Articulo
Articulo
Articulo
Applied Energy
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/apenergy
h i g h l i g h t s
Recent research of three kinds of surface heat exchangers are reviewed.
The STHXs with novel combined helical bafes have been reviewed.
The primary surface heat exchangers with compact surfaces have been reviewed.
The direct and indirect air-cooled heat exchangers have been reviewed.
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 28 January 2014
Received in revised form 30 April 2014
Accepted 3 May 2014
Available online 23 May 2014
Presented at the 8th Conference on
Sustainable Development of Energy, Water
and Environment Systems, 2013.09.22-27,
Dubrovnik, Croatia (Original Paper Title:
High-Efciency Surface Heat Exchangers for
Energy Conversion and Recovery Systems,
by Qiuwang Wang, Min Zeng, Ting Ma,
Paper No. SDEWES2013.00689).
a b s t r a c t
In the present study, the recent research of three kinds of surface heat exchangers, i.e., shell-and-tube
heat exchangers with helical bafes, air-cooled heat exchangers used in large air-cooled systems, and primary surface heat exchangers are reviewed. They are used in the energy conversion and utilization for
liquid to liquid, gas to gas and liquid to gas heat exchange, respectively. It can be concluded that the helical bafed shell-and-tube heat exchangers (STHXs) should be used to replace the conventional segmental
bafed STHXs in industries, despite there are a lot of research work have to be done, especially on the
novel combined helical bafes. The primary surface gas to gas heat exchangers are developing towards
to the more complex 3D CC primary surfaces, such as the double-wave CC primary surface, offset-bubble
primary surface and 3D anti-phase secondary corrugation. The whole performance for the air-cooled heat
exchangers in the air cooling system and the multi-objectives optimization for air-cooled heat exchangers should be paid more attention, considering the heat transfer, pumper power, space usage and other
economic inuence factors.
2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Helical bafed STHX
Primary surface gasgas heat exchanger
Air-cooled heat exchanger
Enhanced heat transfer
Energy conversion and utilization
1. Introduction
Surface heat exchangers are devices that transfer the heat from
the hot uid to the cold uid while keeping them from mixing with
each other. Due to the energy crisis, the importance of surface heat
exchangers has increased immensely in the energy conservation,
conversion, recovery, and new energy utilization. The other reason
to the importance of surface heat exchanger is the thermal pollution, air pollution, water pollution and waste disposal, which have
been concerned by more and more countries. The surface heat
749
Nomenclature
Aw
C
Dh
Eu
h
Hi
Luc
N
Nu
P
Re
vfr
U
Greek symbols
a
apex angle of air-cooled radiator ()
h
air inlet angles, inclination angle ()
Dp
pressure drop (Pa)
Abbreviations
ACC
air-cooled condenser
ACHX
air-cooled heat exchanger
ACSC
air-cooled steam condenser
CC
CU
CW
CH-STHX
cross corrugated
corrugated undulated
cross wavy
shell-and-tube heat exchanger with continuous
helical bafes
CH&CH-CSSP-STHX continuouscontinuous
helical
bafed
combined single shell-pass shell-and-tube heat
exchanger
CMSP-STHX combined multiple shell-pass shell-and-tube heat
exchanger with continuous helical bafes
CPSSP-STHX combined parallel single shell-pass shell-and-tube
heat exchanger with continuous helical bafes
CSSP-STHX combined single shell-pass shell-and-tube heat
exchanger with continuous helical bafes
DCH-STHX shell-and-tube heat exchanger with discontinuous
helical bafes
DCH&CH-CSSP-STHX discontinuouscontinuous helical bafed
combined single shell-pass shell-and-tube heat
exchanger
FTHX
nned tube heat exchanger
SG-STHX
shell-and-tube heat exchanger with segmental
bafes
750
751
752
Table 1
Correlations for heat transfer and pressure drop of DCH-STHXs.
Researchers
Bafe style
Fluid
Correlations
Range
50 < Res < 1000
400 6 Res
400 < Res < 1000
Oil
Nus = 0.275Re0.55
Pr1/3
s
fs = 20.06Re0.56
s
fs = 11.34Re0.47
s
Segmental bafe
Oil
Pr1/3
Nus = 0.706Re0.474
s
fs = 25.1Re0.692
s
Oil
b = 30
Oil
b = 40
Oil
b = 50
Oil
Nus = 0.275Re0.542
Pr1/3
s
fs = 11.0Re0.751
s
Nus = 0.365Re0.516
Pr1/3
s
fs = 13.5Re0.774
s
Nus = 0.455Re0.488
Pr1/3
s
fs = 34.7Re0.806
s
Nus = 0.326Re0.512
Pr1/3
s
fs = 47.9Re0.849
s
Oil
Oil
1/3
Nus = 0.026Re0.8
s Pr
1/3
Nus = 0.029Re0.8
s Pr
unknown
unknown
Oil
Rib-shaped n tube
Oil
Nus = 0.03(ResPr)0.715
Eus = 19.3(ResPr)0.058
Nus = 0.017(ResPr)0.823
Eus = 54.6(ResPr)0.132
Segmental bafe
Middle overlapped helical bafe
Oil
Oil
Pr1/3
Nus = 0.012Re0.98
s
s
Nus = 0.037Re0.75
Pr1/3
s
s
unknown
unknown
EGR-SBCSTs
Air
EGR-HBCSCTs
Air
Nut = 0.0003Re0.634
t
ft = 0.739Re0.354
t
0.281
Nut = 0.012Ret
ft = 1.097Re0.185
t
PF tube
LF tube
R407C
R407C
ao = 888.9exp(q/8.8)
ao = 739.9exp(q/11)
Segmental bafe
Water
Nus = 0.485Re0.440
Pr1/3
s
s
fs = 51.44Re0.58
s
Water
b = 13
Water
b = 25
Water
Nus = 0.448Re0.493
Pr1/3
s
s
fs = 66.64Re0.68
s
0.421 1/3
Nus = 0.493Res
Prs
fs = 132.64Re0.77
s
Nus = 0.492Re0.423
Pr1/3
s
s
fs = 156.97Re0.83
s
simplify the manufacturing difculty and reduce the cost signicantly. The uid ow in the shell side of CH-STHX is an ideal helix
in nature (see Fig. 3). The advantages of this ow pattern includes
all of the good points of discontinuous helical bafes, and even
more, excluding the defect triangle zones existing in the discontinuous helical bafes.
Peng et al. [30] conducted some experiments on the CH-STHXs
with side-in/side-out and middle-in/middle-out congurations. As
expect, the experimental results proved that the CH-STHXs have
better comprehensive performance than that in the SG-STHXs.
And it was also suggested that the side-in/side-out style is the better choice for the CH-STHXs as the shell-side inlet and outlet locations. The CH-STHXs have been considered as the replacement of
the SG-STHXs. There are two examples, one is the building air-conditioning system as an evaporator, and another is the car air-conditioning system (see Fig. 4) as a recuperator. For the former, the
most important index coefcient of performance (COP) of the
CH-STHX was 5.4% exceed than that of the SG-STHX [32]. For the
latter, the most important index heat exchanger effectiveness
increases from 0.21 of the original recuperator to 0.29 of the
753
mass ow rate is as high as 47.7%. And some other typical numerical simulations utilizing entire heat exchanger model and heat
exchanger unit model with periodic boundaries can be referred
to Refs. [4345]. The experimental correlations for heat transfer
and pressure drop of the STHXs with continuous helical bafes
can be seen in Table 2.
The CH-STHXs are not perfect without any defects, researchers
have been aware of the two mainly troubles in the continuous helical bafes. Firstly, Song [46] reported that the helix ow will get
weak in the central axis zone and the uid almost goes through
in a straight line path resulting in decreasing heat transfer performance, seen in Fig. 5. Secondly, when the helical pitch is large, the
continuous helical bafe surface becomes considerably steep at
portions close to the central axis, especially in the STHXs with large
shell diameters. In such situations, it is so difcult to manufacture
the continuous helical bafes surfaces. A central sleeve tube may
have to be employed to x the helical structure inside the shell
to solve the above problem. On the other hand, heat exchange
tubes cannot be arranged at the place where the central tube is
located, and thus the heat transfer area of the heat exchanger will
be decreased; meanwhile, part of the heat exchanger volume is
occupied by the central tube and cannot be used for heat exchange,
which will result in the decreasing of STHX compactness.
Due to the above reasons, Wang et al. [4750] have invented
three different novel structures with continuous helical bafes
(see Fig. 1) to simply the manufacture and make full use of the
advantages of continuous helical bafes, which are the DCH&CHCSSP-STHX, CH&CH-CSSP-STHX, CPSSP-STHX. The DCH&CHCSSP-STHX is a combination of discontinuous helical bafes and
continuous helical bafes, in which discontinuous helical bafes
are mounted in the central region, while the continuous helical
bafes are equipped in most part of the outer space of the shell
side. The two types of helical bafes work together to forming
the whole continuous helicoids. The results from Chen at al. [43]
revealed that the comprehensive performance heat transfer coefcient per unit pressure drop was nearly 81.7% higher than that of
the SG-STHX. The novel structure CH&CH-CSSP-STHX is just proposed recently by Wang [47], and a photograph of this type of heat
exchangers can be found in Fig. 6 at the end of this section. As to
Table 2
Correlations for heat transfer and pressure drop of CH-STHXs.
Researchers
Bafe style
Fluid
Correlations
Range
Segmental bafe
Oil
Nus = 0.0889Re0.717
Pr1/3
s
fs = 2.79Re0.269
s
fs = 1.41Re0.167
s
Res 6 752
Oil
Res 6 1960
Middle-in/middle-out
Oil
Nus = 0.0599Re0.669
Pr1/3
s
fs = 3.76Re0.578
s
fs = 0.316Res0.251
Nus = 0.0451Re0.699
Pr1/3
s
fs = 1.40Re0.437
s
fs = 0.226Re0.206
s
Segmental bafe
Oil
Nus = 0.0743Re0.747
Pr1/3
s
fs = 2.05Re0.22
s
Unknown
Oil
Unknown
Middle-in/middle-out
Oil
Nus = 0.0533Re0.688
Pr1/3
s
fs = 1.64Re0.45
s
Nus = 0.0323Re0.742
Pr1/3
s
0.33
fs = 0.63Res
Oil
1/3
Nus = 0.026Re0.8
s Pr
Unknown
Oil
Oil
0.4
Nus = 0.030Re0.8
s Pr
0.4
Nus = 0.062Re0.8
s Pr
0.4
Nus = 0.063Re0.8
s Pr
0.4
Nus = 0.058Re0.8
s Pr
0.4
Nus = 0.059Re0.8
Pr
s
0.4
Nus = 0.060Re0.8
s Pr
Unknown
the CPSSP-STHXs, the working uid ows through the outer and
inner shell passes simultaneously, the inlet and outlet of two
passes join together at the both ends. To learn more about this type
of STHXs, Wang at al. [51] compared the CPSSP-STHX with the SGSTHX by CFD method and the results showed that the comprehensive performance, which evaluated by heat transfer coefcient per
pressure drop of the CPSSP-STHX is nearly 13.2% higher than that
of conventional SG-STHX for the same mass ow rate, and for
the same overall pressure drop, the heat transfer rate of the
CPSSP-STHX is nearly 20% higher than that of the SG-STHX.
2.2.3. STHXs with combined multiple shell-pass helical bafes
In the CMSP-STHX, the working uid ows through the outer
and inner shell passes in sequence, therefore, for each individual
shell pass, the cross sectional ow area is reduced dramatically,
and thus the velocity magnitude of the uid could be increased
for the same mass ow rate, and the heat transfer performance
can be anticipated to have a great enhancement. Wang et al. [52]
found out that the average overall pressure drop of the CMSP-STHX
was nearly 13% lower than that of SG-STHX under the same mass
ow rate and overall heat transfer rate, and under the same shellside overall pressure drop, the shell-side overall heat transfer rate
of the CMSP-STHX was nearly 5.6% higher than that of SG-STHX
and the mass ow rate in the CMSP-STHX is higher than that in
the SG-STHX by about 6.6%.
2.3. Shell-side thermal design method for STHXs with helical bafes
2.3.1. Correction factors method for discontinuous helical bafes
It can be found that both heat transfer and ow performance of
DCH-STHXs are different from traditional SG-STHX, which result in
many difculties in designing these heat exchangers. In order to
simply the design process, the classic Bell-Delaware method of
shell-and-tube heat exchanger design [53] is used as a basis for calculating several heat transfer and pressure drop correction factors.
Stehlik et al. [54] carried out a study of correction factors for SGSTHXs as compared to STHXs with one quarter discontinuous helical bafes. The results of the study shown that DCH-STHXs, when
properly designed, offered a signicant improvement in heat transfer while providing a reduced cost in pressure drop. In designing
RCH,SG
Fig. 5. Shell-pass ow path line of continuous helical bafed heat exchangers [46].
RCH,SG=2.4
fo,CH/fo,SG
754
fo,CH/fo,SG=0.28
0.4
0.2
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
ho ,kW/(m K)
Fig. 7. Maximal velocity ratio versus shell-side heat transfer coefcient [57].
755
Fig. 8. Schematic diagram of the design process for maximal velocity ratio design
method.
curve and its mathematical expression (see the right part of Fig. 8).
The detailed procedures of the method are depicted in Fig. 8.
2.4. Industrial applications of helical bafed STHXs
More and more helical bafed shell-and-tube heat exchangers
including both DCH-STHXs and CH-STHXs are now in service globally in numerous applications. STHXs with helical bafes have
obvious advantages in cost saving in pumping equipment and
especially in reducing fouling during operation. Two examples
have been provided to testify the excellent features of helical bafed STHXs.
Crude oil stabilization is a vital part of the petroleum extraction.
After the crude oil is exploited, it will exchange heat with the stabilized crude oil to achieve the proper temperature for preparing to
be pumped into the fractionating tower. The schematic diagram of
ow paths of stabilizing crude oil and stabilized crude oil are
shown in Fig. 9.
The original heat exchangers are the DCH-STHXs, and then the
CH-STHXs are adopted to replace the DCH-STHXs. These heat
exchangers have been running continuously one entire year. The
data collected from the operating eld is listed in Table 3. It can
be concluded from Table 3 that the overall heat transfer rate of
the CH-STHXs is nearly 25.5% higher than that of the DCH-STHXs,
and the overall heat transfer coefcient of the CH-STHXs is about
80.9% higher than that of the DCH-STHXs, however, the heat transfer area of the CH-STHXs is 5.6% lower than that of the DCH-STHXs.
Four CH-STHXs are employed in the ammonia hydrate processes as the intercooler and aftercooler for the twelve 2MCL705
centrifugal compressor units. The tube-side working uid is water,
and the shell-side working uid is hybrid gas (gaseous CO2 with
The traditional so-called primary surfaces include the cross corrugated (CC) [63], the cross wavy (CW) [63], the cross undulated
(CU) [64] and the double notched (DN) surfaces [65]. The CC surface is also called chevron surface or herring-bone surface. It is
formed by two symmetrical plates which placed with a phase
angle. The cross section of CC plate is corrugated while the main
756
Table 3
comparisons of DCH-STHXS and CH-STHXs for crude oil stabilization.*
Item
Temperature (C)
Inlet
Outlet
Inlet
Outlet
DCH-STHXs
CH-STHXs
Deviation
46
145
200
68
16,046
35
9018
58.2
42
190
207
67
20,146
21
8504
105.3
/
/
/
/
+25.5%
/
5.6%
80.9%
The data is provided by Qinhuangdao Dongyan Energy-Saving Technology Corporation of China (http://www.dyjn.com/).
Table 4
Comparisons of SG-STHXs and CH-STHXs for ammonia hydrate processes.*
Item
SG-STHXs
Initial operation
Twelve months later
145
145
43.6
46.7
6.6
8.4
CH-STHXs
Initial operation
Twelve months later
145
145
41.2
42.5
4.7
5.1
The data is provided by Qinhuangdao Dongyan Energy-Saving Technology Corporation of China (http://www.dyjn.com/).
757
little effect on the heat transfer performance under a constant corrugation height.
Zhang and Che [65] conducted a single-blow experiment and a
numerical simulation to test the overall and local ow and heat
transfer performances of DN primary surface channels. It was
found that there were wavy channel and pipe ows, but no swirling ow in the DN channels. The Nusselt number side was high at
the luff, but was low at the lee side of the undulations and notches.
758
It was found that the averaged Nusselt number increased approximately as Re2/3, while the equivalent friction coefcient decreased
roughly as Re1/2.
Zhang and Che [70] studied the effect of corrugation prole on
the heat transfer and pressure drop performances of CC primary
surface. Six kinds of corrugation proles, i.e. sinusoidal, isosceles
triangular, trapezoidal, rectangular and elliptic corrugations, are
compared by using a low Reynolds number ke turbulence model.
The Nusselt number and friction factor of trapezoidal channel were
14 times higher than those of elliptic channel. The trapezoidal
channel showed the best heat transfer performance, while its pressure drop was also the largest.
Wang et al. [71] investigated the Nusselt number and friction
factor of CC primary surface channels with different included
angles by experiment. Compared to the CC channel with 60, the
Nusselt number of that with 120 was 4986% higher, while the
friction factor was 5.56 times higher.
Lin et al. [72] conducted an experiment to test the heat transfer
performance of CC duct under an approximately constant temperature boundary condition. Then the dimensionless heat transfer
correlations were derived by using the Buckingham Pi theorem.
It revealed that the local Nusselt number was determined primarily by Re, R/Dh (Radius of curvature), x/Dh (Coordinate) and b
(Corrugated angle), whereas the averaged Nusselt number was
determined by Re, R/Dh and b.
Zhang [73] compared the CC primary surface channel with triangular cross section with that with sinusoidal cross section by
numerical method. It was found that the Nusselt numbers of the
sinusoidal cross sections was bigger than that of triangular cross
sections under uniform temperature condition and smaller than
that under uniform heat ux condition, but the friction factors of
triangular cross sections were much higher. The momentum transfer was mainly produced by the laminar ows at low Reynolds
number, while it was induced by the secondary and swirl ows
at high Reynolds number.
Utriainen and Sundn [74] gave the heat transfer and pressure
drop correlations for three CC surfaces, four CW surfaces and three
CU surfaces, as shown in Tables 5 and 6. Utriainen and Sundn [63]
also compared the comprehensive performances of the CC, CW, CU
and plate-n heat transfer surfaces. The result indicated that the
performances of CC and CW were the best due to their small volume and weight. The CC was recommended due to the simple
manufacture as well as the small passage dimensions. The CC plate
is one of the most popular surfaces in the available primary surface
plates because of its relatively high thermal performance, low
pressure drop, simple structure and high rigidity [70].
3.2. Novel primary surfaces
Unlike the traditional CC primary surface which is single-wave,
Kim et al. [75] proposed a newly double-wave CC primary surface,
as shown in Fig. 11(a). Here the vertical corrugations are
Table 6
Heat transfer and friction factor correlations in the form [Nu, f Re] = C1 + C2 Re
[74].
Surface
CC-45
CC-60
CC-75
CW2-z3
CW2-z5
CW3-z3
CW3-z8
UCS-30
UP2-30
US-50
Nu
f Re
C1
C2
C1
C2
2.9241
3.8988
6.1107
2.4101
1.0441
0.5256
1.8194
6.7538
3.07377
2.85
7.66E03
1.02E02
1.48E02
2.32E02
1.57E02
2.31E02
3.88E03
1.16E03
2.93E03
5.13E03
21.3186
42.4535
85.6395
61.8672
35.1707
51.7276
26.172
37.0463
16.2233
17.7878
2.95E02
5.93E02
0.1362
0.4427
0.1168
0.2524
3.13E02
1.39E02
9.53E03
2.04E02
Table 5
Geometrical parameter of typical primary surfaces [74].
Type
Surface
P /mm
Hi/mm
Luc/mm
Aw/mm
C/m2 m3
h/
Dh/mm
CC
CC
CC
CW
CW
CW
CW
CU
CU
CU
CC-45
CC-60
CC-75
CW2-z3
CW2-z5
CW3-z3
CW3-z8
UCS-30
UP2-30
US-50
3.48
3.48
3.48
1.38
1.38
1.38
1.38
2.24, 3.17
2.78, 2.15
2.74, 2.66
0.87
0.87
0.87
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
1.30, 0.79
1.61, 0.45
1.59, 0.44
4.54
3.48
2.85
2.98
4.96
2.98
7.94
6.33
4.3
3.47
0.99
0.99
0.79
0.79
1299
1299
1299
1717
1422
1496
1343
1299
1299
1299
45
60
75
30
30
50
1.54
1.54
1.54
1.54
1.54
1.54
1.54
1.54
1.54
1.54
759
760
Blomerius and Mitra [79] developed a new 3-D CC primary surface by superposition of an additional wave perpendicular to the
waves in the traditional CC primary surface. Fig. 14 shows the
3-D CC primary surface with corrugation of 45 and the corresponding ow eld. It can be seen that extensive longitudinal vortices are generated by the 3-D wavy, which distribute at the lower
and upper walls as well as in the core of channel. It is different
from the traditional CC primary surface, in which the uid mainly
follows the furrows of the upper and lower plates. The comparison
evaluated by VG1 criteria of Webb indicated that, under the Reynolds number being 1800, the required heat transfer area of 3-D
CC primary surface with corrugation of 45 is about 5% smaller
than that of traditional CC primary surface with corrugation of
45, and about 10% smaller than that of 3-D and traditional CC
primary surfaces with corrugation of 90.
The ow in the middle plane of CC channel is a spiral mixing pattern induced by the interactive effect of the upper and lower plates,
but near the trough is mainly along the corrugation direction [80].
Therefore, the heat transfer performance in the trough is lower than
that in the peaks. In order to enhance the ow mixing and heat
transfer in the trough, Doo et al. [81,82] proposed three modied
primary surfaces with different secondary corrugations, i.e., inphase secondary corrugation, full-wave rectied trough corrugation
and anti-phase secondary corrugation, as shown in Fig. 15(a)(c).
Unlike the straight corrugations in the traditional CC primary surface, there are secondary corrugations on both the peak and trough
of the CC primary corrugation. The secondary corrugations on the
peak and trough are arranged in phase and anti-phase for the
primary surfaces with in-phase secondary corrugation and antiphase secondary corrugation. For the primary surfaces with fullwave rectied trough corrugation, the secondary corrugation on
the peak and trough are dissimilar. According to the comparison,
it is found that the anti-phase secondary corrugation has the greatest potential to improve the compactness of heat exchanger matrix.
For the primary surfaces with big anti-phase secondary corrugation,
the ow separation, recirculation and impingement are produced
and the uid mainly ows along the stream-wise direction and
the two ows become more parallel to each other, as shown in
Fig. 15(d), while the uid mainly ows along the trough of each corrugation plate in the traditional CC channel. Compared to the conventional CC channel, the pressure drops of the primary surface
channels with anti-phase could be reduced by approximate 15%
without big changes for the heat transfer capacity.
In many advanced systems such as the intercooled-cycle gas
turbine engine, the operating pressure and pressure drop requirements on the hot and cold sides are different. For these cases, Kim
et al. [83] proposed a novel primary surface channel with asymmetric proles, as shown in Fig. 16(a). The pressure drop on each
side can be controlled by adjusting the level of asymmetry of this
prole. It can be seen from Fig. 16(b), the ow separation and
impingement in the high pressure side are stronger than those in
the low pressure side due to smaller cross-sectional area. The ow
difference is more obvious as the generation of an asymmetric prole increases. The asymmetric prole could balance the pressure
drops between the high pressure and low pressure sides with a
slight loss of effectiveness.
Fig. 15. Modied primary surfaces with different secondary corrugations [81,82].
761
effects of contact treatments on the pressure drops were remarkable for different structured packings, especially when the porosity
was relatively low, while such effects on the Nusselt numbers were
relatively small. Hence, much attention should be paid on the contact points between the upper and lower primary surface plates.
Du et al. [64] modied the traditional computational model of
CW duct by adopting multiple periodic boundary conditions in
both the main ow and transverse directions, as shown in
Fig. 18. It was more realistic and suitable for large amplitude of
waviness when the ratio of amplitude of waviness to channel pitch
was greater than 0.25. It was found that the Nusselt number of
model with linear-variation wall temperature boundary condition
increases by about 15% with the same pressure drop compared to
that with the constant wall temperature boundary condition.
762
Fig. 18. Division of multi-periodic boundary conditions for CC model with a gap
[64].
763
Table 7
Design parameters of primary surface recuperator developed by RSAB [90].
Operating conditions
Design requirements
Mass ow rate
Inlet air temperature
Inlet gas temperature
Inlet air pressure
Inlet gas pressure
0.78 kg/s
210 C
650 C
4.5 kPa
1.1 kPa
Fig. 20. Heat transfer and pressure drop performances of recuperator developed by
RSAB under different mass ow rates [90].
compressor intercoolers, HVAC & R, automobiles, air cooling industries, residential air-conditioning, and refrigerating appliances.
FTHXs are preferred on the condition of high pressure uid at
one side or high heat transfer coefcient of another uid. Especially
in the air cooling towers and air separators, they play an important
role. So the extended surface is employed effectively either on the
internal or external or on both sides to enhance the heat transfer
performance of the gas side in such compact heat exchangers. Fins
Effectiveness
Total relative pressure losses
Durability
Min. 89%
Max. 4.5%
60,000 hours
3000 start-up cycles
are basically external surfaces on the tube, which can increase the
surface area of the bare tube and be used to destroy the boundary
layer and change the ow pattern to meet the demands of heat
transfer enhancement.
The method of attaching the ns over the tube is very important, since even a slightest air gap between the tubes and ns will
degrade the whole purpose of ns over the tube. The nned tube of
GEA Heat Exchangers is shown clearly in Fig. 22.
If a gas-to-liquid heat exchanger is applied in engineering elds,
the liquid with high heat transfer coefcient is placed on the tube
side, while the gas with low heat transfer coefcient is on the shell
side. The main thermal resistance is usually on the gas side in
practical applications, and therefore special surfaces should be
employed to effectively improve the gas side heat transfer performance of FTHXs. It is an effective way to reduce the air-side
thermal resistance occupying up to 90% of the overall thermal
resistance.
In order to reduce the thermal resistance of the gas-side effectively and study the effect of n types on the hydraulic thermal
performance of FTHXs with different type of ns, different new
types of ns were developed, such as the plain n, wavy n, the
louvered n, herringbone wavy n, crimped spiral n, the slit n
and the vortex generator (VG) n [94100]. Vijaisri and her coworkers [101] proposed a n named rip saw n and applied it to
a high temperature ceramic plate-n heat exchanger. They also
compared the hydraulic and thermal performances of the rip saw
n with those of other types of ns. Experimental, numerical,
and optimal studies for these different types of ns have been
extensively performed.
The air-cooled heat exchanger (ACHX) is a typical type of
FTHXs. An ACHX is a heat transfer device for rejecting the thermal
energy from a hot uid directly to the ambient environment. The
main advantage of an ACHX is that it does not need water, which
means that the plant requiring large cooling capacities does not
need to be located close to a supply of large quantity of cooling
764
(a) Primary surface recuperator for 100 kW microturbine developed by RSAB [90]
(c) Primary surface recuperator for 100 kW microturbine developed by Wang et al. [92]
(d) Annular primary surface recuperator for 30 kW microturbine developed by Zhang et al. [93]
Fig. 21. Typical prototypes of primary surface recuperator (see [9093]).
765
766
767
Fig. 27. Schematic of air-cooled condensers and main buildings in a typical 2 600 MW direct cooling power plant [115].
related results can supply the basic supports for improving the
comprehensive performance of the ACHXs.
The air-side thermal-hydraulic characteristics for the ACCs in a
representative 2 600 MW direct dry cooling power plant were
investigated numerically with three different wind-break walls
[115]. According to the simulation results of the ow and temperature elds at various ambient wind speeds and directions, the
volume ow rate and heat rejection of the ACCs are obtained and
768
Fig. 29. Total volume ow rate and heat rejection of ACCs versus wind speed and direction.
Fig. 30. Numerical mode of two ACSC cells and temperature distribution [118].
Fig. 31. Schematic of the wavy nned at tube used in ACC [119].
769
bundles, can affect its performances. In order to quickly and accurately predict the air side velocity and temperature elds of ACC,
the reduced order models (ROMs) were established based proper
orthogonal decomposition (POD) method [121]. The physical
model was an ACC cell in the cooling system of a 2 330 MW
power plant, which was shown in Fig. 33. As shown in Fig. 33(a),
the typical structure of ACC of power generating unit is A-frame
conguration. The ACC cell is simplied to a two-dimension model
as shown in Fig. 33(b), and the computational domain was set to be
472 138 m (X Y), which was shown in Fig. 33(c). It was found
that it was more appropriate for the POD solution of extrapolated
cases and this research may provide a rapid and reliable approach
for the optimization of real-time operation of air-cooled power
generating units.
In order to remove the strong wind effect, an effective method is
proposed to enhance the thermal performance of the ACSC by setting up deecting plates under the air-cooled platform to form a
770
h 25:345v 0:283
fr
Dp 13:6v 1:36
fr
771
Nu 0:0245 0:0824xRe0:810:22x
Eu 2:85 78:3xRe0:1220:3x
A FTHX with hot uids inside the tubes, and cooling air that is
fan-blown (forced draft) or fan-pulled (induced draft) across the
tube bank. An air cooled FTHX ow chart is shown in Fig. 37. Standard fan coil is designed for air ow capacity of 400 cubic feet per
minute (CFM) to 800 CFM for horizontal air discharge and for
vertical air discharge. The tube materials can be chosen copper,
stainless steel, cupronickel, carbon steel, while the n materials
can be chosen aluminum, copper, stainless steel, cold rolled close
annealed sheet steel (CRCA), and hot dip galvanized CRCA, which
is can be designed according to the customer requirement and
the working condition [113].
Besides, the economic protability of ACHX depends on the
capacity of the nned tubes. The capacity results from the transfer
of the maximum heat exchanged in the smallest possible space
while keeping thermodynamic losses on the air side minimum.
772
Fig. 36. Schematic of the currently used and proposed air-cooled condenser cells and nned tubes [124].
Fig. 38. The distribution of Pareto optimal points for the two objective functions
using NSGA-II [134].
773
Fig. 39. Partial enlarged gure of representative apex angles (a) of a surface type indirect air-cooled radiator.
Fig. 40. Pictures of the experimental system and a nned oval-tube heat exchanger.
774
Table 8
Application data comparison of indirect air cooling-system and ACC system.*
Item
Unit
Tube type
Fin type
Working liquid in tube-side
Inlet temperature in tube-side
Outlet temperature in tube-side
Flow style of air
Heat transfer rate of ACHX unit
Heat transfer area of ACHX unit
Total heat transfer rate
Heat transfer coefcient
Total heat transfer area
Total manufacturing expense
*
C
C
kW
m2
kW
W m2 K1
m2
Yuan (RMB)
ACC system
Oval tube
Rectangular n
Water
65
55
Natural draft
144
2300
420,000
36.8
720,000
130,000,000
Flat tube
Wavy aluminum n
Steam
70
45
Forced draft
140
2500
420,000
30.5
800,000
120,000,000
The data is provided by Beijing Longyuan Cooling Technology Co., Ltd. of China (http://www.bjlylq.com.cn/engver/index.asp).
Table 9
Results comparisons of PFR method with HTFS3-AC method [139].
Parameters
Units
PFR method
HTFS3-AC
Area, required
Area, actual
Area ratio (Ac tula/Re qd.)
Pressure drop, outside
X-ow outlet Temperature
Pressure drop, tube side
Dp ratio tube side
Total price
Operating cost
Brake power for all fans
m2
m2
5586.5
5893.1
1.05
138
105.23
0.47234
0.94
115.733
17.058
35.538
5622.8
5893.1
1.05
138
106.53
0.47478
0.95
115.733
14,088
29.35
Pa
C
bar
Dollar (US)
Dollar (US)
kW
Table 10
Application data comparison of ACHX with different tubes.*
Item
Unit
kW
m2
Oval tube
Rectangular
n
Water
144
2300
Flat tube
Wavy
n
Steam
140
2500
kW
W m2 K1
m2
420,000
36.8
720,000
420,000
30.5
800,000
Tube type
Fin type
Working liquid in tube-side
Heat transfer rate of the ACHX unit
Heat transfer area of the ACHX
unit
Total heat transfer rate
Heat transfer coefcient
Total heat transfer area
*
The data is provided by Beijing Longyuan Cooling Technology Co., Ltd. of China
(http://www.bjlylq.com.cn/engver/index.asp).
The extensions of the inner and outer walkways and elevation of the wind-break wall are effective ways to improve
the thermo-hydraulic performances and weaken the inlet
ow distortions and hot plume recirculation for ACCs. The
inuence of the inlet relative humidity on the sensible heat
transfer performance for ACHXs is small, and is almost negligible when the number of tube rows is above four. The
pressure drop under wet condition is much higher than that
under dry condition, while the difference in pressure drop
between wet and day condition is less profound for the wavy
n conguration as compared to that in plain n geometry.
The sensible heat transfer and mass transfer performance
are insensitive to changes of n pitch under fully and partially wet surface conditions for ACHXs. The indirect ACHX
is mostly used in the cooling system because it needs less
operating cost although it needs much capital investments.
The air inlet angle has signicant effect on the comprehensive performance of ACHXs. The whole performance of ACHXs in the air cooling system and the multi-objectives
optimization for ACHXs should be paid more attention, considering the heat transfer, pumper power, space usage and
other economic inuence factors.
Acknowledgements
This work is nancially supported by the China National Funds
for Distinguished Young Scientists (Grant No. 51025623), the International Cooperation and Exchanges Project of NSFC of China
(Grant No. 51120165002), the National Natural Science Foundation
of China (Grant No. 51276139) and the Fundamental Research
Funds for the Central Universities.
References
[1] Shah RK, Sekulic DP. Fundamentals of heat exchanger design. New
Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2003.
[2] McDonald CF. Recuperator considerations for future higher efciency
microturbines. Appl Therm Eng 2003;23(12):146387.
[3] Kroger D. Air-cooled heat exchangers and cooling towers: thermal-ower
performance evaluation and design. Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA: PennWell
Corporation; 2004.
[4] Master BI, Chunangad KS. Heat exchanger, United States Patent,
US6827138B1, 2004.
[5] Kral D, Stehlik P, Van Der Ploeg HJ, Master BI. Helical bafes in shell-and-tube
heat exchangers, Part I: experimental verication. Heat Trans Eng.
1996;17(1):93101.
[6] Wang SL. Hydrodynamic studies on heat exchangers with helical bafes. Heat
Trans Eng 2002;23(3):439.
[7] Lutcha J, Nemcansky J. Performance improvement of tubular heat exchangers
by helical bafes. Chem Eng Proc 1990;68(3):26370.
[8] Wang QW, Chen GD, Chen QY, Zeng M. Review of improvements on shell-andtube heat exchangers with helical bafes. Heat Trans Eng
2010;31(10):83653.
[9] Zhang DJ, Wang QW, Luo LQ. Numerical simulation of ow performance in
shell side of shell-and-tube heat exchanger with discontinuous helical bafes,
Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Thermal Science and
Technology, Beijing, China, 2005.
[10] Wang QW, Luo LQ, Zeng M, Wang L, Tao WQ, Huang YP. Shell-side heat
transfer and pressure drop of shell-and-tube heat exchangers with
overlap helical bafes. J Chem Indus Eng (China) 2005;56(4):598601 (in
Chinese).
[11] Zhang JF, Guo SL, Li ZZ, Wang JP, He YL, Tao WQ. Experimental performance
comparison of shell-and-tube oil coolers with overlapped helical bafes and
segmental bafes. Appl Therm Eng 2013;58(12):33643.
[12] Zhang JF, Li B, Huang WJ, Lei YG, He YL, Tao WQ. Experimental performance
comparison of shell-side heat transfer for shell-and-tube heat exchangers
with middle-overlapped helical bafes and segmental bafes. Chem Eng Sci
2009;64(8):164353.
[13] Taher FN, Movassag SZ, Razmi K, Azar RT. Bafe space impact on the
performance of helical bafe shell and tube heat exchangers. Appl Therm Eng
2012;44:1439.
[14] Van Der Ploeg HJ, Master BI, Helical bafes heat exchangers-design option for
reactor feed/efuent heat exchanger, Advances in Industrial Heat Transfer,
IChemE, Birmingham, UK, 1992.
775
[15] Lei YG, He YL, Chu P, Li R. Design and optimization of heat exchangers with
helical bafes. Chem Eng Sci 2008;63:438695.
[16] Zhang L, Xia Y, Jiang B, Xiao X, Yang X. Pilot experimental study on shell and
tube heat exchangers with small-angles helical bafes. Chem Eng Process:
Process Intensication 2013;69:1128.
[17] Xiao X, Zhang L, Li X, Jiang B, Yang X, Xia Y. Numerical investigation of helical
bafes heat exchanger with different Prandtl number uids. Int J Heat Mass
Trans 2013;63:43444.
[18] Leong KY, Saidur R, Khairulmaini M, Michael Z, Kamyar A. Heat transfer and
entropy analysis of three different types of heat exchangers operated with
nanouids. Int Commun Heat Mass Trans 2012;39:83843.
[19] He YL, Lei YG, Tao WQ, Zhang JF, Chu P, Li R. Second-law based
thermodynamic analysis of a novel heat exchanger. Chem Eng Technol
2009;32:8692.
[20] Liu L, Ling X, Peng H. Analysis on ow and heat transfer characteristics of EGR
helical bafed cooler with spiral corrugated tubes. Exp Therm Fluid Sci
2013;44:27584.
[21] Zhang ZG, Wu CS, Fang XM, Gao X, Wang ZY. Experimental Study of shell-side
heat transfer coefcient and pressure drop for an integrally helical bafed
heat exchanger combined with different enhanced tubes. Ind Eng Chem Res
2009;48:40404.
[22] Zhang ZG, Fang XM. Comparison of heat transfer and pressure drop for the
helically bafed heat exchanger combined with three-dimensional and twodimensional nned tubes. Heat Trans Eng 2006;27:1722.
[23] Zhang Z, Li Q, Xu T, Fang X, Gao X. Condensation heat transfer
characteristics of zeotropic refrigerant mixture R407C on single, threerow petal-shaped nned tubes and helically bafed condenser. Appl
Therm Eng 2012;39:639.
[24] Chen YP, Cao RB, Wu JF, Dong G, Sheng YJ. Experimental study on shell side
heat transfer performance of circumferential overlap trisection helical bafe
heat exchangers. In: Proceedings of the ASME international mechanical
engineering congress and exposition, Denver, Colorado, USA; November
2011.
[25] Chen YP, Sheng YJ, Dong C, Wu JF. Numerical simulation on ow eld in
circumferential overlap trisection helical bafe heat exchanger. Appl Therm
Eng 2013;50:103543.
[26] Zhang JF, He YL, Tao WQ. 3D numerical simulation on shell-and-tube heat
exchangers with middle-overlapped helical bafes and continuous bafes
Part I: Numerical model and results of whole heat exchanger with middleoverlapped helical bafes. Int J Heat Mass Trans 2009;52:537180.
[27] Chen GD, Wang QW, Zeng M. Numerical studies on a novel shell-and-tube
heat exchanger with combined helical bafes. In: Proceedings of the seventh
international conference on enhanced, compact and ultra-compact heat
exchangers: from microscale phenomena to industrial applications, Heredia,
Costa Rica; 2009.
[28] Jafari Nasr MR, Shafeghat A. Fluid ow analysis and extension of rapid design
algorithm for helical bafe heat exchangers. Appl Therm Eng
2008;28:132432.
[29] Andrews MJ, Master BI. Three-dimensional modeling of a Helixchanger heat
exchanger using CFD. Heat Trans Eng 2005;26:2231.
[30] Peng B, Wang QW, Zhang C, Xie GN, Luo LQ, Chen QY, et al. An experimental
study of shell-and-tube heat exchangers with continuous helical bafes. J
Heat Transfer Trans ASME 2007;129:142531.
[31] Wang QW, Chen QY, Peng BT, Zeng M, Luo LQ, Wu YN. A shell-and-tube heat
exchanger with continuous helical bafes, China Patent, ZL200510043033.5;
2005.
[32] Wang QW. Investigation on novel combined multi-shell-pass shell-andtube heat exchangers with helical bafes, Workshop on advances in
compact and micro heat exchangers for sustainable development, IIT
Delhi, India; 2008.
[33] Yang JF, Zeng M, Wang QW. A new type of liquid-suction heat exchanger for
an automotive air conditioning system. In: Proceedings of the second
international workshop on heat transfer advances for energy conservation
and pollution control, Xian, China, October, 2013.
[34] Zarrella A, Capozza A, Carli MD. Analysis of short helical and double U-tube
borehole heat exchangers: a simulation-based comparison. Appl Energy
2013;112:35870.
[35] Wu Z, Yang FS, Zhang ZX, Bao ZW. Magnesium based metal hydride reactor
incorporating helical coil heat exchanger: simulation study and optimal
design.
Appl
Energy
2014;130:71222.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
j.apenergy.2013.12.071.
[36] Xie GN, Wang QW, Zeng M, Luo LQ. Heat transfer analysis for shell-and-tube
heat exchangers with experimental data by articial neural networks
approach. Appl Therm Eng 2007;27:1096104.
[37] Wang QW, Xie GN, Peng BT, Zeng M. Experimental study and geneticalgorithm-based correlation on shell-side heat transfer and ow performance
of three different types of shell-and-tube heat exchangers. J Heat Transfer
Trans ASME 2007;129:127785.
[38] Lei YG, He YL, Li R, Gao YF. Effects of bafe inclination angle on ow and heat
transfer of a heat exchanger with helical bafes. Chem Eng Process: Process
Intensication 2008;47:233645.
[39] Zhang ZG, Ma DB, Fang XM, Gao XN. Experimental and numerical heat
transfer in a helically bafed heat exchanger combined with one threedimensional nned tube. Chem Eng Process 2008;47:173843.
776
[40] Zhang ZG, Yu ZS, Fang XM. An experimental heat transfer study for helically
owing outside petal-shaped nned tubes with different geometrical
parameters. Appl Therm Eng 2007;27:26872.
[41] Zhang ZG, Xu T, Fang XM. Experimental study on heat transfer enhancement
of a helically bafed heat exchanger combined with three-dimensional nned
tubes. Appl Therm Eng 2004;24:2293300.
[42] Yang JF, Zeng M, Wang QW. Effects of sealing strips on shell-side ow and
heat transfer performance of a heat exchanger with helical bafes. Appl
Therm Eng 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2013.11.064.
[43] Chen GD, Zeng M, Wang Q. Experimental and numerical studies on shell-side
performance of three different shell-and-tube heat exchangers with helical
bafes. J Enhanc Heat Trans 2011;18:44963.
[44] Zhang JF, He YL, Tao WQ. 3D numerical simulation on shell-and-tube heat
exchangers with middle-overlapped helical bafes and continuous bafes
Part II: Simulation results of periodic model and comparison between
continuous and noncontinuous helical bafes. Int J Heat Mass Trans
2009;52:53819.
[45] Huang YQ, Yu XL, Lu GD. Numerical simulation and optimization design of
the EGR cooler in vehicle. J Zhejiang Univ Sci A 2008;9:12706 (in Chinese).
[46] Song S. Numerical studies on performance of double shell-pass heat
exchangers with sleeve tubes and continuous helical bafes. Proc Chinese
Soc Elect Eng 2013;33:827 (in Chinese).
[47] Wang QW, Yang JF, Chen GD, Zeng M. A combined single shell-pass shell-andtube heat exchanger with continuous helical bafes, China Patent,
ZL201210036769.X; 2012.
[48] Wang QW, Chen GD, Zeng M. A combined parallel multiple shell-pass shelland-tube heat exchanger with continuous helical bafes, China Patent,
ZL200910021347.3; 2009.
[49] Wang QW, Zhang DJ, Zeng M, Wu YN. A combined shell-and-tube heat
exchanger with helical bafes, China Patent, ZL200710017395.6; 2007.
[50] Wang QW, Chen QY, Zeng M, Wu YN, Gao Q. A combined multiple shell-pass
shell-and-tube heat exchangers with continuous helical bafes, China Patent,
ZL200710017478.5; 2007.
[51] Wang QW, Chen GD, Zeng M, Chen QY, Peng BT, Zhang DJ, et al. Shell-side
heat transfer enhancement for shell-and-tube heat exchangers with helical
bafes. Chem Eng Trans 2010;21:21722.
[52] Wang QW, Chen QY, Chen GD, Zeng M. Numerical investigation on combined
multiple shell-pass shell-and-tube heat exchanger with continuous helical
bafes. Int J Heat Mass Trans 2009;52:121422.
[53] Kuppat T. Heat exchanger design handbook. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc.;
2000.
[54] Stehlik P, Nemcansky J, Kral D, Swanson LW. Comparison of correction factors
for shell-and-tube heat exchangers with segmental or helical bafes. Heat
Trans Eng 1994;15:5565.
[55] Zhang JF, He YL, Tao WQ. A design and rating method for shell-and-tube heat
exchangers with helical bafes. J Heat Transfer Trans ASME 2010;132.
051802-18.
[56] Azar RT, Khalilarya S, Jafarmadar S. Tube bundle replacement for segmental
and helical shell and tube heat exchangers: experimental test and economic
analysis. Appl Therm Eng 2014;62:62232.
[57] Wang QW, Chen GD, Xu J, Ji YP. Second-law thermodynamic comparison and
maximal velocity ratio design of shell-and-tube heat exchangers with
continuous helical bafes. J Heat Transfer Trans ASME 2010:132.
[58] Shah RK. Compact heat exchangers for microturbines. in micro gas turbines:
2-1-2-18). Educational Notes RTO-EN-AVT-131, Paper 2. Neuilly-sur-Seine,
France: RTO. <http://www.rto.nato.int/abstracts.asp>;2005.
[59] McDonald CF. Low-cost compact primary surface recuperator concept for
microturbines. Appl Therm Eng 2000;20:47197.
[60] Stasiek J, Collins MW, Ciofalo M, Chew PE. Investigation of ow and heat
transfer in corrugated passages.1. Experimental results. Int J Heat Mass Trans
1996;39:14964.
[61] Stasiek JA. Experimental studies of heat transfer and uid ow across
corrugated-undulated heat exchanger surfaces. Int J Heat Mass Trans
1998;41:899914.
[62] Zhang LZ, Chen ZY. Convective heat transfer in cross-corrugated triangular
ducts under uniform heat ux boundary conditions. Int J Heat Mass Trans
2011;54:597605.
[63] Utriainen E, Sunden B. Evaluation of the cross corrugated and some other
candidate heat transfer surfaces for microturbine recuperators. ASME J Eng
Gas Turb Power 2002;124:55060.
[64] Du LX, Ma T, Zeng M, Guo ZX, Wang QW. Numerical investigations on
thermohydraulic performance of cross-wavy channels with multi-periodic
boundary conditions. Numer Heat Trans 2014;65:73249.
[65] Zhang L, Che DF. An experimental and numerical investigation on the
thermal-hydraulic performance of double notched plate. J Heat Transfer
Trans ASME 2012;134:091802.
[66] Khan TS, Khan MS, Chyu MC, Ayub ZH. Experimental investigation of single
phase convective heat transfer coefcient in a corrugated plate heat
exchanger for multiple plate congurations. Appl Therm Eng
2010;30:105865.
[67] Metwally HM, Manglik RM. Enhanced heat transfer due to curvature-induced
lateral vortices in laminar ows in sinusoidal corrugated-plate channels. Int J
Heat Mass Trans 2004;47:228392.
[68] Utriainen E, Sunden B. A numerical investigation of primary surface rounded
cross wavy ducts. Heat Mass Trans 2002;38:53742.
777