Attachment (64) 1

Contraception xx (2014) xxx xxx
Review article
Interventions to improve adolescents' contraceptive behaviors in low- and

middle-income countries: a review of the evidence base
Lindsey B. Gottschalk a,, 1 , Nuriye Ortayli b, 1
a
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health

b
United Nations Population Fund
Received 29 January 2014; revised 1 April 2014; accepted 29 April 2014
Abstract
Objective (s): Many adolescents in developing countries have an unmet need for contraception, which can contribute to poor reproductive
health outcomes. Recent literature reviews have not adequately captured effective contraceptive services and interventions for adolescents in
low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This study aims to identify and evaluate the existing evidence base on contraceptive services and
interventions for adolescents in LMICs that report an impact on contraceptive behavior outcomes.
Study Design: Structured literature review of published and unpublished papers about contraceptive services and interventions for
adolescents in LMICs that report an impact on contraceptive behavior outcomes.
Results: We identify common elements used by programs that measured an impact on adolescent contraceptive behaviors and summarize
outcomes from 15 studies that met inclusion criteria. Effective programs generally combined numerous program approaches and addressed
both user and service provision issues. Overall, few rigorous studies have been conducted in LMICs that measure contraceptive behaviors.
Few interventions reach the young, the out of school and other vulnerable groups of adolescents.
Conclusion (s): Though the evidence base is weak, there are promising foundations for adolescent contraceptive interventions in nearly
every region of the world. We offer recommendations for programmers and identify gaps in the evidence base to guide future research.
2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-SA license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/
by-nc-sa/3.0/).
Keywords: Sexual and reproductive health; Developing countries; Service provision; Young adult; Pregnancy; Contraception behavior
1. Introduction
The world is currently witnessing the largest cohort of
adolescents in history. Nearly one fifth of the global
population is between the ages of 10 and 19 years old,
navigating a period of profound changes that will set the
course for their adult lives, including increased independence, awareness of their bodies and figuring out their place
in the world. Alongside those changes, the transition to
sexual and reproductive maturity brings with it a number of
No funding was received to conduct this study. The open access fee
will be paid by the United Nations Population Fund.
Corresponding author. Department of Population, Family and
Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health,
615 N. Wolfe St. Baltimore, MD 21205 USA.
E-mail address: [email protected] (L.B. Gottschalk).
1
Conflicts of Interest: None.
risks, including pregnancy and its associated health and

social consequences.
Eighty-eight percent of the 1.2 billion adolescents
worldwide live in developing countries where universal access
to reproductive health has yet to be realized, and they face a
higher unmet need for contraception and higher burden of
unplanned pregnancies than their peers in developed countries
[13]. It is estimated that there are over six million unplanned
pregnancies either unwanted or mistimed each year
among adolescents in sub-Saharan Africa, Latin America and
the Caribbean and South Central and Southeast Asia, 90% of
which occur in adolescent women who are not using a modern
method of contraception [1].
Unplanned pregnancies can have devastating effects on
the health and well-being of adolescents, placing them at risk
for maternal morbidities and mortality related to unsafe
abortion and childbirth, as well as social consequences such
as decreased educational and employment opportunities,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2014.04.017
0010-7824/ 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-SA license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-ncsa/3.0/).
L.B. Gottschalk, N. Ortayli / Contraception xx (2014) xxxxxx
poverty and stigma [4,5]. A wide range of factors place

sexually active adolescents at a higher risk for unplanned
pregnancies than older women, including poor sexual health
knowledge, legal barriers to accessing services, provider
bias, stigma around premarital sex and less power in marital
unions [6]. In resource-poor settings, this risk may be
elevated as a result of low-quality services and social and
economic pressures to enter into sexual relationships at a
young age [6]. Addressing unmet need for contraception
among adolescents, thereby reducing unplanned pregnancies, could save millions of lives and improve the social
status of young women in developing countries, and it is one
of the key interventions recommended by the World Health
Organization (WHO) to prevent early pregnancy and poor
reproductive outcomes [4,79].
1.1. Adolescents' access to contraceptive information
and services
To address unmet need among adolescents, it is necessary to
understand which strategies work to increase contraceptive
behaviors among this age group and to identify gaps in the
evidence base for future research. Several recent systematic
reviews have attempted to answer these questions, though none
have looked specifically at contraceptive interventions for
adolescents in developing countries that include contraceptive
use outcomes. Blank et al. looked at clinic-based contraceptive
services for young people in developed countries, while Guse
et al.'s review of digital media interventions for adolescent
sexual and reproductive health (SRH) included studies mostly
from developed countries [10,11]. Another systematic review
of interventions to prevent unintended adolescent pregnancies
limited inclusion to randomized controlled trials, which drew
an evidence base comprised almost entirely of studies from
developed countries; the review also included several programs
that did not offer contraceptive information or services [12].
Older reviews of adolescent SRH interventions are comprised
mostly of HIV/AIDS interventions rather than contraceptive or
holistic SRH services, reflecting the dominance of HIV/AIDS
interventions within the SRH landscape throughout the late
1990s and 2000s [13,14]. While we can learn from the legacy
of adolescent HIV/AIDS interventions, it is also necessary to
understand any issues that might be specific to improving
contraceptive access and use within this age group.
With this in mind, we conducted a structured review of
the literature on contraceptive services and interventions for
adolescents in developing countries in hopes that our
findings might guide program designers and identify gaps
for future research.
2. Methods
2.1. Literature search
We began by searching PubMed using a comprehensive
search string to capture the target population, including
variations on adolescents, young people and youth, the

target intervention or service, including contraceptives,
family planning and pregnancy prevention, and all
possible low- and middle-income country (LMIC) settings
(see Appendix A for detailed search string). This yielded
6634 papers from PubMed from 1990 through October 2013.
In order to account for publication bias and to
acknowledge that many programs do not have an academic
interest in publishing their data, we expanded our search to
consider nonpeer-reviewed and unpublished papers and
reports. Starting with included papers and seminal works in
the area of adolescent SRH, we used snowballing to search
works cited lists, grey literature and relevant program Web
pages. A request was sent to United Nations Population Fund
(UNFPA) country offices to share any relevant program
reports or publications about increasing young persons'
access to contraceptives. Evaluation of the effectiveness of
systematic review protocols has indicated that such nonstandardized techniques like snowballing and utilization of
personal networks are both effective and efficient methods of
reviewing the complex evidence base [15].
Titles and abstracts for the database and the hand search
were screened to remove any papers clearly meeting
exclusion criteria. Remaining full papers were screened
and potential inclusions retained for data abstraction. Each
potential inclusion was screened by a second reader to
confirm inclusion in the final review.
2.2. Inclusion and exclusion criteria
This review considered all papers and reports about services
and interventions with a primary or secondary aim of improving
adolescents' access to contraceptives. All approaches were
considered except for those comprised entirely of school-based
sexual education. However, a program could be considered for
inclusion if school-based sexual education was only one
component of a larger intervention.
Papers had to report a program or intervention impact by
measuring changes in contraceptive behaviors (i.e., use of
modern contraception at last sex). Measures of condom use
were considered only if the intervention clearly stated a goal
of pregnancy prevention and condoms were used for
contraceptive purposes or for dual protection. We acknowledge that condoms are an important contraceptive option for
this age group and an essential part of any reproductive
health program. However, we want to clearly differentiate
contraceptive and holistic SRH services from those SRH
interventions with a narrow focus on HIV/AIDS.
The following criteria were also applied:
majority of sample is 1019 years old

takes place in an LMIC
written in English
original research
Possible study designs were randomized controlled trials,

longitudinal designs with a comparison group and pretest
posttest with or without a comparison group. Each study was

ranked as high, medium or low according to characteristics of
the study design, such as randomization and length of followup, using a quality assessment tool used in two recent family
planning systematic reviews and based on the Effective Public
Health Practice Project tool for quality assessment of
quantitative studies (see Appendix B for details) [1618].
3. Results
Fifteen papers and reports met all inclusion criteria
(Table 1). Geographically, 12 countries were represented.
Nearly half of the papers describe interventions or programs
that took place in sub-Saharan Africa (n=7), four interventions
took place in Latin America, two in South Asia and single
studies took place in Europe/Central Asia and East Asia.
Methodological quality varied, though the majority of studies
were of medium quality (n=10). Four were classified as low
quality, while only one study met the criteria for a high-quality
study. Interventions took place across a wide range of settings:
five occurred exclusively in urban areas, five in rural areas, one
in a suburban area of a major city, two were implemented in
both urban and rural areas and two were implemented across
large regions that likely included both urban and rural areas.
Length of follow-up ranged from 8 months to 48 months;
mean follow-up time across the 15 studies was 23 months.
We categorized interventions and services into three
groups: user-side interventions, provision-side interventions
and those that attempted to address both users and providers.
User-side interventions were those targeted at adolescents or
other persons close to adolescents whose behavior (use of
contraceptives) the intervention was trying to change. These
interventions generally involved activities geared at changing
knowledge and attitudes. Contraceptive commodities could be
included in the intervention and fall into the user category if
they were provided independent of the health system (i.e., a
one-time condom distribution during a sexual education class).
Provision-side interventions were those that targeted the
service delivery system. These might include training
providers in adolescent contraceptive counseling or making
contraceptives free for adolescents from certain access points.
Some interventions and services included elements of both
user-side and provision-side strengthening to improve adolescents' access to contraceptives. Of the papers that met
inclusion criteria, four focused only on the user [1922].
The remaining 11 papers included components that addressed
both user and service provision issues. None of our included
papers were provision-side-only interventions.
3.1.1. Adolescent-friendly services

Most interventions that addressed provision-side issues in
addition to user-side issues were focused on making health
services adolescent or youth friendly (n=7). According to the
WHO, adolescent-friendly services must be accessible,
acceptable, equitable, appropriate, and effective [23].
Programs included in this review typically trained providers
and other clinic staff to reduce discomfort associated with
serving adolescents, build better communication skills for
working with this age group and make services more
attractive to adolescent users. Some programs also tried to
address economic barriers that adolescents face in accessing
contraception by providing contraceptive methods and
services for free or at a reduced cost [24,25].
3.1.2. Adults
Some interventions included an element designed to
foster connectedness between a close adult, typically a parent
or teacher and an adolescent or a group of adolescents (n=4).
In Villaruel et al., parentadolescent pairs attended simultaneous but separate sexual education classes to improve
communication skills between parent and child about sex
[22]. In Andrade et al., an in-school SRH education program
focused on the adultchild relationship by training and
encouraging teachers in order to improve connectedness with
students [26]. In Erulkar et al., young parents in the
community were trained to counsel adolescents and their
parents about SRH issues [24].
3.1. Program elements
3.1.3. Community engagement

Most of the included programs stressed the importance of
community buy-in. Some programs, however, considered
efforts to reach members of the community to be a central
part of the intervention (n=8). The aim of these activities was
to foster a more supportive environment by breaking through
community-level sociocultural barriers that adolescents face
in accessing SRH information and services. In Erulkar and
Muthengi, the Berhane Hawan program in rural Ethiopia
utilized facilitators to stimulate community dialogues about
cultural practices that lead to early marriage and decreased
opportunities for girls [20]. In order to address pressures
from extended family in rural Indian communities, Daniel et
al. invited newlyweds' parents and in-laws to engage in
discussions that challenged traditional norms and promoted
healthy birth timing and spacing; similar messages were
circulated to the wider community through street performances and wall paintings [19]. In Lou et al.'s intervention
in suburban Shanghai, meetings with community members,
leaders and parents helped to create awareness about the
need for the SRH intervention and address the community's
concerns [25].
In assessing the included literature, several program

elements emerged that were used repeatedly across programs
either in isolation or in combination. See Table 1 for a list of
elements utilized by each of the included studies; programspecific details of each element are outlined in Table 2.
3.1.4. Educational interventions

School-based SRH interventions were common throughout the literature and were excluded in this review if the only
component of the intervention was a school-based sexual
education curriculum. The three studies included in this
Table 1
Program characteristics, study design and contraceptive behaviors
Country
Target population
Program elements
Brief description of program
Study quality, design &

analysis
Reference group
Results: contraceptive
behaviors
ACQUIRE Project
2008
Nepal
Married women
b20 years old &
their husbands
Adolescent-friendly
services; community
engagement; peer
education
Low: prepost without a

comparison
n/a
Use of contraception before first

pregnancy (females): 4.4%
versus 4.8%
Use of contraception before
first pregnancy (males): 11%
versus 11%
Andrade et al. 2009;

PEAS BELGO
Brazil
Adolescents ages 1019
Adults; school-based
sexual education
Medium: prepost with a

comparison; logistic regression
controlling for 17 variables
Intervention versus
control adjusted over
time
Use of modern contraception at

last intercourse: OR=1.68
(1.042.72)+
Askew et al. 2004;

Kenya Adolescent
Reproductive
Health Project
Kenya
Adolescents ages
1019; disaggregated
by sex and broken
into 1014 and 1519
Adolescent-friendly
services; community
engagement; peer
education; schoolbased sexual
education
Low: prepost with a

comparison; multivariate
analyses
Met with peer

educator versus
no-peer educator
Condom use at first sex+
Brieger et al. 2001;

West African
Youth Initiative
Ghana &
Nigeria
Ages 1224;
in-school and out
of school
Community
engagement;
multimedia; peer
education
Low: prepost with a

comparison; chi-square and
regression analyses stratified by
in-school versus out-of-school
status
Intervention versus
control
Use of modern contraception

(in-school youth): intervention
62.1% versus control 45.8%+
Use of modern contraception (outof-school youth); intervention
46.6% versus control 40.7%
Daniel et al. 2008;

PRACHAR
India
Unmarried
adolescents ages
1519; married
women ages 1524
(newlyweds, first
pregnancy, with one
child) and their
husbands
Community
engagement;
multimedia
Educated married adolescents as

peer educators to provide
reproductive health (RH) info
for individual and group events;
created an enabling environment
for accessing RH info and
services by raising awareness
among family and community;
supported local health facilities to
provide youth-friendly services
Included both in- and out-ofclassroom activities; systematic
training of education and health
professionals; teacher-taught
comprehensive sex ed with a
focus on adultchild relationships
3 interventions: addressed
sensitivity by working with
communities; increased access
within health facilities; educated
in-school adolescents about SRH
within a framework of life skills
and development
Worked with 9 youth-service
organizations to develop peerbased programs in secondary
schools, postsecondary schools,
and out-of-school sites; used peer
educator (PE's) for individual
and group counseling; used
drama to engage communities;
5/9 programs distributed
condoms, referrals given for other
contraceptives; some had clinics
Youth 1524 broken into
subgroups according to life
stage needs; provided
workshops and behavior
change communication; parents
in the community targeted
about early marriage and
childbirth; home visits by
female change agents for young
married couples

comparison
Intervention versus
control
Follow-up versus
baseline
Intervention versus
control x follow-up
versus baseline
Use of contraception, OR=1.40

Use of contraception, OR=1.60
Use of contraception, OR=3.84+
Author(s) and year;

program name
Kenya
Ages 1024
Adolescent-friendly
services; adults;
community
engagement
Erulkar & Muthengi

2009; Berhane
Hewan
Ethiopia
Married and
unmarried girls ages
1019
Adults; community
engagement
Zimbabwe
Young people ages

1024;
adults=secondary
Adolescent-friendly
services; multimedia;
peer education
Unmarried youth ages

1524
Adolescent-friendly
services;
community
engagement;
multimedia;
nonschool-based
sexual education
Kim et al. 2001
Lou et al. 2004
China
Young parents were nominated

to serve as friends of youth
and counsel adolescents and
parents of adolescents about
SRH and life skills
Group formation by adult female
mentors; support for girls to remain
in school; and participation in
nonformaleducationandlivelihood
training for out-of-school girls;
community conversations
6-month multimedia campaign
directed at young people
(posters, leaflets, newsletter,
radio program, launch events,
dramas, peer educators, hotline);
26 clinics designated youth
friendly 1 family planning (FP)
provider trained in interpersonal
communication and youth
counseling skills and expected to
train coworkers
20-month intervention; 3
activities; awareness building/
education with multimedia about
RH; provision of counseling set
up a health counseling center in the
center of town and trained a young
female counselor; enhancing
service provision contraceptives
distributed free of charge
Medium: prepost with

analyses
Intervention versus
control

comparison; logistic regression
Intervention versus
control
Medium: prepost
with a comparison;
logistic regression
Intervention versus
control
Intervention followup versus baseline
Started to use condoms:

OR=5.7+
Use of modern contraception:
baseline 56%, followup 67%, adjusted OR=1.7+
High: longitudinal with a

comparison; chi-squared,
logistic regression
Intervention versus
control
Ever use of contraception+

Regular use of contraception+
Condom use+
Regular use of contraception
(if first sex during intervention)
OR=13.84 (6.8328.07)+
Condom use (if first sex during
intervention) OR=14.54
(6.3533.30)+
Regular use of contraception (if
sex at baseline and follow-up)
OR=13.43 (6.6627.10)+
Condom use (if sex at baseline and
follow-up) OR=13.49 (6.2529.09)+
Use of contraceptive method at
last sex: male, 1.03 (0.621.73),
female, 1.14 (0.592.18)
Use of condom at last sex: male,
1.0 (0.601.66), female, 0.95
(0.561.59)
Contraceptive method request
during visits to health services
43.6% versus 32.4%+
Interaction of group
and time
Interaction of group and

time
Magnani et al. 2001;

PEAS Belgo
Brazil
Ages 1119
Adolescent-friendly
services; schoolbased sexual
education
Mevsim et al. 2009;

Modern Stork
Legends Project
Turkey
First year university

students
Adolescent-friendly
services; multimedia;
nonschool-based
education; peer
educators
Attempt to link school-based sexual

education with clinic-based
services; 10 clinics with adolescent
SRH background chosen as
referral clinics and paired with
schools; worked to establish links
First year medical students were
targeted;usedaseriesofeducational
methodstoimproveknowledgeand
attitudes and established a youth
counseling unit where RH
counseling and FP services were
provided
Medium: longitudinal with a

analyses
Effects of interventionschool attendance on

SRH behaviors by sex
Low: prepost without a

comparison
Follow-up versus
baseline
Condom use at last sex (males)

OR=3.74 (1.718.17)+
Condom use at last sex
(females) OR=1.35
(0.593.11)
Ever use of contraception,
66.4% versus 42.1%;
OR=2.88+
(continued on next page)
Erulkar et al. 2004;

Nyeri Youth
Health Project
Table 1 (continued)
Country
Target population
Program elements
Study quality, design &

analysis
Reference group
Results: contraceptive
behaviors
Author(s) and year;

program name
Country
Target population
Program elements
Study design & analysis
Reference group
Impact on contraceptive
behaviors
Peer educators recruited from

schools and youth associations
and tested to determine their
commitment; trained and
retrained to educate, counsel
and refer their peers to SRH
services
Youth involved in
development; youth-targeted
behavior change
communication; peer educators
distributed pills and condoms
and were used as mobile sales
people; encouraged providers
to serve young unmarried
women
Trained and motivated
providers to be youth-friendly;
community activities to create a
supportive environment;
school-based activities; peer
educators trained in SRH, gave
referrals and distributed
contraceptives
6-h sexual risk reduction
program based on social
cognitive theory, theory of
reasoned action and theory of
planned behavior; presents
SRH risk reduction as
culturally appropriate; parent
component added to increase
general and sex communication
Medium: prepost
with a comparison;
logistic regression
Intervention versus
control
Use of modern
contraception+
Condom use at
last sex+
Medium: prepost
with a comparison;
logistic regression
Intervention versus
control
Uses condom for FP (male)

Uses condom for FP (female)+
Uses pill for FP (male)+
Uses pill for FP (female)
Uses IUD or injectables for FP
(male)+
Uses IUD or injectables for FP
(female)

comparison (2 intervention
groups)
Follow-up versus
baseline change
compared to control
Use of contraception at last sex

(intervention 1) ()
Use of contraception at last sex
(intervention 2) ()
Medium: randomized
controlled trial; t tests and
chi-square analyses;
generalized linear model
(GLM) controlling for gender
and social desirability
Intervention (Cuidate
safer sex curriculum)
versus control (health
promotion)
Condom use at first sex:

OR=1.75 (1.142.69)+
Use of other contraception at first
sex: OR=1.53 (1.002.33)+
Consistent condom use in past 3
months: OR=0.86 (0.561.33)
Spiezer et al. 2001;

Entre Nous Jeunes
Cameroon
Young people
1225
Peer education
Van Rossem &

Meekers 2000;
Horizon Jeunes
Cameroon
Ages 1222
Multimedia; peer
education
Vernon & Dur 2004;

Gente Joven
Mexico
Ages 1019
Community
engagement;
multimedia; peer
education
Villarruel et al. 2010;

Cuidate
Mexico
Ages 1317 at start

(mean=15.2); 394 in
Cuidate, 314 in
control; plus one of
their parents
Adults; nonschoolbased sexual

education
(+) statistically significant positive difference; () statistically significant negative difference; some programs were not referred to by name.
Author(s) and year;

program name
Table 1 (continued )
review represent school-based programs eligible for inclusion because they were used alongside additional program
elements. These interventions took place during the school
day, were several sessions long and included SRH-specific
information designed to improve knowledge, attitudes, selfefficacy and utilization of services. General health information and skill building related to coming-of-age were often
included alongside SRH education.
Other educational interventions were based outside of the
classroom (n=4). Villarruel et al. used a 6-h sexual education
and life skills curriculum delivered outside of the school
system [22]. Mevsim et al. targeted first year university
students on campus to deliver a brief educational intervention through optional lectures and conferences [27]. Lou et
al. provided comprehensive SRH education to adolescents in
the community through lectures [25]. In Erulkar and
Muthengi, out-of-school girls were given informal education, including lessons based on the Ministry of Education's
basic curriculum, livelihood skills and reproductive health
information and referrals [20].
3.1.5. Multimedia
Several programs supplemented their primary activities
with various forms of media to increase knowledge of SRH
topics, awareness of services and acceptability among
adolescents and the wider community (n=7). For example,
Kim et al. used a 6-month multimedia campaign as the main
component of the intervention, which included a range of
media seen commonly throughout the literature: posters,
leaflets, dramas, newsletters and a radio program [28].
3.1.6. Peer education
Peer educators were a common thread throughout a
majority of the programs included in this review (n=8).
Programs that gave a rationale for using peer educators
typically reasoned that young people would be most
comfortable talking about SRH with friends or others their
age [29,27]. Peer educators were always volunteers and
typically provided individual and group counseling about
SRH topics as well as referrals to health services. Four
programs featured peer educators that distributed condoms
and other contraceptives. In Van Rossem and Meekers, peer
educators in a social marketing program in Cameroon sold
condoms for a small fee [30]; it is unclear whether
contraceptives were free or for purchase in the other three
programs [31,29,32]. Common topics included in peereducator training were human anatomy, SRH-specific
knowledge, guidelines for making proper referrals and
counseling skills. Peer educators typically received a onetime training with ongoing supervision, though one paper by
Spiezer et al. noted that retraining was a regular part of their
peer education program [21].
3.2. Contraceptive behavior outcomes
The included studies used a range of contraceptive
behavior-related outcomes as well as a variety of metrics
to measure outcomes (Table 1). Most of the included studies

reported at least one significant positive contraceptive
outcome (n=12). Two studies found no significant differences in contraceptive outcomes [31,33], and one reported
that contraceptive behavior outcomes were significantly
worse following the intervention [32].
3.2.1. Ever use of contraception
Three studies found significant gains in ever use of
contraception. In an Ethiopian intervention intended to delay
child marriage, Erulkar and Muthengi found that those
exposed to the program, which utilized community engagement, creation of safe spaces, adult-to-adolescent education
and adolescent friendly services, were 2.9 times more likely
to report ever use of contraception [20]. Brieger et al.'s peer
education intervention in Ghana and Nigeria found an
increased use of modern contraception for in-school youths;
however, there were no significant changes among out-ofschool youth [29].
3.2.2. Ever use of condoms
Two studies, Lou et al. and Van Rossem and Meekers,
found significant gains in ever use of condoms [25,30]. In
Van Rossem and Meekers, only females in the intervention
area showed a significant increase in condom use for family
planning purposes [30].
3.2.3. Condom/Contraceptive use at first sex
Two studies measured condom and/or other contraceptive use at first sex. Askew et al. found that adolescents in
Kenya who met with a peer educator were significantly
more likely to use a condom at first sex [34]. In Villarruel et
al., Mexican adolescents exposed to a safer sex curriculum
were also more likely to use a condom [odds ratio (OR)=
1.75, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.142.69] or another
method of contraception (OR=1.53, 95% CI=1.002.33) at
first sex [22].
3.2.4. Condom/Contraceptive use at last sex
Five programs measured condom or modern contraceptive use at last sex with mixed results. Andrade et al. found
that Brazilian adolescents exposed to SRH education in
schools were more likely to report use of modern
contraception at last sex (OR=1.68, 95% CI=1.042.72)
[26]. Another school-based program in Brazil reported by
Magnani et al. did not see significant changes in condom use
at last sex or contraceptive use at last sex [33]. In a peer
education intervention in Cameroon, Spiezer et al. found that
adolescents reported greater condom use at last sex [21]. In
Erulkar et al., males in the intervention were nearly four
times more likely to report condom use at last sex (OR=3.74,
95% CI=1.718.17), though females were not [24]. Finally,
in Vernon and Dur, an SRH intervention in Mexico
reported that youth in the program's two intervention areas
were less likely to have used contraception at last sex
compared to the control group [32].
Table 2
Element-specific program characteristics
Adolescent-friendly services: provision of health services that are accessible, acceptable, equitable, appropriate and effective for adolescents
Author(s) and year
Providers
Description of activities
ACQUIRE Project 2008
Health care providers were from the local

health facilities
Askew et al. 2004
Erulkar et al. 2004
Service providers were mostly nurses, female,

b40 years old, identified due to current or
previous experience with adolescents and
open mindedness
Adult counselors
Health care providers trained to be more aware of the SRH needs of

married adolescents and the reasons why they tend not to access
services; peer educators advocated for better services at the local
health facility; services for youth were included in data collection
more frequently
service providers trained on how to deliver youth-friendly RH services
Kim et al. 2001
Family planning providers from 26 clinics
Lou et al. 2004
Young, female health counselor
Magnani et al. 2001
Health professionals (nurse/physician teams)

at project clinics
Counselors; physicians and nurses provided
family planning
Mevsim et al. 2009
Counselors referred youth to health services; youth were given coupons for
subsidized services
Family planning providers trained for 1 week in interpersonal
communication and youth counseling skills; providers were expected to
train their coworkers; throughout the campaign, youth were referred to these
youth-friendly clinics
Youth counseling center set up in the middle of town and staffed by a trained
counselor; reading materials about SRH were available at the center;
contraceptives were available for free
12 clinics were paired with schools; clinics were training centers for RH with
evidence of demand for adolescent RH services
youth counseling unity created where students could get RH counseling and
family planning services in a setting where privacy and confidentiality was
respected
Adults: program element intended to foster connectedness between a close adult and adolescent(s)
Author(s) and year
Adult
Andrade et al. 2009
Teacher
Erulkar et al. 2004
Parents; friends of youth
Erulkar & Muthengi

2009
Adult female mentors
Villarruel et al. 2010
Parent
Adolescents encouraged to develop positive adultadolescent relationships;

trained teachers helped adolescents work on projects related to sexuality and
reproductive health, such as plays and research projects
Respected young adults in the community (friends of youth) were
trained to counsel adolescents and parents of adolescents about SRH
issues
Objective was to create safe social space for adolescents to interact with
caring adults; adolescent girls met in groups of 1520 led by an older female
mentor once weekly
One parent recruited for every adolescent participant; parents received a 6-h
curriculum intended to foster better communication about general topics
and sex
Community engagement: inclusion of the wider community as a central part of the intervention
Author(s) and year

Askew et al. 2004
Peer educators created community-based groups and held public hearings to create an enabling environment around adolescent health issues
Ministry of Health Community Development Assistants trained civic and religious leaders in adolescent health and sexuality and
encouraged them to raise these issues during community meetings
Promoted community networks of individuals and groups dedicated to advocacy around adolescent reproductive health issues and
able to make referrals to health services
Held community dialogues to challenge traditional beliefs about early marriage; held small group meetings with parents and in-laws
of newlyweds to promote birth spacing and the health benefits of delaying a first pregnancy
Community leaders consulted to design a project in line with Kikuyu traditions; counselors worked with adults in the community,
schools and community groups to improve attitudes towards adolescents
Facilitators were used to stimulate community dialogues about cultural practices that lead to early marriage and decreased opportunities
for girls
Prior to the intervention, there were meetings with community members, leaders and parents to create awareness about the
intervention and the SRH needs of the adolescents in the community
Community promotion activities, health fairs
Brieger et al. 2001

Daniel et al. 2008
Erulkar et al. 2004
Erulkar & Muthengi 2009
Lou et al. 2004
Vernon & Dur 2004
Educational interventions: delivery of a standardized curriculum that includes topics on contraception

Author(s) and year
Brief description of program element
Location
Andrade et al. 2009
Over 350 teachers took an 80-h training; teachers helped students work on various projects related to SRH and
building self-esteem
Askew et al. 2004
74 guidance counselors and 29 teachers underwent 34-h training to improve knowledge and skills around
adolesent SRH; curriculum focused on increasing knowledge, changing attitudes and improving skills for safe
sexual practices; curriculum also included life skills; some schools incorporated lessons into regular hours,
while others conducted SRH curriculum after regular hours
Erulkar & Muthengi Adult female mentors trained; out-of-school girls were given informal education, which included the Ministry of
2009
Education's basic curriculum and livelihood skills, and reproductive health information and referrals if necessary
Lou et al. 2004
Research staff provided educational activities; youth received educational materials, viewed instructional
videos and lectures and participated in small group activities; additional group activities were organized for
dating youths that focused on education about sexual risks, pregnancy prevention and sexual communication
and negotiation
Magnani et al. 2001
Secondary schools chosen for the intervention based on their proximity to a health clinic and formed a
partnership with that clinic; comprehensive SRH curriculum introduced; trained teachers asked to integrate sex
education into their regular curriculum; referrals made to health clinics; some teachers visited health facilities
with their students
Mevsim et al. 2009
Seminars and conferences given by health professionals and peer educators; educational materials distributed
Villarruel et al. 2010
6-h sexual education and life skills curriculum based on social cognitive theory, theory of reasoned action, and
theory of planned behavior; delivered by trained facilitators to small groups
*School-based educational interventions only included in this review if they were a secondary element of a larger program
School*
School*
Girls' groups
Small groups in the
community
School*
University campus
Small groups in the
community
Multimedia: use of a combination of media to communicate messages about health and health services
Author(s) and year
Types of multimedia used
Brieger et al. 2001

Daniel et al. 2008
Kim et al. 2001
Lou et al. 2004
Mevsim et al. 2009
Van Rossem & Meekers 2000
Vernon & Dur 2004
TV, radio, drama

Street theatre, wall paintings
Posters, leaflets, newsletter, radio program, hotline, dramas; multimedia were the primary component of the intervention
Educational health videos at the local cinema prior to popular movies, brochures, pamphlets, books
Books, booklets, brochures, posters, Web site, radio program hosted by an SRH expert
Radio talk shows, radio advertisements for program events, brochures, posters, theatrical sketches about SRH issues
Messages through print media, radio, TV; plays with SRH messages; distribution of posters, brochures, fliers
Peer education: use of peers to deliver information and connect adolescents to services; in some cases, peer educators distribute contraceptives
Author(s) and year
Number of Peer
educators trained
Recruitment and training
Activities
Distribution of contraceptives
1242 change agents

(2 M/F married youth
from each ward); 69
PE leaders
RH and dissemination skills

(3 days), facilitation/
communication skills (2 days);
PE leaders received 5-day
leadership development
training; 25 PEs trained 1 wk
in street drama/performance
arts
Yes, condoms and pills
Askew et al. 2004
203 out of school and

600 in school
Aged 1020, active in school

or community; 34-h training
Brieger et al. 2001
No information
Kim et al. 2001
No information
trained on sexually transmitted

infection (STIs), anatomy and
physiology, communication
and basic counseling skills;
data collection
No information
Disseminated RH information to
married adolescents via door-todoor visits; group and individual
meetings; each PE chose 3 close
friends to meet with regularly to
share training materials; led
discussion groups with
mothers-in-law and sisters-inlaw; PE leaders established
community development
groups, conducted public
hearings about health services
Held group and individual
meetings, distributed information,
education, and communication
(IEC) materials
Held group and individual
meetings, distributed of IEC
materials
Distributed IEC materials;

facilitated discussions after
drama performances; referrals
to youth friendly clinics; staffed
hotline
No
No
Yes, in 5/9 locations (including

3/3 out of school)
10
Mevsim et al. 2009

No information
Spiezer et al. 2001
263; ratio of 1 per

5 students
42
Van Rossem & Meekers

2000
28; men and women,

students and nonstudents
Trained in social marketing and

behavior change
communications
Vernon & Dur 2004
At least 30 peer
promoters in each city
Recruitment: aged 1520,

interest in SRH, volunteerism;
trained in SRH topics
1 week training; retraining
3.2.5. Other contraceptive behaviors

Mevsim et al. measured a significant increase between
baseline and follow-up for first year university students
requesting a contraceptive method during health services visits
[27]. Van Rossem and Meekers looked at specific methods
used by adolescents and found that males in the intervention
community were significantly more likely to report partner's
use of pills and intrauterine device (IUDs)/injectables [30].
4. Discussion
Group and individual

counseling sessions
Discussion groups and one-onone meetings
Created and lead discussion
groups about sexual health
topics as well as other topics
such as communication with
parents; sold branded condoms
to other youths
Disseminated SRH
information; distributed IEC
materials and contraceptives
No
No
Yes, condoms
Yes
The inclusion of weak study designs is both a

limitation and strength of this review. While it may
limit our ability to draw conclusions about program
impact, it does provide more breadth with which to
explore the various approaches that programs have tried
or are currently using to reach adolescents with contraceptive information and services. It also may paint a more
accurate picture of how interventions actually work in the
real world rather than in a tightly controlled experimental
setting, which is a key consideration when implementing
programs in challenging environments.
4.1. Limitations of this review

While this review was conducted using a comprehensive and systematic methodology, the strength of this
review's recommendations is dependent on the quality of
the studies included, which are nearly all low and medium
quality designs. The lowest quality study design that was
acceptable, pretestposttest without a comparison group,
does not permit attribution of significant changes to the
intervention, only the acknowledgement that a significant
change occurred between baseline and follow-up.
4.2. Data quality and reliability
Reporting of contraceptive outcomes was inconsistent
across studies. It is possible that programs could have
underreported insignificant outcomes, especially if they
were secondary interests to the researchers or program
designers. Some outcomes might be less reliable than
others, due to the nature of self-report. Van Rossem and
Meekers found significant differences for pill and IUD/
injectable use among male participants (by their partners) but not female participants of the study [30].
Though this may indicate a true difference in effectiveness of the intervention by gender, it may also raise the
question of how accurately adolescent males report their
partner's use of female-controlled methods, particularly
if they are casual partners [30].
Details of study methodology and statistical analyses
also varied dramatically. Some of this was accounted for
in our grading of the evidence base by downgrading
study quality if methodology was unclear or inconsistent
within the paper or report (see Appendix B) [18].
4.3. Lessons learned

Because most programs used a combination of
elements, it is difficult to determine which elements of
a program work best for reaching adolescents. Successful
programs noted that they should involve adolescents in
the planning process, gain community buy-in and use a
combination of elements that fits with the needs of that
particular community. In addition, this collection of
programs typically addressed both user-side and provision-side issues, which may be why they are among the
few studies to measure an impact on adolescent
contraceptive use. While this review returned only 15
studies measuring contraceptive use, this group of studies
reflects the complexity and reality of life, where there is
no place for one single intervention.
The most effective programs were those that were
sustained over longer periods of time. Shorter programs
may be able to change behaviors in the immediate future,
but long-term results might be limited. For instance, the
Villarruel et al. evaluation of Cudate indicated that
limited educational interventions can be effective for
short-term behavior change (i.e., contraceptive use at first
sex) [22]. They found, however, that there were no
significant differences when it came to consistent condom
and contraceptive use over time, which raises questions
about the amount of reinforcement necessary to sustain
program results [22].
Some program elements that are effective for contraceptive behavior change in certain groups of adolescents
may not work well to reach other groups. Spiezer et al.
note that adolescents who interacted with peer educators

in Entre Nous Jeunes may have self-selected such that
they were already more likely users of contraceptives
[21]. Another program that was centered on peer
education, Brieger et al.'s West African Youth Initiative,
found better results among school-going adolescents than
among out-of-school adolescents. The authors note that
this may be due to the difficulty in reaching out-of-school
youths with peer education [29]. It may also suggest that
out-of-school youth would benefit from supplemental
interventions to address the complex situations they are in
and the additional barriers that they face. Program
planners should bear in mind these challenges to
implementation and use evaluation measures that assess
whether they are successful in reaching the most at-risk
groups of adolescents. Erulkar and Muthengi's study from
rural Ethiopia provides us with reasonable optimism that
we can have a positive impact even in the most difficult
environments provided that we design a program that
adequately addresses the complexity of the situation and
the specific needs of those adolescents [20]. Adolescentfriendly services are a trend in the literature and current
focus of the WHO that could address those needs.
However, successful examples of adolescent-friendly
programs that have demonstrated an impact on adolescent
contraceptive behaviors are sparse and varied in their
approaches. For instance, training of providers was nearly
universal amongst the interventions in this review;
however, the training itself varied greatly, which could
have contributed to positive changes in contraceptive
behaviors in some program areas while others saw no
effect. An assessment of the quality of large-scale
adolescent-friendly service interventions conducted by
the WHO is likely to provide more details on these
issues [35].
4.4. Gaps in the evidence base
Despite being one of the six domains identified by the
WHO Guidelines on Preventing Early Pregnancy and Poor
Reproductive Outcomes among Adolescents in Developing
Countries, increasing use of contraception by adolescents
is an area which needs more research interest [36]. The
majority of papers and reports that we screened were smallscale pilots that lacked evaluation and showed no attempts to
scale up. Though pilots are crucial for testing feasibility,
acceptability and effectiveness, it is crucial to identify
successful programs that can reasonably scale up and
provide services for the long term. This often requires the
foresight to form strong early partnerships throughout the
health system to ensure a supportive policy environment and
build toward sustainability. In addition, the strength of the
evidence base would improve substantially with increased
evaluation, a set of standardized indicators for programs to
report on and better efforts to disseminate program data for
use by others in the field.
11
Though the evidence base is weak, there are promising

foundations for adolescent contraceptive interventions in
nearly every region of the world. However, there are still
regions and vulnerable populations that are underrepresented. For instance, South and Southeast Asia is home to nearly
one third of the global adolescent population, yet the region
is barely represented in this review, which includes one study
from India and one from Nepal [19,31]. Though there were
more studies found from Latin America and the Caribbean,
only two demonstrated positive effects on contraceptive
behaviors, suggesting that different approaches are worth
exploring in the region. Formative research and pilot studies
in Central America have suggested that many adolescents in
the region prefer to get their contraceptives from pharmacies
[37,38]. Applying adolescent-friendly service principles to
pharmacies may be appropriate in the region and in other
settings where adolescents prefer to access contraceptives in
this way and should be evaluated more rigorously to measure
the impact on contraceptive behaviors. Only three programs
addressed needs specific to married adolescents, who may
have different needs than their unmarried peers [31,20,19].
Refugee and internally displaced adolescents, who often face
worse SRH outcomes than their nondisplaced peers, were
completely absent from the literature [39].
Overall, few programs serve adolescents under 18
years old. While older adolescents and youth are still
priority age groups with a high unmet need for family
planning, they may have fewer legal barriers and face
less stigma accessing contraceptives than their younger
adolescent counterparts. Future research is needed to
identify approaches that are effective for reaching
younger groups of adolescents. Longitudinal data linking
early adolescent SRH interventions with outcomes later
in life could provide support to extend SRH programs to
very young adolescents (1014 years old), who currently
receive little attention.
Other substantial gaps in the evidence base, such as the
limited method mix available to adolescents, should be
addressed in future studies. Many programs focus solely on
condoms, while several others only expand the method mix
to include pills. Availability of condoms is essential,
particularly in HIV-endemic areas, but adolescents should
have a choice of methods available to them, including longacting reversible contraceptives like implants and IUDs. A
recent study in Kenya offered youth at a family planning
clinic the option of choosing an implant over the pill or
injectable and found that the implant was acceptable and
resulted in fewer discontinuations and unintended pregnancies [40].
Finally, the majority of adolescent SRH literature is
focused on HIV/AIDS with little or no mention of
contraception. Future efforts to identify effective strategies
for integration of contraception into successful adolescent
HIV interventions may be a cost-effective solution to scale
up adolescent contraceptive services in regions that already
have a wide network of adolescent HIV programs.
12
5. Conclusion
Research on increasing the use of contraception by
adolescents has been identified as one of the priority
areas that would contribute to improvement of adolescent
SRH in LMICs [41]. Given the current momentum for
family planning, it is even more critical to streamline
research and prioritize reaching adolescents with highquality contraceptive services. Researchers should focus
on filling existing gaps, including testing programs that
expand the method mix for adolescents and figuring out
what works to reach vulnerable populations. Future
programs should consider some of the common elements
identified by the studies in this review, involve
adolescents and communities at key stages of design
and implementation and be context specific. In addition,
programs must be monitored and evaluated in order to
make needed adaptions, including a baseline assessment
and common set of indicators for comparison across
programs and settings. Finally, program results, including successes and failures, should be made available so
that the field can continue to learn and evolve. There are
promising beginnings for adolescent contraceptive services in LMICs, but commitments to improving the
strength of the evidence base are needed in order to
significantly reduce unmet need and improve adolescents' health and well-being in the long term.
Acknowledgments/Notes
The authors would like to thank Dr. Juncal PlazaolaCastao for her support in conceptualizing the review, Dr.
Michelle Hindin, Dr. Virginia Bowen, Lori Rosman and Claire
Twose for their help in developing the search strategy used in
the review, as well as Dr. Hindin and Dr. Amy Tsui for
feedback on an earlier draft of the manuscript. Funding for
open access publication has been provided by the UNFPA.
Appendix A. Pubmed Search Terms
Date restrictions: 1990 to present [last updated October
31, 2013]
Adolescent[mesh] OR Minors[mesh] OR teen[all
fields] OR teens[all fields] OR teenager[all fields] OR
teenagers[all fields] OR teenaged[all fields] OR juvenile* OR preteen* OR pre-teen* OR minor OR minors
OR adolescent OR youth[text] OR youths[text] OR
"young people"[all fields] OR "young person"[all fields]
OR "young adult"[all fields]
AND
"Contraception"[Mesh] OR Contraception[all fields] OR
contraception[text] OR contraceptive[text] OR "Contraception
Behavior"[Mesh] OR "Contraceptive Agents"[Mesh] OR
"Sex Education"[Mesh] OR "Family Planning
Services"[Mesh] OR family planning[all fields] OR family
planning[text] OR "Pregnancy, Unplanned"[Mesh] OR

"Pregnancy, Unwanted"[Mesh] OR "Reproductive
Health"[Mesh] OR "Reproductive Health Services"[Mesh] OR
family planning OR contraception OR pregnancy prevention
AND
Argentina or Bolivia or Brazil or Chile or Colombia or
Ecuador or French Guianaor Guyana or Paraguay or Peru
or Suriname or Uruguay or Venezuela or Mexico or Belize
or Costa Rica or El Salvador or Guatemala or
Honduras or Nicaragua or Panama or West Indies or
Antigua or Bahamas or Barbados or Cuba or Dominica or
Dominican Republic or Grenada or Guadeloupe or Haiti
or Jamaica or Martinique or Antilles or Saint Kitts and
Nevis or Saint Lucia or Saint Vincent and the
Grenadines or Trinidad or Tobago or Virgin Islands
or Kazakhstan or Kyrgyzstan or Tajikistan or Turkmenistan or Uzbekistan or Borneo or Brunei or Cambodia or
East Timor or Indonesia or Laos or Malaysia or Mekong
Valley or Myanmar or Burma or Philippines or Singapore
or Thailand or Vietnam or Bangladesh or Bhutan or India
or Nepal or Pakistan or Sri Lanka or China or Korea or
Macao or Mongolia or Taiwan or Afghanistan or Bahrain
or Iran or Iraq or Israel or Jordan or Kuwait or Lebanon or
Oman or Qatar or Saudi Arabia or Syria or Turkey or
United Arab Emirates or Yemen or Fiji or New
Caledonia or Papua New Guinea or Vanuatu or
Micronesia or Melanesia or Guam or Palau or Polynesia
or Samoa or Tonga or Armenia or Azerbaijan or (Georgia
NOT Georgia[MeSH]) or Albania or Estonia or Latvia or
Lithuania or Bosnia or Herzegovina or Bulgaria or Belarus
or Croatia or Czech Republic or Hungary or Macedonia
or Moldova or Montenegro or Poland or Romania or
Russia or Bashkiria or Dagestan or Slovakia or Slovenia or
Ukraine or Cameroon or Central African Republic or
Chad or Congo or Democratic Republic of the Congo
or Equatorial Guinea or Gabon or Burundi or Djibouti or
Eritrea or Ethiopia or Kenya or Rwanda or Somalia or
Sudan or Tanzania or Uganda or Angola or Botswana or
Lesotho or Malawi or Mozambique or Namibia or South
Africa or Swaziland or Zambia or Zimbabwe or Benin or
Burkina Faso or Cote dIvoire or Gambia or Ghana or
Guinea or Guinea-Bissau or Liberia or Mali or
Mauritania or Niger or Nigeria or Senegal or Sierra
Leone or Togo or Algeria or Egypt or Libya or Morocco or
Tunisia or Comoros or Madagascar or Mauritius or
Reunion or Seychelles or developing country or thirdworld country or third world country or less developed or sub-Saharan or Caribbean Region[Mesh] OR
Pacific Islands[Mesh] OR Mexico[Mesh] OR Latin
America[Mesh] OR Indian Ocean Islands[Mesh] OR
Central America[Mesh] OR Asia[Mesh] OR
Africa[Mesh] OR Europe, Eastern[Mesh] OR South
America[Mesh] OR Africa, Northern [Mesh] or Africa
South of the Sahara [Mesh] or Asia, Central[Mesh] or
Asia, Southeastern [Mesh] or Asia, Western [Mesh] or
Far East [Mesh] or Developing Countries[MeSH]
13
Appendix B. Quality Assessment Tool
Quality Assessment Tool Acquire Andrade Askew Brieger Daniel Erulkar Erulkar Kim Lou Magnani Mevism Spiezer Van
Vernon Villarruel
2004
2009
Rossem
High-quality study designs
Randomized cluster
design
Must have details on
the randomization
process (yes/no)
Controlled for
differences in the
groups randomized
(yes/no)
Studies that
randomized
individual-level
participants
Must have details on
the randomization
process (yes/no)
Longitudinal designs
with a comparison
group
Must have loss to
follow-up less than
20%
Must have a follow-up
period (first
measurement to last)
of at least 6 months
Controls for
differences between
groups? (ideal but
not mandatory)
Medium quality studies
PretestPosttest design
with a control group
Must have a follow-up
period of at least
6 months
Must control for
possible selection bias
between the groups
(may be with
multivariate analyses)
Randomized cluster
design
Did not provide details
on the randomization
process
[And/Or] did not
control
for differences
between the
intervention and
control groups
Longitudinal studies
with a comparison
group and loss to
NO
NO
NO
YES
YES
NO
NO
14
(continued)
Quality Assessment Tool Acquire Andrade Askew Brieger Daniel Erulkar Erulkar Kim Lou Magnani Mevism Spiezer Van
Vernon Villarruel
2004
2009
Rossem
follow-up over 20%
Low quality studies
PretestPosttest design
with a control group
No control for
differences between
the groups
[And/Or] less than
6 months follow-up
period
Any pretestposttest
X
design without a
control group
Longitudinal studies
with no comparison
References
[1] Guttmacher Institute. Guttmacher Institute: Facts on the Sexual and
Reproductive Health of Adolescent Women in the Developing
World. [Online]. cited 2012 December 1. Available from: http://www.
guttmacher.org/pubs/FB-Adolescents-SRH.pdf. 2010.
[2] United Nations. World population prospects: the 2012 revision.
New York: Department of Economic and Social Affairs of the United
Nations Secretariat, Population Division; 2014.
[3] UNICEF. The state of the world's children 2011. New York: UNICEF;
2011.
[4] Singh S. Adolescent childbearing in developing countries: a global
review. Stud Fam Plan 1998;29(2):11736.
[5] Gupta N, Mahy M. Sexual initiation among adolescent girls and boys:
trends and differentials in sub-Saharan Africa. Arch Sex Behav
2003;32:4153.
[6] Williamson LM, Parkes A, Wight D, Petticrew M, Hart GJ. Limits to
modern contraceptive use among young women in developing countries:
a systematic review of qualitative research. Reprod Health 2009;6(3).
[7] Ahmed S, Li Q, Liu LTAO. Maternal deaths averted by contraceptive
use: an analysis of 172 countries. Lancet 2012;380:11125.
[8] Singh S, Darroch JE, Ashford LS, Vlassoff M. Adding it up: the costs
and benefits of investing in family planning and maternal and newborn
health. New York: Guttmacher Institute and United Nations Population
Fund; 2009.
[9] World Health Organization. WHO: preventing early pregnancy and
poor reproductive health outcomes among adolescents in developing
countries. [Online]. cited 2014 March 22. Available from: http://www.
who.int/maternal_child_adolescent/documents/preventing_
early_pregnancy/en/. 2011.
[10] Blank L, Baxter SB, Payne N, Guillaume LR, Squires H. Systematic
review and narrative synthesis of the effectiveness of contraceptive
service interventions for young people, delivered in health care
settings. Health Educ Res 2012;27(6):110219.
[11] Guse K, Levine D, Martins S, Lira A, Gaarde J, Westmorlande W, et al.
Interventions using new digital media to improve adolescent sexual
and reproductive health: a systematic review. J Adolesc Health
2012;51:53543.
[12] Oringanje C, Meremikwu MM, Eko H, Esu E, Meremikwu A, E EJ.
Interventions for preventing unintended pregnancies among adolescents. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009;4, http://dx.doi.
org/10.1002/14651858.CD005215.pub2 (Art. No.: CD005215).
[13] Blanc AK, Tsui AO. The dilemma of past success: insiders views
on the future of the family planning movement. Stud Fam Plan
2005;36(4):26376.
[14] Spiezer IS, Magnani RJ, Colvin CE. The effectiveness of adolescent
reproductive health interventions in developing countries: a review of
the evidence. J Adolesc Health 2003;33:32448.
[15] Greenhalgh T, Peacock R. Effectiveness and efficiency of search
methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: audit of primary
sources. Br Med J 2005;331(7524):10645.
[16] Mwaikambo L, Speizer IS, Schurmann A, Morgan G, Fikree F. What
works in family planning interventions: a systematic review. Stud Fam
Plan 2011;42(2):6782.
[17] Scott VK, Gottschalk LB, Wright KW, Twose C, Bohren M, Schmitt
ME, et al. Community Health Workers' Provision of Family Planning
Services: A Systematic Review on Effectiveness. (Submitted for
publication).
[18] Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP). Quality assessment
tool for quantitative studies. [Online]. cited 2013 July 21. Available
from: http://www.ephpp.ca/tools.html. 2009.
[19] Daniel EE, Masilamani R, Rahman M. The effect of community-based
reproductive health communication interventions on contraceptive use
among married couples in Bihar, India. Int Fam Plan Perspect 2008;43
(4):18997.
[20] Erulkar AS, Muthengi E. Evaluation of Berhane Hewan: a program to
delay child marriage in rural Ethiopia. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health
2009;35(1):64.
[21] Spiezer IS, Tambashe BO, Tegang SP. An evaluation of the Entre
Nous Jeunes peer-educator program for adolescents in Cameroon.
Stud Fam Plan 2001;32(4):33951.
[22] Villarruel AM, YZ, Gallegos EC, Ronis DL. Examining long-term
effects of Cudate-a sexual risk reduction program in Mexican youth.
Rev Panam Salud Publica 2010;27(5):34551.
[23] World Health Organization. WHO: making health services adolescent
friendly: developing national quality standards for adolescent friendly
health services. [Online]. cited 2013 July 25. Available from: http://www.
who.int/maternal_child_adolescent/documents/adolescent_
friendly_services/en/. 2013.
[24] Erulkar AS, Ettyang LIA, Nyagah FK, A M. Behavior change
evaluation of a culturally consistent reproductive health program for
young Kenyans. Int Fam Plan Perspect 2004;30(2):5867.
[25] Lou CH, Wang B, Shen Y, Gao ES. Effects of a community-based sex
education and reproductive health service program on contraceptive
use of unmarried youths in Shanghai. J Adolesc Health
2004;34:43340.
[26] Andrade HHSM, de Mello MB, Sousa MH, Makuch MY, Bertoni
NB, Fandes A. Changes in sexual behavior following a sex
education program in Brazilian public schools. Cad Sade Pblica
2009;25(5):116876.

[27] Mevsim V, Guldal D, Gunvar T, Saygin O, Kuruoglu E. Young people
benefit from comprehensive education on reproductive health. Eur J
Contracept Reprod Health Care 2009;14(2):14452.
[28] Kim YM, Kols A, Nyakauru R, Marangwanda C, Chibatamoto P.
Promoting sexual responsibility among young people in Zimbabwe. Int
Fam Plan Perspect 2001;27(1):119.
[29] Brieger WR, Delano GE, Lane KG, Oladepo O, Oyediran KA. West
African Youth Initiative: outcome of a reproductive health education
program. J Adolesc Health 2001;29:43646.
[30] Van Rossem R, Meekers D. An evaluation of the effectiveness
of targeted social marketing to promote adolescent and young
adult reproductive health in Cameroon. AIDS Educ Prev
2000;12(5):383404.
[31] ACQUIRE Project. Mobilizing married youth in Nepal to improve
reproductive health: the reproductive health for married adolescent
couples project, Nepal, 2005-2007. E&R Report No. 12. New York:
Engender Health/The ACQUIRE Project; 2008.
[32] Vernon R, Dur M. Improving the reproductive health of youth in
Mexico. Population Council and Fundacin Mexicana para la
Planificacin Familiar (MEXFAM); 2004.
[33] Magnani RJ, Gaffikin L, L dAEM, Sieber EE, de Conceicao
Chagas Almedia M, Lipovsek V. Impact of an integrated
adolescent reproductive health program in Brazil. Stud Fam
Plan 2001;32(3):23043.
[34] Askew I, Chege J, Njue C, Radeny S. A multi-sectoral approach to
providing reproductive health information and services to young
people in Western Kenya: Kenya adolescent reproductive health
project. Nairobi: Population Council; 2004.
15
[35] Chandra-Mouli V. Do efforts in low- and middle-income coutnries to

standardize, assess, and improve the quality of health service provision
to adolescents lead to improvements in service-quality and in serviceutilization by them? Data presented at the International Conference of
Family Planning; 2013. [Accessed at http://www.xcdsystem.com/
icfp2013/program/index.cfm?aID=1389&seID=234on March 23,
2014].
[36] Chandra-Mouli V, Camacho AV, Michaud PA. WHO guidelines on
preventing early pregnancy and poor reproductive outcomes among
adolescents in developing countries. J Adolesc Health 2013;52(5):51722.
[37] Carranza JM. What do Salvadoran teens think? Determining the
feasibility of youth-friendly pharmacies: a focus group report. Country
Research Series. Washington, DC: USAID/Commercial Market
Strategies; 2003.
[38] Wolfe K. Youth-friendly pharmacies and partnerships: the CMSCELSAM experience. Bethesda, MD: Abt Associates Inc., Private
Sector Partnerships-One project; 2005.
[39] Patel SH, Muyinda H, Sewankambo NK, Oyat G, Atim S, Spittal PM.
In the face of war: examining sexual vulnerabilities of Acholi
adolescent girls living in displacement camps in conflict-affected
Northern Uganda. BMC Int Health Hum Rights 2012;12(38):112.
[40] Hubacher D, Olawo A, Manduku C, Kiarie J, Chen PL. Preventing
unintended pregnancy among young women in Kenya: a prospective cohort study to offer contraceptive implants. Contraception
2012;86(5):5117.
[41] Hindin MJ, Christiansan CS, Ferguson BJ. Setting research priorities
for adolescent sexual and reproductive health in low- and middleincome countries. WHO Bull 2013;91:108.

Attachment (64) 1

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Attachment (64) 1

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Attachment (64) 1

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Contraception xx (2014) xxx xxx

Interventions to improve adolescents' contraceptive behaviors in low- and

Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health

risks, including pregnancy and its associated health and

L.B. Gottschalk, N. Ortayli / Contraception xx (2014) xxxxxx

poverty and stigma [4,5]. A wide range of factors place

variations on adolescents, young people and youth, the

majority of sample is 1019 years old

Possible study designs were randomized controlled trials,

L.B. Gottschalk, N. Ortayli / Contraception xx (2014) xxxxxx

posttest with or without a comparison group. Each study was

3.1.1. Adolescent-friendly services

3.1. Program elements

3.1.3. Community engagement

In assessing the included literature, several program

3.1.4. Educational interventions

Brief description of program

Study quality, design &

Low: prepost without a

Use of contraception before first

Andrade et al. 2009;

Adolescents ages 1019

Medium: prepost with a

Use of modern contraception at

Askew et al. 2004;

Low: prepost with a

Met with peer

Condom use at first sex+

Brieger et al. 2001;

Low: prepost with a

Use of modern contraception

Daniel et al. 2008;

Educated married adolescents as

Medium: prepost with a

Use of contraception, OR=1.40

L.B. Gottschalk, N. Ortayli / Contraception xx (2014) xxxxxx

Author(s) and year;

Erulkar & Muthengi

Young people ages

Unmarried youth ages

Kim et al. 2001

Lou et al. 2004

Young parents were nominated

Medium: prepost with

Medium: prepost with a

Started to use condoms:

High: longitudinal with a

Ever use of contraception+

Interaction of group and

Magnani et al. 2001;

Mevsim et al. 2009;

First year university

Attempt to link school-based sexual

Medium: longitudinal with a

Effects of interventionschool attendance on

Low: prepost without a

Condom use at last sex (males)

(continued on next page)

L.B. Gottschalk, N. Ortayli / Contraception xx (2014) xxxxxx