ENC 3246: PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION FOR ENGINEERS

COURSE DESCRIPTION
Professional communication is the practice of conveying technical information to various audiences with
different goals and levels of expertise. In this class students learn how to research, organize, and present
technical information in effectively written documents, work in collaboration with other professionals,
and use various technologies to support their communication efforts.
This course is designed to help students master a variety of communication strategies and genres of
writing relevant to engineering, including everyday acts of communication, such as email, memos,
letters, technical descriptions, and instructions. The course culminates with an academic research report
and professional proposal.
Students analyze writing situations in the professional engineering workplace and develop strategies for
addressing audiences, organizing information, using appropriate style, and presenting the work. The
objective of this class is to learn to respond in writing to complex rhetorical situations, preparing
students for the professional communities they will join.

OUTCOMES
In ENC 3246, students will learn to

plan, draft, revise, and edit documents for use in professional settings
adapt writing to different audiences, purposes, and contexts
synthesize and report on the professional and technical literature in the field
write in a clear, coherent, and direct style appropriate for applicable professions
understand and employ the various forms of professional writing, including proposals, progress
reports, research and lab reports, and professional correspondence
avoid plagiarism

YOUR LEAD INSTRUCTOR

MICKEY S SCHAFER, PHD

o
o
o

Office: 302 Tigert Hall

Email: [email protected]
Phone: 352-846-1138

YOUR WRITING COACHES

CHRIS GAGE
o
o
o

GABE MAYORA
o
o
o

Office: 302 Tigert Hall

Email: [email protected]
Groups: Cray, Dunbar

TONIA HOWICK
o
o
o

Office: 302 Tigert Hall

Email: [email protected]
Groups: Archimedes, Baird

Office: 302 Tigert Hall

Email: [email protected]
Group: Eiffel

TIMOTHY ROBINSON
o
o
o

Office: 302 Tigert Hall

Email: [email protected]
Group: Fung

ENC 3246 Syllabus 2

REQUIRED TEXTS
Mike Markel. Technical Communication, e-book --10th edition, Bedford/St. Martins, 2012
Supplemental Readings assigned in particular modules

MAJOR ASSIGNMENTS AND GROUP PROJECTS

The assignments below include two group projects. For the group projects, planning and research will be
collaborative, while the written work may be completed independently by each student. Most major
assignments will begin with a Planning Email written to your writing coach in correct, effective,
professional style.
Recommendation Message to Engineering Organization
Students will write a post describing a web application useful to engineers. The message will include
details about function, user experience, navigation, and value, supported by appropriate images.
Technical Description to Various Audiences
Focusing on a current technical innovation, students will write a detailed description of a device or
process for various audiences, and present the device or the implementation of the procedure. The
report will include at least one visual aid and cite at least five high quality sources, using an appropriate
manuscript form.
Instructions
Students will write instructions for a device, process, or task. The instructions will contain descriptions
and specifications, warnings, maintenance and troubleshooting advice, and any other information the
user is likely to need to use the device, complete the process, or accomplish the task. The assignment
will be assessed on the quality and clarity of the instructions, on the functionality of the instructional
visuals, on the effectiveness of the design, and on the rhetorical style of the steps, sequencing, and
transitions.
Job Application Packet (Cover Letter, Rsum)
In this multi-part assignment, students will first identify an internship or job they hope to secure. Next,
students will research the field, construct a profile for the ideal candidate for this position, followed by
an analysis of their own qualifications. Then, students will write a letter of application and a rsum for
this particular position. Congrats you got the position! For the final step, students will write an
Introductory Message Board post to their new colleagues.
Group Project #1: Formal Research or Lab Report
Derived from the scientific method, the research report is the most common type of report written in
academia. It is the form taken by lab reports and other documents that are based on original data
collected by the researcher or research team. Working in a small group, students will establish a
research question, devise a method of gathering original data, and collect the data. Individually,
students will write a research report that presents and analyzes the data collected as a group.
Group Project #2: Proposal
The capstone project will be a proposal for the UF campus or local community. The proposal will seek to
persuade a target audience that a significant problem exists and offer a feasible solution. Drawing on all
of the skills developed over the semester, students will analyze the rhetorical situation and employ

ENC 3246 Syllabus 3

communication strategies designed to persuade the audience to act on the plan. This project will also
include a prospectus and a progress report.
Prospectus
This is a brief report to the project supervisor emphasizing the problem statement driving the
proposal, a possible feasible solution, and a tentative schedule for completion.
Progress Report
Students will write an individual progress report on proposal work. This will track activities,
problems, and progress for both the individuals tasks, and the groups overall task. The focus
will be on schedules, setbacks, problems solved, and the dates and stages of the progress.

SCHEDULE OF ASSIGNMENTS
All of the information about when assignments, activities, discussion, quizzes, and peer reviews are due
is available through Canvas. Check BOTH the Schedule of Assignments document and the Suggested
Weekly Schedule of Activities for information about due dates and scheduling work. Do NOT email
writing coaches or the lead instructor about due dates.

Grading
Grading for this course will be rigorous. Do not rely on the writing coach for copy-editing, even on drafts.
To receive a passing grade, each paper must reach the minimum assigned word count.
Assignment Values

Major Writing Assignments

Recommend App Message
Job Application (rsum [30], letter [35])
Instructions
Annotated Bibliography
Technical Definition
Research Report
Proposal
Prospectus
Progress Report
Other Required Elements
Planning Emails (5 x 20 points)
Peer Reviews (5 X 20 points)
Reading Quizzes (10 x 10 points)
Activities (10 x10 points)
Discussion (5 x 20 points)
Total Possible Points

Points

25
65
50
25
50
100
125
15
50

Words
200
800
800
400
1000
1200
1200
200
600

100
100
100
100
100
1,000

6400

ENC 3246 Syllabus 4

Grading Scale
A
AB+
B
BC+

4.0
3.67
3.33
3.0
2.67
2.33

93-100
90-92
87-89
83-86
80-82
77-79

930-1000
900-929
870-899
830-869
800-829
770-799

C
CD+
D
DE

2.0
1.67
1.33
1.0
0.67
0.00

73-76
70-72
67-69
63-66
60-62
0-59

730-769
700-729
670-699
630-669
600-629
0-599

At the discretion of the writing coach, minor assignments (homework and class activities) may be dropped from
or added to the schedule. If assignments are dropped, the final grade will be calculated as a percentage of the
remaining points.
All questions about grades should be directed to your writing coach through email; be sure to cc the lead
instructor of the course as well.
Revision of Assignments
During the course of the semester, you may rewrite one individual Major Writing Assignment of your choosing
(your new grade will replace the previous one). Two assignments may not be revised under any circumstances:
the annotated bibliography and the proposal project. Revisions must be exhaustive; that is, ALL changes
recommended by the writing coach/instructor must be made or no new score will be given. Revisions are due by
the last day of class, and are submitted to the Revisions assignment tab in Canvas.

Course Policies and Procedures

Participation: Activities, Discussions, Quizzes, Peer Review
Just like lab classes, Professional Communication for Engineers is skills-based -- the more we write, the better
writers we become. Because we develop writing skills by practicing with real audiences, planning, practice
through activities and discussion, quizzes on information needed for work, and peer review are vital to the
online class. Consequently, these class elements comprise half of the points for class.
Since so much of professional writing is collaborative, participation is a crucial part of the class. Students are
expected to work with their peers in a professional manner designed to support the success of the groups.
Activities and Discussions will be evaluated on the quality of their content, not simply quantity. More words
does not mean a better grade; instead, the value of the words is what is most important.
Missed activities, discussions, and peer reviews will be awarded ZERO points. Missed activities, discussions, and
peer reviews cannot be made up. Please READ the weekly suggested schedule for deadlines regarding activities,
discussions, and peer reviews.
Quizzes are scheduled to be completed on Wednesdays throughout the semester. All quizzes will close
Wednesday night at 11:59 p.m. Quizzes cannot be made up.

Assignment Submission Policy

ENC 3246 Syllabus 5

All assignments must be submitted by 11:55 p.m. on the date they are due.
Academic Honesty
As a University of Florida student, your performance is governed by the UF Student Honor Code,
(https://catalog.ufl.edu/ugrad/current/advising/info/student-honor-code.aspx). The Honor Code requires
Florida students to neither give nor receive unauthorized aid in completing all assignments. Violations include
cheating, plagiarism, bribery, and misrepresentation, all defined in detail at the above site.
Plagiarism
Plagiarism is a serious violation of the Student Honor Code. The Honor Code prohibits and defines plagiarism as
follows:
Plagiarism. A student shall not represent as the students own work all or any portion of the work of
another. Plagiarism includes but is not limited to:
1. Quoting oral or written materials including but not limited to those found on the internet,
whether published or unpublished, without proper attribution.
2. Submitting a document or assignment which in whole or in part is identical or substantially
identical to a document or assignment not authored by the student.
(University of Florida, Student Honor Code, 8, October, 2013)
University of Florida students are responsible for reading, understanding, and abiding by the entire Student
Honor Code. The University Writing Program takes plagiarism very seriously, and treats instances of plagiarism
as dishonesty and as a failure to comply with the scholarly requirements of this course. You commit plagiarism
when you present the ideas or words of someone else as your own.
Important tip: There should never be a time when you copy and paste something from the Internet and don't
provide the exact location and citation information for the source.
If a student plagiarizes all or any part of any assignment, he or she will be awarded a failing grade on the
assignment. Additionally, writing coaches or the lead instructor may impose a course grade penalty and report
any incident of academic dishonesty to the Office of the Dean of Students. Each students work may be tested
for its originality against a wide variety of databases by anti-plagiarism sites to which the University subscribes,
and negative reports from such sites may constitute proof of plagiarism. Other forms of academic dishonesty
will also result in a failing grade on the assignment as a minimum penalty. Examples include cheating on a quiz
or citing phony sources or quotations.
General Education Learning Outcomes: (C) and (WR)
Composition Credit: Students must pass this course with a C or better to satisfy the CLAS requirement for
Composition (C). To earn general education Composition credit, students will

Demonstrate forms of effective writing (focusing on analyses, arguments, and proposals);

Learn different writing styles, approaches, and formats and successfully adapt writing to different
audiences, purposes, and contexts; effectively revise and edit their own writing and the writing of
others;
Organize complex arguments in writing, using thesis statements, claims, and evidence;

ENC 3246 Syllabus 6

Employ logic in arguments and analyze their own writing and the writing of others for errors in logic;
Write clearly and concisely consistent with the conventions of standard written English;
Use thesis sentences, claims, evidence, and logic in arguments.

University Writing Requirement: The University Writing Requirement (WR) ensures students both maintain their
fluency in writing and use writing as a tool to facilitate learning. Course grades now have two components. To
receive University Writing Requirement (WR) credit (E6), a student must earn a course grade of C or higher and
assignments must meet minimum word requirements totaling at least 6000 words. Thus, to earn WR-E6 credit,
students must complete all the major writing assignments.
The writing coach will evaluate and provide feedback on the student's written assignments with respect to
content, organization and coherence, argument and support, style, clarity, grammar, punctuation, and
mechanics. Conferring credit for the University Writing Requirement, this course requires that papers conform
to the following assessment rubric. More specific rubrics and guidelines applicable to individual assignments
may be delivered during the course of the semester.

ENC 3246 Syllabus 7

Assessment Rubric
The rubric below is intended as a general guide to how work is graded. Satisfactory does NOT mean an A
grade Satisfactory represents a range of acceptable work from C to A.

CONTENT

SATISFACTORY (Y)

UNSATISFACTORY (N)

Papers exhibit evidence of ideas that respond to

the topic with complexity, critically evaluating
and synthesizing sources, and provide an
adequate discussion with basic understanding of
sources.

Papers either include a central idea(s)

that is unclear or off- topic or provide
only minimal or inadequate discussion
of ideas. Papers may also lack sufficient
or appropriate sources.

Documents and paragraphs exhibit identifiable

ORGANIZATION
structure for topics, including a clear thesis
AND COHERENCE
statement and topic sentences.

Documents and paragraphs lack clearly

identifiable organization, may lack any
coherent sense of logic in associating
and organizing ideas, and may also lack
transitions and coherence to guide the
reader.

Documents use persuasive and confident

presentation of ideas, strongly supported with
evidence. At the weak end of the satisfactory
ARGUMENT AND
range, documents may provide only generalized
SUPPORT
discussion of ideas or may provide adequate
discussion but rely on weak support for
arguments.

Documents make only weak

generalizations, providing little or no
support, as in summaries or narratives
that fail to provide critical analysis.

STYLE

Documents rely on word usage that is

Documents use a writing style with word choice inappropriate for the context, genre, or
appropriate to the context, genre, and discipline. discipline. Sentences may be overly
Sentences should display complexity and
long or short with awkward
logical structure.
construction. Documents may also use
words incorrectly.

MECHANICS

Papers will feature correct or error-free

presentation of ideas. At the weak end of the
satisfactory range, papers may contain a few
spelling, punctuation, or grammatical errors that
remain unobtrusive and do not obscure the
papers argument or points.

Papers contain so many mechanical or

grammatical errors that they impede
the readers understanding or severely
undermine the writers credibility.

Due Dates, Make-up Policy, and In-Class Work

Papers and drafts are due online at the assigned day and time. Late papers will not be accepted. Failure of
technology is not an excuse. If illness or injury prevents a student from turning in a paper on time, the student
should consult with the writing coach to turn in the work as soon as is feasible given the situation.
Readings, Lectures, and Reading Quizzes

ENC 3246 Syllabus 8

In lieu of class meetings, readings and video lectures make up the instructional portion of the class. Reading
quizzes must be completed before you can submit writing assignments. Quizzes cannot be made up, and
students are only excused from a quiz with a doctors note on letterhead or written verification of participation
in a university-sponsored event for the day missed.
Many of the activities are explained in the lecture videos, so please watch them before starting an activity.
Conferences and Writing Studio
Students are encouraged to use the writing coachs office hours (electronic and face-to-face) if there are
questions about progress in the course, work underway, or any other course-related concerns. If there is a
conflict with the posted office hours, please contact the writing coach to schedule a better time. Having
conferences on assignments is often the best way to improve the quality of final drafts. The Writing Studio also
offers one-on-one assistance on writing projects and is available to students of all levels.
Evaluations
Students are expected to provide feedback on the quality of instruction in this course based on 10 criteria. These
evaluations are conducted online at https://evaluations.ufl.edu. Evaluations are typically open during the last
two or three weeks of the semester, but students will be given specific times when they are open. Summary
results of these assessments are available to students at https://evaluations.ufl.edu.
Students with Disabilities
The University of Florida complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Students requesting classroom
accommodation must first register with the Dean of Students Office. The Dean of Students Office will provide
documentation to the student who must then provide this documentation to the writing coach when requesting
accommodation.

COURSE MODULES
The following is a general outline of the topics covered in this course by module. Readings are listed in
the Learning Modules portion of the course website, and assignment due dates are listed in the
website calendar.
Module 1: Form, Function, Audience

Module 6: Research for Professional Reports

Module 2: Clear Communication and the Use of

Graphics

Module 7: Formal Research and Lab Reports

Module 3: Job Applications

Module 8: The Proposal Project: Working

Collaboratively and Running Meetings

Module 4: Document Design and Instructions

Module 9: Progress and Status Reports

Module 5: Evidence-Based Writing in Engineering

Module 10: Proposals