Issue and Escalation Process (4004)
Issue and Escalation Process (4004)
Issue and Escalation Process (4004)
<Project Name>
Office of Systems Integration
Governance Plan
Date
Revision History
REVISION HISTORY
REVISION/WORKSITE
#
SIDdocs #2478,
3312, 3332, 3333
OSI Admin #4004
DATE OF
RELEASE
07/30/2004
02/20/2008
OWNER
SID PMO
OSI PMO
SUMMARY OF CHANGES
Initial Release
ROLE
DATE
<OSIAdmin #259542481.doc
Table of Contents
1. INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................1
1.1 PURPOSE....................................................................................................... 1
1.2 SCOPE........................................................................................................... 1
1.3 REFERENCES..................................................................................................1
1.3.1 Best Practices Website..............................................................................1
1.3.2 Project Issue Database..............................................................................1
1.3.3 Project Document Repository....................................................................2
1.3.4 Other References.......................................................................................2
1.4
1.5
<OSIAdmin #259542481.doc
ii
<OSIAdmin #259542481.doc
iii
1. INTRODUCTION
In most cases, the Issue and Escalation Process will be created during the Planning
life cycle phase. It is preferable to have this document as a stand-alone process that
is referenced by other documents to ensure a consistent approach that is
documented in only one place. The Issue and Escalation Process should be
referenced in the Communication Plan, Governance Plan, Risk Management Plan
and Master Project Plan, and may be referenced in the Interagency Agreement (IAA)
and Memoranda of Understanding (MOU).
This document does not have to be a stand-alone document; it could be an appendix
to the above referenced plans. The process may be described in a tabular format,
process flow chart or swim-lane chart format.
1.1
Purpose
This document describes the Issue and Escalation Process for the < Project Name>
Project. The purpose of the process is to ensure unanticipated issues and action
items are assigned to a specific person for action and are tracked to resolution.
However, when a resolution cannot be reached, the item should be escalated to
ensure a decision is made before it causes impact to the project. The escalation
process documents how to raise an issue to a higher-level of management for
resolution, particularly when resolution cannot be reached at the project level.
1.2
Scope
The Issue and Escalation Process identifies the procedures used to manage issues,
action items, and escalation throughout the project life cycle. The process
documents the approach to issue identification and analysis, the approach to
escalation and how resolutions are documented.
1.3
References
The current list and status of project issues are kept in an issues database located at
< path and/or server >. The project uses < MTS II > as their issue and action item
tracking tool. User instruction guides can be found at < path and/or server >. If the
OSIAdmin 4004.doc
project is using a tool other than MTS II to track issues and action items, indicate the
name and location of the tool.
1.3.3
The project uses <Worksite> as their document repository for all project-specific
documentation. If the project is not using WorkSite, indicate the location of the
projects electronic document repository as well as the projects hardcopy library.
1.3.4
Other References
List only acronyms applicable to this document. If the list becomes longer than one
page, move the acronym list to the Appendix.
Action Item
BPWeb
Escalation
IAA
MOU
OSIAdmin 4004.doc
Issue
MTS II
OSI
1.5
Document Maintenance
This document will be reviewed annually and updated as needed, as the project
proceeds through each phase of the system development life cycle. If the document
is written in an older format, the document should be revised into the latest OSI
template format at the next annual review.
This document contains a revision history log. When changes occur, the version
number will be updated to the next increment and the date, person making the
change, and change description will be recorded in the revision history log of the
document.
2. PARTICIPANTS ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
Section 2 focuses on the roles and responsibilities for the Issue and Escalation
Process, not overall roles for the project. It is quite common for multiple roles to be
assigned to a single person. Discuss the level of authority for the Issue Manager.
Indicate if the Sponsor and Prime Contractor (if applicable) participate in issue/action
item resolution or only in identification.
Discuss who has the authority to identify issues that require escalation and who
validates that the escalation is a valid course of action. Discuss who performs the
analysis of the escalation situation and develops the projects position statement.
Indicate who ultimately has the authority to resolve the item.
OSIAdmin 4004.doc
2.1
Project Director
The Project Director will participate in issue and action item resolutions. If an issue
could not be resolved at the project level, the Project Director will escalate the issue
to the Executive Steering Committee for resolution.
2.2
Project Manager
The Project Manager has overall responsibility for driving, participating, and
managing the overall issue resolution and escalation process at the project level.
The Project Manager will escalate the issue to the Project Director level for
resolution when necessary.
2.3
Issue Manager
The Issue Manager is responsible for overseeing the issue and action item
management process and for periodic reporting on issue status and process
metrics. The Issue Manager generates reports for weekly project team review
meetings. The Issue Manager also monitors due dates and escalates issues and
action items to the Project Manager, as appropriate.
2.4
Any staff member or stakeholder may generate an issue or action item. Typically,
issues and actions are only assigned to project staff to ensure proper visibility and
tracking. Other stakeholders may be asked to assist with analysis and review of
proposed issue and/or action item resolutions, when appropriate.
2.5
OSIAdmin 4004.doc
Discuss the relationship of the issue process to the escalation process. If issues and
action items are treated separately, discuss the differences in the process. Inserting
a process flowchart may be helpful to depict the overall flow and interaction with
other processes.
In the sections below, discuss required time frames and tool features as appropriate.
If there are quality checks or measures for each step, discuss these also.
3.1
Identification
Issue and action item identification occurs throughout the projects life cycle. Issues
and actions may arise from meetings, analysis, document reviews, workgroups, and
other project activities. Traditionally, either project staff members or end-users
identify most issues. Identified issues/action items are documented in meeting
minutes and entered directly into the issue tool. For more information on entering a
new issue/action item, refer to the < MTS II > user manual. If the project is using a
tool other than MTS II to track issues and action items, indicate the name and
location of the tool.
Indicate how issues and action items are identified and where or how they are
documented. For example:
3.2
Are they entered on a form before they are entered into the issue database?
If a form is used, indicate where or to whom the form is submitted.
Are issues entered directly into the database or issue tracking tool?
Who has access to the tool? (e.g., all project staff, sponsor staff, management
only, admin staff, etc.)
Validation and Prioritization
The Issue Manager reviews the issue/action item and checks the issue database to
ensure the item does not already exist, determines that the item is an issue/action
item and not a risk or change request, and ensures the desired resolution or
concern is clearly worded. If the item is determined to be invalid, the originator of the
issue/action item is notified and the item is closed in the issue database.
OSIAdmin 4004.doc
The Issue Manager discusses the new issues at the < insert meeting name >. The
manager will discuss the priority of the item, confirm the assignment, and establish a
due date. The Project Manager makes the final decision on priority, assignment, and
due dates. The Issue Manager updates the issue database with the priority and
assignment.
Indicate how issues and action items are validated, prioritized, and assigned.
Indicate who performs the validation and the criteria used for validation.
Indicate what happens if the item fails the validation check. Is the item entered
into the issue database but marked as invalid? If it was already entered in the
database, is the item deleted or marked as rejected?
Indicate who performs the prioritization and what criteria is used in the
prioritization. Describe the criteria for the priority levels. In some cases, the
priority may have been established at the meeting that originated the item.
Indicate how assignments are made and who has the authority to make the
assignment. In some cases, the assignments may have occurred at the
meeting that originated the item. Can items be assigned directly to a staff
member, or are they assigned to a functional manager who will then delegate
to the appropriate staff?
Are the priorities and assignments reviewed at a meeting or otherwise
confirmed? Discuss how staff availability and other work priorities are adjusted
or negotiated, if appropriate.
Discuss how staff is notified of their assignment and due date.
Indicate when and how the tool is updated. Indicate deadlines for process
steps (e.g., assignment must occur within two [2] business days of
identification).
3.3
Issue Analysis
The assigned staff member performs the required analysis to complete the
issue/action item. The assignee updates the issue database with periodic status at
least <weekly, biweekly >. For issues/action items requiring analysis, the assignee
determines the following:
Impacts to Project Scope
Impacts to Cost and Schedule
Impacts to Staff and Infrastructure Resources
Impacts to Sponsor, User and Stakeholder Relationships
Risks and Impacts to Existing Risks
Resolution Alternatives (Pros and Cons)
Suggested Resolution
OSIAdmin 4004.doc
The Issue Manager monitors the issue database < daily, weekly > to ensure new
issues/action items and resolved items are clearly documented. Assignees are
required to update the status of the item in the issue database at least < weekly,
biweekly >.
Indicate how issues and action items are tracked, monitored, and reported.
Discuss staffs responsibility for updating status on their assigned
issues/action items.
Discuss the Issue Managers responsibility for updating and monitoring
overall issue status.
Discuss how the Issue Manager monitors the projects overall commitment
to timely issue resolution.
Indicate what meetings are used to discuss issue status and issue process
effectiveness.
Indicate when and how the tool is updated. Indicate required status updates
(in the tool) and any automatic notifications. Indicate deadlines for process
steps (e.g., analysis must complete within 10 business days of assignment).
Indicate what triggers the resolution process.
Describe the reports and metrics used to monitor the effectiveness of the
process and the projects adherence to the process.
OSIAdmin 4004.doc
3.5
Escalation Process
The Escalation Process will be used to ensure critical issues are raised soon
enough to prevent undesirable impacts to the <Project Name> Project and to ensure
the appropriate parties are informed and involved in critical decision-making. The
Project Director, Sponsor and stakeholders shall always strive to make decisions
and address issues at the lowest possible level.
3.5.1
scheduled within a certain number of days (not more than ten business
days) of the notification.
Indicate the impacts and considerations used to develop the projects
position based on the analysis of the situation.
Discuss how the escalation history is documented.
The following are examples of types of issues that might be escalated to the
<Project Name> < Executive Steering Committee>.
Policy Issues
Schedule
Go/No-Go recommendations
Vendor Disputes
Stakeholder disagreements
Funding
3.6
Escalation will occur if at any time the necessary activities either are not
being completed or appear that they will not be completed timely, resulting
in a risk to agreed upon target dates.
Escalation will occur if at any time it appears either requirements are not
being met or cannot be met or those requirements may be contrary to
state or county expectations with regard to quality of the system and its
subsequent impact on state programs.
Escalation will occur if at any time an issue is raised for which a decision
is needed in order to continue progress on the completion of the activities.
Escalation will occur if the escalation governance structures are not able
to reach concurrence on an issue where concurrence is needed to
proceed.
3.6.1 Resolution
The <Project Name> < Executive Steering Committee> will:
OSIAdmin 4004.doc
Provide expedited response and direction on issues which may impact the
scope or schedule of <Project Name> activities.
OSIAdmin 4004.doc
10
APPENDICES
<OSIAdmin 4004>
<OSIAdmin 4004>