10.2 Major Surgical Procedures
10.2 Major Surgical Procedures
10.2 Major Surgical Procedures
The diagnosis is aimed at determining the nature, position, severity and the
possible etiology of the dento-facial deformity. The extent of the malocclusion in
all the three planes is thouroughly evaluated.
a. General medical evaluation : The patients general medical history should
be recorded to rule out any systemic condition that may compromise the surgical
procedure.
b. Dental evaluation :- The patients overall dental health should be evaluated.
Particular attention is paid towards the muscles of mastication and
Temperomandibular joint. Pulpo -periodontal problems should be controlled
prior to the surgical intervention.
b. Socio psychological evaluation : The patients is to be assessed to
determine whether he /she is aware of the dentofacial deformity and expectation
from treatment outcome. This helps in determining the patient's motivation
towards surgery
c. Cephalometric evaluation: Cephalometric evaluation is an important and
obligatory tool in locating the nature and severity of the skeletal problems and in
selecting the favourable sites for surgical correction. Cephalometric analyses
often have been used as the cornerstone in the differential diagnostic process for
skeletal imbalances. The lateral cephalogram and anteroposterior cephalogram
are evaluated. The commonly used Cephalometric analysis are the Burstone
analyses and the Quadrilateral analysis. Frontal cephalometric analysis helps in
determining facial asymmetry.
Cephalometric analyses using a Jacobson or Broadbent Bolton template method
and the Moorrees mesh are able to graphically qualify (demonstrate which jaw is
not in balance) and quantify (demonstrate the degree to which each jaw, both
dental and skeletal component, contribute to the imbalance). The template
proved to be a simple, quick, and reliable tool to demonstrate the direction and
approximate amount of surgery needed to correct the skeletal disharmony
Indications for surgery include the problems that are too severe for orthodontics
alone. The amount and range of movement possible can be evaluated from
Epkers envelope of of discrepancies. The envelope of discrepancy outlines the
limits of hard tissue change toward ideal occlusion . The limits vary both by the
tooth movement that would be needed (teeth can be moved further in some
directions than others) and by the patient's age . Growth potential in children
helps to treat conditions by orthodontics alone ( 10mm of overjet) but the same
has to be treated by surgical means in adults.
.
d. Radiographic examination : A complete radiographic survey of the
maxillofacial region is necessary prior to the surgical intervention .
Intra-oral periapical radiographs : These radiographs help in determining the
condition of the teeth and alveolar bone. Presence of pathology around the tooth
can also be determined using these radiographs. Any pulpal or periodontal
infections should be eradicated before surgery
Panaromic radiographs : Orthopantomogram or OPG offers a wide range view of
the entire dentofacial region. It gives us the periapical and periodontal status of
the dentition. Any impacted/embedded or ectopic teeth, which may come in the
line of the osteotomy should be preferably extracted 6 months prior to surgery.
These radiographs are also useful in evaluation of maxillary sinuses ,
temperomandibular joint. and other bony pathologies in maxillo mandibular
region. Panoramic view points out to the asymmetry of the face also
Submento-vertex view : This view is used to determine the buccolingual
thickness of the mandible as well as degree of deformity of the face. It is also
useful is assessing the condition of condyles.
Hand wrist X-rays : They are useful for growth assessment and to determine
skeletal age or maturity. Orthogntahic surgeries are indicated after active growth
period or after attaining skeletal maturity.
e. Photographs: Preoperative photographs are necessary in order to have a
record of pretreatment profile. Both the extraoral facial photographs and the
intraoral photographs are taken. Frontal and lateral facial photographs are
usually taken in a natural head position. Morphometric measurements can also
be done on these photographs
g. Evaluation of masticatory system: The temperomandibular joint is evaluated
by inspection, palpation, auscultation and by radiographic examination to
evaluate joint movements and an pathology. Muscles of mastication are
inspected and palpated to evaluate the force of contraction and any underlying
pathology.
Only Orthodontic
Treatment
Amount of retraction
possible
Amount
protraction
possible
Maxillary
Max.
Mandible
Mand
7 mm
3 mm
2 mm
5mm
of
Amount of
bite
opening
( intrusion)poss
ible
Max
Mand
Amount of bite
closing
( extrusion)possi
ble
Max
Mand
2mm
4mm
4mm
2 mm
Orthodontic
tooth
movement
combined
growth modification
Orthognathic surgery
12 mm
5 mm
5 mm
10mm
5 mm
6 mm
6 mm
5 mm
15 mm
25 mm
10 mm
12mm
15mm
10mm
10 mm
15 mm
Possibility of each type of treatment is not symmetric with respect to plane of space. For example tooth
movement by orthodontic means alone is more possible anterioposteriorly than vertical direction.
Growth modification is more effective in mandibular deficiency(10mm) than mandibular excess( 5mm)
- ( 1) There is more potential to retract than protract the teeth
- (2) There is more potential for extrusion (correction of open bite) then intrusion (correction of deep bite)
- (3) since growth of the maxilla cannot be modified independently of the mandible, the growth modification
envelope for the two jaws is same.
-- (4) surgery to move the jaws back has more potential than to advance the mandible
Table showing the amount of movement possible at posterior region by different methods ( transverse and
vertical direction). Refer figure.- Epker envelope of discrepancies -- c and D
Amount of expansion
possible on each side
Mandible
Amount
of
contraction
possible on each
side
Max.
Mand
2mm
2 mm
1 mm
4 mm
4mm
3 mm
2 mm
3 mm
6 mm
4 mm
5 mm
7 mm
5mm
4 mm
3 mm
10mm
10mm
10 mm
10 mm
Maxillary
Only Orthodontic
Treatment
3 mm
Amount of
intrusion
possible
Amount
extrusion
possible
of
Max
Mand
Max
Mand
2mm
4mm
3mm
3 mm
Orthodontic
tooth
movement
combined
growth modification
Orthognathic surgery
The postsurgical profile of the patient can be predicted with some degree of
accuracy by cephalometric means. This is called as surgical treatment
objective (STO)" or prediction tracing". It is a two-dimensional visual
projection of the changes in osseous, dental, and soft tissues as a result of
orthodontics and orthognathic surgical correction of the dentofacial and occlusal
deformity. The purpose of the STO is threefold: (1) establish presurgical
orthodontic goals, (2) develop an accurate surgical objective that will achieve the
best functional and esthetic result, and (3) create a facial profile objective which
can be used as a visual aid in consultation with the patient and family members
Essentially, after knowing the location and severity of deformity; the osteotomy
and the extent of movement of the osteotomized segment is determined. On an
acetate tracing of the cephalogram, the osteotomized segment is cut out and
moved as calculated. The soft tissue follow the movement of bone in a ratio
determined by the type of movement and the technique performed. These tissue
changes are marked on the tracing to give the postoperative profile. However,
these soft tissue changes are only meant to be a guide for prediction tracings
and are variable.
Mandibular surgeries:
In skeletal openbites with long faces the ramal
surgeries can be done to rotate the mandible anteriorly upwards and posteriorly
downwards. This lengthens the ramus and stretches the muscles associated
with ptyerygomandibular sling . However this is highly unstable due to improper
neuromuscular coordination of muscles .
The deep bite cases are best treated by sagittal split mandibular ramus surgery
to rotate the mandible slightly forward and down and the gonial angle area up.
Anterior subapical surgeries can also be performed to relieve the deep bite ( Fig
10)
.
Problem /
Deformlty
Surgical treatment
1. Bilateral
Mandibular
prognathism
Mandibular
retrognathism
addition
Horizontal
deficiency
Maxillary
protrusion
Maxillary retrusion
Bimaxillary
protrusion
Maxillary
Lefort I osteotomy of maxilla to advance and impact maxilla
deficiency
and BSSO with mandibular set back
mandibular excess
Maxillary
excess
Open bites
Maxillary
constriction/expan
sion
Mandibular
constriction
Mandibular
expansion
Distraction osteogenesis.
Silicone implants can be used to augment the chin. The main drawback is the
problems with bone resorption under the silicone material and migration of the
implant . porous hydroxylapatite in block form can also be used but it is difficult
to adapt at the time of surgery and is not immune to the problems of resorption
and migration.
Osteodistraction
Osteodistraction is a technique of bone lengthening that uses the body's natural
healing mechanisms to generate new bone. An osteotomy (corticotomy) is made
in an area of bone deficiency, and an external fixator is used to slowly elongate
the bone to its new dimension while natural ossification produces new bone at
the site of distractions.
Although osteodistraction was pioneered by surgeons in the 1880s, Codivilla of
Bologna, Italy, produced the first published accounts in 1905 . In 1949 Dr. Gavriel
O. Ilizarov began to develop new ways of applying the principle of
osteodistraction.
.
Ilizarov's principles. Surgeons who have used or modified the distraction
procedure have relied on Ilizarov's basic principles, which can be expressed as
the law of tension stress.
These principles include the following
Latency period The latency period is the time interval between the surgical
procedure and
the initiation of application distraction forces.; Ilizarov
recommended a delay of 5 to 7 days