ACR FORM Filled PDF
ACR FORM Filled PDF
ACR FORM Filled PDF
ACADEMIC STAFF
Period:
01-10-2013 to 31-12-2013
Designation: Lecturer
INSTRUCTIONS
for
Filling the form of Annual Confidential Report
1. Part A (Work Report will be filled in by the teacher himself, correctly, based on documentary
evidence).
2. Part B of the report will be initiated by the Chairman of the department concerned: provided that
he is not below or equal to the rank of the teacher reported upon. In case the Chairman of the
department is below or equal to the rank of the teacher reported upon. The report will be initiated
/ written by the Dean of the Faculty, Director and the Principal as the case may be.
In case, however, the Dean, Director or the Principal is also below or equal in rank with
the teacher to be reported upon the report shall be submitted to the Vice-Chancellor for
completion.
The report on Professors, Dean, Directors and Principal shall be written by the
Vice Chancellor.
3. Annual Confidential Report is an assessment of the conduct and the quality of the work that a
teacher has performed during the calendar year. On this assessment depend important decisions
such as suitability for appointment to a higher post. It is, therefore, imperative that the report
should be written impartially, forthrightly and in unambiguous terms. The work of the Reporting
Officer will be assessed by the next immediate Officer on the quality of his reporting.
4. The opinion expressed in the report should be the result of careful consideration, no personal
bias, or favoritism should colour the report. The Reporting Officer should be in a position to justify
his views, if called upon, to do so. The reports which are not in accordance with the above
principal, shall be returned to the Reporting Officer.
5. The Chairman or the Dean, Director or Principal, as the case may be, shall clearly indicate in the
report as to which of his remarks shall be communicate to the teacher concerned. Likewise the
officer next above the initiating officer if he does not agree with the initiating officer should
indicate as to whether his remarks should be communicated to the teacher concerned or not.
6. Assessment of integrity should be made without fear and favour in definite terms. Where the
grading in any of the factors comes to unsatisfactory/fair the same should invariably be reflected
in the remarks column.
PART A
2.
Designation
Lecturer
3.
Rs.30500/-
Scale BPS-18
4.
Date of Birth
5.
6.
M. Phill
7.
Subject
8.
Field of Specialization
Computer Science
Computer Vision and Image Processing
2.
3.
4.
5.
Progress
Year
2013
A Mitigation Approach to
Counter Initial Ranging
Based DoS Attacks on
IEEE 802.16-2009
2013
Published in Pakistan
Journal of Engineering and
Applied Sciences, Volume
13
6.
7.
Year
__________________
Year
_____
Particulars of Proceedings/
Seminars in which presented
________________________
PART B
1.
Name
2.
Designation
Lecturere
3.
Overall rating of work (Please initial box after doing detailed evaluation of attached proforma):
Remarks
5.
6.
ASSESSMENT
A. PROFESSIONAL PERFORMANCE
(Weight 50%)
Unsatisfactory
Fair
Satisfactory
Good
Excellent
Outstanding
10
10
10
a. Teaching
Power of expression verbal and
written up-to-date in subject
matter; use effective instructional
methods; shows good results
b. Guiding Research
Up-to-date
in
research
methodology; effective supervision
of student research
c. Personal Research/Creative
Achievement
Produced
personal
research;
analysed
current
trends
in
education & developed curriculum
accordingly;
developed
new
discipline or organization
Not
applicable
(Weight 20%)
d. Co-curricular Activities
Participates in and supervises
students, professional meetings
etc.
e. Extra-curricular Activities
f.
10
10
10
Unsatisfactory
Fair
Satisfactory
Good
Excellent
i.
Extending
and
eliciting
co-operation from colleagues /
subordinates. Management of
personnel.
Integrity
j.
Outstanding
10
10
g. Resourcefulness
Not
applicable
10
10
(Weight 10%)
k. Development Activity
Participates in national building
activities like social welfare
economic development,
community uplift, etc.
Utilization of Facilities
10
10
10
l.
OVERALL EVALUATION
Factors
Percent Weight
Composite
Multiple
Weighted Percent
(i)
Score (ii)
(iii)
A. Professional performance
50
B. Co-professional performance
20
20
D. Administrative Performance
10