State Farm Martin Response To Cross Claim
State Farm Martin Response To Cross Claim
State Farm Martin Response To Cross Claim
PLAINTIFF
VS.
DEFENDANTS
FIFTH DEFENSE
Defendant Martin further affirmatively alleges and avers that the seeking of bad faith,
punitive damages and other relief against her is in violation of the Litigation Accountability Act of
1988, Miss. Code Ann. 11-55-1, et. seq., Miss. R. Civ. P. 11, and the decisions of the Mississippi
Courts.
Therefore, the claims for bad faith, punitive damages and other relief sought from
Defendant Martin should be dismissed and Defendant Martin should be awarded attorneys fees and
costs as a result thereof.
SIXTH DEFENSE
The facts not having been fully developed, Defendant Crystal Wise Martin further pleads the
following affirmative defenses as may be applicable in this action: the impermissibility of an
attorneys fee award, failure of consideration, accord and satisfaction, contributory negligence,
duress, estoppel, fraud, illegality, laches, license, payment, release, res judicata, statute of frauds,
statute of limitations, waiver, and Cross-Plaintiff Brandi Barnetts own conduct, or by the conduct of
her agents, representatives, and consultants.
SEVENTH DEFENSE
Defendant Martin specifically reserves the right to add, modify, or delete affirmative
defenses as the legal theories and issues become more fully developed through subsequent litigation
and upon permission from this Court.
ANSWER
Having set forth her Affirmative Defenses, Defendant Martin now responds to the
allegations in Cross-Plaintiff Barnetts additional Cross-Claim, paragraph by paragraph, as follows:
1. Defendant admits the allegations contained with Paragraph 1.
2. Defendant denies as stated the allegations contained within Paragraph 2.
3. Defendant admits the allegations contained within Paragraph 3.
2