A Smoke-Free Environment Is Good For Everyone As

First of all, let me define smoke-free
environment. The term smoke free environment is

sometimes used indiscriminately to discuss both 100
percent smoke free areas as well as segregated and
ventilated area.
I believe a smoke-free environment is good
for everyone as the scientific evidence leaves no doubt
that 100% smoke-free environments,
SFEs are the only proven way to adequately protect the
health of all people from the devastating effects of
secondhand tobacco smoke, SHS. Several countries and
hundreds of sub-national and local jurisdictions have
reached this conclusion and successfully implemented
laws that require almost all indoor workplaces and public
places to be 100% smoke-free. These jurisdictions report
large and immediate health benefits, showing that SFEs
are feasible and realistic in a variety of contexts. In March
2004, Ireland became the first nation in the world to
create and enjoy smoke-free indoor workplaces and
public places, including restaurants, bars and pubs.
Within three months, Norways smoke-free legislation
entered into force. Since then, their example has been
followed by more countries, such as New Zealand, Italy
and Uruguay, territories and many more cities and
communities across the globe.
Besides, I believe a smoke-free environment
is good for everyone as it could steer clear of the chances
of Homo sapiens from entering into a portal of universal
diseases. Secondhand smoke (SHS) is classified as a
known human carcinogen, cancer-causing agent by the
US Environmental Protection Agency EPA, the US National
Toxicology Program, and the International Agency for
Research on Cancer IARC, a branch of the World Health

Organization. Tobacco smoke is a mixture of gases and
particles. It contains more than 7,000 chemical
compounds. More than 250 of these chemicals are known
to be harmful, and at least 69 are known to trigger the
growth of malignant tumor. SHS has been linked to lung
carcinoma. There is also some evidence suggesting it
might be linked to lymphoma, leukemia, and brain tumors
in children, and cancers of the larynx, pharynx, nasal
sinuses, brain, bladder, rectum, stomach, and breast in
adults. IARC reported in 2009 that parents who smoked
before and during pregnancy were more likely to have a
child with hepatoblastoma. This rare liver cancer is
thought to start while the child is still in the uterus.
Compared with non-smoking parents, the risk was about
twice as high if only one parent smoked, but nearly 5
times higher when both parents smokes.
On the other hand, in the absence of
smoke, the environment would be good for everyone as it
lessen the burden of the government in the sense
economy. The costs of SHS are not just only limited to the
burden of disease. Exposure to SHS also imposes
economic costs on individuals, businesses and society as
a whole. These include primarily direct and indirect
medical costs, but also productivity losses. In addition,
workplaces where smoking is permitted incur higher
renovation and cleaning costs, increased risk of fire and
may experience higher insurance premiums. A recent
study by the United States Society of Actuaries estimates
that SHS exposure results in more than US$ 5 billion in
direct medical costs and more than US$ 5 billion in
indirect medical costs such as disability, lost wages and
related benefits annually in the United States of America.
In Hong Kong, the annual value of direct medical costs,

long- term care and productivity loss due to SHS exposure
is estimated to be US$ 156 million. The United States
Occupational Safety and Health Administration has
estimated that clean air would increase productivity in
the USA by 3.5%, saving US employers US$ 15 billion
annually.
The debate is over. The science is clear.
Secondhand smoke is not a mere annoyance but a
serious health hazard. In conclusion, the benefits of
smoke-free places are undeniable, and the movement to
smoke-free environments is growing with unstoppable
momentum. Public health actors, non-governmental
organizations and other civil society representatives,
policy makers, governments and the general public are
raising their voices together to ensure workers and the
public are protected from exposure to SHS, by creating
and enjoying 100% smoke-free environments.

A Smoke-Free Environment Is Good For Everyone As

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

A Smoke-Free Environment Is Good For Everyone As

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

A Smoke-Free Environment Is Good For Everyone As

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

First of all, let me define smoke-free

environment. The term smoke free environment is

Research on Cancer IARC, a branch of the World Health

In Hong Kong, the annual value of direct medical costs,

You might also like