Physicochemical Properties of Edible and Preservative Films From Chitosan/Cassava Starch/Gelatin Blend Plasticized With Glycerol

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 8

262

Q.P. ZHONG and W.S. XIA: Physicochemical Properties of Chitosan-Based Films, Food Technol. Biotechnol. 46 (3) 262269 (2008)

original scientific paper

ISSN 1330-9862
(FTB-1615)

Physicochemical Properties of Edible and Preservative


Films from Chitosan/Cassava Starch/Gelatin Blend
Plasticized with Glycerol
Qiu-Ping Zhong1* and Wen-Shui Xia2
1
2

Food Department, Hainan University, CN-571737 Danzhou, Hainan, PR China

Key Lab of Food Science and Safety, Ministry of Education, Jiangnan University,
CN-214122 Wuxi, Jiangsu, PR China
Received: January 21, 2006
Revised version: November 11, 2007
Accepted: December 4, 2007

Summary
Edible films from chitosan, cassava starch, and gelatin plasticized with glycerol have
been developed by casting method, and the effects of cassava starch (50, 100 and 150 g per
100 g of chitosan), gelatin (0, 25 and 50 g per 100 g of chitosan) and glycerol (21, 42 and 63
g per 100 g of chitosan) from the film solution on various properties of chitosan-based
films have been studied using response surface methodology (RSM). The possible interactions between the major components were evaluated by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). The properties of the resulting chitosan-based
blends for films were greatly influenced by the incorporation of cassava starch, gelatin and
glycerol. The introduction of gelatin and gelatinized cassava starch suppressed the semicrystalline peaks of chitosan films. The amino peak of gelatin shifted from 1542 to 1559
cm1, and the NH and/or OH peak of gelatin, cassava starch and chitosan films shifted
from 3384, 3414 and 3421, respectively, to 3422 cm1 in the composite film. These results indicate that there was an interaction and molecular miscibility among the major components. The growth inhibition of phytopathogen on mango fruit surface indicated the efficiency of these coatings and they can be applied for the conservation of fresh or minimally
processed fruits and vegetables.
Key words: chitosan, cassava starch, gelatin, glycerol, blended film, mango fruit

Introduction

gas and flavour barrier for fresh fruits and vegetales,


confectioneries, frozen foods and meat products (15).

The development of edible films or coatings based on


biopolymers has attracted attention mainly due to their
friendliness to the environment and their potential substitution for some petrochemicals in the food packaging
industry. Edible films and coatings generally formed
from renewable natural biopolymers, such as polysaccharides, proteins, lipids or the combination of these components, have been widely used as lipid, water vapour,

Chitosan is a seafood by-product obtained by deacetylation of chitin (6). It is a cationic polysaccharide with
high molecular mass, excellent film-forming ability and
antimicrobial activity. Systematic investigations have been
made of the effects of factors such as acid types and
concentrations, molecular mass of chitosan, and the degree of deacetylation of chitosan on the mechanical properties and barrier characteristics of chitosan films (79).
The findings show that chitosan films are brittle and not

*Corresponding author; Phone: ++86 898 23 309 279; Fax: ++86 898 23 300 323; E-mail: [email protected]

263

Q.P. ZHONG and W.S. XIA: Physicochemical Properties of Chitosan-Based Films, Food Technol. Biotechnol. 46 (3) 262269 (2008)

suitable for use in the dry state. These properties of chitosan films are ameliorated by incorporating other polysaccharides and hydrophobic materials such as pectin,
cellulose, methylcellulose, starch and fatty acids (1013).
Cassava starch, an important and abundant agricultural commodity, has been used to produce food packaging films which are environmentally safer. These products have excellent properties due to their transparency,
grease and oil resistance and heat sealability (14). However, the application of pure cassava starch films is still
limited because of its brittleness and solubility in both
hot and cold water (15).
Proteins are widely used to form edible films
(1618). Protein-based edible films show satisfactory gas
barrier or mechanical properties (5). Guilbert et al. (19),
Park (20) and Cuq et al. (21) indicated that proteins (e.g.
zein, wheat gluten, albumin, keratin and gelatin) are better gas barriers than polysaccharides (e.g. pectin, methylcellulose, hydroxylpropylcellulose and starch) due to
their unique structure and high intermolecular binding
potentiality.
The association among the polymers can be achieved through blending, laminating or coating with other
polymers with desirable properties. Blending is an easier
and more effective way to prepare compatible multiphase polymeric materials. Thus, the objective of this study
is to investigate the influence of cassava starch, gelatin
and glycerol on mechanical and barrier properties, fungistatic activity of chitosan-based films or coatings, as
well as to evaluate their compatibility.

Materials and Methods


Materials
Chitosan (molecular mass of 1100 kDa and 90 % deacetylation degree) was purchased from Yuhuan Ocean
Biochemistry Co. Ltd. (Zhejiang, China). Cassava starch
(96 % starch, amylose content 16.8 %) was supplied by
Qiongzhong Starch Factory, Hainan, China. Gelatin and
glycerol were supplied by China Oleochemicals Company. Mango fruit (cv. Kent) samples were picked at ripe
stages from a local orchard in Ledong (Hainan, China).
Then they were transported in open boxes to South
China University of Tropical Agriculture. Fruits were selected for their uniformity of shape, size and colour, and
the physically damaged or diseased ones were removed.

Edible chitosan/cassava starch/gelatin blend for film


formation
Chitosan solutions of 2 % (by mass per volume)
were prepared by dissolving 1.2 g of chitosan in 50 mL
of acetic acid solution (1 %, by mass per volume). The
pH of these solutions was adjusted to 5.0 and then the
solutions were made up to 60 mL. Cassava starch solutions were prepared by dispersing different quantities of
cassava starch (50, 100 and 150 g per 100 g of chitosan)
in 60 mL of distilled water at 80 C. They were then
stirred at constant heating rate (4 C/min) until gelatinization. Gelatin solutions were prepared by dissolving
different quantities (0, 25 and 50 g per 100 g of chitosan)
of gelatin in 10 mL of distilled water at 60 C. Then, 2 %

chitosan solutions were mixed in a beaker with cassava


starch and gelatin at different concentrations at (801)
C, as shown in Table 1. The mixed solutions were kept
at (801) C for 10 min in a controlled temperature water bath after the addition of glycerol. Chitosan mixtures
were filtered through 2 layers of cheesecloth to remove
the undissolved impurities and cast onto plexiglas plates
(approx. 2020 cm) after degassing under vacuum. Film
thickness was controlled by measuring the volume of
film-forming solution. The cast films were dried at (601)
C for 1620 h. They were peeled off and stored in desiccator at 25 C and 50 % relative humidity (RH) for 48
h after evaporation of the solvent.
Table 1. Mass of chitosan/cassava starch/gelatin blends in g
per 100 g of chitosan
Blends

Composition
Cassava starch

Gelatin

Glycerol

50

42

50

50

42

150

42

150

50

42

100

21

100

63

100

50

21

100

50

63

50

25

21

10

150

25

21

11

50

25

63

12

150

25

63

13

100

25

42

14

100

25

42

15

100

25

42

Tests of mechanical properties


Mechanical properties (tensile strength, TS, and percentage of elongation at break, E) were measured according to ASTM D822 Standard test (ASTM) (22) with an
RG 3010 Material Tester. Five film specimens (10025
mm) of each formulation were clamped between tensile
grips. Tensile strength (TS) and elongation (E) were recorded during extension at 50 mm/min, with an initial
distance between the grips of 50 mm.

Water vapour permeability (WVP) measurement


ASTM E9680 Standard test method (23) was applied with some modifications (16) to measure WVP.
The film sample was mounted firmly on a circular glass
cup (3.54 cm) containing 10 g of distilled water. Then,
the glass cup was placed in an environmental chamber
set at 25 C and 20 % RH. The chamber was equipped
with a fan to eliminate stagnant air above the test cup
(24). The cup was weighed periodically on a Mettler analytical balance to evaluate stationary-state water vapour transfer. The water vapour permeability rate (WVPR,
g H2O/(sm2)) and the WVP (g H2O/(msPa)) were cal-

264

Q.P. ZHONG and W.S. XIA: Physicochemical Properties of Chitosan-Based Films, Food Technol. Biotechnol. 46 (3) 262269 (2008)

culated according to the method of Kaya and Kaya (3)


using the following equations:
WVPR =

k
A

/1/

and
WVP = WVPR d
p1 p2

/2/

where k is the constant of linear regression from the values of mass loss against time during a constant period,
A is the permeability area, d is the average thickness of
the film and p1p2 is real vapour partial pressure difference (Pa) across the film. The real vapour partial pressure at the film inner surface (p1) was corrected for the
stagnant air gap inside the test cup according to the
method of Gennadios et al. (25). After this correction, the
difference in relative humidity was approx. 2086 % instead of theoretical 20100 % (24).

Measurement of O2 and CO2 permeability


Gas (O2 and CO2) permeability at 25 C was measured in a designed stainless cell using a gas testing instrument, model CYES-2 (Shenyang, China) following
the method described by Garca et al. (26). The gas permeability (GP) was calculated according to the following
equation:
GP =

d V 1

A t P

/3/

where DP is gas pressure difference between the two


sides of the film, and DV/Dt is the constant rate of the
gas diffusing through the film.

Film thickness measurement


Thickness of the films was measured using a hand-held micrometre (Mitutoyo, Japan) at at least 10 random positions on the film.

maintain uniform conidia distribution. The conidial suspension was mixed with sterile water and 2 % (by mass
per volume) of chitosan (pH=5.0) or chitosan/cassava
starch/gelatin blend solution (13 different blends) with
a final conidial concentration of 105 per mL. The selected
mango fruits were dipped in the above solutions for 1
min, dried with a fan and then stored at room temperature for disease assay. Fruits dipped in the sterile water
or chitosan solution containing conidial concentration of
105 per mL were used as control. The mango fruits were
evaluated every other day for disease symptoms by observing visible Botryodiplodia theobromae Pat. growth on
each fruit surface. Spoiled fruits were discarded to avoid
secondary infection. More than 30 fruits were used in
each treatment. The reported value is the mean of three
replications.

Statistical analysis
Response surface methodology (RSM) is a collection
of statistical and mathematical techniques useful for designing experiments, building models through regression and evaluating the effects of multiple parameters
and their interactions for responses (27). The analysis of
variance (ANOVA) and response surface regression procedure of SAS statistical software (v. 8.02) were used to
analyze the average data from triplicate experiments at a
confidence interval of 95 %. Experimental data were fitted to the following second-order polynomial equation
to all dependent Y variables (tensile strength, elongation, WVP, oxygen permeability, and carbon dioxide permeability):
2

Y=b0+b1x 1+b2x2+b3x3+b11x1 +b22x2 +b33x3 +b12x1x2+


/4/
+b13x1x3+b23x2x3
where b0 is offset term, b1, b2 and b3 are the regression
coefficients for linear effect terms, b11, b22 and b33 are quadratic effects and b12, b13 and b23 are interaction effects. In
this model, x1, x2 and x3 are the independent variables,
namely cassava starch, gelatin and glycerol (Table 2).

X-ray diffraction
X-ray patterns of chitosan, cassava starch, gelatin,
and their composite films were analyzed using an X-ray
diffractometer (Rigaku D/Max-IIIA, Tokyo, Japan) with
Cu K-a radiation at a voltage of 30 kV and 20 mA. The
samples were scanned between 2q=360 with a scanning speed of 2/min. Prior to testing, all the film samples were stored in a desiccator.

Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR)


FTIR spectra of the films were recorded using an attenuated total reflection (ATR) method in IR spectrometer (Spectrum One, PerkinElmer, USA). The thin films
were applied directly onto the ZeSe ATR cell.

In situ evaluation of the fungistatic activity of


chitosan/cassava starch/gelatin blend solution
Botryodiplodia theobromae Pat. isolated from infected
mango fruits was maintained on Petri dishes containing
potato dextrose agar (PDA). Conidial suspension at a
concentration of 2105 conidia per mL was prepared in
sterile water containing 0.1 % (by volume) Tween 80 to

Results and Discussion


Transparent, homogeneous, thin and flexible films
were obtained from chitosan blended with cassava starch,
gelatin and glycerol. Visually, all the blended films had
a slightly yellow appearance. As chitosan and gelatin concentration of the film-forming solution increased, the colour of the films became more intensively yellow. The average thickness of chitosan-based films was (0.1000.017)
mm.

Mechanical properties of the films


The tensile strength and elongation of chitosan-based films are shown in Table 3. ANOVA indicated
that the addition of cassava starch, gelatin and glycerol
caused significant differences in both tensile strength
and elongation of chitosan-based films (p<0.05). The effect of cassava starch and gelatin on the tensile strength
is shown in Fig. 1, where it can be seen that when the
cassava starch mass fraction ranges from 50100 g per
100 g of chitosan, tensile strength decreases as cassava
starch in the film solutions increases. However, the ten-

Q.P. ZHONG and W.S. XIA: Physicochemical Properties of Chitosan-Based Films, Food Technol. Biotechnol. 46 (3) 262269 (2008)

265

Table 2. Regression coefficients and significant regression models for tensile strength, elongation, water vapour permeability, oxygen
permeability and carbon dioxide permeability
Coefficient

Tensile strength

Elongation

WVP

O2 permeability

CO2 permeability

33.37

100.40

7.43

0.87

0.40

b0
Linear

2.98*

19.00*

0.79*

0.42*

0.21*

b2 (gelatin)

5.89*

8.46*

0.15

0.24*

0.14*

b3 (glycerol)

6.94*

35.09*

0.76*

0.03

0.04

15.66*

1.52*

0.70*

0.31*

b1 (cassava starch)

Quadratic
0.63

b11 (cassava starchcassava starch)


b22 (gelatingelatin)
b33 (glycerolglycerol)

0.20

20.64*

0.19

0.06

0.04

4.14

25.64*

1.03

0.01

0.01

0.12

0.03

0.03

Crossproduct
10.71*

b12 (cassava starchgelatin)

3.65

1.57

6.75

0.26

0.03

0.37

11.98*

0.36

0.02

R-square

0.97

0.99

0.88

0.90

0.98

CV

7.70

9.99

9.54

22.50

10.71

b13 (cassava starchglycerol)


b23 (gelatinglycerol)

0.02
0

CV=coefficient of variance
*Significant at 5 %

Table 3. Responses of tensile strength, elongation, water vapour permeability, oxygen permeability and carbon dioxide permeability
Blends

Tensile strength

Elongation

WVP
10

O2 permeability
8

CO2 permeability
108 cm3/(msPa)

49.401.95

100.4016.90

9.220.31

1.420.09

0.670.03

13.631.49

70.602.30

9.060.31

0.750.05

0.360.03

33.361.64

50.303.40

10.120.36

2.580.03

1.170.04

40.411.67

35.102.60

9.470.34

1.780.06

0.750.03

39.231.70

8.901.00

7.030.20

0.890.04

0.500.01

28.830.53

110.706.60

5.780.11

1.170.04

0.580.05

30.762.28

21.501.90

8.750.22

0.640.05

0.310.01

18.900.89

75.402.90

6.080.14

1.000.04

0.390.02

36.460.95

51.203.20

8.170.36

1.340.07

0.500.02

10

39.893.24

4.510.70

10.170.45

1.970.04

0.860.04

11

16.710.66

100.202.40

6.580.22

1.220.09

0.530.02

12

26.403.01

80.502.60

9.610.25

1.720.07

0.970.03

13

33.361.63

100.308.60

8.060.15

0.860.06

0.390.05

14

33.890.95

100.804.00

8.170.22

0.830.04

0.440.03

15

32.851.18

100.104.90

8.170.20

0.920.03

0.360.03

g/(msPa)

10

w(gelatin)/%

w(cassava
starch)/%

cm /(msPa)

TS/MPa

10

TS/MPa

TS/MPa

MPa

w(glycerol)/%

w(cassava
starch)/%

w(gelatin)/%
w(glycerol)/%

Fig. 1. Response surface plots showing the effect of cassava starch, gelatin and glycerol on tensile strength (TS)

Elongation

Elongation

Q.P. ZHONG and W.S. XIA: Physicochemical Properties of Chitosan-Based Films, Food Technol. Biotechnol. 46 (3) 262269 (2008)

Elongation

266

w(cassava
starch)/%

w(cassava
starch)/%
w(gelatin)/%

w(gelatin)/%

w(glycerol)/%

w(glycerol)/%

Water vapour permeability


Since one of the main functions of edible films is at
least to decrease moisture transfer between the food and
the surrounding atmosphere, water vapour permeability
should be as low as possible (30).
Table 3 shows WVP values of chitosan-based films.
The ANOVA indicated that only cassava starch and glycerol have a significant effect on WVP at a confidence
interval of 95 %. As can be observed in Fig. 3, the addition of cassava starch from 50 to 100 g per 100 g of chitosan decreased WVP in blended films. However, when
cassava starch exceeded 100 g per 100 g of chitosan, the
WVP increased with the increase of cassava starch and
reached the maximum with cassava starch at 150 g per
100 g of chitosan. This phenomenon could be related to
the significant hydrogen bonding interaction with water,
favouring water vapour transmission through the films
(30). The WVP increased initially and then decreased
with the increase of glycerol. The blended films produced with 63 g of glycerol per 100 g of chitosan exhibited lower WVP. Similar results were reported regarding
the effect of glycerol on WVP of starch films (31). This
behaviour could be related to structural modifications of
chitosan-cassava starch-gelatin network that occurs when
63 g of glycerol per 100 g of chitosan are added. Initially,
chitosan-based films formulated with lower mass fraction of glycerol form a loose structure, which facilitates
the water vapour permeation, then, when glycerol reached

12
10
8
6
4
2
0
50

10
WVP/(10 g/(msPa))

sile strength then increases with further increase of the


cassava starch mass fraction up to 100 g per 100 g of
chitosan. The increasing tensile strength values of the
blended films, with the cassava starch mass fraction increasing from 100 to 150 g per 100 g of chitosan, are attributable to the formation of intermolecular hydrogen
bonds between NH4+ of the chitosan backbone and OH
of the cassava starch (13). There was a negative correlation between the tensile strength and gelatin. The effect
of glycerol on elongation is shown in Fig. 2. Glycerol, as
a plasticizer, is added to the film to modify its mechanical properties, making the film more flexible, since the
plasticizer reduces the intermolecular bonds between
the polymer chains. The elongation increased with increasing glycerol and reached a maximum value at a
level of 63 g per 100 g of chitosan. Therefore, 63 g of
glycerol per 100 g of chitosan plasticized the films. Similar behaviour was observed in other hydrophilic films
composed of polysaccharides and proteins (28,29).

10
WVP/(10 g/(msPa))

Fig. 2. Response surface plots showing the effect of cassava starch, gelatin and glycerol on elongation

100
150
w(cassava starch)/%

12
10
8
6
4
2
0

21

42
w(glycerol)/%

63

Fig. 3. Water vapour permeability of chitosan-based films as a


function of cassava starch and glycerol

63 g of glycerol per 100 g of chitosan, the formation of


loose structure was avoided, a more compact structure
was formed, and this probably resulted in lower WVP
values.

Oxygen and carbon dioxide permeability


ANOVA results indicated that there was a significant effect of cassava starch and gelatin on oxygen and
carbon dioxide permeability (p<0.05). As can be observed in Fig. 4, there was an improvement of gas barrier properties of the blended films with cassava starch
below 100 g per 100 g of chitosan. When the quantity of
cassava starch was increased above 100 g per 100 g of
chitosan, the blended films with higher mass fraction of
cassava starch had a higher gas (O2 and CO2) permeability values compared to those with lower mass fraction
of cassava starch. Gelatin improved the barrier properties of the blended films. The permeability of the blended films to oxygen and carbon dioxide decreased with
the increase of gelatin. Gas permeability strongly depends on the interaction between the polymer matrix

Q.P. ZHONG and W.S. XIA: Physicochemical Properties of Chitosan-Based Films, Food Technol. Biotechnol. 46 (3) 262269 (2008)

267

Gas permeability
10
10 cm 3 /(msPa)

3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0

50

100
w(cassava starch)/%

150

Gas permeability
10
10 cm 3 /(msPa)

2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0

Oxygen permeability

25
w(gelatin)/%

50

Carbon dioxide permeability

Fig. 4. Oxygen and carbon dioxide permeability of chitosan-based films as a function of cassava starch and gelatin

and the permeating gas (26). The improvement of gas


barrier properties of the blended films increased with the
increase of cassava starch and gelatin due to the formation of intermolecular hydrogen bonds between NH4+ of
chitosan and gelatin backbone and OH- of cassava starch.
The increased molecular interaction resulted in a film
with compact structure and low permeability (32). Gas
permeability increased with the increase of cassava starch
from 100 to 150 g per 100 g of chitosan because cassava
starch intramolecular hydrogen bonds rather than intermolecular hydrogen bonds are formed, resulting in a
phase separation among the main components where
the film could not be formed well, facilitating the gas
permeation (13). Table 3 shows that CO2 permeabilities
were much lower than those of O2, indicating a selective
action of these blended films on gas permeability. These
effects could be attributed to a lower diffusion and solubility of CO2 in the blended films.

X-ray diffraction
X-ray diffractograms of chitosan/cassava starch/gelatin composite films are shown in Fig. 5. As observed,
the chitosan-based film was in a semicrystalline state
with four main diffraction peaks (2q=8.2, 11.28, 15.6 and
21.98) present in its X-ray diffraction pattern, whereas
an amorphous state was observed in the cassava starch
and gelatin films. When incorporating 50 g of cassava
starch per 100 g of chitosan, two chitosan peaks (2q=11.2
and 15.6) were still observed in film blend 1, indicating
that chitosan structure was influenced slightly by the
addition of a small mass fraction of cassava starch.
However, the semicrystalline peaks of chitosan were
suppressed in film blend 5 when incorporating 100 g of
cassava starch per 100 g of chitosan. In its place, a broad
amorphous peak was observed, demonstrating an inter-

Fig. 5. X-ray patterns of chitosan, cassava starch, gelatin films


and their blends

action between these two components. Interestingly, the


intensities of the peak at around 2q=10 were enhanced
in film blend 3 when incorporating 150 g of cassava
starch per 100 g of chitosan. This suggests that there
was a slight phase separation between chitosan and cassava starch. In film blend 13, a new broad amorphous
peak was present, indicating that there was a molecular
miscibility and an interaction among these three components. This was consistent with the results of film blend
13, exhibiting lower water vapour permeability, good
mechanical and improved gas barrier properties.

FTIR spectroscopy
FTIR spectroscopy was used to characterize the interactions between chitosan, cassava starch and gelatin.
The infrared spectra of chitosan, cassava starch, gelatin,
chitosan/cassava starch, and chitosan/cassava starch/gelatin composite films are shown in Fig. 6. The gelatin,
cassava starch and chitosan spectra were similar to previous reports (13,33). In the spectrum, the broad band
from 33843422 cm1 was the OH and/or NH stretching.
The band at 29302939 cm1 was CH stretching. The
bands from 16301660 and 15401570 cm1 were the
C=O stretching (amide I) and NH bending (amide II),
respectively. The peak near 1740 cm1 suggested the
presence of a carbonyl group in the starch and chitosan
films.
The chemical interactions are reflected by changes
in the peaks of characteristic spectra after physical blending of two or more substances. In the spectrum of chitosan/cassava starch/gelatin composite film, the amino
peak of gelatin shifted from 1542 to 1559 cm1 with the
addition of gelatin, and the OH and/or NH of gelatin,
cassava starch and chitosan shifted from 3384, 3414 and
3421 to 3422 cm1, respectively. This result indicated that
interactions were present between the hydroxyl groups
of cassava starch and the amino groups of gelatin and
chitosan.

268

Q.P. ZHONG and W.S. XIA: Physicochemical Properties of Chitosan-Based Films, Food Technol. Biotechnol. 46 (3) 262269 (2008)

Gelatin
1200.395

2939.353

Transmittance/%

Starch

1653.653 1453.413
1734.871 1542.270

3384.061

1636.821
1458.000 1153.174

2930.383

Chitosan

3414.900

599.958

761.702
577.406

1025.141
1744.680

2934.236

Chitosan-starch

1653.970 1404.255
1559.942

3421.276

2930.056

1634.317 1409.839
1568.379
1153.454
1080.261
1026.466
1637.093 1406.255
1025.976
1080.166

3417.150
Chitosan-starch-gelatin
2930.163
3422.068

4800

4000

1080.851

1559.954

3000

2000

1152.865

1500

Wavenumber/cm

1000

563.780

575.799

576.702

400

Fig. 6. FTIR spectra of gelatin, cassava starch, chitosan films and their blends

Fungistatic properties of blended coatings

Conclusions

From Table 4, it can be seen that the significantly


lower stem-end rot incidence in the fruits treated with
chitosan solution (or chitosan-based solution) was comparable with that of samples treated with sterile water
after 2 days of storage. No significant difference was observed between the fruits treated with chitosan only and

Table 4. Stem-end rot incidence (Botryodiplodia theobromae Pat.)


in mango fruits treated with sterile water, 2 % chitosan solution and a blended solution containing B. theobromae Pat. of conidial concentration of 105 per millilitre
Disease incidence/%
Storage
Fruits treated Fruits treated with Fruits treated
time
with sterile
2 % of chitosan
with blended
day
water
solution
solution
0

(0.00.0)a

(0.00.0)a

(0.00.0)a

(5.21.2)a

(1.80.9)b

(2.41.1)b

(27.83.6)a

(6.51.2)b

(9.61.6)b

(68.65.8)a

(27.64.3)b

(35.75.3)b

(89.44.3)

(54.33.8)

(62.23.4)

(100.00.0)

(76.25.7)

(85.16.2)b

10

Meansstandard errors for three replicates with different superscript within a row with the same storage time indicate significant difference (p<0.05)

chitosan-based solution (p>0.05). It was demonstrated


that the incorporation of cassava starch and gelatin into
chitosan solution did not significantly affect the fungicidal activities of the blended solution. Thus, chitosan/
cassava starch/gelatin film blend showed fungistatic activities.

The effects and interactions of cassava starch, gelatin and glycerol on the properties of chitosan-based films
were studied using RSM. Results showed that all these
ingredients greatly influenced the properties of the resulting film blends. For the X-ray diffraction pattern, the
semicrystalline structure of chitosan was depressed with
the addition of the gelatinized cassava starch and a broad
amorphous peak appeared. These results and the FTIR
spectra indicated that interactions and molecular miscibility were present between the major components. The
measurement of fungistatic activities indicated that incorporation of cassava starch and gelatin into chitosan
solution did not significantly affect the antifungal activities of chitosan.

Acknowledgements
The authors greatly appreciate the financial support
provided by Hainan Science and Technology Development Foundation (No. 807036), PR China.

References
1. B.L. Butler, P.J. Vergano, R.F. Testin, J.M. Bunn, J.L. Wiles,
Mechanical and barrier properties of edible chitosan films
as affected by composition and storage, J. Food Sci. 61 (1996)
953955.
2. P.D. Hoagland, N. Parris, Chitosan/pectin laminated
films, J. Agric. Food Chem. 44 (1996) 19151919.
3. S. Kaya, A. Kaya, Microwave drying effects on properties
of whey protein isolate edible films, J. Food Eng. 43 (2000)
9196.
4. H.J. Park, M.S. Chinnan, Gas and water vapor barrier properties of edible films from protein and cellulosic materials, J. Food Eng. 25 (1995) 497507.
5. S. Ou, Y. Wang, S. Tang, C. Huang, M. Jackson, Role of ferulic acid in preparing edible films from soy protein isolate, J. Food Eng. 70 (2005) 205210.

Q.P. ZHONG and W.S. XIA: Physicochemical Properties of Chitosan-Based Films, Food Technol. Biotechnol. 46 (3) 262269 (2008)

6. E.E. Babiker, Effect of chitosan conjugation on the functional properties and bactericidal activity of gluten peptides,
Food Chem. 79 (2002) 367372.
7. C. Caner, P.J. Vergano, J.L. Wiles, Chitosan film mechanical and permeation properties as affected by acid, plasticizer, and storage, J. Food Sci. 63 (1998) 10491053.
8. S.Y. Park, K.S. Marsh, J.W. Rhim, Characteristics of different molecular weight chitosan films affected by the type
of organic solvents, J. Food Sci. 67 (2002) 194197.
9. J.L. Wiles, P.J. Vergano, F.H. Barron, J.M. Bunn, R.F. Testin,
Water vapor transmission rates and sorption behavior of
chitosan films, J. Food Sci. 65 (2000) 11751179.
10. M. Hasegawa, A. Isogai, F. Onabe, M. Usuda, R.H. Atalla,
Characterization of cellulose-chitosan blend films, J. Appl.
Polym. Sci. 45 (1992) 18731879.
11. P. Hoagland, N. Parris, Chitosan/pectin laminated films,
J. Agric. Food Chem. 44 (1998) 19151919.
12. M.C. Chen, G.H.C. Yeh, B.H. Chiang, Antimicrobial and
physicochemical properties of methylcellulose and chitosan films containing a preservative, J. Food Process. Preserv. 20 (1996) 379390.
13. Y.X. Xu, K.M. Kim, M.A. Hanna, D. Nag, Chitosan-starch
composite film: Preparation and characterization, Ind. Crops
Prod. 21 (2005) 185192.
14. The Development of Biodegradable Packages from Cassava Starch,
Department of Packaging Technology, Faculty of Agro-Industry, Kasetsart University, Thailand (1998) (http://www.
rdi.ku.ac.th).
15. Q. Wu, L. Zhang, Structure and properties of casting films
blended with starch and waterborne polyurethane, J. Appl.
Polym. Sci. 79 (2001) 20062013.
16. N. Gontard, S. Guilbert, J.L. Cuq, Water and glycerol as
plasticizers affect mechanical and water vapor barrier properties of an edible wheat gluten film, J. Food Sci. 58 (1993)
206211.
17. A. Gennadios, C.L. Weller, Edible films and coatings from
wheat and corn proteins, Food Technol. 44 (1990) 6369.
18. A. Gennadios, C.L. Weller, R.F. Testin, Temperature effect
on oxygen permeability of edible protein-based films, J.
Food Sci. 58 (1993) 212214.
19. S. Guilbert, N. Gontard, G.M. Gorris, Prolongation of the
shelf-life of perishable food products using biodegradable
films and coatings, LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 29 (1996) 1017.
20. H.J. Park, Development of advanced edible coatings for
fruits, Trends Food Sci. Technol. 10 (1999) 254260.

269

21. B. Cuq, C. Aymard, J.L. Cuq, S. Guilbert, Edible packaging films based on fish myofibrillar proteins: Formulation
and functional properties, J. Food Sci. 60 (1995) 13691374.
22. ASTM D882, Standard Test Methods for Tensile Properties of Thin Plastic Sheeting. In: Annual Book of ASTM
Standards, ASTM, Philadelphia, PA, USA (1995) pp. 324330.
23. ASTM E9680, Standard Test Methods for Water Vapor
Transmission of Materials. In: Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM, Philadelphia, PA, USA (1989) pp. 730739.
24. B. Bravin, D. Peressini, A. Sensidoni, Development and
application of polysaccharidelipid edible coating to extend shelf-life of dry bakery products, J. Food Eng. 76
(2006) 280290.
25. A. Gennadios, C.L. Weller, C.H. Gooding, Measurement
errors in water vapor permeability of highly permeable,
hydrophilic edible films, J. Food Eng. 21 (1994) 395409.
26. M.A. Garca, M.N. Martino, N.E. Zaritzky, Lipid addition
to improve barrier properties of edible starch-based films
and coating, J. Food Sci. 65 (2000) 941947.
27. R.H. Myers, D.C. Montgomery: Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, USA (1995).
28. I.S. Arvanitoyannis, A. Nakayama, S. Aiba, Chitosan and
gelatin based edible films: State diagrams, mechanical
and permeation properties, Carbohydr. Polym. 37 (1998)
371382.
29. R. Sothornvit, C.W. Olsen, T.H. McHugh, J.M. Krochta,
Tensile properties of compression-molded whey protein
sheets: Determination of molding condition and glycerol-content effects and comparison with solution-cast films,
J. Food Eng. 78 (2007) 855860.
30. V.D. Alves, S. Mali, A. Belia, M.V.E. Grossmann, Effect of
glycerol and amylose enrichment on cassava starch film
properties, J. Food Eng. 78 (2007) 941946.
31. S. Mali, M.V.E. Grossmann, M.A. Garca, M.N. Martino,
N.D. Zaritzky, Effects of controlled storage on thermal, mechanical and barrier properties of plasticized films from
different starch sources, J. Food Eng. 75 (2006) 453460.
32. K.S. Miller, J.M. Krochta, Oxygen and aroma barrier properties of edible films: A review, Trends Food Sci. Technol. 8
(1997) 228237.
33. Z.F. Dong, Y.M. Du, L.H. Fan, Y. Wen, H. Liu, X.H. Wang,
Preparation and properties of chitosan/gelatin/nano-TiO2
ternary composite films, J. Funct. Polym. 17 (2004) 6166
(in Chinese).

You might also like