Appendix B A Review of State-of-the-Art Techniques For Real-Time Damage Assessment of Bridges
Appendix B A Review of State-of-the-Art Techniques For Real-Time Damage Assessment of Bridges
Appendix B A Review of State-of-the-Art Techniques For Real-Time Damage Assessment of Bridges
31 Aug 98
Appendix B
A Review of State-of-the-Art
Techniques for Real-Time Damage
Assessment of Bridges
B-1. Introduction
a. It was reported that, as of November 1991,
35 percent of approximately 590,000 bridges in
the United States were considered structurally
deficient or functionally obsolete (Bagdasarian
1994). Many bridges have become deficient due
to increased age and larger than expected service
loads. In addition, some highway and railroad
bridges ranging from 50 to more than 100 years
old are still performing their intended function in
spite of excessive use (Scalzi 1988). AASHTO
has developed a Manual for Condition Evaluation of Bridges (1994), which provides for
uniformity in the procedures and policies for
determining the physical condition, maintenance
needs, and load capacity of highway bridges.
Recent bridge collapse or near collapse has
focused the need to develop extensive nondestructive evaluation (NDE) techniques for real-time
structural damage assessment to guarantee the
safety of our nationwide transportation system.
Real-time NDE techniques can immediately
provide information such as size, shape, location,
and orientation of discontinuities as part of the
structural damage assessment.
c. Applications of dynamic property measurement techniques in civil engineering (e.g., buildings, bridges, and dams) are rather rare. Although
ETL 1110-2-551
31 Aug 98
(2) Applications.
(a) As early as the late 1930s and early 1940s,
investigators began the application of eddy current
techniques to materials evaluation problems.
Commercial instruments became available during
this time and were used extensively during World
War II.
(b) With the rapid development of electronics
and computer science, presently the eddy current
technology can be utilized to assess selected
material properties as well as locate discrete
discontinuities in metallic structures such as
aircraft (Hugemaier 1991), coolant channel
assemblies of nuclear reactor (Bhole et al. 1993),
large diameter pipeline steels (Nestleroth 1993),
etc. A list of selected applications is given in
Table B-1.
B-2
ETL 1110-2-551
31 Aug 98
Figure B-1. Arrangements of eddy current test probes and test objects for (a) probe on one side of test
object, (b) probe encircling test object, and (c) excitation and pick-up on opposite sides of test object
B-3
ETL 1110-2-551
31 Aug 98
Table B-1
Typical Applications of Eddy Current Inspection
Material Property Determinations
Heat treatment evaluation
Hardness measurements
Fire damage determinations
Impurity content measurement
Discontinuity Detection
Sheet metal
Foil
Wire
Bar
Tube Testing
Bolt inspection
Weld inspection
Ball bearings tests
fflex. =
20.2h
l
E
'
(B-1)
(1) Principle.
(a) Certain properties of structures can be
evaluated using vibration dynamic techniques. It
is well-known that a structure possesses certain
natural vibration frequencies and mode shapes. If
friction is taken into account, the vibrations that
are already excited will decrease gradually. This
is called a damping vibration. The dynamic
vibration tests are carried out by applying a known
forced vibration to the structure and observing its
vibration response. The fundamental concept is to
flong =
h
2l
E
'
where
f = natural vibration frequency (Hz)
h = height or depth of the bar (in.)
B-4
(B-2)
ETL 1110-2-551
31 Aug 98
B-5
ETL 1110-2-551
31 Aug 98
l = length
' = density
0.00245f 2l 4'
h2
(B-3)
Table B-2
Physical Quantities Typically Measured by Resonance
Vibration
Length, width, thickness diameter
Modulus of elasticity
Shear Modulus
Poissons Ratio
Density
Modulus of rupture
Discontinuities or other inhomogeneities
(B-5)
(B-4)
where
K = stiffness matrix
M = mass matrix
7 = resonant frequency
1 = the vibration mode shape
A perturbation of the structure is considered in
which a small change in stiffness [K] produces
B-6
ETL 1110-2-551
31 Aug 98
B-7
ETL 1110-2-551
31 Aug 98
(h) A prototype monitoring system was developed by Vibra-Metrics, Inc., for placement on an
actual Connecticut bridge. The monitoring system
consists of sixteen accelerometers, two cluster
boxes, and a sentry unit that houses a computer.
B-8
ETL 1110-2-551
31 Aug 98
B-9
ETL 1110-2-551
31 Aug 98
Figure B-5. Intensity transit-time or pulse transit-time method, (a) with sound transmission, (b) with
reflection
ETL 1110-2-551
31 Aug 98
Figure B-6. A-, B-, and C-scan presentation and scanning method
Adhesive bonds
Aircraft
Spacecraft
Nuclear reactors
Ships
Bridges
ETL 1110-2-551
31 Aug 98
Figure B-7(a). Typical digitized RF display of test of aluminum bar 76 mm (3 in.) thick. Time base is
3.6 E-6x/div.
(1) Principle.
(a) Acoustic emission (AE), sometimes called
stress wave emission, is a transient mechanical
B-12
ETL 1110-2-551
31 Aug 98
ETL 1110-2-551
31 Aug 98
Figure B-9. Testing fillet welds; (a) joint not welded through, (b) joint welded through (K-joint)
B-14
ETL 1110-2-551
31 Aug 98
Table 4
Some Sources of Acoustic Emissions
Crack initiation and growth
Dislocation movements
Twinning
Phase changes
Fracture of brittle inclusions or surface films
Fiber breakage, crazing, and delaminations in
composites
Chemical activity
B-15
ETL 1110-2-551
31 Aug 98
2
(ChKImax/)Y)
dl/dn
(B-6)
(B-7)
where
dl/dn = C (K) m
(B-8)
C = a proportionality factor
where
h = thickness of the specimen
dl/dn = crack-growth rate
Kimax = maximum value of the stress intensity
factor
)Y = yield point
dl/dn = growth rate of the crack length for
loading cycle
(2) Applications.
(a) The AE method has wide applications. It
can be used to monitor changing material
B-16
ETL 1110-2-551
31 Aug 98
B-17
ETL 1110-2-551
31 Aug 98
Figure B-13. Typical relationships among the crack safety index, crack-growth rate, count rate, and K for
bridge steels
B-18
ETL 1110-2-551
31 Aug 98
Table B-5
Fatigue-Crack Characterization for Bridge Steels
Range of K
Crack Description
0 K < 10
10 K < 20
20 K < 30
30 K < 40
40 K
1
2
3
4
5
Minor defect
Slow crack growth
Requires repair
Dangerous
Imminent failure
monitor 36 bridges under normal loading conditions. The system consists of surveillance units
and an IBM PC control unit as shown in the
Figure B-14 block diagram. A line driver and
receiver are located next to each acoustic transducer to ensure the fidelity of weak acoustic
signals after transmission over long cables.
The monitoring distance can be up to 460 m
(1,509 ft). All bridges tested utilized standard
piezoelectric transducers with resonant
frequencies of 200 kHz.
B-19
ETL 1110-2-551
31 Aug 98
Figure B-14. Block diagram of the Monac acoustic monitoring system. RMS = root mean square
external influence, but the fiber numbered 4 is isolated. Any change of the light phase in fiber
number 5 will result in the interference fringe displacement. The advantages of optical fiber
include its small size, light weight, faster data
speed, immunity from electromagnetic induction,
positioning, and lower cost.
(2) Applications. Optical fiber sensors have
been widely investigated (Asawa et al. 1982;
Marvin and Ives 1984; Lapp et al. 1988; Maria
et al. 1989). A special conference on fiber optic
smart structures and skins was held with more
than thirty papers presented at the International
Society for Optical Engineering (1988). Following is a brief introduction of some applications of
the optical fiber sensors.
Mapping strain field. Optical fiber
sensors can be used to provide evaluation of the
B-20
ETL 1110-2-551
31 Aug 98
Table B-6
Results of Railroad Bridge Monitoring
Bridge
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
Bridge Type
Number of
Monitoring
Locations
Number of
Active
Cracks
TTS
TPGV
TPG
DPG/TPG
TPG
TTS/TT
TT/TPG/TTS
DPG/PYT
TPG/TT
DPG
TT/DT/DPG
TPG
DPG/BM/DPGV
DPG/DT
DT/TT
DPG/TPG
DT
TT
TT
TT
DT
TT
TT
DPG
TT
DPG
DPGV
DPGV
DPG
DPGV
DT
DPGV
DPGV
DPGV
DPG
DPG
8
4
6
7
6
8
8
7
5
5
8
6
8
8
8
6
15
13
134
12
5
6
5
6
8
12
2
2
3
2
6
2
3
3
2
4
2
1
3
2
0
3
1
1
0
1
3
4
1
3
6
4
3
2
46
6
0
0
2
3
2
4
1
2
1
0
1
0
2
2
1
3
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
3
3
1
1
5
1
2
1
19
4
1
2
1
3
1
23
2
1
4
2
3
2
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
Bridge types: TTS = through-truss swing, TPG = through-plate girder, PYT = pony truss, DT = deck truss, TPGV = throughplate girder viaduct, TT = through-truss, DPG = deck-plate girder, and BM = beam.
ETL 1110-2-551
31 Aug 98
B-22
ETL 1110-2-551
31 Aug 98
Figure B-17. Reconstruction of the strain field: (a) integrating fiber optic sensors traversing a measured
field, (b) using point fiber optic sensors
B-23
ETL 1110-2-551
31 Aug 98
B-24
ETL 1110-2-551
31 Aug 98
B-25