Nipas 1992
Nipas 1992
Nipas 1992
THE LAW
Declaration of Policy
Cognizant of the profound impact of man's activities on all components
of the natural environment particularly the effect of increasing population,
resource exploitation and industrial advancement and recognizing the critical
importance of protecting and maintaining the natural biological diversities of
the environment notably on areas with biologically unique features, it is
hereby declared the policy of the State to secure for the Filipino people of
present and future generations the perpetual existence of all native plants,
animals and other organisms, through the establishment of a comprehensive
system of integrated protected areas within the classification of national park
as provided for in the Constitution.
It is hereby recognized that these areas may be incorporated into a
national land-sea use planning framework consistent with global trends and
standards such as those provided in the Convention on Biological Diversity
and other international agreements; that effective administration of these
areas is possible only through cooperation among national government, local
government, concerned private organizations and local communities; and
that the use and enjoyment of these protected areas must be consistent with
the principles of biological diversity, sustainable development and protection
of cultural heritage.
To this end, there is hereby established a National Integrated Protected
Areas System (NIPAS), which shall encompass outstandingly remarkable
areas and biologically important public lands and ancestral domains that are
habitats of rare and endangered species of plants and animals, biogeographic zones and related ecosystems, whether terrestrial, wetlands or
marine, all of which shall be designated as "protected areas".
2.1 The following shall be the specific
theestablishment and management of the NIPAS:
policies
governing
Definition of Terms
For purposes of this Order, the following terms shall be defined as
follows:
"National Integrated Protected Areas System (NIPAS)" is the classification and
administration of all designated protected areas to maintain essential
ecological processes and life-support systems, to preserve genetic diversity,
to ensure sustainable use of resources found therein, and to maintain their
natural conditions to the greatest extent possible;
"Protected Area" refers to identified portions of land and water set aside by
reason of their unique physical and biological significance, managed to
enhance biological diversity and protected against destructive human
exploitation;
"Buffer zones" are identified areas outside the boundaries of and
immediately adjacent to designated protected areas pursuant to Section 8
that need special development control in order to avoid or minimize harm to
the protected area;
Buffer zones are intended to provide an extra layer of protection
around the protected area while also providing livelihood opportunities
based on sustainable resource utilization. The major goal is to
encourage buffer zones residents and/or managers to establish a
strong social fence that will prevent encroachment into the protected
area by others, that is, to provide sufficiently strong incentives so that
buffer zone users will help to protect the protected area
- Must be established by law
- The PAMB and the PAS shall exercise authority over buffer zones
on behalf of the DENR in cooperation with NGOs and other
government agencies
- The range of resource management activities that may be
allowed in various portions of the buffer zone must be broad so
as to give maximum management flexibility
- Those who will manage buffer zone areas; indigenous cultural
communities, tenured migrants and others; must play a
prominent role in developing the plans, policies and rules for
buffer zone management
"Indigenous cultural community" refers to a group of people sharing common
bonds of language, customs, traditions and other distinctive cultural traits
and who have since time immemorial, occupied, possessed and utilized a
territory;
Within one (1) year from the effectivity of this Act, the DENR shall
submit to the Senate and the House of Representatives a map and legal
descriptions or natural boundaries of each protected area initially comprising
the System. Such maps and legal description shall, by virtue of this Act,
constitute the official documentary representation of the entire System,
subject to such changes as Congress deems necessary;
All DENR records pertaining to said protected areas, including maps
and legal descriptions or natural boundaries, copies of rules and regulations
governing them, copies of public notices of, and reports submitted to
Congress regarding pending additions, eliminations, or modifications shall be
made available to the public. These legal documents pertaining to protected
areas shall also be available to the public in the respective DENR Regional
Offices, Provincial Environment and Natural Resources Offices (PENROs) and
Community Environment and Natural Resources Offices (CENROs) where
NIPAS areas are located;
Within three (3) years from the effectivity of this Act, the DENR shall
study and review each area tentatively composing the System as to its
suitability or non-suitability for preservation as protected area and inclusion
in the System according to the categories established in Section 3 hereof and
report its findings to the President as soon as each study is completed. The
study must include in each area:
1.
A forest occupants survey;
2.
An ethnographic study;
3.
A protected area resource profile;
4.
Land use plans done in coordination with the respective Regional
Development Councils; and
5.
Such other background studies as will be sufficient bases for
selection.
The DENR shall:
Notify the public of proposed action through publication in a newspaper
of general circulation, and such other means as the System deems necessary
in the area or areas in the vicinity of the affected land thirty (30) days prior
to the public hearing;
i. Conduct public hearings at the locations nearest to the
area affected;
ii. At least thirty (30) days prior to the date of hearing, advise
all Local Government Units (LGUs) in the affected areas,
national agencies concerned, people's organizations and
non-government organizations and invite such officials to
submit their views on the proposed action at the hearing
not later than thirty (30) days following the date of
hearing; and
iii. Give due consideration to the recommendations at the
public hearing; and provide sufficient explanation for his
recommendations contrary to the general sentiments
expressed in the public hearing;
Upon receipt of the recommendations of the DENR, the President shall
issue a presidential proclamation designating the recommended areas as
protected areas and providing for measures for their protection until such
time when Congress shall have enacted a law finally declaring such
recommended areas as part of the integrated protected area systems; and
Thereafter, the President shall send to the Senate and the House of
Representatives his recommendations with respect to the designations as
protected areas or reclassification of each area on which review has been
completed, together with maps and legal description of boundaries. The
President, in his recommendation, may propose the alteration of existing
boundaries of any or all proclaimed protected areas, addition of any
contiguous area of public land of predominant physical and biological value.
Nothing contained herein shall limit the President to propose, as part of his
recommendation to Congress, additional areas which have not been
designated, proclaimed or set aside by law, presidential decree, proclamation
or executive orders as protected area/s.
The DENR Regional Office under the direction of the Regional Executive
Director (RED) shall undertake or cause to undertake the activities from
below
- Compilation of Maps and Technical Descriptions of Protected
Areas
- Initial Screening. - After the maps and technical descriptions of
the initial NIPAS components have been compiled, evaluate the
suitability or unsuitability of each area for inclusion in the NIPAS
- Public Notification. - The general public, local government units,
non-government organizations, indigenous communities and all
other concerned institutions and agencies shall be informed
- Initial Consultation. - Organize consultative meetings at locations
within or near the areas identified for possible establishment as
protected areas
- Census and Registration of Protected Area Occupants.
- Initial Protected Area Plan. - Compile information developed in
the studies and from other available sources. if the area is still
judged to be suitable for inclusion in the NIPAS, develop a land
use plan for each proposed protected area in coordination with
the regional Development Council.
- Public hearings. - Conduct public hearings on the proposed
inclusion of each area under the NIPAS. The DENR shall: (i) notify
the public of proposed establishment of the protected area under
the NIPAS Act through publication in newspapers of general
circulation and such other means deemed necessary in the
vicinity of the affected land at least 30 days prior to the public
hearing
- Regional Review and Recommendations. - Following the public
hearings, make any modifications of the boundary and/or
management plan that may be warranted and, if sufficient public
support for inclusion of the area under the NIPAS is evident,
prepare and submit to the Secretary a report that includes a draft
Presidential Proclamation designating the area as a protected
area
- National Review and Recommendations. - Within three (3) years
of the effectivity of the Act, the Secretary, based on the review of
recommendations made by the Regional Offices, shall
recommend to the President the areas for inclusion as initial
components under the NIPAS
- Presidential Proclamation
Buffer Zones
Buffer Zones are identified areas outside the boundaries of and
immediately adjacent to designated protected areas. Each protected area
has established peripheral buffer zones to protect the same from activities
that will directly and indirectly harm it. Such buffer zones shall be included
in the individual protected area management plan that shall be prepared for
each protected area.
As provided for in the Implementing Rules and Regulations, the major
goal of establishing buffer zones is to encourage buffer zones residents
and/or managers to establish a strong fence that will prevent encroachment
into the
protected area by others. The following are the guidelines:
a. Buffer zones must be established by law in the same manner that a
protected area is established. Therefore, every effort shall be made to
include the appropriate buffer zones in the original recommendations
for establishment.
b. When buffer zones are established after the protected area has been
established, the procedures to be followed are those set forth in
Section 4 of this Order.
c. The PAMB and the PAS shall exercise authority over buffer zones on
behalf of the DENR (Section 8 of this Act) in cooperation with NGOs and
other government agencies. Management and land use practices for
buffer zones shall be prescribed in the management plan.
d. The range of resource management activities that may be allowed in
various portions of the buffer zone must be broad so as to give
maximum management flexibility. If very limited resource access is
contemplated, the area should be considered for inclusion in the
protected area. In cases where there is conflict in the classification of
buffer zone such classification shall not impair the traditional livelihood
of cultural communities.
e. Those who will manage buffer zone areas; indigenous cultural
communities, tenured migrants and others; must play a prominent role
in developing the plans, policies and rules for buffer zone
management.
Management Plans
In order to promote the adoption and implementation of innovative
management techniques, the concept of zoning, buffer zone management
for multiple use and protection, habitat conservation and rehabilitation,
diversity management, community organizing, socioeconomic and scientific
researches, site-specific policy development, pest management, and fire
control, there shall be a general management planning strategy to serve as
guide in formulating individual plans for each protected area.
A
management manual shall be formulated and developed which must contain
of
Other
Departments
and
said protected area or a portion thereof shall coordinate with the DENR in the
preparation of its management plans, upon the effectivity of this Act.
The greatest challenge from the standpoint of a legislative study is the
NIPAS Acts unresolved overlaps with other laws, specifically the Fisheries
Code with respect to coastal and marine conservation areas, and the IPRA
concerning ancestral domains. The requirement of a Congressional Act to
fully establish a protected area under the NIPAS Act opens the door for sitespecific laws 46 to deviate from the framework of the Act, since a new
congressional enactment will supersede the NIPAS Act for that particular
area. This matter is left to the vigilance of the DENR, which must ensure that
legislative proposals (which the DENR is supposed to review) are consistent
with the NIPAS Act framework, and to the wisdom of Congress to consider the
overall strategy and framework of protected areas system management and
to not treat each site-specific law or legislation on a related issue (pollution,
fisheries, local autonomy) in isolation.
Integrated Protected Areas Fund
There is hereby established a trust fund to be known as Integrated
Protected Areas (IPAS) Fund for purposes of financing projects of the System.
The IPAS may solicit and receive donations, endowments, and grants in the
form of contributions, and such endowment shall be exempted from income
or gift taxes and all other taxes, charges or fees imposed by the Government
or any political subdivision or instrumentality thereof.
All incomes generated from the operation of the System or
management of wild flora and fauna shall accrue to the Fund and may be
utilized directly by the DENR for the above purpose. These incomes shall be
derived from:
a.
b.
c.
d.
Taxes from the permitted sale and export of flora and fauna and
other resources from protected areas;
Proceeds from lease of multiple use areas;
Contributions from industries and facilities directly benefiting
from the protected area; and
Such other fees and incomes derived from the operation of the
protected area. Disbursements from the Funds shall be made
solely for the protection, maintenance, administration, and
management of the System, and duly approved projects
endorsed by the PAMBs, in the amounts authorized by the DENR.
regulation in force
recommendations.
and
other
pertinent
information,
together
with
Field Officers
All officials, technical personnel and forest guards or park rangers
employed in the protected areas or all persons deputized by the DENR, upon
recommendation of the Management Board shall be considered as field
officers. Such field officers shall have the authority to investigate and search
premises and buildings and make arrests in accordance with the rules on
criminal procedure for the violation of laws and regulations relating to
protected areas. Persons arrested shall be brought to the nearest police
precinct for investigation and filing of appropriate charges.
Nothing herein mentioned shall be construed as preventing regular
law enforcers and police officers from arresting any persons in the act of
violating the laws and regulations related to protected areas and biodiversity
conservation.
Special Prosecutor
The Department of Justice shall designate special prosecutors to
prosecute violations of laws rules and regulations in protected areas.
Prohibited Acts
Except as may be allowed by the nature of their categories and pursuant to
rules and regulations governing the same, the following acts are prohibited
within protected areas:
a. Hunting, fishing, gathering, collecting, destroying, disturbing, or
possession of any plants or animals or products derived therefrom
without a permit from the DENR Secretary after clearance to be
obtained from the PAMB; Provided, that the DENR Secretary
exercises these powers upon advice of pertinent government
agencies;
b. Dumping of any hazardous and toxic products and other pollutants in
the protected area;
c. Use of any motorized equipment without a permit from the
Management Board;
d. Gathering, collecting, mutilating, defacing or destroying any
objects of special or cultural value within the protective area,
as may be defined in the Implementing Rules and Regulations;
e. Damaging and leaving roads and trails in a damaged condition;
f. Squatting, mineral locating, or otherwise occupying any land;
g. Constructing or maintaining any kind of structure, fence or enclosures,
conducting any business enterprise without a permit;
And in addition to the Sections provided in the NIPAS Law there must
be a provision for: Section 25
Alternative Dispute Resolution
The DENR Secretary shall issue the pertinent rules, regulations
and orders as would be necessary to implement an effective
alternative dispute resolution (ADR) or conflict management
mechanism for appropriate cases with the objective of
achieving speedy and impartial justice and actively promoting
party autonomy in the resolution of disputes or the freedom of
the parties to make their own arrangements to resolve their
disputes. Parties to a dispute shall not be allowed to invoke
the jurisdiction of courts without prior recourse to the ADR
process.
ANALYSIS
Salient Features of NIPAS Law are one, the DENR is the lead agency in
the administration of the NIPAS and among others it is mandated to submit
to the Senate and House of Representatives a map and legal description of
natural boundaries of each protected area, which shall constitute the official
documentary representation of the entire system and second, prohibited acts
and penalties thereof are defined.
However, there is a need to take a closer look into these seeming
inconsistencies in the law to make a more reliable and sound piece of
legislation. A law cannot be properly implemented if its provisions are vague
or inconsistent with other laws and the Constitution. Recognizing the
inherent flaws is a step closer to the achievement of enacting laws which are
socially relevant and proactive.
One area for concern in the NIPAS law is the wide latitude of discretion
given to the DENR secretary as regards the issuance of permits for certain
activities inside the protected area and the provision provided for in Section
20 of the NIPAS Act prohibits hunting, destroying, disturbing, or mere
possession of any plants or animals or products derived there from, use of
any motorized equipment, constructing or maintaining any kind of structure,
fence or enclosures, conducting any business enterprise without a permit.
This necessarily means that these acts are not prohibited if with permit. The
law does not provide for guidelines for the administrative exercise of
discretion to issue permits. Hence, the law can be perceived as vague and
an undue delegation of powers.
Moreover, there is the opinion that the NIPAS Act can be challenged as
being void on the ground of vagueness. This opinion states that the NIPAS
Act, specifically the portion on prohibited acts (Section 20), lacks
comprehensible standards which allow the people to necessarily guess at its
meaning and differ as to its application. It is repugnant to the Constitution in
two respects: (1) it violates due process for failure to accord persons,
especially the parties targeted by it, fair notice of the conduct to avoid; and
(2) it leaves law enforcers unbridled discretion in carrying out its provisions
and becomes an arbitrary flexing of the government muscle.
For instance, how can people know in advance what waste products
are detrimental to the protected area? Clearly, the law does not punish the
dumping of waste products per se, but only those waste products that are
detrimental to the protected area. Moreover, destroying objects within a PA
does not seem to be punishable by itself. What is punishable is to mutilate,
deface or destroy objects of natural beauty, or objects of interest to cultural
communities (of scenic value). Again, the NIPAS Act imposes no standard at
all because one may never know in advance what is naturally beautiful or of
scenic value to some people but is not so to others.
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS
HB 6156 Amending Republic Act No. 7586, January 18, 2013 House Bills.1
The NIPAS Law was enacted about 20 years ago. However, only a few
of the proclaimed and congress-enacted Protected Areas (PAs) are properly
managed exemplified only by the Mt. Kitanglad Protected Landscape in
Bukidnon. There are many constraints to the proper management of a PA.
Among these are the lack of plantilla position of Protected Area
Superintendent and its corresponding staff that is supposed to provide
management of a PA.
To implement fully the PA Management Plan requires tremendous
amount of funds. However, PAs are not appropriated with sufficient funds to
carry out proper management. In fact there are limited sources of funds for
the Integrated Protected Area Fund (IPAF). There is need to identify
innovative sources of funds for the IPAF in addition to its appropriate
application.
RA 7586 is basically applicable to terrestrial protected areas and there
is less emphasis on marine and inland water sites. This situation has led to
the identification and proclamation of loop-sided number of terrestrial PAs
against marine and fresh water areas. Of the 113 proclaimed PAs covering
3.57 million hectares, 84 are terrestrial (2.2 million hectares) while only 29
are marine and inland waters protected areas in 1.37 million hectares. The
law needs to be revised/amended to correct the situation.
The penalties for violation of the NIPAS Act are not commensurate to
the destruction of the environment that such acts bring about. There is need
to revise the penalties in terms of fines and/or imprisonment in order that
these pose some deterring effects on would-be violators.
Despite the provision of Section 45 of RA No. 8550, otherwise known as
the Fisheries Code thattwo (2) years after the approval of this Act, no fish
pens or fish cages or fish traps shall be allowed in lakes many lakes and
inland waters there are still such structures seeded beyond the carrying
capacity of the lakes or inland waters. In addition to aggravating causes fish
kills have occurred similar to the one that occurred in Taal Lake on May 29,
2011 when more than 800 tons of milk fish or bangus died worth P142
million because of over-stocking beyond the carrying capacity of the lake.
The carrying capacity of lakes and inland waters where fish cages or fish
1 http://agham.org.ph/house-bil-6156-amending-republic-act-no-7586/