating demand variation from the corresponding last

columns of each country, in Table 1, one remarks a clear linear dependence on
latitude, in Romania, compared to an apparent none correlation, in Germany (Fig.
290
Nicolae Rotar, Viorel Bdescu
2). In moderate climate zones from Germany and Romania, for the same PH
structure, the heating demand is more reduced in Romania. Also, various towns of
Romania, situated in the same climate zone (Fig.1B, zone of -150C), but at
different latitudes, exhibit a grater variation of the heating demand (Table 1,
Oradea: 10 kWh/m2.y / Craiova: 6 kWh/m2.y equals 1.66 for lat. N = 2,750)
while, comparatively in Germany, for similarly situated localities (Fig. 1A, zone
of -140C), the variation interval of the heating demand is more restraint even if the
latitude difference is higher (Table 1, Berlin: 12 kWh/m2.y / Stuttgart: 8
kWh/m2.y equals 1.5 for lat. N = 3,750). Due to the limitation of the town
number in each country (11), the range limits of the heating demand are not
represented, mainly in Germany. This is because we focused mostly on Romanian
climate variation impact on PH constructive design solutions.
4. Conclusions
Comparing the energetic performance variation function of climate data
and latitude (Table 1 and Fig.2), one see that, for the same PH constructive
structure, the heating demand, computed by means of PHPP, is in Romania
latitude dependent and more reduced comparative to Germany. Towns, situated in
the same climate zone at different latitudes, exhibit a variation of the specific
heating demand higher in Romania relative to Germany, where the variation range
is smaller but with larger absolute values. On a large extent of the Romanian
territory (Fig.1B), under 450 latitude N, with higher solar irradiation during the
heating season, the heating demand (of 6-7 kWh/m2.y) is lower compared to
central Germany (8-12 kWh/m2.y). So, PH design solutions from Germany may
be more relaxed; explicitly, as example, exterior insulation depths of 20 mm
Polystyrene + 6.3mm Neopor of all PH building concrete wall panels, as
everywhere used for the heating demand estimation in Table 1, may be reduced.
This could lead to a reduction of PH initial costs.
REFERENCES
[1] W. Feist, Passivhaus Institut: Nutzerverhalten, Protokollband Nr. 9 des Arbeitskreis
kostengnstige Passivhuser, Darmstadt, 1997
[2] Tor Helge Dokka, I. Andresen, Passive Houses in cold Norwegian climate, 2006
[3] J. Schnieders, Passive Houses in South West Europe, 2nd edition, PHI Darmstadt, 2009
[4] N. Rotar, V. Badescu, Could/must be modified PH design solutions when applied in Romania?
2010, http://instal.utcb.ro/conferinta_2010/articole/rotar_badescu_2010.pdf
[5] V. Badescu, N. Laaser, R. Crutescu, DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2010.04.013
[6] SR 1907-1:1997, Heating installations. Number of degrees-days
[7] DIN 4710:2003-01, Statistics on German meteorological data for calculating the energy
requirement for heating and air conditioning equipment
[8] SoDa Service, Knowledge in Solar Radiation. http://www.soda-is.com/eng/index.html.

Romanian Climate Data Impact On Passive Buildings Design

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Romanian Climate Data Impact On Passive Buildings Design

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Romanian Climate Data Impact On Passive Buildings Design

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

U.P.B. Sci. Bull., Series C, Vol. 73, Iss.

ROMANIAN CLIMATE DATA IMPACT ON PASSIVE

Keywords: passive house (PH), climatic zones, building heating demand

Eng., Nuclearelectrica National Society, Bucharest, Romania, e-mail:

Nicolae Rotar, Viorel Bdescu

Passive House Planning Package (PHPP), software developed by Passive House

Romanian climate data impact on passive buildings design

development of PH. Towns in Table 1 are differently indexed (for Romania - by

Comparing the heating demand variation from the corresponding last

Nicolae Rotar, Viorel Bdescu

You might also like