Liberia - Marine Advisory On PSC Inspection (No. 14-2012)
Liberia - Marine Advisory On PSC Inspection (No. 14-2012)
Liberia - Marine Advisory On PSC Inspection (No. 14-2012)
LIBERIA MARITIME A
Office of
Deputy Commissioner
of Maritime Affairs
17 October 2012
Marine Advisory: 14/2012
Subject:
Dear Shipowner/Operator/Master;
This Advisory is to provide assistance and guidance regarding Port State Control (PSC)
inspections.
Port State Control authorities are becoming more aggressive during this period of economic
downturn and are finding an increase in deficiencies due to lack of maintenance and training.
Detentions are increasing as result of deficiencies for required equipment not working properly,
cleanliness (excessive oil) in machinery spaces, vessels not being adequately supplied and
maintained, and inadequately trained crews. In addition, more PSC inspectors are issuing
detentions for failure of the ships safety management system when several deficiencies are
noted which, when taken separately, would not otherwise be reason for detention. PSC
detentions are time and resource consuming events for ship-owners and operators, which will
add more to a companys operating costs then proper maintenance and training. This
Administration has prepared guidance to assist owners and operators preparing their vessels for
PSC inspections in order to minimize deficiencies and prevent PSC detentions.
The PSC Inspection Process: During a PSC inspection, the Inspector will first conduct an
initial inspection, which includes examination of the ships and crews certificates, an
inspection of critical areas and equipment which will probably involve a fire and abandon ship
drill. If the inspector is of the opinion that the vessel is substantially in compliance after the
initial inspection, then no further inspection should be necessary. Therefore, it is essential that
the Master and crew demonstrate a positive first impression. This will reduce the time the
inspector(s) is/are on board and may prevent an in depth inspection (the attached
checklist has been developed to assist).
More detailed Inspection: If the ship or crews certification is incomplete or invalid, or if
there are clear grounds to suspect that the ship and/or its equipment or crew may not be in
substantial compliance with the requirements, a more detailed inspection will usually be
undertaken. A more detailed inspection is expanded in scope and increases the chance of
disrupting the ships schedule and delay in the port, if deficiencies are found that require
correction or that lead to a detention. A record of serious deficiencies and detentions can lead
to more frequent PSC inspections and negative PSC and safety compliance ratings on a vessels
and the ship managers.
Guidance to Masters: The attached check list with the document General Guidance for
Masters to ensure a Positive PSC Inspection on Port State Control Inspections shows the most
Australia: Australia has been and continues to be the most active country in detaining
vessels. AMSA targets predominantly older General Cargo Vessels and Bulk Carriers.
The following detainable deficiencies are commonly reported:
-
Lifeboats
o On-load release defective, lifeboat engine could not start, Auto drain valve Missing
2
China: Chinese Port State Control is reporting, as detainable deficiencies, valid defects,
which we believe are not always detainable deficiencies, but this is difficult to appeal. Before
calling a port in China the following items should be inspected in detail:
-
Fire dampers,
Cleanliness of the Engine Room,
Jacketed piping system for high pressure fuel lines
o Leakage alarm devices out of order, Jacket piping or Protective cover not be
provided, Jacketed pipe broken
During a PSC inspection in China a vessel was detained during cargo operations while being
alongside because the Chief Engineer and Second Engineer were simultaneously ashore. We
successfully appealed this detention because according to STCW VIII Part 4WATCHKEEPING IN PORT there is no requirement that prohibits the Third Engineer from
assuming the watch while in port during cargo operations. However, according to the national
Act on Minimum Safe Manning of People's Republic of China it is prohibited that the Chief
Engineer and Second Engineer go ashore simultaneously when calling a Chinese port.
Noncompliance can lead to fines.
India: We have experienced a substantial increase in the detention rate for vessels calling
Indian ports. Most detentions are due to:
-
Singapore: We have had a substantial increase in Singaporean detentions for the first half of
2012. All detentions were related to the Arcs of Visibility for the Navigation Light, mainly
the Masthead light was not correct (on two separate occasions it appears a stern light (135 o) was
fitted where a mast head light (225o) should be fitted), or the bulb provided insufficient
luminosity. The correct installation of the Navigation lights should be checked.
3
Turkey:
Traditionally the port of Mersin has been very active in detaining vessels,
predominantly Reefers and Bulk Carriers. The following deficiencies have led to most
detentions:
-
United States: When calling the United States it is essential that the OWS is in working
condition and the crew is able to operate the device.
Incorrect entries in the oil record books can lead to a detention: Port state control officers are
requiring ships Chief Engineers to demonstrate that what is recorded in the oil record book is
the same as the electronic record retained by the oil monitoring device.
*****
During visits by Port State Control Officers (PSCO) it is essential that the conduct of the
Master and crew be professional.
If PSCO officer boards the vessel they should be met at embarkation and asked for their
identification (ISPS CODE) and escorted to the Masters office. Require an opening meeting-even if not offered. Ensure a suitable business like atmosphere.
Properly introduce key officers/personnel and ask for the same courtesy in return. Ensure that
the lead in the official PSC party is identified. All key staff should be present unless duty
requires otherwise, in which case this should be explained.
The inspection procedure contemplated by the PSCO should be explained. If not, ask for an
explanation.
Inform the PSCO of any problems with required equipment, including repairs and
corrective action that is ongoing and/or dispensations that have been issued by the flag
Administration, to allow time needed to affect repairs.
Identify ships officers who will assist in key elements of the inspection. Identify their PSCO
counter-part.
Escorting ships officers should always be professional and knowledgeable of ships
equipment.
Escorting ships officers should keep notes on deficiencies noted by PSCO.
RLM258Rev:10/12
1of2
Even when there are defects it is possible to prevent a detention. However, the Crew, Company,
Recognized Organization, and Flag must be proactive and show that they have identified the
defect and are taking appropriate corrective action.
The items listed on the attached check list represent the most common deficiencies.
When equipment is not functioning as required and cannot be repaired prior to arrival in a port, it
is essential to contact this Administration at [email protected], (if possible) prior to arrival.
Liberia will issue a dispensation to present to PSC in order to avoid a possible detention.
2of2
RLM258Rev:10/12
Ships Name:
____________________________
IMO No.:
____________________________
Nextportofcall:
____________________________
Dateofcall:
Date:
____________________________
____________________________
Item
Common Detainable
Deficiency
Record of Ships
Statutory Certificates
incomplete
YES NO
Missing Liberian
certificates for Master
and Officers
YES NO
Missing Liberian
Certification for the crew
YES NO
YES NO
Comments
RLM258Rev:10/12
1of4
YES NO
Lack of maintenance
YES NO
YES NO
YES NO
YES NO
YES NO
YES NO
System Operational?
YES NO
YES NO
RLM258Rev:10/12
2of4
Separator operable?
YES NO
YES NO
YES NO
YES NO
YES NO
YES NO
YES NO
YES NO
YES NO
YES NO
YES NO
YES NO
YES NO
YES NO
Fire Pumps
inoperable/inefficient
(Especially the
Emergency fire pump)
Defective lifeboat
launching arrangements
RLM258Rev:10/12
3of4
Cleanliness of E/R
YES NO
RLM258Rev:10/12
4of4